Effects of an Explicit Decoding Plus Frequency Building Intervention on Word Reading Fluency for Students With Disabilities in an Urban Elementary Setting

Abstract

Students with disabilities in upper elementary grades who read well below grade level often require one-to-one intensive intervention. The following study examines the effects of a combined explicit decoding plus frequency building intervention on consonant–vowel–consonant (CVC) word reading fluency. Participants were two third-grade students and one fourth-grade student receiving special education services from an urban U.S. elementary school. Delivered during the intervention block, the students practiced 5 to 8 min per day over 8 to 9 days per word list. The multiple probe design demonstrated an experimental effect for all three participants, with significant gains revealed on individual word lists, curriculum-based assessment, and curriculum-based measurement.

Keywords

explicit decoding frequency building multi-tiered systems of support response to intervention reading fluency intensive intervention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archer

Hughes

(2011). Explicit instruction: Efficient and effective teaching. The Guilford Press.

Berninger

V. W.

Abbott

R. D.

Vermeulen

Fulton

C. M.

(2006). Paths to reading comprehension in at-risk second-grade readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 334–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390040701

Bramlett

Cates

G. L.

Savina

Lauinger

(2010). Assessing effectiveness and efficiency of academic interventions in school psychology journals: 1995-2005. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20457

Braun

Kumm

Brown

Walte

Hughes

M. T.

Maggin

D. M.

(2020). Living in Tier 2: Educators’ perceptions of MTSS in urban schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24, 1114–11129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1511758

Brosnan

Moeyaert

Brooks Newsome

Healy

Heyvaert

Onghena

Van den Noortgate

(2018). Multilevel analysis of multiple-baseline data evaluating precision teaching as an intervention for improving fluency in foundational reading skills for at risk readers. Exceptionality, 26, 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2016.1238378

Carnevale

A. P.

Smith

Melton

(2011). STEM: Science technology engineering mathematics. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.

Carnine

Silbert

Kame’enui

Slocum

Travers

(2017). Direct instruction reading (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

Clemens

N. H.

Shapiro

E. S.

Thoemmes

F. J.

(2011). Improving the efficacy of first grade reading screening: An investigation of Word Identification Fluency with other early literacy indicators. School Psychology Quarterly, 26, 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025173

Clemens

N. H.

Shapiro

E. S.

Taylor

A. B.

Caskie

G. L.

(2014). Monitoring early first-grade reading progress: A comparison of two measures. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/002219412454455

10.

Cooper

J. O.

Heron

T. E.

Heward

W. L.

(2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.

11.

Coyne

M. D.

Koriakin

T. A.

(2017). What do beginning special educators need to know about intensive reading interventions? Teaching Exceptional Children, 49, 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916688648

12.

Daly

E. J.

III Martens

B. K.

Barnett

Witt

J. C.

Olson

S. C.

(2007). Varying intervention delivery in response to intervention: Confronting and resolving challenges with measurement, instruction, and intensity. School Psychology Review, 36, 562–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2007.12087918

13.

Denton

C. A.

(2012). Response to intervention for reading difficulties in the primary grades: Some answers and lingering questions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412442155

14.

Denton

C. A.

Fletcher

J. M.

Anthony

J. L.

Francis

D. J.

(2006). An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390050601

15.

Downer

A. C.

(2007). The national literacy strategy sight recognition programme implemented by teaching assistants: A precision teaching approach. Educational Psychology in Practice, 23, 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667360701320820

16.

Ehri

L. C.

(2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In Snowling

M. J.

Hulme

(Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 135–154). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch8

17.

Elbaum

Vaughn

Hughes

M. T.

Moody

S. W.

(2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.605

18.

Engelmann

Haddox

Bruner

(2011). Teach your child to read in 100 easy lessons. Touchstone.

19.

Foorman

Beyler

Borradaile

Coyne

Denton

C. A.

Dimino

Furgeson

Hayes

Henke

Justice

Keating

Lewis

Sattar

Streke

Wagner

Wissel

(2016). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade (NCEE 2016-4008). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://whatworks.ed.gov

20.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

(2011). Using CBM for progress monitoring in reading. National Center on Student Progress Monitoring.

21.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Compton

D. L.

(2004). Monitoring early reading development in first grade: Word identification fluency versus nonsense word fluency. Exceptional Children, 71, 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407100101

22.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Malone

A. S.

(2017). The taxonomy of intervention intensity. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50, 35–43. https://doi-org.liblink.uncw.edu/10.1177/0040059917703962

23.

Gersten

Compton

Connor

C. M.

Dimino

Santoro

Linan-Thompson

Tilly

W. D.

(2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide (NCEE 2009-4045). U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Publications/practiceguides/

24.

Graham

Harris

K. R.

Zito

(2005). Promoting internal and external validity: A synergism of laboratory experiments and classroom-based research. In Phye

Robinson

D. H.

Levin

(Eds.), Experimental methods for educational intervention (pp. 235–265). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012554257-9/50012-7

25.

Griffin

C. P.

Murtagh

(2015). Increasing the sight vocabulary and reading fluency of children requiring reading support: The use of a Precision Teaching approach. Educational Psychology in Practice, 31(2), 186–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2015.1022818

26.

