This article examines the reasons offered by seven New York governors in justification of their decisions to commute death sentences in 159 cases between 1920 and 1970. In doing so, it scrutinizes the common assertion that, in marked contrast to contemporary death penalty cases, merciful considerations once were bountiful in sparing condemned offenders from execution. An examination of the New York governors’ reasons for granting clemency and the legal context within which their decisions were made suggests that mercy accounted for few death sentence commutations during this time period and that other considerations predominated. To the extent that the New York experience resembles that of other states historically, the analysis suggests that the comparatively infrequent use of executive clemency in contemporary capital cases may owe more to the significant differences in death penalty laws and their administration during the different eras than to a diminished role for mercy.
Abdul-Kabir v. Quarterman, 127 S. Ct. 1654. (2007).
2.
Abramowitz, E., & Paget, D. ( 1964). Executive clemency in capital cases. New York University Law Review, 39, 136-192.
3.
Acker, J.R. ( 1990). New York’s proposed death penalty legislation: Constitutional and policy perspectives. Albany Law Review , 54, 515-616.
4.
Acker, J.R., & Lanier, C.S. ( 2000). May God-or the Governor-have mercy: Executive clemency and executions in modern death-penalty systems. Criminal Law Bulletin, 36, 200-237.
5.
Acker, J.R., & Lanier, C.S. ( 2003). Beyond human ability? The rise and fall of death penalty legislation. In J. R. Acker, R. M. Bohm, & C. S. Lanier (Eds.), America’s experiment with capital punishment: Reflections on the past, present, and future of the ultimate penal sanction (pp. 85-125). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
6.
Anaya, T. ( 1993). Statement by Toney Anaya on capital punishment. University of Richmond Law Review, 27, 177-183.
7.
Argys, L.M., & Mocan, H.N. ( 2004). Who shall live and who shall die? An analysis of prisoners on death row in the United States. Journal of Legal Studies , 33, 255-281.
8.
Arrigo, B.A., & Williams, C.R. (2003). Victim vices, victim voices, and impact statements: On the place of emotion and the role of restorative justice in capital sentencing. Crime and Delinquency, 49, 603-626.
9.
Baldus, D.C., Woodworth, G.G., & Pulaski, C.A., Jr. (1990). Equal justice and the death penalty: A legal and empirical analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
10.
Barkow, R.E. ( 2008). The ascent of the administrative state and the demise of mercy. Harvard Law Review, 121, 1332-1365.
11.
Bedau, H.A. ( 1964). Death sentences in New Jersey 1907-1960. Rutgers Law Review, 19, 1-64.
12.
Bedau, H.A. ( 1965). Capital punishment in Oregon, 1903-64. Oregon Law Review, 45, 1-39.
13.
Bedau, H.A. ( 1990-1991). The decline of executive clemency in capital cases. New York University Review of Law & Social Change, 18, 255-272.
14.
Bedau, H.A., & Radelet, M.L. ( 1987). Miscarriages of justice in potentially capital cases . Stanford Law Review, 40, 21-173.
15.
Bienen, L.B. ( 1996). The proportionality review of capital cases by state high courts after Gregg: Only ‘‘the appearance of justice’’ ? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 87, 130-314.
16.
Black, C.L., Jr. ( 1974). Capital punishment: The inevitability of caprice and mistake. New York: Norton.
17.
Boger, J.C. ( 2004). Foreword: Acts of capital clemency: The words and deeds of Governor George Ryan. North Carolina Law Review, 82, 1279-1296.
18.
Bowers, W.J. ( 1984). Legal homicide: Death as punishment in America, 1864-1982 . Boston: Northeastern University Press.
19.
Brown, E.G., & Adler, D. ( 1989). Public justice, private mercy: A governor’s education on death row. New York: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
20.
Burnett, C. ( 2002). Justice denied: Clemency appeals in death penalty cases . Boston: Northeastern University Press.
21.
Cobb, P.W., Jr. ( 1989). Reviving mercy in the structure of capital punishment . Yale Law Journal, 99, 389-409.
22.
Death Penalty Information Center. (2009a). Executions by year. Retrieved January 19, 2009, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/executions-year
23.
Death Penalty Information Center. (2009b). Clemency. Retrieved January 19, 2009, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/clemency
24.
Death Penalty Information Center. (2009c). Executions in the United States, 1608-1976, by state. Retrieved January 22, 2009, from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/executions-united-states-1608-1976-state
25.
