In this article, we provide an overview of current knowledge on the underlying cognitive deficits associated with mathematics learning disabilities (MLD). We highlight difficulties surrounding the identification of MLD that include inconsistency in defining MLD, comorbidity with other disabilities, problems associated with assessment tools and actual skills measured, and the limited research on MLD. We offer suggestions for strengthening the research base, which in turn should contribute to improved outcomes for students with mathematics disabilities.
AgostinoA.JohnsonJ.Pacual-LeoneJ. (2010). Executive functions underlying multiplication reasoning: Problem type matters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 286–305. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.09.006.
2.
AllowayT. P. (2011). Improving working memory: Supporting students’ learning. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
3.
AllowayT. P.PassolunghiM. C. (2011). The relationship between working memory, IQ, and mathematical skills in children. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 133–137. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.013
4.
AnderssonU. (2007). The contribution of working memory to children’s mathematical word problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 1201–1216. doi:10.1002/acp.1317
5.
AnderssonU. (2008). Mathematical competencies in children with different types of learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 48–66. doi:10.1037/0022-0663. 100.1.48
6.
AnderssonU.LyxellB. (2007). Working memory deficit in children with mathematical difficulties: A general or specific deficit?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 197-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.10.001
7.
AnobileG.CicchiniG. M.BurrD. C. (2012). Linear mapping of numbers onto space requires attention. Cognition, 122, 454–459. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.006
8.
AugustyniakK.MurphyJ.PhillipsD. K. (2005). Psychological perspectives in assessing mathematics learning needs. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32, 277–286. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost
9.
BaddeleyA. (1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49(A), 5–28. doi:10.1080/027249896392784
10.
BaddeleyA. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
11.
BergD. H.HutchinsonN. L. (2010). Cognitive processes that account for mental addition fluency differences between children typically achieving in arithmetic and children at-risk for failure in arithmetic. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 8, 1–20. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
12.
BlairC.RazzaR. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false believe understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78, 647–663. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
13.
BryantB. R.BryantD. P. (2008). Introduction to the special series: Mathematics and learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 3–8. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
14.
BryantB. R.BryantD. P.GerstenR. M.SxcammaccaN. N.FunkC.WinterA.PoolC. (2008). The effects of tier 2 intervention on the mathematics performance of first-grade students who are at risk for mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 47–63. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
15.
BryantD. P.BryantB. R.RobertsG.VaughnS.PfannenstielK. H.PoterfieldJ.GerstenR. (2011). Early numeracy intervention for first-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Exceptional Children, 78, 7–23. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
16.
BryantD. P.BryantB. T.HammillD. D. (2000). Characteristics behaviors of students with LD who have teacher-identified math weaknesses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 168–177, 199. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
17.
BullR.EspyK. A.WiebeS. A. (2008). Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement age 7 years. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 205–228. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
18.
BullR.ScerifG. (2001). Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematical ability: Inhibition, switching, and working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19, 273–293. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
19.
CartaJ. J.GreenwoodC. R. (1985). Ecobehavioral assessment: A methodology for examining the evaluation of early intervention programs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 5, 88–104. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
20.
CawleyJ. F.ParmarR. S.Lucas-FuscoL. M.KilianJ. D.FoleyT. E. (2007). Place value and mathematics for students with mild disabilities: Data and suggested practices. Learning Disabilities: A contemporary Journal, 5, 21–39.
21.
CirinoP. T. (2011). The interrelationships of mathematical precursors in kindergarten. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 713–733. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.11.004
22.
ClarkC. A. C.PritchardV. E.WoodwardL. J. (2010). Preschool executive functioning abilities predict early mathematics achievement. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1176–1191. doi:10.1037/a0019672
23.
CowanN. (2010). Multiple concurrent thoughts: The meaning and developmental neuropsychology of working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35, 447–474. doi:10.1080/ 875656412010494985
24.
De SmedtB.BoetsB. (2010). Phonological processing and arithmetic fact retrieval: Evidence from developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3973–3981. doi:10.1016/jneuropsychologia.2010.10.018
25.
DowkerA. (2005). Early identification for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 324–332. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
26.
FletcherJ. M.LyonG. R.FuchsL. S.BarnesM. A. (2007). Learning disabilities: A framework for understanding unexpected underachievement. New York, NY: Guilford.
27.
FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.PaulsenK.BryantJ. D.HamlettC. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 493–513. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.493
28.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.ComptonD. L.HamlettC. L.SeethalerP. M. (2007). Mathematics screening and progress monitoring at first grade: Implications for interventions. Exceptional Children, 73, 311–330. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.493
29.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M. (2008). Intensive intervention for students with mathematic disabilities: Seven principles of effective practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 79–92. Retrieved from http://content.ebscohost.com.proxy.lib.odu.edu/pdf25_26/pdf/
30.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.PrenticeK. (2004). Responsiveness to mathematical problem-solving instruction: Comparing students at risk of mathematics disability with and without risk of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 293–306. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
31.
GarrettA. J.MazzoccoM. M. M.BakerL. (2006). Development of the metacognitive skills of prediction and evaluation in children with and without math disability. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21, 77–88. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
32.
GathercoleS. E.PickeringS. J.KnightC.StegmannZ. (2004). Working memory skills and educational attainment: Evidence from the national curriculum assessments at 7 and 14 years of age. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–16. doi:10.1002/acp.934
33.
GearyD. C. (1993). Mathematical disabilities: Cognitive, neuropsychological and genetic components. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 345–362. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
34.
