Drug consumption and addiction are known to increase the incidence of violent and property crimes. For this reason, governments prohibit the trade in some psychoactive substances and vigorously enforce the law. The unfortunate consequence of this governmental control is that it increases drug market violence. This article examines how drug prohibition and its enforcement affect violence among illicit drug traders. Two processes are considered: the role of virtual anarchy and police pressure in exposing illicit drug traders to predation and motivating them to retaliate. After reviewing the empirical literature bearing on these theories, this article concludes by outlining what is needed to move the field forward.
AitkenC.MooreD.HiggsPKelsallJ.KergerM. (2002). The impact of a police crackdown on a street drug scene: Evidence from the street. International Journal of Drug Policy, 13, 189–198.
2.
AndersonE. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
3.
BallJ. C.ShafferJ. W.NurcoD. N. (1983). The day-to-day criminality of heroin addicts in Baltimore—A Study in the Continuity of Offense Rates. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 12, 119–142.
4.
BenthamJ. (1988 [1789]). The principles of morals and legislation. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
5.
BlackD. (1976). The behavior of law. New York, NY: Academic Press.
6.
BrownsteinH. H. (1993). What does “drug-related” mean? Reflections on the problem of objectification. The Criminologist, 18, 5–7.
7.
BrownsteinH. H.CrimminsS. M.SpuntB. J. (2000). A conceptual framework for operationalizing the relationship between violence and drug market stability. Contemporary Drug Problems, 27, 867–890.
8.
CooneyM. (1998). Warriors and peacemakers: How third parties shape violence. New York, NY: New York University Press.
9.
CooneyM. (2006). The criminological potential of pure sociology. Crime, Law & Social Change, 46, 51–63.
10.
CopesH.BrunsonR. K.ForsythC. J.WhiteH. (2011). Leaving no stone unturned: Exploring responses to and consequences of failed crack-for-car transactions. Journal of Drug Issues, 41, 151–174.
11.
CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. (Eds.). (1986). The reasoning criminal. New York, NY: Springer.
12.
CurtisR.WendelT. (2007). “You’re always training the dog”: Strategic interventions to reconfigure drug markets. Journal of Drug Issues, 37, 867–890.
13.
DillsA. K.MironJ. A.SummersG. (2010). What do economists know about crime? In Di TellaR.EdwardsS.SchargrodskyE. (Eds.), The economics of crime: Lessons for and from Latin American. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
FelsonR. B.BonkiewiczL. (2013). Guns and trafficking in crack-cocaine and other drug markets. Crime & Delinquency, 59, 319–343.
16.
FelsonR.SavolainenJ.AaltonenM.MoustgaardH. (2008). Is the association between alcohol use and delinquency causal or spurious?Criminology, 46, 785–808.
17.
GoldsteinP. J. (1985). The drugs/violence nexus: A tripartite conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 15, 493–506.
18.
GoldsteinP. J.BrownsteinH. H.RyanP. J.BellucciP. A. (1997). Crack and homicide in New York City: A Case Study in the Epidemiology of Violence. In ReinarmanC.LevineH. G. (Eds.), Crack in America: Demon drugs and social justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
JacobsB. A. (1999). Dealing crack. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
20.
JacobsB. A. (2000). Robbing drug dealers. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
21.
JacobsB. A.WrightR. (2006). Street justice: Retaliation in the criminal underworld. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22.
JacquesS. (2010). The necessary conditions for retaliation: Toward a theory of non-violent and violent forms in drug markets. Justice Quarterly, 27, 186–205.
23.
JacquesS.AllenA.WrightR. (2013). Drug dealers’ rational choices on which customers to rip-off. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25, 251–256. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.11.010
24.
JacquesS.BernascoW. (2013). Drug dealing: Amsterdam’s red light district. In WortleyR.LeclercB. (Eds.), Cognition and crime: Offender decision making and script analyses. London, England: Routledge.
25.
JacquesS.WrightR. (2008). The relevance of peace to studies of drug market violence. Criminology, 46, 221–253.
26.
JacquesS.WrightR. (2011). Informal control and illicit drug trade. Criminology, 49, 726–765.
27.
JacquesS.WrightR. (2013). How victimized drug traders mobilize police. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 42, 545–575.
28.
JensenG. F. (2000). Prohibition, alcohol, and murder: Untangling countervailing mechanisms. Homicide Studies, 4, 18–36.
29.
KleimanM. A.CaulkinsJ. P.HawkenA. (2011). Drugs and drug policy: What everyone needs to know. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30.
KlingerD. A. (1997). Negotiating order in patrol work: An ecological theory of police response to deviance. Criminology, 35, 277–306.
31.
