“To Remember Is to Live Again”: Geragogical Approaches to Online Storytelling With Older Immigrants

Abstract

Seeing aging not solely as a biological process but as a meaning-making practice, this paper presents findings from an exploratory study conducted within a community-based organization’s transition to online educational programming during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study aimed to explore how collaborative storytelling functioned as a geragogical practice in an online setting. The study involved 17 Spanish-speaking older immigrants in co-designing an age- and culturally responsive online storytelling curriculum. Through creative and reflective prompts, the virtual sessions facilitated autoethnographic and collaborative storytelling on a range of topics. Thematic analysis identified three interrelated themes in participants’ experience: connection in a time of isolation; anti-ageist reclamation; and temporal transcendence. Participants revisited and reinterpreted personal histories, reclaimed a sense of creative authorship, and envisioned new forms of community participation. The paper offers practical strategies for co-designing storytelling activities in community-based learning environments.

Keywords

storytelling online older adults immigrants learning co-development geragogy

What This Paper Adds

• Positions storytelling as a geragogical practice that centers relational and creative dimensions of learning in later life.

• Contributes an account of older immigrants’ learning experiences in virtual storytelling programming.

• Suggests directions for future research that integrates creative and participatory approaches.

Applications of Study Findings

• Community organizations can adapt the proposed model for designing collaborative arts-based educational programming.

• Practitioners can draw on the insights from the study to consider creative and relational strategies as part of their work.

• Advocates can use findings to promote programming that recognizes older adults as co-creators rather than passive recipients of learning.

Introduction

Despite significant attention to varied realities of older adults, voices of older immigrants are markedly underrepresented in interdisciplinary research. Their educational experiences, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, have received even less attention. This paper seeks to address this gap, by describing a small-scale exploratory study of an online storytelling curriculum co-developed with a group of immigrant seniors during the pandemic-related emergency orders in Ontario, Canada.

According to the latest data, 30% of all older adults comprising Canadian population are foreign-born (ImmigrationRefugees and Citizenship Canada, 2017). Islam and Gilmour (2023) found that older immigrants in Canada face a greater likelihood of experiencing loneliness compared to individuals born in Canada. Already vulnerable to increased social isolation (Employment and Social Development Canada, 2022; Johnson et al., 2019; Salma & Salami, 2020), older immigrants in Canada experienced the COVID-19 pandemic in distinctly marginalizing ways. For example, older adults speaking English as an additional language faced significant barriers to primary care access (Sierra-Heredia et al., 2024) and relied on culturally relevant community support services (Wada & Canham, 2025), which were limited and overburdened during the active phase of the pandemic. Moreover, those older immigrants with existing connections to their homeland experienced heighted psychological vulnerability due to “migratory grief” (Wang et al., 2021, p. 164), a sense of symbolic loss and displacement as they followed the news of the global spread of COVID-19, while being unable to travel and support loved ones abroad.

There has been a growing interest in understanding what initiatives can continue mitigating the negative impacts of isolation, which presented a challenge globally (Wu, 2020). In response, adoption of technology was widely promoted as a strategy to reduce isolation and maintain service access for older immigrants (Sidani et al., 2022). As the result, digital learning technologies were used in ways that were non-existent pre-pandemic, with many older adults using video conferencing for social interaction, cognitive stimulation, and emotional support (Greenwood-Hickman et al., 2021; Lim & Bowman, 2022; Shapira et al., 2021). The project presented in this paper was driven by the needs of a community-based organization which faced urgent pandemic-related need in shifting their educational programming online. An active group of Spanish-speaking¹ older adults who had a history of gathering for educational and social activities were eager to continue learning in a virtual setting. The researcher was invited to help the group in this endeavor and (in consultations with the group) developed a series of eight storytelling sessions to be conducted on Zoom.

