Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-4
The Role of Dementia and Residential Service Agency Characteristics in the Care Experiences of Maryland Medicaid Home and Community-Based Service Participants and Family and Unpaid Caregivers
In Maryland, residential service agencies deliver Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) to older adults with disabilities through direct care workers (e.g., personal care aides). Leveraging survey data from residential service agency administrators, linked to interRAI Home Care assessments for 1144 participants, we describe agency characteristics, and participant and family caregiver experiences by participant dementia status. Most (61.7%) participants experienced low social engagement, and roughly 10.0% experienced a hospitalization or emergency room visit within 90 days. Few (14.4%) participants were served by agencies requiring dementia-specific direct care worker training, and most were served by agencies offering supplemental services, or in which direct care workers helped with health information technology (81.2% and 72.8%, respectively). Few caregivers reported negative care experiences. Participants with dementia and those served by agencies with training and support more often reported negative care experiences. Findings lay the foundation for future longitudinal and embedded interventions within Medicaid HCBS.
BurgdorfJ. G.ArbajeA. I.ChaseJ. A.WolffJ. L. (2022). Current practices of family caregiver training during home health care: A qualitative study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 70(1), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17492
2.
California Long-Term Care Education Center. (2016). Care team integration and training of home care workers – impact study. California Long-Term Care Education Center.
3.
ColbyS. L.OrtmanJ. M. (2015). Projections of the US census population (9780890420256). Current Populations Report, Issue.
4.
CudjoeT. K. M.RothD. L.SzantonS. L.WolffJ. L.BoydC. M.ThorpeR. J. (2020). The epidemiology of social isolation: National health and aging trends study. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby037
5.
FabiusC. D.ShugrueN.RobisonJ. T. (2020). Outcomes associated with home and community-based service use among older adults following a nursing home transition. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 63(8), 807–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2020.1830328
6.
FabiusC. D.WolffJ. L.KasperJ. D. (2020). Race differences in characteristics and experiences of black and white caregivers of older Americans. The Gerontologist, 60(7), 1244–1253. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa042
7.
Fashaw-WaltersS.RahmanM.GeeG. C.MorV.WhiteM.ThomasK. (2022). Out of reach: Inequities in the use of high-quality home health agencies. Health Affairs, 41(2), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01408
8.
FortinskyR. H.GitlinL. N.PizziL. T.PiersolC. V.GradyJ.RobisonJ. T.MolonyS.WakefieldD. (2020). Effectiveness of the care of persons with dementia in their environments intervention when embedded in a publicly funded home- and community-based service program. Innov Aging, 4(6), Article igaa053. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa053
9.
GorgesR. J.SanghaviP.KonetzkaR. T. (2019). A national examination of long-term care setting, outcomes, and disparities among elderly dual eligibles. Health Affairs, 38(7), 1110–1118. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05409
10.
Government Accountability Office. (2016). Better information needed on nursing assistants, home health aides, and other direct care workers. Government Accountability Office
11.
HarringtonC.NgT.LaPlanteM.KayeS. H. (2012). Medicaid home- and community-based services: Impact of the affordable care act. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 24(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2012.659118
12.
HarrisP. A.TaylorR.ThielkeR.PayneJ.GonzalezN.CondeJ. G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
13.
KaneR. A.CutlerL. J. (2015). Re-imagining long-term services and supports: Towards livable environments, service capacity, and enhanced community integration, choice, and quality of life for seniors. The Gerontologist, 55(2), 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv016
14.
KasperJ. D. W.JenniferL.SkehanM. (2018). Care arrangements of older adults: What they prefer, what they have, and implications for quality of life. The Gerontologist, 59(5), 845–855. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny127
15.
KempC. L.BallM. M.PerkinsM. M. (2013). Convoys of care: Theorizing intersections of formal and informal care. Journal of Aging Studies, 27(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2012.10.002
16.
LevertonM.BurtonA.Beresford-DentJ.RapaportP.ManthorpeJ.MansourH.Guerra CeballosS.DownsM.SamusQ.DowB.LordK.CooperC. (2021). ‘You can’t just put somebody in a situation with no armour’. An ethnographic exploration of the training and support needs of homecare workers caring for people living with dementia. Dementia, 20(8), 147130122110236. https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012211023676
17.
MajerovitzS. D.MollottR. J.RudderC. (2009). We're on the same side: Improving communication between nursing home and family. Health Communication, 24(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230802606950
MorrisJ. N.BergK.FriesB. E.SteelK.HowardE. P. (2013). Scaling functional status within the interRAI suite of assessment instruments. BMC Geriatrics, 13(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-13-128
20.