KubrinC. E.WeitzerR. (2003). Retaliatory homicide: Concentrated disadvantage and neighborhood culture. Social Problems, 50, 157–180.
32.
LeuwE. (1991). Drugs and drug policy in the Netherlands. Crime and Justice, 14, 229–276.
33.
LevittS.VenkateshS. A. (2000). An economic analysis of a drug-selling gang’s finances. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 755–789.
34.
LumC. (2011). Violence, drug markets and racial composition: Challenging stereotypes through spatial analysis. Urban Studies, 48, 2715–2732.
35.
MacCounR.KilmerB.ReuterP. (2003). Research on drugs-crime linkages: The next generation. In AshcroftJ.DanielsD. J.HartS. V. (Eds.), Toward a drugs and crime agenda for the 21st century, NIJ Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
36.
MaherL.DixonD. (1999). Policing and public health: Law enforcement and harm minimization in a street- level drug market. British Journal of Criminology, 39, 488–512.
37.
MeesonJ.MorselliC. (2012). La Violence et al Résolution de Conflits chez des Trafiquants de Cocaïne. Criminologie, 45, 213–241.
38.
MironJ. A. (1999). Violence and the U.S. prohibitions of drugs and alcohol. American Law and Economics Review, 1, 78–114.
39.
MironJ. A. (2001). Violence, guns, and drugs: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Law and Economics, 2, 615–633.
40.
MohamedR.FritsvoldE. D. (2010). Dorm room dealers: Drugs & the privileges of race & class. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
41.
MoskosP. (2008). Cop in the hood: My year policing Baltimore’s eastern district. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
NadelmannE. A. (1997). Drug prohibitions in the U. S.: Costs, consequences, and alternatives. In ReinarmanC.LevineH. G. (Eds.), Crack in America: Demon drugs and social justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
NatapoffA. (2009). Snitching: Criminal informants and the erosion of the American justice system. New York, NY: New York University Press.
OuseyG. C.LeeM. R. (2002). Examining the conditional nature of the illicit drug market–homicide relationship: A partial test of the theory of contingent causation. Criminology, 40, 73–102.
46.
OuseyG. C.LeeM. R. (2004). Investigating the connections between race, illicit drug markets, and lethal violence, 1984–1997. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 41, 352–383.
47.
OuseyG. C.LeeM. R. (2007). Homicide trends and illicit drug markets: Exploring differences across time. Justice Quarterly, 24, 48–79.
48.
OwensE. G. (2011). Are underground markets really more violent? Evidence from early 20th century America. American Law and Economics Review, 13, 1–44.
49.
PhillipsS. (2003). The social structure of vengeance: A test of black’s model. Criminology, 41, 673–708.
50.
PhillipsS. A. (2012). Operation fly trap: L.A. gangs, drugs, and the law. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
ReuterP. (2009). Systemic violence in drug markets. Crime, Law, & Social Change, 52, 275–284.
52.
ReuterP.MacCounR.MurphyP. (1990). Money from crime: A study of the economics of drug dealing in Washington, DC Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.
53.
RosenfeldR.JacobsB. A.WrightR. (2003). Snitching and the code of the street. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 291–309.
54.
StankoE. A. (1981, 1982). The impact of victim assessment on prosecutors’ screening decisions: The case of the New York county district attorney’s office. Law & Society Review, 16, 225–240.
55.
St. JeanP. K. B. (2007). Pockets of crime: Broken windows, collective efficacy, and the criminal point of view. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56.
TaylorA. (2012). Step by step: A situational analysis of drug business disputes. Journal of Drug Issues, 42, 279–297.
57.
The Queen v. James William Grove. (2008). CRI-2007-057-002094. In the High Court of New Zealand Auckland Registry.
TopalliV.WrightR.FornangoR. (2002). Drug dealers, robbery and retaliation: Vulnerability, deterrence and the contagion of violence. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 337–351.
60.
WerbD.RowellG.GuyattG.KerrT.MontanerJ.WoodE. (2011). Effect of drug law enforcement on drug market violence: A systematic review. International Journal of Drug Policy, 22, 87–94.
61.
WrightR.DeckerS. (1997). Armed robbers in action: Stickups and street culture. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
62.
WrightR.TopalliV.JacquesS. (in press). Crime in motion: Predation, retaliation, and the spread of urban violence. In TurnerB.SchleeG. (Eds.), On retaliation: Toward an interdisciplinary understanding of a basic human condition. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
63.
ZaitchD. (2002). Trafficking cocaine: Colombian drug entrepreneurs in the Netherlands. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
64.
ZimringF. E.HawkinsG. J. (1992). The search for rational drug control. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
65.
ZimringF. E.HawkinsG. J. (1997). Crime is not the problem: Lethal violence in America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