Narrative approaches are widely adopted in diverse contexts: residential care (Buckley et al., 2014), dementia care (Li, 2022), drama-therapy (Leshem & Harel, 2023), psychotherapy (Smart et al., 2022), social work (Langer, 2016), and explorations of the impact of historical events (Kenyon, 2005). Interdisciplinary research has shown that different forms of narrative work might offer psychological benefits such as an increased sense of self-worth and empowerment (Mager, 2019). Participants in storytelling-based activities report feelings of validation (Hausknecht et al., 2019; Stargatt et al., 2019), well-being (Bruce-Golding et al., 2023; Schoales et al., 2020) and strengthened intergenerational relationships (Cerezo et al., 2024). There is existing research on intergenerational storytelling in immigrant communities that demonstrates that through storytelling older immigrants can act as cultural informants central to children’s literacy and cultural identity development (Olmedo, 2004). Digital storytelling practice specifically allows older adults a range of pathways to challenge dominant ageist narratives (Bossio et al., 2023), make sense of their experience and memories (Alexandrakis et al., 2020a), and address “issues related to communication, emotions, sharing personal memories, and interacting with younger generations” (Alexandrakis et al., 2020b, p. 1624).

While many studies have addressed the benefits of storytelling in later life, there is limited research that places storytelling at the center of educational practice with older immigrants. This paper addresses this gap by analyzing how storytelling functioned as a learning practice online and extends existing literature by emphasizing co-design and peer co-facilitation as central to the learning process. This participatory, flexible model allowed for storytelling to function not only as expression but also as a space for recognizing learner agency. The sections that follow outline critical geragogical framing of project methodology, situate the qualitative findings within broader discussions of later-life education, and offer insights relevant for those seeking to design educational programming for older adults.

Underlying Theory of Learning: Geragogy

Geragogy, as an extension of andragogy, acknowledges the distinct educational needs of older adults (Findsen & Formosa, 2012; Formosa, 2012). Importantly, geragogy emphasizes that later-life learning is inseparable from the exploration of personal experience, as Formosa (2002) notes learners may at times hold greater expertise than facilitators in a range of subjects. Relevant to this article, as a geragogical practice, autoethnographic work that makes visible the complexities of aging (Stončikaitė, 2023) can create symbolic spaces where personal stories operate as experiential learning resources. For example, self-narratives can challenge age-based misconceptions and spotlight age-based discrimination. Thus, older learners can act as both bearers of rich experiential knowledge and agents of change.

Critical geragogical work has long been concerned with challenging of ageist, deficit-based assumptions about older learners (Formosa, 2012) and recognition of their agency in learning (Glendenning & Battersby, 1990). More recent theorizations in the field (Hachem, 2020) suggest that educators working with older learners must also account for the interplay between individual agency and structural conditions, while also recognizing that older learners may pursue multiple, overlapping or contradicting goals beyond self-fulfillment, empowerment, and emancipation.

It is important to note that older immigrants pursue learning due to pragmatic reasons such as language acquisition (Chen & Buckingham, 2025), re-settlement needs (Zhu & Zhang, W, 2019), or seeking intergenerational solidarity, especially during COVID-19 pandemic (Zhu & Zhang, 2025). Indeed, while the notion of emancipation of older adults is compelling, it must be approached carefully so that not to oversimplify complex power dynamics or assume older adults’ “naïve consciousness” (Hachem & Westberg, 2023, p. 102). Instead of an assumed unilateral empowerment, geragogical learning environments should be centered on topics relevant to older learners (Formosa, 2002, p. 80) and recognize learner ownership of the curriculum. In other words, as Withnall (2006) notes, “what is required is a new insight into how people make sense of their own attitudes to learning and how they have acquired beliefs and values about what education and learning mean in the context of their own lives” (p. 30).

Critical geragogy is an increasingly utilized framework for a wide range of educational interventions with older adults. Research in this area is extensive and diverse. For example, in their systematic narrative review of digital skills programs for middle and older adults, Gates and Wilson-Menzfeld (2022) emphasize the centrality of the learning environment, with particular attention to the role of the instructor. Importantly, critical geragogy views older adults not as passive recipients constrained by the cognitive, physical, and social changes of aging, but as active participants in the co-construction of their own learning.

Geragogical curricula are most effective when grounded in established relationships with older learners that recognize their needs and autonomy in design of learning experiences. For example, Creech & Hallam (2015) examined professional practice in informal music education and found that trusting interpersonal climate as crucial for effective work. In their study, facilitators valued participants’ prior experiences and sought to use these as resources, while also taking responsibility for helping participants set meaningful learning goals. Similarly, (Gómez, 2015) explored the application of critical geragogy in foreign language education. Gómez argues that the absence of cognitive uniformity among older learners makes learner autonomy particularly important, and that language education for older adults should go beyond linguistic practice to encourage social participation.

