Because reading comprehension is an important skill that many students struggle with, there is an urgent need to foster it. Few studies have investigated effective comprehension practices within a response-to-intervention design. Therefore, this study investigated the impact of a Tier 1 intervention implemented for 10 weeks on 491 Flemish fifth and sixth graders’ reading comprehension, strategy use, and motivation by means of multilevel analyses. The Tier 1 intervention included four effective comprehension practices: strategy instruction, peer-mediated instruction, reading motivation promotion, and differentiated instruction. Results revealed no significant effects on reading comprehension, but experimental condition students increased significantly more on recreational autonomous and controlled motivation and on monitoring strategies than students in the control condition. Furthermore, struggling experimental condition students reported using significantly more monitoring and evaluating strategies than their counterparts in the control condition.
Al OtaibaS.AllorJ.OrtizM.GreulichL.WanzekJ.TorgesenJ. (2015). Tier 3 primary grade reading interventions: Can we distinguish necessary from sufficient? In Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of multi-tiered systems of support (2nd ed., pp. 389–404). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_23
2.
AlzahraniT.LekoM. (2018). The effects of peer tutoring on the reading comprehension performance of secondary students with disabilities: A systematic review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2017.1302372
BerkeleyS.RiccominiP. J. (2013). QRAC-the-Code: A Comprehension monitoring strategy for middle school social studies textbooks. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(2), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411409412
5.
BlanchS.DuranD.ValdebenitoV.FloresM. (2013). The effects and characteristics of family involvement on a peer tutoring programme to improve the reading comprehension competence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0104-y
6.
BoakyeN. A. (2017). Exploring students’ reading profiles to guide a reading intervention programme. English Language Teaching, 10(7), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n7p158
7.
BoardmanA. G.BoeléA. L.KlingnerJ. K. (2018). Strategy instruction shifts teacher and student interactions during text-based discussions. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.191
8.
BogaertR.MerchieE.AesaertK.Van KeerH. (2021). Development of a progress monitoring tool for upper primary students’ reading comprehension. In EARLI 2021, 19th biennial EARLI conference, abstracts (p. 121). EARLI. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8718983
9.
BogaertR.MerchieE.RosseelY.Van KeerH. (2022). Development of the Reading Comprehension Strategies Questionnaire (RCSQ) for late elementary school students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13:1016761. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016761
10.
BondieR. S.DahnkeC.ZushoA. (2019). How Does Changing “One-size-fits-all” to differentiated instruction affect teaching?Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 336–362. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821130
11.
BouwerR.KosterM.van den BerghH. (2018). Effects of a strategy-focused instructional program on the writing quality of upper elementary students in the Netherlands. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000206
12.
BråtenI.MaglianoJ. P.SalmerónL. (2020). Concurrent and task-specific self-reports. In DinsmoreD. L.FryerL. K.ParkinsonM. M. (Eds.), Handbook of strategies and strategic processing: Conceptualization, intervention, measurement, and analysis (1st ed., pp. 275–295). Routledge.
13.
CainelliE.BisiacchiP. S. (2019). Diagnosis and treatment of developmental dyslexia and specific learning disabilities: Primum non nocere. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 40(7), 558–562. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000702
14.
CastlesA.RastleK.NationK. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
15.
CoubergsC.StruyvenK.VanthournoutG.EngelsN. (2017). Measuring teachers’ perceptions about differentiated instruction: The DI-Quest instrument and model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.02.004
16.
DanielJ.WilliamsK. J. (2019). Self-questioning strategy for struggling readers: A synthesis. Remedial and Special Education, 42(4), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519880338
17.
De NaeghelJ.Van KeerH. (2013). The relation of student and class-level characteristics to primary school students’ autonomous reading motivation: A multi-level approach. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(4), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2013.12000.x
18.
De NaeghelJ.Van KeerH.VansteenkisteM.HaerensL.AeltermanN. (2016). Promoting elementary school students’ autonomous reading motivation: Effects of a teacher professional development workshop. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(3), 232–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.942032
19.
De NaeghelJ.Van KeerH.VansteenkisteM.RosseelY. (2012). The relation between elementary students’ recreational and academic reading motivation, reading frequency, engagement, and comprehension: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1006–1021. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027800
20.
DesimoneL. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
21.
De SmedtF.Van KeerH. (2018). Fostering writing in upper primary grades: A study into the distinct and combined impact of explicit instruction and peer assistance. Reading and Writing, 31(2), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9787-4
22.
