This study examined the geographical distribution of home- and community-based services (HCBS) resources in Taiwan’s Long-Term Care 2.0 policy and explored its association with the number of deaths among older adults. The main outcome of the study was determination of the number of deaths among older adults in townships (N = 346) in 2021. The results showed that home-based HCBS had a significant positive association with mortality among older adults; moreover, community-based and complementary services, which are highly clustered within a township and among its neighbors, exert a significant protective effect on mortality among older adults. Stratified analyses showed a significantly lower mortality among older adults using adult foster care and transportation services, but a significantly higher mortality among older adults using home-based professional care and respite care services, after considering the sociodemographic characteristics of older adults, urbanization, and the number of long-term care resources in the spatial analysis.
AbeK.KawachiI.TaniguchiY.TamiyaN. (2022). Municipal characteristics of in-home death among care-dependent older Japanese adults. JAMA Network Open, 5(1), Article e2142273. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42273
2.
AnselinL.SyabriI.KhoY. (2010). GeoDa: An introduction to spatial data analysis. Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Springer.
3.
ChenC. F.FuT. H. (2020). Policies and transformation of long-term care system in Taiwan. Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research, 24(3), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.20.0038
4.
ChenM. C.KaoC. W.ChiuY. L.LinT. Y.TsaiY. T.JianY. T. Z.TzengY. M.LinF. G.HwangS. L.LiS. R.KaoS. (2017). Effects of home-based long-term care services on caregiver health according to age. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 208. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0786-6
5.
ChiuT. Y.YuH. W.GotoR.LaiW. L.LiH. C.TsaiE. T.ChenY. M. (2019). From fragmentation toward integration: A preliminary study of a new long-term care policy in a fast-aging country. BMC Geriatrics, 19(1), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1172-5
6.
ChukwusaE.VerneJ.PolatoG.TaylorR.J HigginsonI.GaoW. (2019). Urban and rural differences in geographical accessibility to inpatient palliative and end-of-life (PEoLC) facilities and place of death: A national population-based study in England, UK. International Journal of Health Geographics, 18(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-019-0172-1
7.
ComberA. J.BrunsdonC.RadburnR. (2011). A spatial analysis of variations in health access: Linking geography, socio-economic status and access perceptions. International Journal of Health Geographics, 10(44), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-10-44
8.
CurtisS.Rees JonesI. (1998). Is there a place for geography in the analysis of health inequality?Sociology of Health and Illness, 20(5), 645–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00123
9.
DeardenE. K.LloydC. D.CatneyG. (2019). A spatial analysis of health status in Britain, 1991–2011. Social Science and Medicine, 220(2019), 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.014
10.
EwenH. H.WashingtonT. R.EmersonK. G.CarswellA. T.SmithM. L. (2017). Variation in older adult characteristics by residence type and use of home-and community-based services. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(3), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14030330
11.
EzzatvarY.Ramírez-VélezR.Sáez de AsteasuM. L.Martínez-VelillaN.Zambom-FerraresiF.IzquierdoM.García-HermosoA. (2021). Physical function and all-cause mortality in older adults diagnosed with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 76(8), 1447–1453. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaa305
12.
FabiusC.ShugrueN.RobisonJ. T. (2020). Outcomes associated with home and community-based service use among older adults following a nursing home transition. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 63(8), 807–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2020.1830328
13.
FaramnuaypholP.ChongsuvivatwongV.PannarunothaiS. (2011). Geographical variation of mortality in Thailand. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 91(9), 1455–1460. 18843878.
14.
GaoW.HuqueS.MorganM.HigginsonI. J. (2018). A population-based conceptual framework for evaluating the role of health care services in place of death. Health Care, 6(3), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare6030107
15.
GauglerJ. E.KaneR. L.KaneR. A.NewcomerR. (2005). Early community-based service utilization and its effects on institutionalization in dementia caregiving. The Gerontologist, 45(2), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/45.2.177
HuJ. L.ChangM. C.ChungH. J. (2020). Projecting the target quantity of medical staff in Taiwan’s administrative regions by the theory of carrying capacity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 2998. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17092998
18.
IkedaT.TsuboyaT. (2021). Place of death and density of homecare resources: A nationwide study in Japan. Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research, 25(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.21.0003
19.
KaoJ. H.WuW. C.ChowC. H.LiawH. T. (2021). The discussion of potential care needs for physically and mentally disabled citizens in Taipei city by using spatial analysis. Sustainability, 13(5), 2665–2676. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052665
20.
KataokaA.FukuiK.SatoT.KikuchiH.InoueS.KondoN.NakayaT.ItoY. (2021). Geographical socioeconomic inequalities in healthy life expectancy in Japan, 2010–2014: An ecological study. The Lancet Regional Health-Western Pacific, 14(2021), 100204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100204
21.
KimH. J.MinJ. Y.MinK. B. (2019). Successful aging and mortality risk: The Korean longitudinal study of aging (2006-2014). Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 20(8), 1013–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2018.12.010
22.
KimM. H.XiangX. (2021). Hospitalization trajectories in home-and community-based services recipients: The influence of physician and social care density. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(8), 1679–1690. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa199
23.
KuzuyaM.MasudaY.HirakawaY.IwataM.EnokiH.HasegawaJ.IguchiA. (2006). Day care service use is associated with lower mortality in community-dwelling frail older people. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 54(9), 1364–1371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00860.x
24.
LinT. Y.ChenC. Y.TsaoC. Y.HsuK. H. (2017). The association between personal income and aging: A population-based 13-year longitudinal study. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 70(2017), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2017.01.002
25.
