Abstract
Despite its importance, research on geometry learning among students with specific learning disabilities remains limited. This study interviewed three students with specific learning disabilities to examine their errors in learning the Pythagorean theorem and to analyze their geometric thinking levels based on the van Hiele model. Errors were categorized as conceptual, procedural, representational, computational, and nonsystematic. Conceptual errors, involving misunderstandings of key terminology, and representational errors, reflecting difficulties in translating verbal descriptions into diagrams, were mainly linked to Level 1 (visualization). Procedural errors, particularly missing steps such as extracting square roots, were associated with Level 2 (analysis). Computational errors involved incorrect calculations, whereas nonsystematic errors included guessing solutions and misreading questions. Despite these challenges, students demonstrated flexible reasoning. The findings identify specific breakdowns in geometric thinking and suggest implications for targeted instructional support.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