Methodology

The project was co-designed with a group of Spanish-speaking immigrant older adults living in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. This group had previously participated in activities organized by a local community organization with which the researcher had a relationship. The group shared that they were interested in continuing learning online but did not have a plan to follow. The study was envisioned through a collaborative process (IRB approval #e2021-187). There were 17 participants aged 65 and over, 14 identified as women and three as men. Since participants spoke limited English as an additional language, informed consent was obtained in their preferred language -- Spanish. Because the study was guided by the group’s needs, formal inclusion and exclusion criteria were not applied and members were not anonymous during educational sessions.

The project operationalized Hachem’s (2020) argument that geragogical programming must be inclusive, flexible and responsive to the realities of older adults’ learning. A distinctive feature of the project was co-facilitation and co-design approach. One group member recognized for his informal leadership served as a co-facilitator and participated in debriefing with the primary researcher. In the result, a series of eight storytelling sessions were co-developed to be conducted on Zoom. Sessions were designed to be collaborative, slow-paced and accommodating of diverse modes of participants’ cognitive and affective processing. Furthermore, in planning the curriculum, the project team sought to balance agency and structure by providing both clear frameworks and allowing for learner-driven adaptation.

Inspired by a storytelling card game Story Stitch developed by GreenCard Voices group (https://www.greencardvoices.org/programs/story-stitch/), three types of storytelling prompts were designed to guide the sessions. First, “Personal/Community” prompts (e.g., Share a story about someone from your community), to help participants share and situate their life stories within broader social and cultural contexts and reflect on their relationships and shared histories. Second, “Well-being” prompts (e.g., Share a story about the last time you felt truly happy) to elicit narratives of joy, gratitude, and fulfillment. Third, “Resilience” prompts (e.g., Share a story about a time when you felt brave) to help participants name and reframe difficult experiences as sites of learning.

Participants’ life experiences were treated as rich sources of knowledge and their prior experiences with learning were called upon to shape the curriculum. For example, at the mid-point of the program, the curriculum was revised based on observational insights and participant feedback. Specifically, the co-facilitator recommended incorporating a stronger educational component, as the participants were expecting more of school-like environment. This led to the integration of short mini lectures on narrative techniques (e.g., the use of metaphor, imagery, and symbolic language) to scaffold the storytelling activities that followed. After consulting with the co-facilitator, it was decided that these mini lectures would be delivered at the beginning of the sessions. Feedback during the group interview suggested that participants found these segments helpful for the development of their skills of storytelling. While writing was not required, some participants chose to prepare short texts between sessions. Story-sharing was always voluntary. While open to micro modifications, the group agreed on the following session progression.

(1) Warm-up visualization guided by the facilitator (e.g., “Visualize your arrival to Canada, what do you see?”).

(2) Sharing of a prompt.

(3) The first storyteller responded to the prompt. Others responded with related stories, questions, or comments. To ensure all voices were heard, each person could respond once per story.

(4) The original storyteller tagged the next participant to continue. The process repeated until time or prompts ran out.

(5) The group discussed shared themes they identified in the stories, offered suggestions to curricula revisions and chose prompts for the following session.

Data Generation and Analysis

Data were generated through the audio-visual recordings of the sessions, debriefing sessions between the primary researcher and the co-facilitator, and an additional 60-minute group interview with participants that included evaluative questions. All data were transcribed in Spanish and analyzed thematically using an inductive approach (Heath et al., 2010) with a focus on patterns in the data. Initial open coding was conducted in Spanish by the lead researcher and hired research assistant. Themes related to learning, identity, emotional expression, and the pandemic were identified and refined by the principal researcher. Informed by Patton’s (2008) emphasis on meaning-making in qualitative evaluation research, the refining of themes was structured around the questions: “What? So what? Now what?” (p. 5) in relation to future educational recommendations and member-checked with the group and the co-facilitator. All participant quotes were translated into English for this publication.²

Findings

The analysis of the data identified three main themes pertaining to the participants’ learning experiences of storytelling. They are (1) connection in a time of isolation; (2) anti-ageist reclamation; and (3) temporal transcendence.

