The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy of fractions intervention with and without an embedded self-regulation (SR) component for third-grade students at risk for mathematics disabilities. Fractions intervention focused on magnitude understanding and word problems. Embedded SR was designed to support a growth mindset (fostering belief that intellectual and academic abilities can be developed) along with SR processes in which students set goals, self-monitor, and use strategies to engage motivationally, metacognitively, and behaviorally through challenging tasks. Students (n = 69) were randomly assigned to business-as-usual control and the two versions of fractions intervention. Multilevel models, accounting for the nested structure of the data, identified a moderation effect on fraction word problems: For students receiving fractions intervention with embedded SR, response to intervention was robust across the continuum of students’ pretest word problem skill; by contrast, without SR, response to fractions intervention depended on students’ pretest word problem skill. On the remaining outcomes, results reflected stronger outcomes when fractions intervention embedded SR instruction without moderation.
BlairC.RaverC. C. (2014). Closing the achievement gap through modification of neurocognitive and neuroendocrine function: Results from a cluster randomized controlled trial of an innovative approach to the education of children in kindergarten. PLoS One, 9(11), 13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112393
2.
BoothJ. L.NewtonK. J. (2012). Fractions: Could they really be the gatekeeper’s doorman?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 247–253. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.07.001
3.
CirinoP. T.MiciakJ.GerstE.BarnesM. A.VaughnS.ChildA.Huston-WarrenE. (2017). Executive function, self-regulated learning, and reading comprehension: A training study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(4), 450–467. doi:10.1177/0022219415618497
4.
CoureyS. J. (2006). Informal knowledge and fraction instruction in third grade (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (Order No. 3229917).
5.
De CorteE.VerschaffelL.Op’t EyndeP. (2000). Self-regulation: A characteristic and a goal of mathematics education. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 687–726). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6.
EdgertonA. K.FuchsD.FuchsL. (in press). New standards and old divides: Policy attitudes about college- and career-readiness standards for students with disabilities. Teachers College Record.
7.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.KarnsK.HamlettC. L.KatzaroffM.DutkaS. (1997). Effects of task-focused goals on low-achieving students with and without learning disabilities. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 513–544. doi:10.3102/00028312034003513
8.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.PrenticeK.BurchM.HamlettC. L.OwenR.SchroeterK. (2003). Enhancing third-grade students’ mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 306–315. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.306
9.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.SeethalerP. M.BarnesM. A. (2019). The role of working memory in mathematical word-problem solving: Implications for instruction and intervention. Manuscript submitted for publication.
10.
FuchsL. S.HamlettC. L.PowellS. R. (2003). Second-grade calculations battery. Available from L.S. Fuchs, 228 Peabody, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203.
FuchsL. S.MaloneA.WangA.FuchsD.AbramsonR.KrowkaS. (2015). Third-grade super solvers. Available from L.S. Fuchs, 228 Peabody, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203.
13.
FuchsL. S.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.ZumetaR. O. (2009). Remediating number combination and word problem deficits among students with mathematics difficulties: A randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 561–576. doi:10.1037/a0014701
FuchsL. S.SchumacherR. F.LongJ.NamkungJ.MaloneA. S.WangA.. . . ChangasP. (2016b). Effects of intervention to improve at-risk fourth graders’ understanding, calculations, and word problems with fractions. The Elementary School Journal, 116(4), 625–651. doi:10.1086/686303
16.
FuchsL. S.SchumacherR. F.SterbaS. K.LongJ.NamkungJ.MaloneA.. . . ChangasP. (2014). Does working memory moderate the effects of fraction intervention? An aptitude-treatment interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 499–514. doi:10.1037/a0034341
17.
FuchsL. S.SeethalerP. S.PowellS. R.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.FletcherJ. M. (2008). Effects of preventative tutoring on the mathematical problem solving of third-grade students with math and reading difficulties. Exceptional Children, 74, 155–173. doi:10.1177/001440290807400202
18.
