The criminal justice system has experienced changes related to correctional population growth over the past 30years. This article applies general systems theory to assess differences between directors’ and nondirectors’ perceptions of community corrections goals of supervision, importance of officer tasks, and the time required to complete such tasks. Policy implications are drawn from the results of a web-based survey of the American Probation and Parole Association.
AbadinskyH. (2009). Probation and parole: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
2.
AndrewsD.BontaJ. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
3.
BeckettK.WesternB. (2001). Governing social marginality: Welfare, incarceration, and the transformation of state policy. Punishment and Society, 3, 43-59.
4.
BertalanffyL. (1968). General systems theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York, NY: George Braziller.
5.
BogueB.CampbellN.CareyM.ClawsonE.FaustD.FlorioK.. . . WoodwardW. (2004). Implementing evidence-based practices in community corrections: The principles of effective intervention. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections, Crime and Justice Institute. Retrieved on May 30, 2012from http://www.nicic.org/Library/019342
6.
ChiricosT.DeloneM. (1992). Labor surplus and punishment: A review and assessment of theory and evidence. Social Problems, 39, 421-446.
7.
ChristianL.DillmanD.SmythJ. (2008). The effects of mode and format on answers to scalar questions in telephone and web surveys. In LepkowskiJ.. (Eds.), Advances in telephone survey methodology (pp. 250-275). New York, NY: John Wiley.
8.
ChristieN. (2000). Crime control as industry. London, UK: Routledge.
9.
ClaxtonM.SinclairN.HansonR. (2002, December10). Felons on probation often go unwatched. The Detroit News.
10.
DeMicheleM. (2007). Probation and parole’s growing caseloads and workload allocation: Strategies for managerial decision making. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance, Department of Justice.
11.
DeMicheleM.PaparozziM. (2008). Community corrections: A powerful field. Corrections Today, 70(5), 68-72.
12.
DeMicheleM.PayneB. (2007). Probation officers speak out: Caseload and workload allocation. Federal Probation, 71, 30-36.
13.
DeMicheleM.PayneB.ButtonD. (2008). Electronic monitoring of sex offenders: Evidence-based or sanction stacking?Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 46(3/4), 119-135.
14.
DiekhoffG. (1992). Statistics for the social and behavioral sciences: Univariate, bivariate, multivariate. Dubuque, IA: William Brian.
15.
DillmanD.ChristianL. (2005). Survey mode as a source of instability in responses across surveys. Field Methods, 17, 30-51.
16.
DillmanD.PhelpsG.TortoraR.SwiftK.KohrellJ.BerckJ.MesserB. (2009). Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet. Social Science Research, 38(1), 1-18.
17.
DillmanD.SmythJ.ChristianL. (2008). Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
18.
FeeleyM.SimonJ. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30, 449-474.
19.
GarlandD. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago, MI: University of Chicago Press.
20.
GlazeL.BonczarT. (2008). Probation and parole in the United States, 2007. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
21.
GrattetR.PetersiliaJ.LinJ. (2008). Parole violations and revocations in California. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
22.
HansonK.BussiereM. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical psychology, 66, 348-362.
23.
LiskaA. (1997). Modeling the relationships between macro forms of social control. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 39-61.
24.
LowenkampC. T.LatessaE.HolsingerA. (2006a). Risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs?Crime and Delinquency, 52, 77-93.
25.
LowenkampC. T.PealerJ.SmithP.LatessaE. (2006b). Adhering to the risk and need principles: Does it matter for supervision based programs. Federal Probation, 70(3), 3-8.
26.
LuckenK. (1997). The dynamics of penal reform. Crime, Law, & Social Change, 26, 367-384.
27.
MartinsonR. (1974).What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest, 35, 22-54.
28.
MunroJ. (1975). Administrative behaviour and police organization. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
29.
National Council on Crime and Delinquency. (2006). Michigan Department of Corrections Probation and Parole Agency Workload Study. Madison, WI: Author.
30.
PaparozziM.DeMicheleM. (2008). Probation and parole: Overworked, misunderstood, under-appreciated–but why?Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 275-296.
31.
PayneB.BergB. (2004). Perceptions about the criminalization of elder abuse among police chiefs and ombudsmen. Crime and Delinquency, 49, 439-459.
32.
PayneB.GaineyR. (2002). Family violence and criminal justice: A life-course approach. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
33.
PetersiliaJ.TurnerS. (1991). An evaluation of intensive probation in California. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 610-658.
34.
RobinsonL. (2003). Sex offender management: The public policy challenges. Annals of New York Academy of Science, 989, 1-7.
35.
RobinsonM. (2004). Why crime? An integrated systems theory of antisocial behavior. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
36.
RuscheG.KirchheimerO. (1939). Punishment and social structure. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
37.
SimonJ. (1988). The ideological effects of actuarial practices. Law & Society Review, 22, 801-830.
38.
SimonJ.FeeleyM. (1994). Actuarial justice: Power/knowledge in contemporary criminal justice. In David Nelkin (Ed.), The future of criminology (pp. 173-201). London, UK: SAGE.
39.
Van GigchJ. (1978). Applied general systems theory. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
40.
WeberM. (1997). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York, NY: Routledge.
41.
WilsonJ. (1985). Thinking about crime. New York, NY: Vintage.
42.
WorrallJ.SchramP.HaysE.NewmanM. (2004). An analysis of the relationship between probation caseloads and property crime rates in California counties. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 231-241.
