China launched its long-term care insurance (LTCI) program for older adults in 2016. Although the scheme has shown some promising outcomes, little is known about whether it improves subjective well-being. This study explored this topic among older persons with a disability and identified the underlying mechanisms associated with the channel of this effect using data from a national survey. The LTCI program was shown to improve the subjective well-being among older persons with a disability and this effect increased over time. The LTCI program has great positive effect among women and those who lived alone compared to their counterparts. Mechanism analysis revealed that the main channel by which the LTCI program has positive effect occurred through the satisfaction of long-term care needs and improved self-reported health. This study suggests promising benefits of the LTCI program for older Chinese adults.
BakxP.De MeijerC.SchutF.Van DoorslaerE. (2015). Going formal or informal, who cares? The influence of public long-term care insurance. Health Economics, 24(6), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3050
2.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
3.
BergA. I.HassingL. B.McClearnG. E.JohanssonB. (2006). What matters for life satisfaction in the oldest-old?Aging & Mental Health, 10(3), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860500409435
4.
CaiX.LuY.WuM.YuL. (2016). Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Journal of Development Economics, 123, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.08.003
5.
ChangS.YangW.DeguchiH. (2020). Care providers, access to care, and the long-term care nursing insurance in China: An agent-based simulation. Social Science & Medicine, 244, 112267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112667
6.
ChenL.FanH.ChuL. (2020). The double-burden effect: Does the combination of informal care and work cause adverse health outcomes among females in China?Journal of Aging and Health, 32(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264320910916
7.
ChenL.XuX. (2020). Effect evaluation of the long-term care insurance (LTCI) system on the health care of the elderly: A review. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 13, 863–875. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S270454
8.
ChoiJ. W.ParkE-C.LeeS. G.ParkS.RyuH. G.KimT. H. (2018). Does long-term care insurance reduce the burden of medical costs? A retrospective elderly cohort study. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 18(12), 1641–1646. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13536
9.
CourbageC.Montoliu-MontesG.WagnerJ. (2020). The effect of long-term care public benefits and insurance on informal care from outside the household: Empirical evidence from Italy and Spain. European Journal of Health Economics, 21(8), 1131–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-020-01215-7
10.
De ChaisemartinC.D’HaultfœuilleX.GuyonvarchY. (2021). DID_MULTIPLEGT: Stata module to estimate sharp difference‐in‐difference designs with multiple groups and periods. In Statistical software components S458643. Boston College Department of Economics. https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s458643.html
11.
De ChaisemartinC.D’HaultfoeuilleX. (2020). Two‐way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects. American Economic Review, 110(9), 2964–2996. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181169
12.
DuongP.ThanhP. (2019). Adoption and effects of modern rice varieties in Vietnam: Micro-econometric analysis of household surveys. Economic Analysis and Policy, 64, 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2019.09.006
13.
FanH.QiR.PengZ.ZhangX.CoyteP. C. (2022). The contribution of alternative types of care on life satisfaction among disabled older persons in China. Ageing and Society, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X22000101
14.
FengJ.WangZ.YuY. (2020). Does long-term care insurance reduce hospital utilization and medical expenditures? Evidence from China. Social Science & Medicine, 258(4), 113081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113081
15.
ForderJ. (2009). Long-term care and hospital utilization by older people: An analysis of substitution rates. Health Economics, 18(11), 1322–1338. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1438
16.
FuR.NoguchiH.KawamuraA.TakahashiH.TamiyaN. (2017). Spillover effect of Japanese long-term care insurance as an employment promotion policy for family caregivers. Journal of Health Economics, 56, 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.09.011
17.
García-GómezP.Hernández-QuevedoC.Jiménez-RubioD.Oliva-MorenoJ. (2015). Inequity in long-term care use and unmet need: Two sides of the same coin. Journal of Health Economics, 39, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.11.004
18.
GarrousteM.ZaiemM. (2020). School supply constraints in track choices: A French study using high school openings. Economics of Education Review, 78, 102041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.102041
19.
GaughanJ.GravelleH.SicilianiL. (2015). Testing the bed-blocking hypothesis: Does nursing and care home supply reduce delayed hospital discharges?Health Economics, 24(S1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3150
20.
HanH.GaoQ. (2020). Does welfare participation improve life satisfaction? Evidence from panel data in rural China. Journal of Happiness Study, 21(5), 1795–1822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00157-z
21.