DoneganR. E.WanzekJ. (2021). Effects of reading interventions implemented for upper elementary struggling readers: A look at recent research. Reading and Writing, 34, 1943–1977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10123-y
23.
DukeN. K.CartwrightK. B. (2019). Implications of the DRIVE model of reading: Making the complexity of reading actionable. Reading Teacher, 73(1), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1819
24.
DukeN. K.PearsonD. P.StrachanS. L.BillmanA. K. (2011). Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension. In SamuelsS. J.FarstrupA. E. (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (4th ed., pp. 51–93). International Reading Association. https://doi.org/10.1598/0829.03
25.
EdmondsM. S.VaughnS.WexlerJ.ReutebuchC.CableA.TackettK. K.SchnakenbergJ. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 262–300. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325998
26.
FogartyM.OslundE.SimmonsD.DavisJ.SimmonsL.AndersonL.ClemensN.RobertsG. (2014). Examining the Effectiveness of a multicomponent reading comprehension intervention in middle schools: A focus on treatment fidelity. Educational Psychology Review, 26(3), 425–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9270-6
27.
FörsterN.KawohlE.SouvignierE. (2018). Short- and long-term effects of assessment-based differentiated reading instruction in general education on reading fluency and reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 56, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.009
28.
GajriaM.JitendraA. K. (2016). Effective strategies for developing reading comprehension. In SchiffR.JoshiR. M. (Eds.), Interventions in learning disabilities: A handbook on systematic training programs for individuals with learning disabilities (pp. 119–137). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31235-4_8
29.
GambrellL. B.CorbettK.HubbardK.JacquesL. A.RobertsL. (2018). Young children’s motivation to engage in social aspects of reading. In OrellanaG. P.BaldwinL. P. (Eds.), Literacy studies: Perspectives from cognitive neurosciences, linguistics, psychology and education: Reading achievement and motivation in boys and girls (pp. 99–113). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75948-7_6
30.
GhesquièreP. (2014). Actualisering van het standpunt in verband met de praktijk van attestering voor kinderen met een leerstoornis in het gewoon onderwijs [Update on the practice of attestation for children with learning disabilities in regular education]. In GhesquièreP.DesoeteA.AndriesC. (Eds.), Zorg dragen voor kinderen en jongeren met leerproblemen. Handvatten voor goede praktijk (pp. 11–19). Acco.
31.
GheyssensE.CoubergsC.Griful-FreixenetJ.EngelsN.StruyvenK. (2022). Differentiated instruction: The diversity of teachers’ philosophy and praxis to adapt teaching to students’ interests, readiness and learning profiles. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26, 1383–1400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1812739
32.
GloverT. A.VaughnS. (2011). The promise of response to intervention: Evaluating current science and practice. Guilford Press.
33.
GoldmanS. R.SnowC.VaughnS. (2016). Common themes in teaching reading for understanding: Lessons from three projects. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.586
34.
GustafsonS.SvenssonI.FälthL. (2014). Response to intervention and dynamic assessment: Implementing systematic, dynamic and individualised interventions in primary school. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 61(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2014.878538
35.
Hall-MillsS. S.MaranteL. M. (2022). Explicit text structure instruction supports expository text comprehension for adolescents with learning disabilities: A Systematic review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 45(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720906490
36.
IsraelS. E.BlockC. C.BausermanK. L.Kinnucan-WelschK. (2014). Metacognition in literacy learning. Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
JeffersonR. E.GrantC. E.SanderJ. B. (2017). Effects of Tier I differentiation and reading intervention on reading fluency, comprehension, and high stakes measures. Reading Psychology, 38(1), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2016.1235648
38.
JimersonS. R.BurnsM. K.Van Der HeydenA. M. (2016). Handbook of response to intervention (2nd ed.). Springer.
39.
JonesR. E.YsselN.GrantC. (2012). Reading instruction in Tier 1: Bridging the gaps by nesting evidence-based interventions within differentiated instruction. Psychology in the Schools, 49(3), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits
40.
JosephL. M.Alber-MorganS.CullenJ.RouseC. (2016). The effects of self-questioning on reading comprehension: A literature review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32(2), 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.891449
41.
KaminskiR. A.Powell-SmithK. A. (2017). Early literacy intervention for preschoolers who need Tier 3 support. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 36(4), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121416642454
42.
KimJ. S.HemphillL.TroyerM.ThomsonJ. M.JonesS. M.LaRussoM. D.DonovanS. (2017). Engaging Struggling adolescent readers to improve reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(3), 357–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.171
43.
