We aimed to describe recent technologic advances in the three domains of dementia care, falls, and home supports; summarize existing literature on usability; and identify knowledge gaps.
Methods:
A comprehensive search of five databases for recent peer-reviewed publications was conducted in May 2020. Independent reviewers performed title/abstract review, full-text screening, data extraction, and study characteristic summarization.
Results:
Out of 2,696 citations, 151 articles were retrieved for full-text evaluation, after which 54 studies were included in this scoping review. For each domain, different technologies are available to enhance the health and well-being of older adults; many users deemed them usable and useful. Technologies targeted improving function, psychosocial and cognitive status, home safety, and caregiver burden. Barriers to widespread uptake include privacy concerns, suboptimal user experience, and willingness to accept assistance.
Conclusion:
Technologic innovations directed toward dementia care, fall detection, and ambient-assisted living can aid older adults “aging in place.”
AdcockM.FankhauserM.PostJ.LutzK.ZizlspergerL.LuftA. R.Guimarães, V., Schättin, A., & de BruinE. D. (2020). Effects of an in-home multicomponent exergame training on physical functions, cognition, and brain volume of older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Medicine, 6, Article 321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00321
4.
AmjadI.ToorH.NiaziI. K.PervaizS.JochumsenM.ShafiqueM.Haavik, H., & AhmedT. (2019). Xbox 360 Kinect cognitive games improve slowness, complexity of EEG, and cognitive functions in subjects with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized control trial. Games for Health Journal, 8(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2018.0029
AppelL.AppelE.BoglerO.WisemanM.CohenL.EinN.CamposJ. L. (2019). Older adults with cognitive and/or physical impairments can benefit from immersive virtual reality experiences: A feasibility study. Frontiers in Medicine, 6, Article 329. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00329
7.
AsgharI.CangS.YuH. (2018). Usability evaluation of assistive technologies through qualitative research focusing on people with mild dementia. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.034
8.
AstellA. J.BouranisN.HoeyJ.LindauerA.MihailidisA.NugentC.RobillardJ. M. (2019). Technology and dementia: The future is now. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 47(3), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1159/000497800
BaricV.AndreassenM.OhmanA.HemmingssonH. (2019). Using an interactive digital calendar with mobile phone reminders by senior people—A focus group study. BMC Geriatrics, 19(1), Article 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1128-9
11.
BatsisJ. A.ZagariaA.KotzD. F.BartelsS. J.BoatengG. G.ProctorP. O.Halter, R. J., & Carpenter-SongE. A. (2018). Usability evaluation for the Amulet Wearable Device in rural older adults with obesity. Gerontechnology, 17(3), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2018.17.3.003.00
12.
*Ben-SadounG.SaccoG.ManeraV.BourgeoisJ.KönigA.FoulonP.RobertP. (2016). Physical and cognitive stimulation using an exergame in subjects with normal aging, mild and moderate cognitive impairment. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 53(4), 1299–1314. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160268
13.
BergenG.StevensM. R.BurnsE. R. (2016). Falls and fall injuries among adults aged ≥65 years—United States, 2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 65(37), 993–998. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6537a2
14.
BerridgeC.ChanK. T.ChoiY. (2019). Sensor-based passive remote monitoring and discordant values: Qualitative study of the experiences of low-income immigrant elders in the United States. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(3), Article e11516. https://doi.org/10.2196/11516
15.
BrownE. L.RuggianoN.LiJ.ClarkeP. J.KayE. S.HristidisV. (2019). Smartphone-based health technologies for dementia care: Opportunities, challenges, and current practices. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 381(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464817723088
16.
BurnsE. R.StevensJ. A.LeeR. (2016). The direct costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults—United States. Journal of Safety Research, 58, 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2016.05.001
17.
ChaudhuriS.KnealeL.LeT.PhelanE.RosenbergD.ThompsonH.DemirisG. (2017). Older adults’ perceptions of fall detection devices. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 36(8), 915–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464815591211
18.
CohenC.KampelT.VerlooH. (2016). Acceptability of an intelligent wireless sensor system for the rapid detection of health issues: Findings among home-dwelling older adults and their informal caregivers. Patient Preference and Adherence, 10, 1687–1695. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S113805
*CostaS. E.RodriguesJ. J.SilvaB. M.IsentoJ. N.CorchadoJ. M. (2015). Integration of wearable solutions in AAL environments with mobility support. Journal of Medical Systems, 39(12), Article 184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-015-0342-z
21.
