Due to calls for reform of legislation that accounts for the difficulties complainants of repeated child sexual abuse (CSA) face when asked to particularize individual acts, jurisdictions in the United States and Australia have adopted continuous CSA statutes. Continuous CSA statutes allow for reduced particularity of individual instances when abuse is repeated. In this article, we discuss particularization requirements and how they are adapted in current jurisdictions in the United States and Australia with continuous CSA statutes. We then discuss the relevant research on children’s memory for repeated events and frequency to discuss how current and future research can inform the criteria for the charge. Our goal in this article is to inspire thoughtful discussion of continuous CSA legislation, and how current and future psychological research can advance the criteria for the charge. As more jurisdictions consider adopting these statutes, it would be helpful for psychologists and legal professionals to work toward developing a consensus on the criteria for the charge that balances both the victim’s capabilities to particularize repeated CSA and various rights of the accused.
Arizona Rev. Stat. § 13-1417. Continuous sexual abuse of a child (1993).
2.
BahB. (2013). Jury unanimity and the problem with specificity: Trying to understand what jurors must agree about by examining the problem of prosecuting child molesters. Texas Law Review, 91, 1203–1226.
3.
BrainerdC. J.ReynaV. F. (2012). Reliability of children’s testimony in the era of developmental reversals. Developmental Review, 32, 224–267. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2012.06.008
4.
Brodiev.The King, S.C.R. 188 (1936).
5.
BrubacherS. P.GlisicU.RobertsK. P.PowellM. (2011). Children’s ability to recall unique aspects of one occurrence of a repeated event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 351–358. doi:10.1002/acp.1696
6.
BrubacherS. P.PowellM. B.RobertsK. P. (2014). Recommendations for interviewing children about repeated experiences. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 325–335. doi:10.1037/law0000011
7.
California Penal Code § 288.5. Continuous sexual abuse of child (1989).
8.
Canadian Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1970, c C-34, s 529(4.1).
9.
Canadian Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c C-46, s 601(4.1).
10.
CastelliP.GoodmanG. S.GhettiS. (2005). Effects of interview style and witness age on perceptions of children’s credibility in sexual abuse cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 297–317. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02122.x
11.
ClevelandK. C.QuasJ. A. (2016). Adults’ insensitivity to developmental changes in children’s ability to report when and how many times abuse occurred. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 34, 126–138. doi:10.1002/bsl.2211
12.
ConnollyD. A.ChongK.CoburnP. I.LutgensD. (2015). Factors associated with delays of days to decades to criminal prosecutions of child sexual abuse. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 33, 546–560. doi:10.1002/bsl.2185
13.
ConnollyD. A.GordonH. M. (2014). Can order of general and specific memory prompts help children to recall an instance of a repeated event that was different from the others?Psychology, Crime & Law, 20, 852–864. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2014.885969
14.
ConnollyD. A.GordonH. M.WoiwodD. M.PriceH. L. (2016). What children recall about a repeated event when one instance is different from the others. Developmental Psychology, 52, 1038–1051. doi:10.1037/dev0000137
15.
ConnollyD. A.HockleyW. E.PrattM. W. (1996). A developmental evaluation of frequency memory for actions presented in lists, scripts, and stories. Memory, 4, 243–263. doi:10.1080/096582196388942
16.
ConnollyD. A.PriceH. L.LavoieJ. A.GordonH. M. (2008). Perceptions and predictors of children’s credibility of a unique event and an instance of a repeated event. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 92–112. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9083-3
17.
ConnollyD. A.ReadJ. D. (2006). Delayed prosecutions of historic child sexual abuse: Analyses of 2064 Canadian criminal complaints. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 409–434. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9011-6
18.
ConnollyJ. J. (1990). “Reasonable particularity” in indictments against child abusers. Maryland Law Review, 49, 1008–1029.
19.
Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s 47A (1991).
20.
Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) s 56 (1991).
21.
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 66EA (1998).
22.
Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) s 229B (1989).
23.
Criminal Code Act 1913 (WA) s 321A (2008).
24.
Criminal Code Act 1924 (Tas) s 125A (1994).
25.
Criminal Code Act 1983 (NT) s 131A (1994).
