This pilot study examined the promise of a Tier 2 Grade 6 intervention program for students at risk for difficulties in mathematics. The study utilized a quasi-experimental design. The final sample included 112 students in treatment (Promoting Algebra Readiness) and 86 students in control (standard district practice) conditions. The Promoting Algebra Readiness program consisted of 93 lessons across four strands focused on key concepts and applications of fractions. Measures of mathematics achievement were collected at pretest and posttest. Feasibility and usability data indicated favorable impressions by users and strong levels of implementation fidelity. Gain scores of treatment students were significantly greater than those of control peers on two of four proximal measures of mathematics achievement. Positive nonsignificant effects were found on additional proximal and distal measures. Implications for educators delivering instruction for at-risk students in multitier service delivery models are discussed.
AllisonP. D. (2009). Missing data. In MillsapR. E.Maydeu-OlivaresA. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 72–89). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020994.n4
2.
AlmirallD.KasariC.McCaffreyD. F.Nahum-ShaniI. (2018). Developing optimized adaptive interventions in education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 11(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2017.1407136
3.
AlonzoJ.TindalG.UlmerK.GlasgowA. (2006). easyCBM online progress monitoring assessment system. University of Oregon. http://easycbm.com
4.
AndersonG. L.DonchikL. M. (2014). Privatizing schooling and policy making: The American legislative exchange council and new political and discursive strategies of education governance. Educational Policy, 30, 322–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814528794
5.
ArcherA. L.HughesC. A. (2011). Exploring the foundations of explicit instruction. In ArcherA. L.HughesC. A. (Eds.), Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching (pp. 1–22). The Guilford Press.
6.
CollinsL. M.SchaferJ. L.KamC.-M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330–351. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.330
CoyneM. D.CookB. G.TherrienW. J. (2016). Recommendations for replication research in special education: A framework of systematic, conceptual replications. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516648463
9.
ClarkeB.DoablerC.SmolkowskiK.Kurtz NelsonE.FienH.BakerS. K.KostyD. (2016). Testing the immediate and long-term efficacy of a Tier 2 kindergarten mathematics intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9, 607–634. doi: 10.1080/19345747.2015.1116034
10.
ClarkeB.DoablerC. T.SmolkowskiK.TurturaJ.KostyD.Kurtz-NelsonE.FienH.BakerS. K. (2019). Exploring the relationship between initial mathematics skill and akindergarten mathematics intervention. Exceptional Children, 85(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918799503
11.
DoablerC. T.BakerS. K.KostyD. B.SmolkowskiK.ClarkeB.MillerS. J.FienH. (2015). Examining the association between explicit mathematics instruction and student mathematics achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 115, 303–333. doi: 10.1086/67996
12.
DoablerC. T.ClarkeB.StoolmillerM.KostyD. B.FienH.SmolkowskiK.BakerS. K. (2016). Explicit instructional interactions: Exploring the black box of a Tier 2 mathematics intervention. Remedial and Special Education, 38(2), 98–110. doi: 10.1177/0741932516654219
13.
DoablerC. T.Nelson-WalkerN. J. (2009). Ratings of classroom management and instructional support [Measurement instrument]. Center on Teaching and Learning, University of Oregon.
14.
DysonN. I.JordanN. C.GluttingJ. (2013). A number sense intervention for low-income kindergartners at risk for mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411410233
15.
DysonN. I.JordanN. C.RodriguesJ.BarbieriC.RinneL. (2018). A fraction sense intervention for sixth graders with or at risk for mathematics difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 41, 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518807139
16.
FloresM. M.HintonV. M.TaylorJ. L. J. (2018). CRA fraction intervention for fifth-grade students receiving tier two interventions. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 62(3), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2017.1414027
17.
FryeD.BaroodyA. J.BurchinalM.CarverS. M.JordanN. C.McDowellJ. (2013). Teaching math to young children: A practice guide (NCEE No. 2014-4005). National Center for Education and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/early_math_pg_111313.pdf
18.
FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.PaulsenK.BryantJ. D.HamlettC. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.493
FuchsL. S.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M.FuchsD.HamlettC. L. (2010). The effects of strategic counting instruction, with and without deliberate practice, on number combination skill among students with mathematics difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.09.003
21.
FuchsL. S.SchumacherR. F.LongJ.NamkungJ.HamlettC. L.CirinoP. T.JordanN. C.SieglerR.GerstenR.ChangasP. (2013). Improving at-risk learners’ understanding of fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 683–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032446
22.
GerstenR. M.ChardD. J.JayanthiM.BakerS. K.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202–1242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309334431
23.