DiSalle, M.V., & Blochman, L.G. (1965). The power of life or death . New York: Random House.
26.
Dolinko, D. ( 2007). Some naïve thoughts about justice and mercy. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 4, 349-360.
27.
Federalist papers: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay; Introduction by Clinton Rossiter. (1961 ed.). New York : The New American Library, Inc.
28.
Freilich, J.D., & Rivera, C.J. ( 1999). Mercy, death, and politics: An analysis of executions and commutations in New York State, 1935-1963. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 15-29.
29.
Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238. (1972).
30.
Garvey, S.P. ( 2004). Is it wrong to commute death row? Retribution, atonement, and mercy. North Carolina Law Review, 82, 1319-1342.
31.
Gregg v. Georgia. 428 U.S. 153. (1976).
32.
Haas, K.C. ( 2008). The emerging death penalty jurisprudence of the Roberts Court. Pierce Law Review, 6, 387-440.
33.
Hay, D. ( 1975). Property, authority and the criminal law. In D. Hay, P. Linebaugh , J. G. Rule, E. P. Thompson, & C. Winslow (Eds.), Albion’s fatal tree: Crime and society in eighteenth-century England (pp. 17-63). New York: Pantheon Books.
34.
Heise, M. ( 2003). Mercy by the numbers: An empirical analysis of clemency and its structure. Virginia Law Review, 89, 239-310.
35.
Herrera v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390. (1993).
36.
Jacoby, R. ( 2000). Conversations with the Capeman: The untold story of Salvador Agron. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
37.
Johnson, E.H. ( 1957). Selective factors in capital punishment. Social Forces, 36, 165-169.
38.
Kaufman-Osborn, T.V. ( 2008). Proportionality review and the death penalty. Justice System Journal, 29, 257-272.
39.
Kennedy v. Louisiana, 128 S. Ct. 2641. (2008).
40.
Knight v. Florida, 528 U.S. 990. (1999).
41.
Kobil, D.T. ( 1991). The quality of mercy strained: Wresting the pardoning power from the King. Texas Law Review, 69, 569-641.
42.
Kobil, D.T. ( 2003a). The evolving role of clemency in capital cases. In J. R. Acker, R. M. Bohm, & C. S. Lanier (Eds.), America’s experiment with capital punishment: Reflections on the past, present, and future of the ultimate penal sanction (pp. 673-692). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
43.
Kobil, D.T. ( 2003b). How to grant clemency in unforgiving times. Capital University Law Review, 31, 219-241.
44.
Korengold, M.A.G., Noteboom, T.A., & Gurwitch, S. ( 1996). And justice for few: The collapse of the capital clemency system in the United States. Hamline Law Review, 20, 349-369.
45.
Kraemer, J. ( 2008). An empirical examination of the factors associated with the commutation of state death row prisoners’ sentences between 1986 and 2005. American Criminal Law Review, 45, 1389-1417.
46.
Kubik, J.D., & Moran, J.R. ( 2003). Lethal elections: Gubernatorial politics and the timing of executions. Journal of Law and Economics, 46, 1-25.
47.
Lackey v. Texas, 514 U.S. 1045. (1995).
48.
Ledewitz, B., & Staples, S. ( 1993). The role of executive clemency in modern death penalty cases. University of Richmond Law Review, 27, 227-239.
49.
Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586. (1978).
50.
Lumer, M., & Tenney, N. ( 1995). The death penalty in New York: An historical perspective . Journal of Law and Policy, 4, 81-142.
51.
Markel, D. ( 2004). Against mercy. Minnesota Law Review, 88, 1421-1480.
52.
Markel, D. ( 2005). State, be not proud: A retributivist defense of the commutation of death row and the abolition of the death penalty. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 40, 407-480.
53.
Marquart, J.W., Ekland-Olson, S., & Sorensen, J.R. (1994). The rope, the chair, and the needle: Capital punishment in Texas, 1923-1990. Austin : University of Texas Press.
54.
Meyer, L.R. ( 2007). The merciful state. In Sarat A. & Hussain N. (Eds.), Forgiveness, mercy, and clemency (pp. 64-116). Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.
55.
Moore, K.D. ( 1989). Pardons: Justice, mercy, and the public interest. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
Morrison, S.T. ( 2005). The politics of grace: On the moral justification of executive clemency. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 9, 1-138.
57.