26.
Criminal Law and Evidence Amendment Bill 2006, Report 9, 37th Parliament, Western Australia Legislative Council (2007).
27.
Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) s 50 (1994).
DanbyM. C.BrubacherS. P.SharmanS. J.PowellM. B.RobertsK. P. (2017). Children’s reasoning about which instance of a repeated event is best remembered. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31, 99–108. doi:10.1002/acp.3306
30.
DavidsonD. (2006). Memory for bizarre and other unusual events: Evidence from script research. In HuntR.WorthenJ. B. (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 157–179). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169669.003.0008
31.
Delaware Code Ann. tit. 11, § 776. Continuous sexual abuse of a child; class B felony (1994).
32.
Department of Justice (Hong Kong), Item 11: Review of sexual offences in Part XII of the Crimes Ordinance (2004).
33.
FivushR. (1984). Learning about school: The development of kindergartner’s school script. Child Development, 55, 1697–1709. doi:10.2307/1129917
34.
FriedmanW. J.LyonT. D. (2005). Development of temporal-reconstructive abilities. Child Development, 76, 1202–1216. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00844.x-i1
35.
FriedmanW. J.ReeseE.DaiX. (2011). Children’s memory for the times of events from the past years. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 156–165. doi:10.1002/acp.1656
36.
GomesD. M.SheahanC.FitzgeraldR.ConnollyD. A.PriceH. L. (2015, 3). A meta-analysis examining differences in children’s memory for single and repeat events. Paper session presented at the 2015 American Psychology-Law Society Conference, San Diego, CA.
37.
GuadagnoB. L.PowellM.WrightR. (2006). Police officers’ and legal professionals’ perceptions regarding how children are, and should be, questioned about repeated abuse. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 13, 251–260. doi:10.1375/pplt.13.2.251
38.
HasherL.ZacksR. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 3, 356–388. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.356
39.
Hawaii Rev. Stat. Ann. § 707-733.6. Continuous sexual assault of a minor under the age of fourteen years (2006).
40.
HudsonJ. A. (1990). Constructive processing in children’s event memory. Developmental Psychology, 26, 180–187. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.26.2.180
41.
HudsonJ. A.MayhewE. M. Y. (2009). The development of memory for recurring events. In CourageM.CowanN. (Eds.), The development of memory in infancy and childhood (pp. 69–92). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
42.
KBT v. The Queen, 191 CLR 417 (1997).
43.
Kentucky Rev. Stat. Ann. § 501.100. Offense against a vulnerable victim (2016).
44.
Kuhnv.State, 393 S.W.3d 519 (2013).
45.
LambM. E.HershkowitzI.OrbachY.EsplinP. W. (2008). Tell me what happened: Structured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses. Chichester, England: Wiley.
46.
LambM. E.OrbachY.HershkowitzI.EsplinP. W.HorowitzD. (2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1201–1231. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021
47.
LeinsD. A.FisherR. P.PludwinskiL.RivardJ.RobertsonB. (2014). Interview protocols to facilitate human intelligence sources’ recollections of meetings. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 926–935. doi:10.1002/acp.3041
48.
Maryland Code Ann. Crim. Law § 3-315. Continuing course of conduct with child (2002).
New Hampshire Rev. Stat. Ann. § 632-A:2. Aggravated Felonious Sexual Assault (1975).
51.
New York Penal Law § 130.75. Course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree (1996).
52.
New York Penal Law § 130.80. Course of sexual conduct against a child in the second degree (1996).
53.
North Dakota Cent. Code § 12.1-20-03.1. Continuous sexual abuse of a child (1997).
54.
Parks v. Hargett, No. 98-7068 (D.C. No. 97-CV-235-S) (E.D. Okla. 10th Circ. 1999).
55.
People v. Guerrero 356 Ill. App.3d 22 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005).
56.
People v. Jones, 51 Cal.3d 294, 270 Cal.Rptr. 611, 792 P.2d 643 (1990).
57.
People v. Keindl, 68 N.Y.2d 410, 419, 502 N.E.2d 577, 581, 509 N.Y.S.2d 790, 794 (1986).