GerstenR. M.ClarkeB.JordanN.Newman-GoncharR.HaymondK.WilkinsC. (2012). Universal screening in mathematics for the primary grades: Beginnings of a research base. Exceptional Children, 78, 423–445. Retrieved from http://cec.metapress.com/content/B75U2072576416T
24.
GerstenR. M.RolfhusE.ClarkeB.DeckerL. E.WilkinsC.DiminoJ. (2015). Intervention for first graders with limited number knowledge: Large-scale replication of a randomized controlled trial. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 516–546. doi: 10.3102/000283121456578
25.
HamdanN.GundersonE. A. (2017). The number line is a critical spatial-numerical representation: Evidence from a fraction intervention. Developmental Psychology, 53(3), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000252
26.
HwangJ.RiccominiP. J.HwangS. Y.MoranoS. (2019). A systematic analysis of experimental studies targeting fractions for students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 34(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12187
27.
JitendraA. K.LeinA. E.ImS.-h.AlghamdiA. A.HefteS. B.MouanoutouaJ. (2017). Mathematical interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities and mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 84(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917737467
28.
JitendraA. K.Petersen-BrownS.LeinA. E.ZaslofskyA. F.KunkelA. K.JungP.-G.EganA. M. (2015). Teaching mathematical word problem solving: The quality of evidence for strategy instruction priming the problem structure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413487408
29.
JordanN. C.HansenN.FuchsL. S.SieglerR. S.GerstenR.MicklosD. (2013). Developmental predictors of fraction concepts and procedures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.02.001
30.
Ketterlin-GellerL. R.GiffordD. B.PerryL. (2015). Measuring middle school students’ algebra readiness: Examining validity evidence for three experimental measures. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 41(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/153450841558654
31.
LittleR. J. A.RubinD. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). Wiley.
32.
MetheS. A.HojnoskiR.ClarkeB.OwensB. B.LilleyP. K.PolityloB. C.. . . MarcotteA. M. (2011). Innovations and future directions for early numeracy curriculum-based measurement. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36, 200–209. doi: 10.1177/153450841141415
33.
MillerS. P.HudsonP. J. (2007). Using evidence-based practices to build mathematics competence related to conceptual, procedural, and declarative knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 47–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00230.x
34.
MurrayD. M. (1998). Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. Oxford University Press.
35.
NamkungJ. M.FuchsL. S.KoziolN. (2018). Does initial learning about the meaning of fractions present similar challenges for students with and without adequate whole-number skill?Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 151–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.018
36.
National Assessment Educational Progress. (2019). Results from the 2019 Mathematics and Reading Assessments (NCES No. 2020012). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/mathematics?grade=4
37.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence.
38.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. U.S. Department of Education.
39.
Oregon Department of Education. (n.d). OAKS—Oregon Assessment of Knowledge and Skills Science subtest. http://oaksportal.org
PowellS. R.MasonE. N.BosS. E.HirtS.Ketterlin-GellerL. R.LembkeE. S. (under review). A systematic review of mathematics interventions for middle-school students experiencing mathematics difficulty. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice.
42.
RoessleinR. I.CoddingR. S. (2019). Fraction interventions for struggling elementary math learners: A review of the literature. Psychology in the Schools, 56(3), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22196
SchumacherR. F.JayanthiM.GerstenR.DiminoJ.SpalloneS.HaymondK. S. (2018). Using the number line to promote understanding of fractions for struggling fifth graders: A formative pilot study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(4), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12169
46.
SchumacherR. F.ZumetaR.ArdenS. V. (2017). Examining implementation of intensive intervention in mathematics. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(3), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12141
47.
ShinM.BryantD. P. (2015). Fraction interventions for students struggling to learn mathematics: A research synthesis. Remedial and Special Education, 36(6), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515572910
48.
SieglerR. S.CarpenterT.FennellF. S.GearyD.LewisJ. R.OkamotoY.ThompsonL.WrayJ. (2010). Developing effective fractions instruction for kindergarten through 8th grade: A practice guide (Report No. NCEE #2010-4039). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/fractions_pg_093010.pdf
49.
SieglerR. S.DuncanG. J.Davis-KeanP. E.DuckworthK.ClaessensA.EngelM.SusperreguyM. I.ChenM. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23(7), 691–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612440101
50.
SieglerR. S.ThompsonC. A.SchneiderM. (2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.03.001
51.
TianJ.SieglerR. S. (2016). Fractions learning in children with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(6), 614–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416662032
WitzelB.ClarkeB. (2015). Focus on inclusive education: Benefits of using a multi-tiered system of supports to improve inclusive practices. Childhood Education, 91, 215–219. doi: 10.1080/00094056.2015.104731
