This study examined how older adults engage with socially assistive robots (SARs) using a mixed-methods approach that integrated survey data, behavioral logs, and conversational data. Among 191 participants aged 65 and older, 40.8% actively interacted with the Hyodol SAR. Discriminant analysis identified education level, life satisfaction, and early usage frequency as key predictors of engagement. K-means clustering revealed three distinct user profiles: Social Engagers, who prioritized emotional connection despite low self-esteem; Independent Reflectors, who exhibited self-sufficiency with minimal social interaction; and Emotionally Expressive Users, who formed strong emotional bonds with the Hyodol SAR. In the predictive models, religious affiliation and marital status were key indicators for Social Engagers; smartphone proficiency and Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) for Independent Reflectors; and subjective health status for Emotionally Expressive Users.
AbdollahiH.MahoorM. H.ZandieR.SiewierskiJ.QuallsS. H. (2022). Artificial emotional intelligence in socially assistive robots for older adults: A pilot study. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.11167
2.
BulgaroA.Liberman-PincuE.Oron-GiladT. (2022). Bridging the gap: Generating a design space model of Socially assistive robots (SARs) for older adults using participatory design (PD). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.10990
3.
ChenS. C.MoyleW.JonesC.PetskyH. (2020) (In thisissue). A social robot intervention on depression, loneliness, and quality of life for Taiwanese older adults in long-term care. International Psychogeriatrics, 32(8), 981–991. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610220000459
4.
CzajaS. J.BootW. R.CharnessN.RogersW. A.SharitJ. (2018). Improving social support for older adults through technology: Findings from the PRISM randomized controlled trial. The Gerontologist, 58(3), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw249
5.
FelberN. A.AlaviH.MugelliniE.WangmoT. (2024). The smart home, a true home? How new technologies disrupt the experience of home for older persons. Universal Access in the Information Society, 24(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-024-01114-1
6.
GhoshR.KhanN.MigovichM.TateJ. A.MaxwellC.LatshawE.SarkarN. (2024). User-centered design of socially assistive robotic combined with non-immersive virtual reality-based dyadic activities for older adults residing in long term care facilities. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.21197
7.
HeH.GarciaE. A. (2009). Learning from imbalanced data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(9), 1263–1284. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2008.239
8.
HinzA.Mehnert-TheuerkaufA.GlaesmerH.SchroeterM. L.TibubosA. N.PetrowskiK.FriedrichM. (2025). Changes in life satisfaction over six years in the general population: A longitudinal study with the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS). PloS One, 20(1), Article e0316990. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316990
9.
KhaksarW.Saplacan LindblomD.BygraveL. A.TorresenJ. (2025). Robotics in elderly healthcare: A qualitative analysis of 20 recent European research projects. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 14(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3711936
10.
KnightT.YuanX.Bennett GayleD. (2024). Illuminating privacy and security concerns in older adults’ technology adoption. Work, Aging and Retirement, 10(1), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waac032
11.
LeeE. H.KangE. H.KangH. J.LeeH. Y. (2023). Measurement invariance of the patient health questionnaire-9 depression scale in a nationally representative population-based sample. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1217038. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1217038
12.
LeeO. E.ShinH. (2024) (In this issue). Social Workers’ Perspectives on Socially Isolated Older Adults Living with a Robot Companion. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 67(5), 621–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2024.2339974
13.
LimaM. R.WairagkarM.GuptaM.y BaenaF. R.BarnaghiP.SharpD. J.VaidyanathanR. (2021). Conversational affective social robots for ageing and dementia support. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 14(4), 1378–1397. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2021.3115228
14.
LinX. Y.MoxleyJ.SharitJ.CzajaS. J. (2025). Beyond the digital divide: Factors associated with adoption of technologies related to aging in place. Journal of Applied Gerontology: The Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 44(6), 959–969. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648251318789
15.
LuoC.YuanR.MaoB.LiuQ.WangW.HeY. (2024). Technology acceptance of socially assistive robots among older adults and the factors influencing it: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Gerontology: The Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 43(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648231202669
16.
MoisG.TrinhM. U.Afsar AliA. F.VergaraL. G. L.RogersW. A. (2023). Design considerations for a socially assistive robots in the home to support older adults. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (67(1) pp. 542–548), Columbia, USA, 23–27 October 2023. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231194324
17.
OstrowskiA. K.BreazealC.ParkH. W. (2022). Mixed-method long-term robot usage: Older adults' lived experience of social robots. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI) (pp. 33–42), 7–10 March 2022, Hokkaido, Japan. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889488
18.
PinoO.PalestraG.TrevinoR.De CarolisB. (2020) (In this issue). TheHumanoid Robot NAO as Trainer in a Memory Program for Elderly People with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Int J of Soc Robotics, 12, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00533-y
19.
SalzwedelM. H.ZuidemaS.KortH.JanusS. (2025). The role of sex and gender in the adoption of assistive technology in dementia care. Gerontechnology, 23(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.4017/GT.2024.23.S.1056.OPP
20.
SawikB.TobisS.BaumE.SuwalskaA.KropińskaS.StachnikK.Pérez-BernabeuE.CildozM.AgustinA.Wieczorowska-TobisK. (2023). Robots for elderly care: Review, multi-criteria optimization model and qualitative case study. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5287. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095287
SchroederT.DoddsL.GeorgiouA.GewaldH.SietteJ. (2023). Older adults and new technology: Mapping review of the factors associated with older adults’ intention to adopt digital technologies. JMIR Aging, 6(1), Article e44564. https://doi.org/10.2196/44564
SeongH.ResnickB.HolmesS.GalikE.BremanR. B.FortinskyR. H.ZhuS. (2024). Psychometric properties of the resilience scale in older adults post-hip fracture. Journal of Aging and Health, 36(3-4), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643231184098
25.
SorrentinoA.FioriniL.La ViolaC.CavalloF. (2023). Measuring the perception of the personalized activities with CloudIA robot. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.06481
TanC. K.LouV. W.ChengC. Y. M.HeP. C.KhooV. E. J. (2024). Improving the social well-being of single older adults using the LOVOT social robot: Qualitative phenomenological study. JMIR Human Factors, 11(1), Article e56669. https://doi.org/10.2196/56669
29.
TrinhM. U.MoisG.VergaraL. G. L.RogersW. A. (2024). Exploring potential of a socially assistive robot in facilitating daily activities for older adults. Gerontechnology, 23(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2024.23.1.1149.12
30.
VagnettiR.CampN.StoryM.Ait-BelaidK.MitraS.Fowler DavisS.ZeccaM.Di NuovoA.MagistroD. (2024). Social robots and sensors for enhanced aging at home: Mixed methods study with a focus on mobility and socioeconomic factors. JMIR Aging, 7, Article e63092. https://doi.org/10.2196/63092
31.
Van KaamA. (1967). Existential foundations of psychology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 28(1), 140–141.
32.
ZhaiB.LiuX.FuJ.ZhuX.LiJ. (2024). More cognitive gains from social activity in the oldest-old: Evidence from a 10-year longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1382141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1382141
33.
ZhangX.LinY.ZhangC. (2023). Self-reported vision loss, health status, and social participation among middle-aged and older adults—evidence from China. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 32(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2023-0005
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