58.
People v. Morris, 61 N.Y.2d 290, 473 N.Y.S.2d 769, 773-74, 461 N.E.2d 1256, 1260-61 (1984).
59.
Podirsky v. The Queen, 3 WAR 128 (1990).
60.
PowellM.RobertsK.GuadagnoB. (2007). Particularisation of child abuse offences: Common problems when questioning child witnesses. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 19, 64–74. doi:10.1375/pplt.13.2.251
61.
PowellM. B.ThomsonD. M.CeciS. J. (2003). Children’s memory of recurring events: Is the first event always the best remembered?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 127–146. doi:10.1002/acp.864
62.
PriceH. L.ConnollyD. A.GordonH. M. (2006). Children’s memory for complex autobiographical events: Does spacing of repeated instances matter?Memory, 14, 977–989. doi:10.1080/09658210601009005
63.
Queensland Law Reform Commission Report No. 55, Part 1. The receipt of evidence by Queensland courts: Evidence of children (2000).
64.
R. v. B. (G.), 2 S.C.R. 30. (1990).
65.
R. v. Dossi, 13 Cr. App. R. 158 (1918).
66.
RivardJ. R.FisherR. P.RobertsonB.Hirn MuellerD. (2014). Testing the cognitive interview with professional interviewers: Enhancing recall of specific details of recurring events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 917–925. doi:10.1002/acp.3026
67.
RobertsK. P.BrubacherS. P.Drohan-JenningsD.GlisicU.PowellM. B.FriedmanW. J. (2015). Developmental differences in the ability to provide temporal information about repeated events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29, 407–417. doi:10.1002/acp.3118
68.
SasL. D.CunninghamA. H. (1995). Tipping the balance to tell the secret: The public discovery of child sexual abuse. London, Canada: London Family Court Clinic.
69.
SchankR. C.AbelsonR. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
70.
SheadK. (2014). Responding to historical child sexual abuse: A prosecution perspective on current challenges and future directions. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 26, 55–73.
71.
State v. Adams, 26 N.E.3d 1283 (Ohio 2014).
72.
State v. Baldonado, 955 P. 2d 214 (Ct. App. N. M. 1998).
State v. Stefka, 973 N.E.2d 786 (Ohio 7th Dis. 2012).
76.
SturgessD. G. (1985). An inquiry into sexual offences involving children and related matters(Sturgess Report). Brisbane, Australia: Australian Government Printing Service.
77.
S v. The Queen, 168 CLR 266 (1989).
78.
Tennessee Code Ann. § 39-13-518. Continuous sexual abuse of a child (2014).
79.
Texas Penal Code Ann. § 21.02. Continuous Sexual Abuse of Young Child or Children (2007).
80.
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 558 (1875).
81.
United States v. Dashney, 117 F.3d 1197, 1205 (10th Cir. 1997).
82.
Valentine v. Konteh, 395 F. 3d 626 (6th Cir. 2005).
83.
WallaceW. P. (1965). Review of the historical, empirical, and theoretical status of the von Restorff phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 410–424. doi:10.1037/h0022001
84.
WandreyL.LyonT. D.QuasJ. A.FriedmanW. J. (2012). Maltreated children’s ability to estimate temporal location and numerosity of placement changes and court visits. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18, 79–104. doi:10.1037/a0024812
85.
WillénR. M.GranhagP. A.StrömwallL. A. (2016). Factors affecting two types of memory specificity: Particularization of episodes and details. PLoS One, 11, e0166469. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0166469
86.
WillénR. M.GranhagP. A.StrömwallL. A.FisherR. P. (2015). Facilitating particularization of repeated similar events with context-specific cues. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56, 28–37. doi:10.1111/sjop.12180
87.
Wisconsin Stat. Ann. § 948.025. Engaging in repeated acts of sexual assault of the same child (1993).
88.
WoiwodD. M.CoburnP. I.ChongK.ConnollyD. A. (2017, March). Judicial decisions indicate complainants use certain numbers and descriptions when reporting frequency of alleged child sexual abuse. Paper session presented at the 2017 American Psychology-Law Society Conference, Seattle, WA.