MorrisJ. N.FriesB. E.FrijtersD.HirdesJ. P.SteelR. K. (2013). interRAI home care quality indicators. BMC Geriatrics, 13(1), 127. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-13-127
Ofei-DodooS.MedveneL. J.NilsenK. M.SmithR. A.DilolloA. (2015). Exploring the potential of computers to enrich home and community-based services clients' social networks. Educational Gerontology, 41(3), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2014.950491
23.
PeeblesV.BohlA. (2014). The HCBS taxonomy: A new language for classifying home- and community-based services. Medicare and Medicaid Research Review, 4(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5600/mmrr.004.03.b01
24.
ReckreyJ. M.BoernerK.FranzosaE.Bollens-LundE.OrnsteinK. A. (2021a). Paid caregivers in the community-based dementia care team : Do family caregivers benefit?Clinical Therapeutics, 43(6), 930–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.03.022
25.
ReckreyJ. M.BoernerK.FranzosaE.Bollens-LundE.OrnsteinK. A. (2021b). Paid caregivers in the community-based dementia care team: Do family caregivers benefit?Clinical Therapeutics, 43(6), 930–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.03.022
26.
ReckreyJ. M.MorrisonR. S.BoernerK.SarahS.Bollens-LundE.LeffB.OrnsteinK. A. (2020). Living in the community with dementia: Who receives paid care?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 68(1), 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16215
27.
ReckreyJ. M.TsuiE. K.MorrisonR. S.GeduldigE. T.StoneR. I.OrnsteinK. A.FedermanA. D. (2019). Beyond functional support: The range of health-related tasks performed in the home by paid caregivers in New York. Health Affairs, 38(6), 927–933. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00004
28.
ReckreyJ. M.WatmanD.TsuiE. K.FranzosaE.PerezS.FabiusC. D.OrnsteinK. A. (2022). “I am the home care agency”: The dementia family caregiver experience managing paid care in the home. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1311. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031311
29.
ResnickB.GalikE.KolanowskiA.Van HaitsmaK.EllisJ.BehrensL.FlanaganN. M.McDermottC. (2018). Reliability and validity of the care plan checklist for evidence of person-centered approaches for behavioral and psychological symptoms associated with dementia. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 19(7), 613–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.021
30.
RobisonJ.PorterM.ShugrueN.KleppingerA.LambertD. (2015). Connecticut’s ‘Money Follows the Person’ yields positive results for transitioning people out of institutions. Health Affairs, 34(10), 1628–1636. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0244
31.
RobisonJ. S.NoreenFortinskyRichard H.GrumanC. (2014). Long-term supports and services planning for the future: Implications from a statewide survey of baby boomers and older adults. The Gerontologist, 54(2), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt094
32.
RobisonJ. T.ShugrueN. A.FortinskyR. H.FabiusC. D.BakerK.PorterM.GradyJ. J. (2021). A new stage of the caregiving career: Informal caregiving after long-term institutionalization. The Gerontologist, 61(8), 1211–1220. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa185
33.
SAS Institute Inc. (2013). SAS/ACFCESS®9.4 interface to ADABAS. SAS Institute Inc.
34.
ScalesK. (2018). The direct services workforce in long-term services and supports in Maryland and the District of Columbia. PHI.
35.
SchwartzM. L.KosarC. M.MrozT. M.KumarA.RahmanM. (2019). Quality of home health agencies serving traditional Medicare vs Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. JAMA Network Open, 2(9), Article e1910622. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10622
36.
SchwartzM. L.MrozT. M.ThomasK. S. (2021). Are patient experience and outcomes for home health agencies related?Medical Care Research and Review, 78(6), 798–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558720968365
37.
ShawA. L.RiffinC. A.ShalevA.KaurH.SterlingM. R. (2020). Family caregiver perspectives on benefits and challenges of caring for older adults with paid caregivers. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 40(12), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464820959559
38.
StoneR. I.BryantN. S. (2019). The future of the home care workforce: Training and supporting aides as members of home-based care teams. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 67(S2), S444–S448. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15846
39.
The National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. (2021). Meeting the challenge of caring for persons living with dementia and their care partners and caregivers: A way forward. (Vol. 12). National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine.
40.
VandepitteS.PutmanK.Van Den NoortgateN.VerhaegheS.AnnemansL. (2019). Effectiveness of an in‐home respite care program to support informal dementia caregivers: A comparative study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 34(10), 1534–1544. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5164
41.
WolffJ. L.KimV. S.MintzS.StametzR.GriffinJ. M. (2018). An environmental scan of shared access to patient portals. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25(4), 408–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx088
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