KimW.Linan-ThompsonS.MisquittaR. (2012). Critical factors in reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities: A research synthesis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27(2), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2012.00352.x
44.
LiJ. T.TongF.IrbyB. J.Lara-AlecioR.RiveraH. (2021). The effects of four instructional strategies on English learners’ English reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168821994133
45.
LinJ. (2019). Factors related to EFL/ESL learners’ reading strategy use: A literature review. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 42(1), 92–112. https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2019-0006
MagnussonC. G.RoeA.Blikstad-BalasM. (2019). To what extent and how are reading comprehension strategies part of language arts instruction? A study of lower secondary classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(2), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.231
48.
MeneghettiC.De BeniR.CornoldiC. (2007). Strategic knowledge and consistency in students with good and poor study skills. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4–5), 628–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701325990
49.
MerchieE.GobynS.De BruyneE.De SmedtF.SchiepersM.VanbuelM.GhesquièreP.Van den BrandenK.Van KeerH. (2019). Effectieve, eigentijdse begrijpend leesdidactiek in het basisonderwijs. Wetenschappelijk eindrapport van een praktijkgerichte literatuurstudie [Effective contemporary reading comprehension instruction in elementary education. Scientific report of a practice-based literature review]. Vlaamse Onderwijsraad.
50.
MerchieE.TuytensM.DevosG.VanderlindeR. (2016). Evaluating teachers’ professional development initiatives: Towards an extended evaluative framework. Research Papers in Education, 33(2), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1271003
51.
MerchieE.Van KeerH. (2014). Learning from text in late elementary education. Comparing think- aloud protocols with self-reports. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1193
52.
MerchieE.Van KeerH. (2016). Stimulating graphical summarization in late elementary education: The relationship between two instructional mind map approaches and student characteristics. Elementary School Journal, 116(3), 487–522. https://doi.org/10.1086/684939
53.
MuijselaarM. M. L.SwartN. M.Steenbeek-PlantingE. G.DroopM.VerhoevenL.de JongP. F. (2017). Developmental relations between reading comprehension and reading strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
56.
Nelson-WalkerN. J.FienH.KostyD. B.SmolkowskiK.SmithJ. L. M.BakerS. K. (2013). Evaluating the effects of a systemic intervention on first-grade teachers’ explicit reading instruction. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36(4), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948712472186
57.
OkkingaM.van SteenselR.van GelderenA. J. S.van SchootenE.SleegersP. J. C.ArendsL. R. (2018). Effectiveness of reading-strategy interventions in whole classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(4), 1215–1239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9445-7
58.
PalincsarA. S.BrownA. L.MartinS. M. (1987). Peer interaction in Reading comprehension instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22(3–4), 231–253.
59.
PilonietaP.HathawayJ.MedinaA.CastoA. (2019). The impact of explicit comprehension strategy instruction on first- and second-grade at-risk students. The Journal of Education, 199(3), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057419854346
60.
PressleyM. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In KamilR. B. M. L.MosenthalP. B.PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 545–563). Lawrence Erlbaum.
61.
PressleyM.HarrisK. R. (2006). Cognitive strategies instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. In AlexanderP. A.WinneP. H. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 265–286). Lawrence Erlbaum.
62.
RasbashJ.SteeleF.BrowneW. J.GoldsteinH. (2009). A user’s guide to MLwiN (Version 2.10). Centre for Multilevel Modelling.
63.
RasinskiT. V. (2017). Readers who struggle: Why many struggle and a modest proposal for improving their reading. The Reading Teacher, 70(5), 519–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1533
64.
RitcheyK. D.PalomboK.SilvermanR. D.SpeeceD. L. (2017). Effects of an informational text reading comprehension intervention for fifth-grade students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40(2), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948716682689
65.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
66.
SchellingsG.van Hout-WoltersB. (2011). Measuring strategy use with self-report instruments: Theoretical and empirical considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9081-9
67.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.McDuffieK. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 392–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300401
68.
Shaunessy-DedrickE.EvansL.FerronJ.LindoM. (2015). Effects of differentiated reading on elementary students’ reading comprehension and attitudes toward reading. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214568718
69.
Smale-JacobseA. E.MeijerA.Helms-LorenzM.MaulanaR. (2019). Differentiated instruction in secondary education: A systematic review of research evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02366
70.
