This study explored how working conditions influence the psychological outcomes of paid family and non-family home care workers, focusing on the interaction between institutional and recipient effects. Using data from the 2019 Korean Long-Term Care Survey (N = 998), we performed regression analyses on home care workers’ stress and turnover intention. For both types of home care-workers, inadequate working conditions and high occupational hazards influenced stress, while good working conditions and low occupational hazards influenced turnover intention. Overall, the findings suggest that wages, working hours, and work intensity must be reformed in a home care-worker-friendly manner; the wages for home care workers must be raised to a level appropriate to their care work; the services provided by home care workers should be explicitly stipulated; and, to eliminate occupational hazards, environments for fostering cordial relationships between recipients and home care workers must be developed.
BaeH.KimT. (2022). Factors affecting the turnover intention of female caregivers who provide visitin care in long-term care insurance for the elderly. Journal of Public Society, 12(3), 141–173. https://doi.org/10.21286/jps.2022.08.10.3.141
2.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
3.
ButlerS. S.Brennan-IngM.WardamaskyS.AshleyA. (2014). Determinants of longer job tenure among home care aides: What makes some stay on the job while others leave?Journal of Applied Gerontology, 33(2), 164–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464813495958
4.
ChonY.KimY. Y. (2020). Reasons for turnover intention among direct care workers in Korea’s long-term care insurance. Healthcare, 8(4), 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040395
5.
DalyM.LewisJ. (2000). The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310050030181
6.
DelpL.WallaceS. P.Geiger-BrownJ.MuntanerC. (2010). Job stress and job satisfaction: Home care Workers in a consumer-directed model of care. Health Services Research, 45(4), 922–940. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01112.x
7.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.NachreinerF.SchaufeliW. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
8.
DentonM.ZeytinogluI.KuschK.DaviesS. (2007). Market-modelled home care: Impact on job satisfaction and propensity to leave. Canadian Public Policy, 33(Supplement 1), S81–S99. https://doi.org/10.3138/G551-755V-12W7-2551
9.
FaulA. C.SchapmireT. J.D’AmbrosioJ.FeasterD.OakC. S.FarleyA. (2010). Promoting sustainability in frontline home care aides: Understanding factors affecting job retention in the home care workforce. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 22(6), 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1084822309348896
10.
FeldmanP. H.RyvickerM.EvansL. M.BarrónY. (2019). The homecare aide workforce initiative: Implementation and outcomes. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 38(2), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464817707298
11.
GreenO.AyalonL. (2018). Violations of workers’ rights and exposure to work-related abuse of live-in migrant and live-out local home care workers – a preliminary study: Implications for health policy and practice. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 7(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-018-0224-1
12.
HaS. C. (2019). The factors affecting the elderly’s preferences for types of care: Focusing on family care, professional home care, and institutional care. Social Welfare Policy, 46(2), 27–55. https://doi.org/10.15855/SWP.2019.46.2.27
13.
HanE. J.LeeJ. M.KwonJ. H.ShinS. B.LeeJ. S. (2014). Factors related to family caregivers’ burden with the community-dwelling disabled elderly under the long-term care insurance system. Health Policy and Management, 24(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2014.24.1.71
14.
HanM.KimC. (2019). A study on the specification characteristics and values of care work for the elderly. Korea Social Policy Review, 26(3), 117–147. https://doi.org/10.17000/kspr.26.3.201909.117
15.
HusseinS. (2017). We don’t do it for the money” the scale and reasons of poverty-pay among frontline long-term care workers in England. Health & Social Care in the Community, 25(6), 1817–1826. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12455
16.
JeonB.KimH. (2016). Effects of role stress on service quality of family care workers and buffering effect of occupational identity. Institute for Humanities and Social Sciences, 17(3), 583–624. https://doi.org/10.15818/IHSS.2016.17.3.583
17.
KangE. (2021). Influencing factors by type of benefit use of long-term care home benefit recipients. Public Policy Research, 38(2), 247–269. https://doi.org/10.33471/ILA.38.2.10
KarlssonN. D.MarkkanenP. K.KriebelD.GalliganC. J.QuinnM. M. (2020). That's not my job”: A mixed methods study of challenging client behaviors, boundaries, and home care aide occupational safety and health. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 63(4), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23082
20.