Gist

Bulla

A. J.

(2022) A systematic review of frequency building and precision teaching with school-aged children. Journal of Behavioral Education, 31, 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09404-3

27.

Harris

M. T.

Noell

G. H.

McIver

E. B.

Miller

S. J.

(2021). The effect of instructional set size on learning efficiency. Educational Studies, 47, 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1668257

28.

Hattie

Timperley

(2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

29.

Hayes

Heather

Jones

Clarke

(2018). Overcoming barriers to using precision teaching with a web-based programme. Educational Psychology in Practice, 34, 166–174. https://doi-org.liblink.uncw.edu/10.1080/02667363.2018.1433129.

30.

Jimerson

S. R.

Burns

M. K.

VanDerHeyden

A. M.

(Eds.). (2007). Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-49053-3

31.

Kazdin

A. E.

(2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

32.

Kena

Hussar

McFarland

de Brey

Musu-Gillette

Wang

Zhang

Rathbun

WilkinsonFlicker

Diliberti

Barmer

Bullock Mann

Dunlop Velez

(2016). The Condition of Education 2016 (NCES 2016-144). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC.

33.

Kessissoglou

Farrell

(1995). Whatever happened to precision teaching? British Journal of Special Education, 22, 60– 63. https://doi-org.liblink.uncw.edu/10.1111/j.1467-8578.1995.tb01324.x

34.

Kostewicz

D. E.

Kubina

R. M.

Selfridge

K. A.

Gallagher

D. L.

(2016). A review of fixed fluency criteria in repeated reading studies. Reading Improvement, 53, 23–41.

35.

Kubina

R. M.

(2019). The precision teaching implementation manual. Greatness Achieved.

36.

Kubina

R. M.

Commons

Heckard

(2009). Using precision teaching with direct instruction in a summer school program. Journal of Direct Instruction, 9, 1–12.

37.

Kubina

R. M.

Yurich

K. K. L.

(2012). The precision teaching book. Greatness Achieved.

38.

Lambe

Murphy

Kelly

M. E.

(2015). The impact of a precision teaching intervention on the reading fluency of typically developing children. Behavioral Interventions, 30, 364–377. https://doi-org.liblink.uncw.edu/10.1002/bin.1418

39.

Ledford

J. R.

Gast

D. L.

(2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. Routledge.

40.

Lemons

C. J.

Kearns

D. M.

Davidson

K. A.

(2014). Data-based individualization in reading: Intensifying interventions for students with significant reading disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914522978

41.

Levin

Shatil-Carmon

Asif-Rave

(2006). Learning of letter names and sounds and their contribution to word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 139–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.08.002

42.

Mannion

Griffin

(2018). Precision teaching through Irish: Effects on isolated sight word reading fluency and contextualised reading fluency. Irish Educational Studies, 37, 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2017.1421090

43.

McTiernan

A. M.

McCoy

Mendonca

Lydon

Diffley

(2022). The implementation of Precision Teaching for the improvement of academic skills: A systematic review of the literature over thirty years. Behavioral Interventions, 37, 505–528. https://doi-org.liblink.uncw.edu/10.1002/bin.1852

44.

Morgan

P. L.

Sideridis

Hua

(2012). Initial and over-time effects of fluency interventions for students with or at risk for disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 46, 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466910398016

45.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2020). National Assessment of Educational Progress: An overview of NAEP. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

46.

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (No. 00-4769). National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

47.

Newman

Wagner

Cameto

Knokey

A. M.

(2009). The post-high school outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2009-3017). National Center for Special Education Research.

48.

O’Connor

R. E.

Padeliadu

(2000). Blending versus whole word approaches in first grade remedial reading: Short-term and delayed effects on reading and spelling words. Reading and Writing, 13, 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008134818771

49.

Pearson

N. C. S.

(2017). AIMSwebplus technical manual. Author.

50.

Pennypacker

H. S.

Gutierrez

Lindsley

(2003). Handbook of the standard celeration chart. Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies.

51.

Piasta

S. B.

Purpura

D. J.

Wagner

R. K.

(2010). Fostering alphabet knowledge development: A comparison of two instructional approaches. Reading and Writing, 23, 607–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9174-x

52.

Shadish

W. R.

(2014). Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs: An introduction. Journal of School Psychology, 52, 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.11.009

53.

Skinner

C. H.

(2010). Applied comparative effectiveness researchers must measure learning rates: A commentary on efficiency articles. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20461

54.

Therrien

W. J.

(2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250040801

55.

Vadasy

P. F.

Sanders

E. A.

Tudor

(2007). Effectiveness of paraeducator-supplemented individual instruction: Beyond basic decoding skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 508–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400060301

56.

Vaughn

Linan-Thompson

Kouzekanani

Bryant

D. P.

Dickson

Blozis

S. A.

(2003). Reading instruction grouping for students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325030240050501

57.

Wanzek

Vaughn

(2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36, 541–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2007.12087917

58.

Wanzek

Wexler

Vaughn

Ciullo

(2010). Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: A synthesis of 20 years of research. Reading and Writing, 23, 889–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9179-5

59.

What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). What Works Clearinghouse standards handbook, version 4.1. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks

60.

Zumeta

R. O.

Compton

D. L.

Fuchs

L. S.

(2012). Using word identification fluency to monitor first-grade reading development. Exceptional Children, 78, 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800204