Connection in a Time of Isolation

A recurring theme that emerged from the discussion was the idea that learning helped the group to be more connected and cognitively active. A quote from participant B, reflects this. In response to a question about the different ways to tell a story, they responded: “The idea is very good; it is very good for us to know the steps that need to be taken for a good conversation.” We can take this comment as pointing to an appreciation not only for storytelling as a vehicle for personal expression, but also for its pedagogical potential, specifically its capacity to facilitate communication. The reference to “the steps” underscores that B saw narrative work as a scaffolded practice that supported their learning in meaningful dialogue. Similarly, participant A emphasized the importance of mental activity during lockdowns, stating: “In this time of pandemic when we all need to keep our minds active.” Storytelling learning thus seemed to function not only as a social outlet, but also as an exercise which seemed to help some participants counteract the inertia of isolation.

The emotional limitations of remote interaction also surfaced. For example, when reflecting on the future of the program another participant expressed a deep longing for in-person connection, stating, “Hopefully, this pandemic will end so we can meet in person.” This sentiment illustrates the dual role of storytelling in this context: it offered a valuable channel for connection in a time of physical distance; however, it also served as a reminder of the irreplaceable affordances of face-to-face interaction. As the workshop progressed, participants spoke often on the tensions between online and in-person learning. Some noted that while face-to-face sessions tend to provide more freedom, hybrid formats may be more sustainable. Although no formal digital literacy training was provided, the digital format shaped both the depth of emotional exchange and the nature of group cohesion.

For many participants, the act of storytelling was introspective as it offered a space to explore personal histories and emotions. For example, participant C articulated this clearly: “I am very grateful because I have learned a lot, right? From all these stories, from each of the people, from my companions, and from myself.” In this way, storytelling functioned as an individual and at the same time social learning practice that deepened relational bonds within the group.

Finally, several participants described the storytelling workshops as a vital source of communal support. Summarizing the impact of the program, participant F noted, “It has strengthened us, it has changed us during this time; we are more alert, happier, we forget about the pandemic for a while.” This quote highlights how storytelling offered participants not only a temporary reprieve from the stress of the pandemic, but it also offered a renewed sense of communal vitality and joy. Refereeing to alertness, happiness, and temporary escape in combination with “us” suggests a shared emotional experience among participants and the value of the collective storytelling practice.

Anti-ageist Reclamation

Many participants remarked that participation in the storytelling sessions helped them re-think their assumptions about later life. When asked about their expectations for the project, participants spoke about their desires that reached beyond the act of telling stories itself. They hoped to be able to communicate with younger generations, keep their minds active, and learn new concepts through intergenerational exchange. Indeed, some participants brought the learning from the workshops back home. One participant shared, “I told my granddaughters… because there, at least, you entertain yourself, your mind is cleared.” The act of narrating stories to grandchildren was described as mutually beneficial: it provided cognitive stimulation and enjoyment for the storyteller, while also building intimacy and dialogue across generational lines. The discussion frequently brought up storytelling as a vital medium for intergenerational exchange, one through which older adults could pass down knowledge, values, and experiences to younger generations. For example, Participant D emphasized the significance of this process: “Finding a way to transmit our thoughts, our wishes, our aspirations to the younger generations that follow us is very important.” This statement positions storytelling as a forward-looking act, rooted in shaping the values and aspirations of those who come next. These remarks speak to a strong desire for intergenerational connection and, importantly, to participants’ recognition that they could learn and contribute across generations.

In response to a question about expectations for the project, participant F remarked: “I had no expectations because I didn’t know, it was uncertain what you were going to bring us, but by being in the program and learning everything you taught us… you made us creative.” The shift from uncertainty to creativity suggests that the scaffolded nature of storytelling workshops opened new creative possibilities for participants that challenged them to think differently about themselves as storytellers. This idea of newly realized creative contributions was especially prominent in the participants’ reflections on fictitious storytelling. For example, Participant D stated, “We older adults have enough capacity to create fictitious, imaginary things to feel better and to make our younger generations feel better.” She also remarked later “I don’t feel that I am old” and reminded the rest of the group to “never let your inner child die.” In addition to addressing the creative capacities in later life, this assertion repositions the learner as an imaginative agent capable of both self-expression and intergenerational contribution. Affirmation of the ongoing vitality and social relevance of older adults was further echoed by participant G who stated: “We can give a lot to the world because life is not over yet; it ends when we close our eyes” as this learner challenged the perception that aging limits creativity and capacity to contribute.