KimE.YangN.KimS. (2021). Factors for choosing family care work service in the Korean long-term care insurance service. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 52(4), 131–164. https://doi.org/10.16999/kasws.2021.52.4.131
21.
KimH.KwonS. (2021). A decade of public long-term care insurance in South Korea: Policy lessons for aging countries. Health Policy, 125(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.11.003
22.
KimJ.De BellisA. M.XiaoL. D. (2018). The experience of paid family-care workers of people with dementia in South Korea. Asian Nursing Research, 12(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2018.01.002
23.
KimM.ShimJ. (2011). The effect on job satisfaction of home health care workers’ stress and care receivers’ attributes. Health and Social Research, 31(4), 193–228. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2011.31.4.193
24.
KwonH.JeonH.KoJ. (2018). Why do care workers return to work?: The institutional relations and precarious work. Social Welfare Policy, 45(3), 179–212. https://doi.org/10.15855/SWP.2018.45.3.179
25.
KyungS.JangS.LeeY. (2017). A study on the care worker’s working condition and wage with public data of the NHIC. Journal of the Korean Contents Association, 17(6), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.06.339
26.
LeeE.KuH. (2020). The study on the effects of job stress of female caregivers in home-based elderly welfare center on turnover intention: Self-elasticity as a controlling variable. Journal of Industrial Convergence, 18(5), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.22678/jic.2020.18.5.054
27.
LeeH. S.KimC. (2018). Factors affecting family caregivers’ burden and depression in home-based long-term care service under the long-term care insurance system. Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing, 29(4), 530–538. https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2018.29.4.530
28.
LimJ. (2021). Characteristics of elderly care work that influence care workers’ turnover intentions. Healthcare, 9(3), 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030259
29.
LiuC.-C.LiuL.-F.ChuangS.-S. (2022). The effect of ageist behaviors on home care workers’ job satisfaction and retention in long-term care. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 41(2), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464820975598
MehtaK. K.LengT. L. (2017). Experiences of formal and informal caregivers of older persons in Singapore. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 32(3), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-017-9329-1
32.
OhY. (2021). A study on the relationship between gender inequality in care workers and women’s participation in economic activities of couples. Discourse and Policy in Social Science, 14(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.22417/dpss.2021.10.14.2.121
33.
OhY.ChunH. (2022). The analysis of factors influencing job satisfaction of caregivers: Focusing on unfair experiences. Social Science Research, 33(1), 87–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.16881/jss.2022.01.33.1.87
ParkS.KyoungS. (2022). A study of impact factors on resigning of care workers for the elderly. Korean Journal of Gerontological Social Welfare, 77(2), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.21194/kjgsw.77.2.202206.99
36.
RavenswoodK.DouglasJ.HaarJ. (2017). Physical and verbal abuse, work demands, training and job satisfaction amongst aged-care employees in the home and community sector. Labour and Industry, 27(4), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2018.1427846
37.
ScalesK. (2020). It is time to resolve the direct care workforce crisis in long-term care. The Gerontologist, 61(4), 497–504. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa116
38.
SeokJ. (2020). Vulnerability and social challenges of long-term care workers revealed in the COVID-19 phase. Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 72(4), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.20970/kasw.2020.72.4.005
39.
SmallT. F.GillespieG. L.HuttonS.DavisK. G.SmithC. R. (2022). Workplace violence prevalence and reporting in home health care: A cross sectional survey. Home Health Care Management & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/10848223221116144
40.
StoneR.WilhelmJ.BishopC. E.BryantN. S.HermerL.SquillaceM. R. (2017). Predictors of intent to leave the job among home health workers: Analysis of the national home health aide survey. The Gerontologist, 57(5), 890–899. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw075
41.
VicenteJ.McKeeK. J.MagnussonL.JohanssonP.EkmanB.HansonE. (2022). Informal care provision among male and female working carers: Findings from a Swedish national survey. Plos One, 17(3), e0263396. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263396
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