National Governors’ Association Center for Policy Research. (1988). Guide to executive clemency among the American states. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
58.
New York State. (1924). Public papers of Governor Smith, 1923. Albany, NY: J.B. Lyon Co.
59.
New York State. (1926). Public papers of Governor Smith, 1925. Albany, NY: J.B. Lyon Co.
60.
New York State. (1927). Public papers of Governor Smith, 1926. Albany, NY: J.B. Lyon Co.
61.
New York State. (1930). Public papers of Governor Roosevelt, 1929. Albany, NY: J.B. Lyon Co.
62.
New York State. (1931). Public papers of Governor Roosevelt, 1930. Albany, NY: J.B. Lyon Co.
63.
New York State. (1932). Public papers of Governor Roosevelt, 1931. Albany, NY: J.B. Lyon Co.
64.
New York State. (1933). Public papers of Governor Roosevelt, 1932. Albany, NY: J.B. Lyon Co.
65.
New York State. (1940). Public papers of Governor Lehman, 1939. Albany, NY: J.B. Lyon Co.
66.
New York State. (1944). Public papers of Governor Dewey, 1943. Albany, NY: J.B. Lyon Co.
67.
New York State. (1945). Public papers of Governor Dewey, 1944. Albany, NY: J.B. Lyon Co.
68.
New York State. (1949). Public papers of Governor Dewey, 1948. Albany, NY: J.B. Lyon Co.
69.
New York State. (1963). Public papers of Governor Rockefeller, 1962. Albany, NY: State of New York.
70.
New York Times. ( 1937). Lehman ‘‘leniency’’ criticized in court. January19, p. 3.
71.
Note. (1964). The two-trial system in capital cases. New York University Law Review, 39, 50-77.
72.
Palacios, V.J. ( 1996). Faith in fantasy: The Supreme Court’s reliance on commutation to ensure justice in death penalty cases. Vanderbilt Law Review, 49, 311-372.
73.
People v. LaValle, 817 N.E.2d 341 (N.Y.). (2004).
74.
Pridemore, W.A. ( 2000). An empirical examination of commutations and executions in post-Furman capital cases. Justice Quarterly, 17, 159-183.
75.
Pulley v. Harris. (1984). 465 U.S. 37.
76.
Radelet, M.L., & Zsembik, B.A. ( 1993). Executive clemency in post Furman capital cases. University of Richmond Law Review, 27, 289-314.
77.
Radzinowicz, L. ( 1948). A history of English criminal law and its administration from 1750. Vol. 1London: Stevens & Sons Limited.
78.
Sarat, A. ( 2005). Mercy on trial: What it means to stop an execution. NJPrinceton University Press.
79.
Sarat, A. ( 2008). Memorializing miscarriages of justice: Clemency petitions in the killing state. Law and Society Review, 42, 183-224.
80.
Sawyer v. Whitley, 505 U.S. 333. (1992).
81.
Shakespeare, W. (Ed.). (2006). The merchant of Venice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
82.
Steiker, C.S., & Steiker, J.M. ( 2003). Judicial developments in capital punishment law. In J. R. Acker, R. M. Bohm, & C. S. Lanier (Eds.), America’s experiment with capital punishment: Reflections on the past, present, and future of the ultimate penal sanction (pp. 55-83). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
83.
Sumner v. Shuman, 483 U.S. 66. (1987).
84.
United States Department of Justice. (2007). Bureau of Justice Statistics, capital punishment, 2007, Table 11, Time under sentence of death and execution, by race, 1977-2007. Retrieved February 6, 2009, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/html/cp/2007/tables/cp07st11.htm
85.
Vandiver, M. ( 1993). The quality of mercy: Race and clemency in Florida death penalty cases, 1924-1966. University of Richmond Law Review , 27, 315-343.
86.
Warden, R. ( 2005). Illinois death penalty reform: How it happened, what it promises. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 95, 381-426.
87.
Wolfgang, M.E. ( 1959). Murder, the pardon board, and recommendations by judges and district attorneys. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 50, 338-346.
88.
Wolfgang, M.E., Kelly, A., & Nolde, H.C. ( 1962). Comparison of the executed and the commuted among admissions to death row. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 53, 301-311.
89.
Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280. (1976).
90.
Zimmerman, I., & Bond, F. ( 1964). Punishment without crime: The true story of a man who spent twenty-four years in prison for a crime he did not commit. New York: C.N. Potter.