FuchsL. S.ZumetaR. O.SchumacherR. F.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.HamlettC. L.FuchsD. (2010). The effects of schema-broadening instruction on second graders’ word-problem performance and their ability to represent word problems with algebraic equations: A randomized control study. Elementary School Journal, 110, 440–463. doi:10.1086/651191
19.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.NugentL.BaileyD. H. (2012). Mathematical cognition deficits in children with learning disabilities and persistent low achievement: A five-year prospective study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 206–223. doi:10.1037/a0025398
20.
HamlettC. L.SchumacherR. F.FuchsL. S. (2011). Fraction Number Line adapted from Siegler et al. (2011). Available from L.S. Fuchs, 228 Peabody, Vanderbilt, Nashville, TN 37203.
21.
JitendraA. K.StarJ. R. (2012). An exploratory study contrasting high- and low-achieving students’ percent word problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 151–158. doi:10.1177/0022219414554228
22.
JitendraA. K.StarJ. R.RodriguezM.LindellM.SomekiF. (2011). Improving students’ proportional thinking using schema-based instruction. Learning and Instruction, 21, 731–745. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.04.002
23.
JitendraA. K.StarJ. R.StarostaK.LehJ. M.SoodS.CaskieG.. . . MackT. R. (2009). Improving seventh grade students’ learning of ratio and proportion: The role of schema-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 250–264. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.06.001
24.
LamonS. J. (2012). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers. New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
LezakM. D.HowiesonD. B.BiglerE. D.TranelD. (2012). Neurological assessment (5th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
Lin-SieglerX.DweckC. S.CohenG. L. (2016). Instructional interventions that motivate classroom learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 295–299. doi:10.1037/edu0000124
27.
McNeishD. M.StapletonL. M. (2016). The effect of small sample size on two-level model estimates: A review and illustration. Education Psychology Review, 28, 295–314. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9287-x
28.
Melby-LervagM.HulmeC. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49, 270–291. doi:10.1037/a0028228
29.
MuthénB.SatorraA. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 267–316. doi:10.2307/271070
30.
NamkungJ. M.FuchsL. S.KoziolN. (2018). Does initial learning about the meaning of fractions challenging for students with adequate whole-number skill?Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 151–157. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.018
31.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics advisory panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
32.
ParkD.GundersonE. A.TsukayamaE.LevineS. C.BeilockS. L. (2016). Young children’s motivational frameworks and math achievement: Relation to teacher-reported instructional practices, but not teacher theory of intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 300–313. doi:10.1037/edu0000064
33.
PerkinsV.CullinanD. (1984). Effects of direct instruction intervention for fraction skills. Education & Treatment of Children, 7(2), 109–117.
34.
PowellS. R.FuchsL. S. (2015). Intensive intervention in mathematics. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30, 182–192. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12087
35.
RobertsC.RobertsS. A. (2005). Design and analysis of clinical trials with clustering effects due to treatment. Clinical Trials, 2, 152–162. doi:10.1191/1740774505cn076oa
36.
SchmittS. A.McClellandM. M.TomineyS. L.AcockA. C. (2015). Strengthening school readiness for head start children: Evaluation of a self-regulation intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 30, 20–31. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.08.001
37.
SchumacherR. F.NamkungJ.MaloneA.WangA.AbramsonR.FuchsL. (2015). Fraction Battery–Revised. Available from L.S. Fuchs, 228 Peabody, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203.
38.
SchunkD. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 359–382. doi:10.2307/1163289
39.
Scott Foresman Addison Wesley enVisionMath: Grade 3. (2011). Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman, Pearson Education.
40.
SieglerR. S.DuncanG. J.Davis-KeanP.DuckworthK.ClaessensA.EngelM.. . . ChenM. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23(7), 691–697. doi:10.1177/0956797612440101
41.
SieglerR. S.ThompsonC. A.SchneiderM. (2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 273–296. doi:10.1111/cdep.12077
42.
WechslerD. (2011). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
43.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2013, March). Procedures and standards handbook (version 3.0). Retrieved from http://whatworks.ed.gov
44.
WilkinsonG. S.RobertsonG. J. (2006). Wide range achievement test (4th ed.). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.
45.
YeagerD. S.DweckC. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47, 302–324. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.722805
46.
ZelazoP. D.BlairC. B.WilloughbyM. T. (2016). Executive function: Implications for education (NCER 2017-2000). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