Temporal Transcendence

The storytelling work connected participants’ pasts and imagined futures. For many, the act of storytelling revived personal and familial memories which re-situated them within broader generational narratives as participant B remarked, “To remember is to live again.” This poetic reflection captures the restorative dimension of storytelling. For some, storytelling became a vehicle for processing existential questions and making sense of an unprecedented global event as the participants reconnected with meaningful past experiences unavailable due to social isolation. Through this recollection they were able to experience a sense of emotional and spiritual re-interpretation of their lives; as one participant remarked: “This pandemic came to teach us more, above all, the fear of God.” Over time, they described the program as strengthening, uplifting, and even a way to temporarily “forget about the pandemic” (participant Y). Participant E reflected, “It taught us a lot and, in remembering our ancestors, our family and everything, it made us remember all of that… That was very beautiful.” This quote illustrates how storytelling activities served as a bridge between past and present, thus offering participants a way to honor their cultural heritage. Another participant reinforced the temporal layering of their experience in the workshops by indicating that as an intentional space for reminiscence the workshop allowed memories that might otherwise fade to be reactivated and affirmed.

While memory and reflection were central themes, participants also looked ahead as exemplified by this quote from one participant: “It would be wonderful to write fictional stories, but about the future, focusing on positive things, on positive aspects.” This forward-looking perspective expands the purpose of storytelling in later life beyond nostalgia and positions this practice as a generative force that allows older adults to articulate hope, creativity, and vision for what lies ahead.

Discussion

A central principle of geragogy is that learning in later life must be relational (Findsen & Formosa, 2012). The findings of this paper speak to recognizing older adults’ needs of being in community, especially evident in the time of social isolation. As the pandemic exacerbated social isolation, relational learning became even more critical. Participants reflected that joining the storytelling project helped them counteract loneliness and see each other as full members of their learning community.

While this project did not specifically consider working with youth, many participants spoke of wanting to connect with younger generations and explore new ideas through future-oriented intergenerational dialogue. Such expectations directly counter the stereotype that older adults are primarily oriented toward decline or nostalgia. Research has shown that authentic stories created by older adults can elicit empathy in younger audiences (Sljivic et al., 2021). Similarly, by imaging intergenerational connection, participants validated their life experiences as valuable knowledge to be shared. Further research could investigate if storytelling via Zoom and other communication platforms would encourage some form of age-positive intergenerational learning.

Tension between structure and adaptability presents a recurring challenge for curriculum development. Much of the geragogical literature speaks to the importance of the learning environments (Ahmad et al., 2022; Creech & Hallam, 2015; Gates & Wilson-Menzfeld, 2022), especially arguing for the nuance of objectives depending on the needs of the learner group (Maderer & Skiba, 2006) and suggests that older adults often prefer structured learning environments with clear activities and guidance. However, data from this study suggests that learning environments must remain flexible and incorporate diverse activities and learner contributions. In this paper, co-creation has been suggested as one way to reconcile these demands, as it retains a recognizable structure while allowing learners to shape content and activities in ways that reflect their needs and experiences. For example, an important insight from the process of co-development of the curriculum was participants expressed a strong desire to learn how to become better storytellers. This was evident in their request to offer mini lectures on narrative techniques. Indeed, several participants emphasized that despite joining the project to mitigate isolation, they also learned new skills which made them more confident creatives. In fact, participants noted skill-building, gained knowledge and techniques to evoke past lives as important outcomes of the project.

A critical geragogical perspective actively challenges ageist assumptions that depict older adults as passive, dependent, or lacking in learning potential. Similarly, participants in the study actively constructed anti-ageist narratives and spoke about themselves and each other as capable and creative individuals. However, they were interested in developing their capacity as creatives and storytellers. This desire to learn and apply new skills disrupted ageist stereotypes that might surround learning in later life: they asserted their ongoing motivation and capacity to learn, challenged idea of detrimental cognitive decline, and reclaimed learning as a valued activity in their lives. This aligns with the critical geragogical perspective of Formosa (2012), which emphasizes the importance of education in reinforcing self-determination of older learners. Rather than being passive recipients of instruction, participants in this study used their past learning experiences to actively share aprirations for future programming. Further, the importance of creating counter narratives to understanding aging solely as the time of decline becomes even more central as participants’ reflections illustrate that storytelling-based curriculum invited emotional imaginative work, while also functioning as an affirming and generative space.