HeA. J.ChouK. (2020) What affects the demand for long-term care insurance? A study of middle-aged and older adults in Hong Kong. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 39(4), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464818766598
22.
JeonH. S. (2017). Exploratory analyses on the effects of the national long-term care insurance: Using the Korea welfare panel study (2006–2015). Health and Social Welfare Review, 37(1), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2017.37.1.307
JungK. H.Yong-UnC.Ji-YoungK. (2011). The effects of long-term care insurance on the life satisfaction and satisfaction in family relationships: The DD method combined with propensity score matching. Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 63(4), 301–326, https://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO201109649110063.page
25.
La FerraraE.ChongA.DuryeaS. (2012). Soap operas and fertility: Evidence from Brazil. American Economic Journal-Applied Economics, 4(4), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.4.1
26.
LeeH. S. (2015). Better off after the introduction of universal long-term care insurance systems? A comparetive study of Germany, Japan, and Korea. [Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University]. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/306
27.
LeeH. S.WolfD. A. (2014). An evaluation of recent old-age policy innovations in South Korea. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 36(6), 707–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027513519112
28.
LeeT. W.YimE.ChoE.ChungJ. (2014). Cognitive function, behavioral problems, and physical function in long-term care insurance beneficiaries with dementia in South Korea: Comparison of home care and institutional care services. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 62(8), 1467–1475, https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12944
29.
LeiX.BaiC.HongJ.LiuH. (2022). Long-term care insurance and the well-being of older adults and their families: Evidence from China. Social Science & Medicine, 296(2019), 114745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114745
30.
LeiX.LinW. (2009). The new cooperative medical scheme in rural China: Does more coverage mean more service and better health?Health Economics, 18(S2), S25–S46. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1501
31.
LiY.JensenG. A. (2011). The impact of private long-term care insurance on the use of long-term care. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, 48(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.5034/inquiryjrnl_48.01.05
32.
LindgrenE.Pettersson-LidbomP.TyreforsB. (2021). The causal effect of transport infrastructure: Evidence from a new historical database (No. 1407). IFN Working Paper. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.00348
33.
LiuH.HuT. (2022). Evaluating the long-term care insurance policy from medical expenses and health security equity perspective: Evidence from China. Archives of Public Health, 80(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00761-7
MoonS.ParkH. J.SohnM. (2021). The impact of long-term care service on total lifetime medical expenditure among older adults with dementia. Social Science & Medicine, 280, 114072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114072
36.
MoserP.VoenaA.WaldingerF. (2014). German Jewish Émigrés and US invention. American Economic Review, 104(10), 3222–3255. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.10.3222
37.
ShinyaS.NakamuraJ. (2014). Can formal elderly care stimulate female labor supply? The Japanese experience. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 34, 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2014.05.006
38.
SohnM.O’CampoP.MuntanerC.ChungH.ChoiM. (2020). Has the long-term care insurance resolved disparities in mortality for older Koreans? Examination of service type and income level. Social Science & Medicine, 247(1), 112812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112812
39.
TamiyaN.NoguchiH.NishiA.ReichM. R.IkegamiN.HashimotoH.ShibuyaK.KawachiI.CampbellJ. C. (2011). Population ageing and wellbeing: Lessons from Japan’s long-term care insurance policy. Lancet, 378(9797), 1183–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61176-8
WeaverF.StearnsS. C.NortonE. C.SpectorW. (2009). Proximity to death and participation in the long-term care market. Health Economics, 18(8), 867–883. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1409
42.
WheatonF. VCrimminsE. M. (2016). Female disability disadvantage: A global perspective on sex differences in physical function and disability. Ageing & Society, 36(6), 1136–1156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X15000227
43.
World Health Organization. (2002). Active ageing: A policy framework. A contribution of the world health organization to the second united nations world assembly on ageing.
44.
XuD.SimpsonV. L. (2022). Subjective well-being, depression, and delays in care among older adults: Dual-eligible versus Medicare-only beneficiaries. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 41(1), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648211000920
45.
YuX.LiuH.YangW. (2019). Long-term care insurance’s impacts on medical expenditure-based on synthetic control research on Qingdao case. Insurance Study, 2, 114–127. https://doi.org/10.13497/j.cnki.is.2019.02.010
46.
ZengY.FengQ.GuD.VaupelJ. W. (2017). Demographics, phenotypic health characteristics and genetic analysis of centenarians in China. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 165(Pt B), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2016.12.010
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