SolisM.CiulloS.VaughnS.PyleN.HassaramB.LerouxA. (2012). Reading comprehension interventions for middle school students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of 30 years of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(4), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411402691
StevensE. A.ParkS.VaughnS. (2019). A review of summarizing and main idea interventions for struggling readers in Grades 3 through 12: 1978,2016. Remedial and Special Education, 40(3), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517749940
73.
SüdkampA.KaiserJ.MöllerJ. (2012). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027627
74.
SuprayogiM. N.ValckeM.GodwinR. (2017). Teachers and their implementation of differentiated instruction in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.020
75.
SwansonE.StevensE. A.ScammaccaN. K.CapinP.StewartA. A.AustinC. R. (2017). The impact of Tier 1 reading instruction on reading outcomes for students in Grades 4,12: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 30(8), 1639–1665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9743-3
76.
SwansonE.VaughnS. (2011). Implementing a response to intervention model to improve reading outcomes for all students. In FarstrupS. A. (Ed.), What research has to say about reading instruction (4th ed., pp. 266–285). International Reading Association.
77.
TomlinsonC. A.BrightonC.HertbergH.CallahanC. M.MoonT. R.BrimijoinK.ConoverL. A.ReynoldsT. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2–3), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700203
78.
ToppingK.BuchsC.DuranD.Van KeerH. (2017). Effective peer learning: From principles to practical implementation. Routledge.
79.
ToppingK.DuranD.Van KeerH. (2016). Using peer tutoring to improve reading skills: A practical guide for teachers. Routledge.
80.
TosteJ.DidionL.PengP.FildermanM. (2020). A meta-analytic review of the relations between motivation and reading achievement for K-12 students. Review of Educational Research, 90(3), 420–456. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320919352
81.
Vaknin-NusbaumV.NevoE.BrandeS.GambrellL. (2018). Developmental aspects of reading motivation and reading achievement among second grade low achievers and typical readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(3), 438–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12117
82.
Van AmmelK.AeseartK.De SmedtF.De MeesterF.Van KeerH. (2021). An analytic description of ProjectExpert: An instructional reading program for ninth grade vocational students. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 21(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2021.21.01.10
83.
Van den BroeckW. (2010). Rijmt dyslexie op empirie of op theorie? Nieuwe inzichten over diagnose en achtergronden [Does dyslexia align with empiricism or theory? New insights on diagnosis and backgrounds]. In GeudensM.BaeyensA.SchraeyenD.MaetensK.De BrauwerK.LonckeJ. (Eds.), Jongvolwassenen met dyslexie. Diagnostiek en begeleiding in wetenschap en praktijk [Young adults with dyslexia. Diagnostics and counseling in science and practice] (pp. 59–80). Acco.
84.
van DijkT. A.KintschW. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
85.
Van KeerH.VerhaegheJ. P. (2005). Effects of explicit reading strategies instruction and peer tutoring on second and fifth graders’ reading comprehension and self-efficacy perceptions. Journal of Experimental Education, 73(4), 291–329. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.73.4.291-329
86.
VaughnS.CirinoP. T.WanzekJ.WexlerJ.FletcherJ. M.DentonC. D.BarthA.RomainM.FrancisD. J. (2010). Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2010.12087786
87.
VaughnS.KlingnerJ. K.SwansonE. A.BoardmanA. G.RobertsG.MohammedS. S.Stillman-SpisakS. J. (2011). Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 938–964. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211410305
88.
WanzekJ.VaughnS.ScammaccaN.GatlinB.WalkerM. A.CapinP. (2015). Meta-analyses of the effects of Tier 2 type reading interventions in Grades K-3. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 551–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9321-7
89.
WanzekJ.WexlerJ.VaughnS.CiulloS. (2010). Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: A synthesis of 20 years of research. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 889–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9179-5
90.
WexlerJ.ReedD. K.PyleN.MitchellM.BartonE. E. (2015). A Synthesis of peer-mediated academic interventions for secondary struggling learners. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(5), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413504997
WigfieldA.GladstoneJ. R.TurciL. (2016). Beyond cognition: Reading motivation and reading comprehension. Child Development Perspectives, 10(3), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12184
93.
WijekumarK.MeyerB. J.LeiP.BeerwinkleA. L.JoshiM. (2020). Supplementing teacher knowledge using web-based intelligent tutoring system for the text structure strategy to improve content area reading comprehension with fourth- and fifth-grade struggling readers. Dyslexia, 26, 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1634
94.
YappD. J.de GraaffR.van den BerghH. (2021). Improving second language reading comprehension through reading strategies. Journal of Second Language Studies, 4(1), 154–192. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.19013.yap
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