*CroffR. L.WitterP. I. V.WalkerM. L.FrancoisE.QuinnC.RileyT. C.KayeJ. A. (2019). Things are changing so fast: Integrative technology for preserving cognitive health and community history. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny069
22.
DarraghM.AhnH. S.MacDonaldB.LiangA.PeriK.KerseN.BroadbentE. (2017). Homecare robots to improve health and well-being in mild cognitive impairment and early stage dementia: Results from a scoping study. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 18(12), 1099.e1091–1099.e1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2017.08.019
23.
DemirisG.ChaudhuriS.ThompsonH. J. (2016). Older adults’ experience with a novel fall detection device. Telemedicine and e-Health, 22(9), 726–732. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2015.0218
24.
DethlefsN.MildersM.CuayáhuitlH.Al-SalkiniT.DouglasL. (2017). A natural language-based presentation of cognitive stimulation to people with dementia in assistive technology: A pilot study. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 42(4), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2016.1255627
25.
Di RosaM.HausdorffJ. M.StaraV.RossiL.GlynnL.CaseyM.Burkard, S., & CherubiniA. (2017). Concurrent validation of an index to estimate fall risk in community dwelling seniors through a wireless sensor insole system: A pilot study. Gait & Posture, 55, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.037
26.
DjabelkhirL.WuY. H.VidalJ. S.Cristancho-LacroixV.MarlatsF.LenoirH.Carno, A., & RigaudA. S. (2017). Computerized cognitive stimulation and engagement programs in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: Comparing feasibility, acceptability, and cognitive and psychosocial effects. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 12, 1967–1975. https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.S145769
27.
DupuyL.FrogerC.ConselC.SauzéonH. (2017). Everyday functioning benefits from an assisted living platform amongst frail older adults and their caregivers. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9, Article 302. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00302
28.
EjupiA.BrodieM.LordS. R.AnnegarnJ.RedmondS. J.DelbaereK. (2017). Wavelet-based sit-to-stand detection and assessment of fall risk in older people using a wearable pendant device. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 64(7), 1602–1607. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2016.2614230
29.
EpsteinI.AligatoA.KrimmelT.MihailidisA. (2016). Older adults’ and caregivers’ perspectives on in-home monitoring technology. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 42(6), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20160308-02
30.
FarinaN.SherlockG.ThomasS.LowryR. G.BanerjeeS. (2019). Acceptability and feasibility of wearing activity monitors in community-dwelling older adults with dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 34(4), 617–624. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5064
31.
FinchM.GriffinK.PacalaJ. T. (2017). Reduced healthcare use and apparent savings with passive home monitoring technology: A pilot study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 65(6), 1301–1305. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14892
32.
*FischingerD.EinramhofP.PapoutsakisK.WohlkingerW.MayerP.PanekP.Hofmann, S., Koertner, T., Weiss, A., Argyros, A., & VinczeM. (2016). Hobbit, a care robot supporting independent living at home: First prototype and lessons learned. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75(Pt. A), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2014.09.029
33.
ForsythK.HendersonC.DavisL.Singh RoyA.DunkB.CurnowE.HowardR. (2019). Assessment of need and practice for assistive technology and telecare for people with dementia—The ATTILA (assistive technology and telecare to maintain independent living at home for people with dementia) trial. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions, 5, 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2019.07.010
34.
GanesanB.GowdaT.Al-JuamilyA.FongK. N. K.MeenaS. K.TongR. K. Y. (2019). Ambient assisted living technologies for older adults with cognitive and physical impairments: A review. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 23(23), 10470–10481. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_201912_19686
35.
GelonchO.RiberaM.Codern-BovéN.RamosS.QuintanaM.ChicoG.CerullaN.LafargaP.RadevaP.GaroleraM. (2019). Acceptability of a lifelogging wearable camera in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A mixed-method study. BMC Geriatrics, 19(1), Article 110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1132-0
36.
GiovagnoliA. R.ManfrediV.SchifanoL.PaterliniC.ParenteA.TagliaviniF. (2018). Combining drug and music therapy in patients with moderate Alzheimer’s disease: A randomized study. Neurological Sciences, 39(6), 1021–1028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-018-3316-3
37.
