This mixed-methods study examined perspectives on factors that influence meaningful student and parent involvement in Individualized Education Program (IEP) transition planning. Survey data and open-ended qualitative interviews with urban high school students with a learning disability (LD; n = 16), their parents (n = 9), and their teachers (n = 17) were analyzed. A group comparison of student and teacher ratings on the Student Involvement Survey revealed no difference between students and teachers on level of school efforts to facilitate student and parent involvement. However, qualitative analysis of interview data resulted in the emergence of four primary themes related to challenges to meaningful involvement: (a) facilitation of student involvement in IEP development, (b) challenges to parent involvement in IEP development, (c) challenges and effective supports for graduation, and (d) supports needed for career and college preparation. Recommendations for school practices to support student and parent involvement in the development of authentic IEPs is provided.
AgranM.HughesC. (2008). Asking student input: Students’ opinions regarding their individualized education program involvement. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 69–76. doi:10.1177/0885728808317657
2.
BermanD. L. (2009). Beyond words: Reflections on our journey to inclusion. Harrisburg, PA: White Hat Press.
3.
BondT.FoxC. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
CavendishW. (2013). Student perceptions of school efforts to facilitate student involvement, school commitment, self determination and graduation track. Social Psychology of Education, 16, 257–275. doi:10.1007/s11218-013-9212-z
5.
CavendishW. (2016). The role of gender, race/ethnicity, and disability on the relationship between school and family support and self-determination. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/2165143416629359
6.
CavendishW.ConnorD.RedikerE. (2016). Facilitating student and parent involvement in transition focused individualized education program (IEP) planning. Intervention in School and Clinic. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1053451216659469
7.
CharltonJ. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
CreswellJ. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
9.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2003). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 1–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
FerriB.GallagherD.ConnorD. (2011). Pluralizing methodology in the field of LD: From “what works” to what matters. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 34, 222–231.
11.
HarryB.SturgesK.KlingnerJ. (2005). Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educational Researcher, 34, 3–13.
12.
Individual With Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, P.L.105–17, 20 U.S.C § 1400 et seq. (1997).
13.
Individual With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, H.R.1350, 108th Cong.
14.
JohnsonR. B.StefurakT. (2013). Considering the evidence-and-credibility discussion in evaluation through the lens of dialectical pluralism. In MertensD. M.Hesse-BiberS. (Eds.), Mixed methods an credibility of evidence in evaluation (pp. 37–48). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15.
LandmarkL.RobertsE.ZhangD. (2013). Educators’ beliefs and practices about parent involvement in transition planning. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36, 114–123. doi:10.1177/2165143412463047
16.
LandmarkL.ZhangD.MontoyaL. (2007). Culturally diverse parents’ experiences in their children’s transition: Knowledge and involvement. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 30, 68–79. doi:10.1177/08857288070300020401
17.
MartinJ.MarshallL.SaleP. (2004). A 3-year study of middle, junior high, and high school IEP meetings. Exceptional Children, 70, 285–297.
18.
MartinJ.Van DyckeJ.ChristensenW.GreeneB.GardnerJ.LovettD. (2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the self-directed IEP as an evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72, 299–316.
19.
MeadanH.SheldenD.AppelK.DeGraziaR. (2010). Developing a long-term vision: A road map for students’ futures. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43, 8–14. doi:10.1177/004005991004300201
20.
MyersA.EisenmanL. (2005). Student-led IEPs: Take the first step. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37, 52–58. doi:10.1177/004005990503700408
21.
National Science Foundation. (2008). Broadening participation at the National Science Foundation: A framework for action. Arlington, VA: Author.
22.
ParkY. (2008). Transition services for high school students with disabilities: Perspectives of special education teachers. Exceptionality Education Canada, 18, 95–111.
PowersL. E.TurnerA.WestwoodD.MatuszewskiJ.WilsonR.PhillipsA. (2001). TAKE CHARGE for the Future: A controlled field-test of a model to promote student involvement in transition planning. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 89–104.
25.
RosnerB. (2015). Fundamentals of biostatistics. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
26.
ShipwayB. (2010). A critical realist perspective of education. New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
SkrticT. M. (2005). A political economy of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 149–154. doi:10.2307/1593616
28.
SkrticT.McCallZ. (2010). Ideology, institutions, and equity: Comments on Christine Sleeter’s why is there learning disabilities?Disability Studies Quarterly, 30, 9–17.
29.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
30.
ThomaC.RoganP.BakerS. (2001). Student involvement in transition planning: Unheard voices. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 16–29.
31.
TuckerV.SchwartzI. (2013). Parents’ perspectives of collaboration with school professionals: Barriers and facilitators to successful partnerships in planning for students with ASD. School Mental Health, 5, 3–14.
32.
ValleJ. W. (2009). What mothers say about special education: From the 1960s to the present. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
ValleJ. W.AponteE. (2002). IDEA and collaboration: A Bakhtinian perspective on parent and professional discourse. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 469–479. doi:10.1177/00222194020350050701
34.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.JavitzH.ValdesK. (2012). A national picture of parent and youth participation in IEP and transition planning meetings. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23, 140–155. doi:10.1177/1044207311425384
35.
WehmeyerM.PalmerS.Williams-DiehmK.ShogrenK.DaviesD.StockS. (2011). Technology and self-determination in transition planning: The impact of technology use in transition planning on student self-determination. Journal of Special Education Technology, 26, 13–24.
36.
ZeitlinV.CurcicS. (2014). Parental voices on individualized education programs: “Oh, IEP meeting tomorrow? Rum tonight!”Disability & Society, 29, 373–387. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.776493