Storytelling was chosen by the participants with the broader goal of sustaining a sense of community amid the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns. Research has argued that narrative work can help older adults process memories and generate wisdom (Kenyon, 2003) and feel validated (Hausknecht et al., 2019). In addition, narrative learning formats that specially involve memory work and reminiscence can also help older learner express emotions in a creative way (Balyasnikova & Gillard, 2018) and stimulate cognition (Greenwood-Hickman et al., 2021). The benefits of storytelling were further corroborated by the participants in this study who noted that storytelling helped them explore personal histories and emotions related to significant moments in their lives. Importantly, storytelling workshops acted not only as spaces to learn new skills and connect with each other, but also as spaces that connected participants to their imagined futures. This was particularly relevant in the case of this research as older adults navigated the pandemic-related disruptions, using narrative to make sense of their experiences and maintain social connections. Taken together, data demonstrate how storytelling operated across temporal dimensions and anchored participants in their familial and cultural pasts, provided emotional sustenance in the present, and opened imaginative pathways toward positive futures. As such, storytelling in this context functioned as both remembrance and reimagining, affirming the enduring agency of older adults as they narrate and shape their lives across time.

Based on the insights from the analysis, following suggestions to guide creative programming are offered:

(1) Build the programming on an explicit anti-ageist foundation by affirming older adults’ capacity for creativity and learning.

(2) Ensure that participants’ learning experiences shape the co-development of curriculum through ongoing feedback.

(3) Incorporate experimentation with different creative forms and opportunities to learn and apply new skills in practice.

(4) Support participants not only in revisiting past experiences but also in future-oriented envisioning.

In recommendations to program staff, participants further suggested having additional time for socialization, patient instructors, and expert guest speakers, including fictional narrative work, memory-focused activities, and opportunities to publish their stories.

Conclusion

This paper described a process and impact of co-designing storytelling curriculum with older immigrant adults. Conducted in the time of great uncertainty brought on by COVID-19 pandemic, the study was small in scale and context-specific. It involved participants from a single Spanish-speaking group, all of whom were already connected and used to learning together. Data were generated by the group and the analysis aimed to surface shared insights rather than evaluate outcomes in a measurable way. These methodological choices, alongside the co-facilitation model and the language-specific context, limit generalizability of the findings.

Despite the acknowledged limitations, the practices described here may serve as a resource for professionals, especially working in community-based settings. Unlike many educational programs for older adults, the curriculum was co-designed with the learners and included a peer mentor from within the group. Analysis suggests that for many participants, this format offered a space for connection, reflection, and pause amid the disorientation of the pandemic. These findings point to new possibilities for designing inclusive and participatory learning environments.

This project uniquely demonstrates that even basic online formats (e.g., Zoom) can create meaningful and impactful learning environments. Regardless of platform for delivery, storytelling remains a promising, layered strategy for later life education. Future research might extend this work to see how scaffolded teaching of storytelling could support mental health, facilitate intergenerational communication, and resource advocacy led by older adults themselves. Longitudinal or comparative studies could explore how collaborative storytelling practices might be scaled or institutionalized to serve broader populations of older adults.

Footnotes

ORCID iD

Natalia Balyasnikova

Funding

The author disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This project was supported by New Horizons for Seniors; Employment and Social Development Canada grant (017429143), provided by the Government of Canada.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

IRB Approval

IRB protocol Certificate #: e2021-187

Notes

References

Ahmad

N. A.

Abd Rauf

M. F.

Mohd Zaid

N. N.

Zainal

Tengku Shahdan

T. S.

Abdul Razak

F. H.

(2022). Effectiveness of instructional strategies designed for older adults in learning digital technologies: A systematic literature review. SN Computer Science, 3(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01016-0

Alexandrakis

Chorianopoulos

Tselios

(2020a). Digital storytelling experiences and outcomes with different recording media: An exploratory case study with older adults. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 38(4), 352–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2020.1796893

Alexandrakis

Chorianopoulos

Tselios

(2020b). Older adults and web 2.0 storytelling technologies: Probing the technology acceptance model through an age-related perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(17), 1623–1635. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1735589