HalcombE.PurcellR.HickmanL.SmythE. (2016). Telemonitoring is acceptable amongst community dwelling older Australians with chronic conditions. Collegian, 23(4), 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2015.09.007
38.
HattinkB. J.MeilandF. J.Overmars-MarxT.de BoerM.EbbenP. W.van BlankenM.Verhaeghe, S., Stalpers-Croeze, I., Jedlitschka, A., Flick, S. E., Leeuw, J. V. D., Karkowski, I., & DröesR. M. (2016). The electronic, personalizable Rosetta system for dementia care: Exploring the user-friendliness, usefulness and impact. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 11(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2014.932022
39.
JangI.-Y.KimH. R.LeeE.JungH.-W.ParkH.CheonS.-H.Lee, Y. S., & ParkY. R. (2018). Impact of a wearable device-based walking programs in rural older adults on physical activity and health outcomes: Cohort study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(11), Article e11335. https://doi.org/10.2196/11335
40.
JoeJ.HallA.ChiN.-C.ThompsonH.DemirisG. (2018). IT-based wellness tools for older adults: Design concepts and feedback. Informatics for Health & Social Care, 43(2), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2017.1290637
41.
KunnappillyA.MarinescuR.SeceleanuC. (2019). A model-checking-based framework for analyzing ambient assisted living solutions. Sensors, 19(22), Article 5057. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19225057
42.
*LachH. W.LorenzR. A.PalmerJ. L.KoedbangkhamJ.NoimontreeW. (2019). Home monitoring to track activity and sleep patterns among older adults: A feasibility study. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 37(12), 628–637. https://doi.org/10.1097/cin.0000000000000569
43.
LazarouI.KarakostasA.StavropoulosT. G.TsompanidisT.MeditskosG.KompatsiarisI.TsolakiM. (2016). A novel and intelligent home monitoring system for care support of elders with cognitive impairment. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 54(4), 1561–1591. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160348
44.
LiaoY. Y.TsengH. Y.LinY. J.WangC. J.HsuW. C. (2020). Using virtual reality-based training to improve cognitive function, instrumental activities of daily living and neural efficiency in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 56(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.23736/s1973-9087.19.05899-4
45.
LiberatiA.AltmanD. G.TetzlaffJ.MulrowC.GøtzscheP. C.IoannidisJ. P.Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & MoherD. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339, Article b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700
46.
*LieM. L. S.LindsayS.BrittainK. (2016). Technology and trust: Older people’s perspectives of a home monitoring system. Ageing & Society, 36(7), 1501–1525. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X15000501
47.
MacisS.LoiD.UlgheriA.PaniD.SolinasG.MannaS.Cestone, V., Guerri, D., & RaffoL. (2020). Design and usability assessment of a multi-device SOA-based telecare framework for the elderly. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 24(1), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1109/jbhi.2019.2894552
48.
MeggesH.FreieslebenS. D.JankowskiN.HaasB.PetersO. (2017). Technology for home dementia care: A prototype locating system put to the test. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions, 3(3), 332–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2017.04.004
*MitchellL. L.PetersonC. M.RudS. R.JutkowitzE.SarkinenA.TrostS.Porta, C. M., Finlay, J. M., & GauglerJ. E. (2020). “It’s like a cyber-security blanket”: The utility of remote activity monitoring in family dementia care. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 39(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464818760238
*MoyleW.JonesC.DwanT.OwnsworthT.SungB. (2019). Using telepresence for social connection: Views of older people with dementia, families, and health professionals from a mixed methods pilot study. Aging & Mental Health, 23(12), 1643–1650. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1509297
53.
*NishiuraY.NiheiM.Nakamura-ThomasH.InoueT. (2019). Effectiveness of using assistive technology for time orientation and memory, in older adults with or without dementia. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1650299
54.
PetersenJ. D.SiersmaV. D.ChristensenR. D.StorsveenM. M.NielsenC. T.WaldorffF. B. (2018). The risk of fall accidents for home dwellers with dementia—A register- and population-based case-control study. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions, 10, 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2018.05.004
55.
PhamM. T.RajićA.GreigJ. D.SargeantJ. M.PapadopoulosA.McEwenS. A. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1123
56.
PietrzakE.CoteaC.PullmanS. (2014). Does smart home technology prevent falls in community-dwelling older adults: A literature review. Informatics in Primary Care, 21(3), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v21i3.64
57.
