Ensuring that support and services are meeting the needs of survivor-victims (SV) of sexual assault requires that policymakers, service providers, and advocates seek their insight directly. This article reports qualitative results on self-perceived needs from SV focus groups conducted in the fifth-largest metropolitan area in the United States (Phoenix, Arizona). Interviews with key informants (KIs) drawn from the service and justice sector were also obtained for system-level perspectives of SV priority needs. The major themes of the SV conversations demonstrated that they use a holistic wellness perspective. Their narratives mapped across the social-ecological model and demonstrated a wide range of wants and needs beyond justice. KI narratives identified options typically listed on a grant menu. SVs spoke of what they needed in their daily lives. Typically, KIs focused on increased funds to offer more of the same interventions currently available. The findings open opportunities to better align services with what SVs seek, and further underscore the need to engage them in planning and implementation.
BachM. H.HansenN. B.AhrensC.Reendal NielsenC.WalsheC.HansenM. (2021). Underserved survivors of sexual assault: A systematic scoping review. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 12(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1895516
CampbellR. (2008). The psychological impact of rape victims’ experiences with the legal, medical, and mental health systems. American Psychologist, 63(8), 702–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.702
4.
CattaneoL. B.StylianoA. M.HargroveS.GoodmanL. A.GebhardK. T.CurbyT. W. (2020). Survivor-centered practice and survivor empowerment: Evidence from a research–practitioner partnership. Journal of Violence Against Women, 27(9). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220935196
5.
Centers for Disease Control. (2016). STOP SV: A technical package to prevent sexual violence. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
DalyK.BouhoursB. (2010). Rape and attrition in the legal process: A comparative analysis of five countries. Crime and Justice, 39, 565–650. https://doi.org/10.1086/653101
9.
FaramarziM.EsmaelzadehS.MosaviS. (2005). Prevalence, maternal complication, and birth outcomes of physical, sexual, and emotional domestic violence during pregnancy. Acta Medica Iranica, 43(2), 115–122. http://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta/article/view/2975
10.
GoodmanL. A.SmythK. F. (2011). A call for a social network-oriented approach to services for survivors of intimate partner violence. Psychology of Violence, 1(2), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022977
11.
GoodmarkL. (2015). ‘Law and justice are not always the same’: Creating community-based justice forums for people subjected to intimate partner abuse. Florida State University Law Review, 42, 707.
12.
KazdinA. E. (2017). Addressing the treatment gap: A key challenge for extending evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 88(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.004
13.
KirknerA.LorenzK.UllmanS. E. (2021). Recommendations for responding to survivors of sexual assault: A qualitative study of survivors and support providers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(3–4), 1005–1028. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517739285
KossM. P.FigueredoA. J.PrinceR. J. (2002). Cognitive mediation of rape's mental, physical and social health impact: Tests of four models in cross-sectional data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(4), 926–941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.70.4.926
16.
KossM. P.WhiteJ. W.LopezE. C. (2017). Victim voice in reenvisioning responses to sexual and physical violence nationally and internationally. American Psychologist, 72(9), 1019–1030. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000233
17.
MaierS. L. (2008). “I have heard horrible stories . . .”: Rape victim advocates’ perceptions of the revictimization of rape victims by the police and medical system. Violence Against Women, 14(7), 786–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208320245
18.
MartinP. Y. (2005). Rape work: Victims, gender, and emotions in organization and community context. Routledge.
19.
McGlynnC.WestmarlandN. (2019). Kaleidoscopic justice: Sexual violence and victim-survivors’ perceptions of justice. Social & Legal Studies, 28(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663918761200
20.
Munro-KramerM. L.DulinA. C.GaitherC. (2017). What survivors want: Understanding the needs of sexual assault survivors. Journal of American College Health, 65(5), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2017.1312409
SmithS. G.ZhangX.BasileK. C.MerrickM. T.WangJ.KresnowM.ChenJ. (2018). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2015 data brief – updated release. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/2015data-brief508.pdf
23.
Strauss SwansonC.SzymanskiD. M. (2020). From pain to power: An exploration of activism, the #MeToo movement, and healing from sexual assault trauma. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 67(6), 653–668. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000429
24.
UllmanS. E.BrecklinL. R. (2003). Sexual assault history and health-related outcomes in a national sample of women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-2-00006
25.
Violence Against Women Act of 1994. (1996). Violence against women office. U.S. Dept. of Justice.