LiuC. Y.HungY. T.ChuangY. L.ChenY. J.WengW. S.LiuJ. S.LiangK. Y. (2006). Incorporating development stratification of Taiwan townships into sampling design of large scale health interview survey. Journal of Health Management, 4(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.29805/JHM.200606.0001
26.
LiuL. F.ChenJ. J.LeeY. C.LiuC. C. (2018). Exploring the home services utilization and its influencing factors for case closures in Taiwan long-term care system. Taiwan Journal of Public Health, 37(5), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.6288/TJPH.201810_37(5).107038
27.
LuntC.DowrickC.Lloyd-WilliamsM. (2021). What is the impact of day care on older people with long-term conditions: A systematic review. Health and Social Care in the Community, 29(5), 1201–1221. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13245
28.
MelakuY. A.GillT. K.AppletonS. L.HillC.BoydM. A.AdamsR. J. (2019). Sociodemographic, lifestyle and metabolic predictors of all-cause mortality in a cohort of community-dwelling population: An 18-year follow-up of the North West Adelaide Health Study. BMJ Open, 9(8), Article e030079–e030092. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030079
Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan. (2021). Long-term care ABC tiers with GIS coordinates (XY). https://data.gov.tw/dataset/88270
32.
Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan. (2022). Service utilization and distribution of long-term care resource in local government. https://1966.gov.tw/LTC/mp-201.html
33.
MoriokaN.TomioJ.SetoT.YumotoY.OgataY.KobayashiY. (2018). Association between local-level resources for home care and home deaths: A nationwide spatial analysis in Japan. PLoS One, 13(8), Article e0201649. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201649
34.
Olivares-TiradoP.TamiyaN.KashiwagiM. (2012). Effect of in-home and community-based services on the functional status of elderly in the long-term care insurance system in Japan. BMC Health Services Research, 12(239), 239. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-239
35.
SegelmanM.SzydlowskiJ.KinosianB.McNabneyM.RazianoD. B.EngC.van ReenenC.Temkin-GreenerH. (2014). Hospitalizations in the program of all-inclusive care for the elderly. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 62(2), 320–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12637
36.
ShihC. M.WangY. H.LiuL. F.WuJ. H. (2020). Profile of long-term care recipients receiving home and community-based services and the factors that influence utilization in Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8), 2649. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082649
37.
SiconolfiD.ShihR. A.FriedmanE. M.KotziasV. I.AhluwaliaS. C.PhillipsJ. L.SalibaD. (2019). Rural-urban disparities in access to home-and community-based services and supports: Stakeholder perspectives from 14 states. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 20(4), 503–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.120
38.
SilvaV. D. L.CesseE. Â. P.de AlbuquerqueM. d. F. P. M. (2014). Social determinants of death among the elderly: A systematic literature review. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 17(Suppl 2), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4503201400060015
39.
SonnegaA.RobinsonK.LevyH. (2017). Home and community-based service and other senior service use: Prevalence and characteristics in a national sample. Home Health Care Services Quarterly, 36(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621424.2016.1268552
40.
TakahashiK.TachimoriH.KanC.NishiD.OkumuraY.KatoN.TakeshimaT. (2017). Spatial analysis for regional behavior of patients with mental disorders in Japan. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 71(4), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12488
41.
Villalobos DintransP. (2018). Do long-term care services match population needs? A spatial analysis of nursing homes in Chile. PLoS One, 13(6), Article e0199522. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199522
42.
WangW. F.SuY. Y.JhangK. M.ChenC. M. (2021). Patterns of home-and community-based services in older adults with dementia: An analysis of the long-term care system in Taiwan. BMC Geriatrics, 21(1), 290. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02231-9
43.
WangY. C.YuH. W.WuS. C.ChanS. Y.YangM. C.LeeY. C.ChenY. M. (2021). The impact of different patterns of home-and community-based services on nursing home admission: National data from Taiwan. Social Science and Medicine, 270(2021), 113679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113679
44.
WeaverR. H.RobertoK. A. (2017). Home and community-based service use by vulnerable older adults. The Gerontologist, 57(3), 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv149
World Health Organization. (2010). A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44489
47.
WuC. Y.HuH. Y.HuangN.FangY. T.ChouY. J.LiC. P. (2014). Determinants of long-term care services among the elderly: A population-based study in Taiwan. PLoS One, 9(2), Article e89213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089213
48.
WuH. C.TsengM. H. (2018). Evaluating disparities in elderly community care resources: Using a geographic accessibility and inequality index. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(7), 1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071353
49.
WuK. F.HuJ. L.ChiouH. (2021). Degrees of shortage and uncovered ratios for long-term care in Taiwan’s regions: Evidence from dynamic DEA. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020605
50.
WysockiA.ButlerM.KaneR. L.KaneR. A.ShippeeT.SainfortF. (2015). Long-term services and supports for older adults: A review of home and community-based services versus institutional care. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 27(3), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2015.1024545
51.
XuH.WeinerM.PaulS.ThomasJ.CraigB.RosenmanM.DoebbelingC. C.SandsL. P. (2010). Volume of home-and community-based Medicaid waiver services and risk of hospital admissions. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 58(1), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02614.x
52.
YangC. C.HsuehJ. Y.WeiC. Y. (2020). Current status of long-term care in Taiwan: Transition of long-term care plan from 1.0 to 2.0. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 9(8), 363–364. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2019.115
53.
YenI. H.MichaelY. L.PerdueL. (2009). Neighborhood environment in studies of health of older adults: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(5), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.022
54.
YuH. W.TuY. K.KuoP. H.ChenY. M. (2020). Use of home-and community-based services in Taiwan’s national 10-year long-term care plan. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 39(7), 722–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464818774642
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