PiginiL.BoviG.PanzarinoC.GowerV.FerratiniM.AndreoniG.Sassi, R., Rivolta, M. W., & FerrarinM. (2017). Pilot test of a new personal health system integrating environmental and wearable sensors for telemonitoring and care of elderly people at home (SMARTA Project). Gerontology, 63(3), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1159/000455168
58.
PinoM.BoulayM.JouenF.RigaudA. S. (2015). “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 7, Article 141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141
59.
PolM.van NesF.van HartingsveldtM.BuurmanB.de RooijS.KröseB. (2016). Older people’s perspectives regarding the use of sensor monitoring in their home. The Gerontologist, 56(3), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu104
60.
RantzM.LaneK.PhillipsL. J.DespinsL. A.GalambosC.AlexanderG. L.Koopman, R. J., Hicks, L., Skubic, M., & MillerS. J. (2015). Enhanced registered nurse care coordination with sensor technology: Impact on length of stay and cost in aging in place housing. Nursing Outlook, 63(6), 650–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2015.08.004
61.
*RobertP.ManeraV.DerreumauxA.MontesinoM. F. Y.LeoneE.FabreR.BourgeoisJ. (2020). Efficacy of a web app for cognitive training (MeMo) regarding cognitive and behavioral performance in people with neurocognitive disorders: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.2196/17167
62.
*RohrbachN.GuldeP.ArmstrongA. R.HartigL.AbdelrazeqA.SchröderS.NeuseJ.GrimmerT.Diehl-SchmidJ.HermsdörferJ. (2019). An augmented reality approach for ADL support in Alzheimer’s disease: A crossover trial. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 16(1), Article 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0530-z
63.
SaadehW.ButtS. A.AltafM. A. B. (2019). A patient-specific single sensor IoT-based wearable fall prediction and detection system. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 27(5), 995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2019.2911602
64.
*SejunaiteK.LanzaC.GandersS.IljaitschA.RiepeM. W. (2017). Augmented reality: Sustaining autonomous way-finding in the community for older persons with cognitive impairment. Journal of Frailty & Aging, 6(4), 206–211. https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2017.25
65.
SerinoS.PedroliE.TuenaC.De LeoG.Stramba-BadialeM.GouleneK.Mariotti, N. G., & RivaG. (2017). A novel virtual reality-based training protocol for the enhancement of the "mental frame syncing" in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease: A development-of-concept trial. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9, Article 240. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00240
66.
SilvaA. R.PinhoM. S.MacedoL.MoulinC.CaldeiraS.FirminoH. (2017). It is not only memory: Effects of sensecam on improving well-being in patients with mild Alzheimer disease. International Psychogeriatrics, 29(5), 741–754. https://doi.org/10.1017/s104161021600243x
67.
SonH.KimH. (2019). A pilot study to test the feasibility of a home mobility monitoring system in community-dwelling older adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(9), Article 1512. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091512
68.
ThiloF. J. S.HahnS.HalfensR. J. G.ScholsJ. (2019). Usability of a wearable fall detection prototype from the perspective of older people-A real field testing approach. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(1–2), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14599
69.
van BoekelL. C.WoutersE. J. M.GrimbergB. M.van der MeerN. J. M.LuijkxK. G. (2019). Perspectives of stakeholders on technology use in the care of community-living older adults with dementia: A systematic literature review. Healthcare, 7(2), Article 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7020073
70.
WilesJ. L.LeibingA.GubermanN.ReeveJ.AllenR. E. (2012). The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr098
71.
*WoltersM. K.KellyF.KilgourJ. (2016). Designing a spoken dialogue interface to an intelligent cognitive assistant for people with dementia. Health Informatics Journal, 22(4), 854–866. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458215593329
WuY.-H.Cristancho-LacroixV.FassertC.FaucounauV.de RotrouJ.RigaudA. S. (2016). The attitudes and perceptions of older adults with mild cognitive impairment toward an assistive robot. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 35(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464813515092
75.
Zając-LamparskaL.Wiłkość-DębczyńskaM.WojciechowskiA.PodhoreckaM.Polak-SzabelaA.WarchołŁ.Kędziora-Kornatowska, K., Araszkiewicz, A., & IzdebskiP. (2019). Effects of virtual reality-based cognitive training in older adults living without and with mild dementia: A pretest-posttest design pilot study. BMC Research Notes, 12(1), Article 776. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4810-2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
