Beyond considerations of relative punitiveness, very little is known about how offenders understand the experience of serving a probation sentence. The current study surveyed offenders currently on probation to assess the extent to which they believed their sentence was rehabilitative, incapacitative, deserved, and a deterrent to future offending. Perceptions that probation served no purpose and that it represented a game of manipulation and impression management were also investigated. The results showed that most probationers believed that their sentence was a deterrent, and it was rehabilitative and deserved. They also felt that probation served multiple purposes, and a minority of respondents perceived that there was no point to being on probation. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Allen, F.A. (1981). The decline of the rehabilitative ideal: Penal policy and social purpose. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
Allen, G.F. (1985). The probationers speak: Analysis of the probationers' experiences and attitudes. Federal Probation, 49(September), 67-75.
3.
American Friends Service Committee. (1971). Struggle for justice: A report on crime and punishment in America. New York: Hill & Wang.
4.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Lexis/Nexis-Anderson.
5.
Apospori, E., & Alpert, G. (1993). The role of differential experience with the criminal justice system in the changes in perceptions of severity of legal sanctions over time. Crime & Delinquency, 39, 184-194.
6.
Applegate, B.K., Cullen, F.T., & Fisher, B.S. (1997). Public support for correctional treatment: The continuing appeal of the rehabilitative ideal. Prison Journal , 77, 237-258.
7.
Applegate, B.K., Davis, R.K., Otto, C.W., Surette, R., & McCarthy, B.J. (2003). The multifunction jail: Policymakers' views on the goals of local incarceration. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14, 155-170.
8.
Beccaria, C. (1963). On crimes and punishments (H. Paolucci, Trans.) . New York: Bobbs-Merrill. (Original work published 1764)
9.
Bentham, J. (2007). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Mineola, NY: Dover . (Original work published 1789)
10.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Clear, T.R. (1995). Harm in American penology: Offenders, victims, and their communities. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
12.
Crouch, B.M. (1993). Is incarceration really worse? Analysis of offenders' preferences for prison over probation. Justice Quarterly, 10, 67-88.
13.
Cullen, F.T., Fisher, B.S., & Applegate, B.K. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 1-79). Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
14.
Cullen, F.T., & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In J. Horney (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000: Vol. 3. Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Cullen, F.T., Latessa, E.J., Burton, V.S., Jr., & Lombardo, L.X. (1993). The correctional orientation of prison wardens: Is the rehabilitative ideal supported? Criminology, 31, 69-92.
17.
Feeley, M.M., & Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30, 449-474.
18.
Gendreau, P., Paparazzi, M., Little, T., & Goddard, M. (1993). Does "punishing smarter" work? An assessment of the new generation of alternative sanctions in probation. Forum on Corrections Research, 8, 31-34.
19.
Glaze, L.E., & Bonczar, T.P. (2007). Probation and parole in the United States, 2006. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
20.
Harris, L. (1968). Changing public attitudes toward crime and corrections . Federal Probation, 32(4), 9-16.
21.
Horvath, A.O., & Luborsky, L. (1993). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 561-573.
22.
Karp, D.R., & Drakulich, K.M. (2004). Minor crime in a quaint setting: Practices, outcomes, and limits of Vermont reparative probation boards . Criminology & Public Policy, 3, 655-686.
23.
Kifer, M., Hemmens, C., & Stohr, M.K. (2003). The goals of corrections: Perspectives from the line. Criminal Justice Review, 28, 47-69.
24.
MacKenzie, D.L. (2006). What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Martin, D.J., Garske, J.P., & Davis, M.K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 438-450.
26.
May, D.C., & Wood, P.B. (2005). What influences offenders' willingness to serve alternative sanctions. Prison Journal, 85, 145-167.
27.
May, D.C., Wood, P.B., Mooney, J.L., & Minor, K.I. (2005). Predicting offenders generated exchange rates: Implications for a theory of sentence severity. Crime & Delinquency, 51, 373-399.
28.
McCleary, R. (1992). Dangerous men: The sociology of parole. Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston.
29.
McClelland, K.A., & Alpert, G.P. (1985). Factor analysis applied to magnitude estimates of punishment seriousness: Patterns of individual differences. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1, 307-318.
30.
McCorkle, R.C. (1993). Research note: Punish and rehabilitate? Public attitudes toward six common crimes. Crime & Delinquency , 39, 240-252.
31.
Morris, N., & Tonry, M. (1991). Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Paternoster, R. (1987). The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues. Justice Quarterly, 4, 173-217.
33.
Petersilia, J. (1990). When probation becomes more dreaded than prison . Federal Probation, 54(1), 23-27.
34.
Petersilia, J., & Deschenes, E.P. (1994). Perceptions of punishment: Inmates and staff rank the severity of prison versus intermediate sanctions . Prison Journal, 74, 306-332.
35.
Pratt, T., Cullen, F.T., Blevins, K., Daigle, L., & Madensen, T. (2006). The empirical status of deterrence theory: A meta-analysis . In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction .
36.
Roberts, J.V., & Stalans, L.J. (1997). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
37.
Sitren, A.H., & Applegate, B.K. (2006). Intentions to offend: Examining the effects of personal and vicarious experiences with punishment and punishment avoidance. Journal of Crime and Justice, 29, 25-51.
38.
Spelman, W. (1995). The severity of intermediate sanctions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 107-135.
Steiner, B., Wada, J., Hemmens, C., & Burton, V.S., Jr. (2005). The correctional orientation of community corrections: Legislative changes in the legally prescribed functions of community corrections 1992-2002. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 141-159.
41.
Umbreit, M.S., & Coates, R.B. (1992). Victim offender mediation: An analysis of programs in four states of the U. S. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Restorative Justice and Peacemaking.
42.
Umbreit, M.S., Coates, R.B., & Vos, B. (2001). The impact of victim-offender mediation: Two decades of research. Federal Probation, 65(December), 29-35.
43.
Van Voorhis, P., Browning, S.L., Simon, M., & Gordon, J. (1997). The meaning of punishment: Inmates' orientation to the prison experience. Prison Journal, 77, 135-167.
44.
von Hirsch, A. (1976). Doing justice: The choice of punishments. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
45.
Warner, R.M. (2008). Applied statistics. Los Angeles : Sage.
46.
Wilson, J.Q. (1975). Thinking about crime. New York : Basic Books.
47.
Wood, P.B., & Grasmick, H.G. (1999). Toward the development of punishment equivalencies: Male and female inmates rate the severity of alternative sanctions compared to prison. Justice Quarterly , 16, 19-50.
48.
Wood, P.B., & May, D.C. (2003). Racial differences in perceptions of the severity of sanctions: A comparison of prison with alternatives. Justice Quarterly, 20, 605-631.
49.
Zimring, F.E., & Hawkins, G. (1995). Incapacitation: Penal confinement and the restraint of crime. New York: Oxford University Press.