Balyasnikova

Gillard

(2018). I love to write my Story: Storytelling and its role in seniors’ language. Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.56105/cjsae.v30i2.5428

Bossio

McCosker

Schleser

Davis

Randjelovic

(2023). Not that old person: Older people’s responses to ageism revealed through digital storytelling. Journal of Sociology, 59(1), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833211040111

Bruce-Golding

Brown

Alexander

Sharma

(2023). Cultural networking, storytelling, and zoom during the COVID-19 pandemic: Conversations with african-caribbeans on using a decolonized digital arts-based educational platform. In The routledge companion to decolonizing art, craft, and visual culture education (1st ed., pp. 147–156). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003190530-21

Buckley

McCormack

Ryan

(2014). Valuing narrative in the care of older people: A framework of narrative practice for older adult residential care settings. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 23(17–18), 2565–2577. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12472

Cerezo

Coma-Roselló

Aguelo

Blasco-Serrano

A. C.

Garrido

M. Á.

(2024). Exploring intergenerational interactions through an online storytelling experience. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 157–170.

Chen

Buckingham

(2025). The English-language learning difficulties of older migrants in New Zealand: A life course perspective. Educational Gerontology, 51(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2024.2382878

10.

Creech

Hallam

(2015). Critical geragogy: A framework for facilitating older learners in community music. London Review of Education, 13(1), 43–57.

11.

Employment and Social Development Canada . (2022). Social isolation of seniors – Supplement: Immigrant and refugee seniors. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/corporate/seniors-forum-federal-provincial-territorial/social-isolation-immigrant-refugee.html

12.

Findsen

Formosa

(2012) Lifelong learning in later life (7). Springer Science & Business Media.

13.

Formosa

(2002). Critical gerogogy: Developing practical possibilities for critical educational gerontology. Education and Ageing, 17(1), 73–86.

14.

Formosa

(2012). Critical geragogy: Situating theory in practice. Educational Gerontology, 38(1), 1–14.

15.

Gates

J. R.

Wilson-Menzfeld

(2022). What role does geragogy play in the delivery of digital skills programs for middle and older age adults? A systematic narrative review. Journal of Applied Gerontology: The Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 41(8), 1971–1980. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648221091236

16.

Glendenning

Battersby

(1990). Why we need educational gerontology and education for older adults: A statement of first principles. In Glendenning

Percy

(Eds.), Ageing, education and society: Readings in educational gerontology (pp. 219–231): Association for Educational Gerontology.

17.

Gómez

D. R.

(2015). Critical geragogy and foreign language learning: An exploratory application. Educational Gerontology, 42(2), 136–143.

18.

Greenwood-Hickman

M. A.

Dahlquist

Cooper

Holden

McClure

J. B.

Mettert

K. D.

Perry

S. R.

Rosenberg

D. E.

(2021). “They're going to zoom it”: A qualitative investigation of impacts and coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic among older adults. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 679976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.679976

19.

Hachem

(2020). Is there a need for a fourth statement? An examination of the critical and humanist statements of educational gerontology principles. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 39(5-6), 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2020.1801869

20.

Hachem

Westberg

(2023). On older learners’ naïveté: An examination of the emancipatory function of critical older adult education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 42(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2022.2152117

21.

Hausknecht

Vanchu-Orosco

Kaufman

(2019). Digitising the wisdom of our elders: Connectedness through digital storytelling. Ageing and Society, 39(12), 2714–2734. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x18000739

22.

Heath

Hindmarsh

Luff

(2010). Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. Sage.

23.

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada . (2017). Landings data [database]. https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/reports-statistics/statistics-open-data.html

24.

Islam

M. K.

Gilmour

(2023). Immigrant status and loneliness among older Canadians (catalogue no. 82-003-X). Health Reports, 34(7), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202300700001-eng

25.

Johnson

Bacsu

McIntosh

Jeffery

Novik

(2019). Social isolation and loneliness among immigrant and refugee seniors in Canada: A scoping review. International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care, 15(3), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmhsc-10-2018-0067

26.

Kenyon

(2003). Telling and listening to stories: Creating a wisdom environment for older people. Generations, 27(3), 30–33.

27.

Kenyon

(2005). Holocaust stories and narrative gerontology. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 60(3), 249–254. https://doi.org/10.2190/UEV1-PWF7-FUEY-TDJE

28.

Langer

(2016). The power of storytelling and the preservation of memories. Educational Gerontology, 42(11), 739. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2016.1231515

29.

Leshem

Harel

(2023). A patchwork quilt: Drama therapy and life-stories group with older adults. GeroPsych, 37(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000325

30.

(2022). Navigating through the narrative montages: Including voices of older adults with dementia through collaborative narrative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–13.

31.

Lim

W. M.

Bowman

(2022). Aging and COVID-19: Lessons learned. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 46(4), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2022.2132602

32.

Maderer

Skiba

(2006). Integrative geragogy: Part 1: Theory and practice of a basic model. Educational Gerontology, 32(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270500388158

33.

Mager

(2019). Storytelling contributes to resilience in older adults. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 43(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2018.1448669

34.

Patton

M. Q.

(2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Sage.

35.

Salma

Salami

(2020). “Growing old is not for the weak of heart”: Social isolation and loneliness in Muslim immigrant older adults in Canada. Health & Social Care in the Community, 28(2), 615–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12894

36.

Schoales

Jones

Jones-Bonofiglio

Stroink

(2020). Older adults’ experience of digital storytelling on the perceptions of wellbeing. The Journal of the Canadian Gerontological Nursing Association, 41(1), 28113.

37.

Shapira

Yeshua-Katz

Cohn-Schwartz

Aharonson-Daniel

Sarid

Clarfield

A. M.

(2021). A pilot randomized controlled trial of a group intervention via zoom to relieve loneliness and depressive symptoms among older persons during the COVID-19 outbreak. Internet Interventions, 24, 100368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2021.100368

38.

Sidani

Northwood

Sethi

Zhuang

Z. C.

Edhi

(2022). Social isolation and loneliness in older immigrants during COVID-19: A scoping review. International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care, 18(2), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmhsc-08-2021-0071

39.

Sierra-Heredia

Tayyar

Bozorgi

Thakore

Hagos

Carrillo

Machado

Peterson

Goldenberg

Wiedmeyer

M. L.

Lavergne

M. R.

(2024). Growing inequities by immigration group among older adults: Population-based analysis of access to primary care and return to in-person visits during the COVID-19 pandemic in British Columbia, Canada. BMC Primary Care, 25(1), 332. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02530-1

40.

Sljivic

Sutherland

Stannard

Ioppolo

Morrisby

(2021). Changing attitudes towards older adults: Eliciting empathy through digital storytelling. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 43(3), 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2021.1900838

41.

Smart

Eastwood

Nash

Vaculik

C. L.

(2022). Untold stories - The art of imagination in later life: Storytelling and multi-modal arts psychotherapy on an older adult inpatient mental health ward. In Integrative arts psychotherapy (1st ed., pp. 153–167). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003155676-16

42.

Stargatt

Bhar

Bhowmik

Al Mahmud

(2019). Implementing digital storytelling for health-related outcomes in older adults: Protocol for a systematic review. JMIR Research Protocols, 8(12), e15512. https://doi.org/10.2196/15512

43.

Stončikaitė

(2023). The ‘inside’of ageing: Autoethnography in critical geragogy. Educational Gerontology, 49(9), 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2022.2161036

44.

Wada

Canham

S. L.

(2025). Resilience in Japanese older immigrants in Canada and the role of community support during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 40(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-025-09526-z

45.

Wang

Liu

J. K. K.

Walsh

C. A.

(2021). Identities: Experiences and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspectives of older Chinese immigrants in Canada. China Journal of Social Work, 14(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2021.1923544

46.

Withnall

(2006). Exploring influences on later life learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370500309477

47.

(2020). Social isolation and loneliness among older adults in the context of COVID-19: A global challenge. Global Health Research and Policy, 5(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-020-00154-3

48.

Zhu

Zhang

(2019). Active learning for active ageing: Chinese senior immigrants’ lifelong learning in Canada. Educational Gerontology, 45(8), 506–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2019.1662933

49.

Zhu

Zhang

(2025). Intergenerational learning for active aging amid the pandemic: Chinese immigrant seniors' online learning in Canada. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 65(1), 34–60.