GearyD. C. (2003). Learning disabilities in arithmetic: Problem-solving differences and cognitive deficits. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 199–212). New York, NY: Guilford.
35.
GearyD. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4–15. doi:10.1177/00222194040370010201
36.
GearyD. C. (2007). An evolutionary perspective on learning disability in mathematics. Developmental Neuropsychology, 32, 471–519. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
37.
GearyD. C.BaileyD. H.LittlefieldA.WoodP.HoardM. K.NugentL. (2009). First-grade predictors of mathematical learning disability: A latent class trajectory. Cognitive Development, 24, 411–429. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.10.001
38.
GearyD. C.HamsonC. O.HoardM. K. (2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: A longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 236–263. doi:10.1006/jecp.2000.2561
39.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.Byrd-CravenJ.DeSotoM. (2004). Strategy choices in simple and complex addition: Contributions of working memory and counting knowledge for children with mathematical disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 121–151. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
40.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.Byrd-CravenJ.NugentL.NumteeC. (2007). Cognitive mechanism underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematics learning disability. Child Development, 78, 1343–1359. doi:0009-3920/2007/ 7804-0019
41.
GerstenR.JordanN. C.FlojoJ. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293–304. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
42.
GilmoreC. K.McCarthyS. E.SpelkeE. S. (2010). Non-symbolic arithmetic abilities and mathematics achievement in the first year of schooling. Cognition, 115, 394–406. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.02.002
HanichL. B.JordanN. C.KaplanD.DickJ. (2001). Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 615–626. doi:10.1037//0022-0663. 93.3.615
45.
HolmesJ.AdamsJ. W. (2006). Working memory and children’s mathematical skills: Implications for mathematical development and mathematics curricula. Educational Psychology, 26, 339–366. doi:10.1080/01443410500341056
IsemanS. J.NaglieriJ. A. (2011). A cognitive strategy instruction to improve math calculation for children with ADHD and LD: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 184–195. doi:10.1177/0022219410391190
48.
IvrendiA. (2011). Influence of self-regulation on the development of children’s number sense. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39, 239–247. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
49.
JayanthiM.GerstenR.BakerS. (2008). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities or difficulty learning mathematics: A guide for teachers. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
50.
JordanN. C.GluttingJ.RamineniC. (2010). The importance of number sense to mathematics achievement in first and third grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 82–88. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.07.004
51.
JordanN. C.HanichL. B. (2000). Mathematical thinking in second-grade children with different forms of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 567–578. doi:0009-3920/2006/7701-0011
52.
JordanN. C.KaplanD.LocuniakM. N.RamineniC. (2007). Predicting first-grade math achievement developmental number sense trajectories. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 36–46. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
53.
JudgeS.WatsonS. M. R. (2011). Longitudinal outcomes for mathematics achievement for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 147–157. doi:10.1080/00220671003636729
54.
KailR. V. (2004). Cognitive development includes global and domain-specific processes. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 445–455. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
55.
KailR. V.FerrerE. (2007). Processing speed in childhood and adolescence: Longitudinal models for examining developmental change. Child Development, 78, 1760–1770. doi:0009-3920/2007/7806-0009
56.
KaufmannL. (2008). Dyscalculia: Neuroscience and education. Educational Research, 50, 163–175. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
57.
KetelsenK.WelshM. (2010). Working memory and mental arithmetic: A case for dual central executive resources. Brain and Cognition, 74, 203–209. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
58.
KyttalaM.LehtoJ. E. (2008). Some factors underlying mathematical performance: The role of visuospatial working memory and non-verbal intelligence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23, 77–94. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
59.
LagoR. M.DiPernaJ. C. (2010). Number sense in kindergarten: A factor-analytic study of the construct. School Psychology Review, 39, 164–180. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
60.
LeeK.-M.KangS.-Y. (2002). Arithmetic operation and working memory: Differential suppression in dual tasks. Cognition, 83, B63–B68. Retrieved from www.elsevier.com/locate/cognit
61.
LibertusM. E.BrannonE. M. (2009). Behavioral and neural basis of number sense in infancy. Association for Psychological Science, 18, 346–351. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
62.
LyonG. R.ShaywitzS. E.ShaywitzB. A. (2003). Defining dyslexia, comorbidity, teacher’s knowledge of language, and reading: A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
63.
LyonsI. M.BeilockS. L. (2011). Numerical ordering ability mediates the relation between number-sense and arithmetic competence. Cognition, 121, 256–261. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.07.009
64.
MabbottD. J.BisanzJ. (2008). Computational skills, working memory, and conceptual knowledge in older children with mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 15–28. doi:10.1177/002221940731103
65.
MammarellaI. C.LucangeliD.CornoldiC. (2010). Spatial working memory and arithmetic deficits in children with nonverbal learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 455–468. doi:10.1177/0022219409355482
66.
MazzoccoM. M. M. (2005). Challenges in identifying target skills for math disability screening and intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 318–323. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
67.
MazzoccoM. M. M.KoverS. T. (2007). A longitudinal assessment of executive function skills and their association with math performance. Child Neuropsychology, 13, 18–45. doi:10.1080/09297040600611346
68.
MercerC. D.PullenP. C. (2009). Students with learning disabilities (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
69.
MeyerM. L.SalimpoorV. N.WuS. S.GearyD. C.MenonV. (2010). Differential contribution of specific working memory components to mathematics achievement in 2nd and 3rd graders. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 101–109. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.08.004
70.
MontagueM. (2007). Self-regulation and mathematics instruction. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 75–83. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
71.
MontagueM.van GarderenD. (2003). A cross-sectional study of mathematics achievement, estimation skills, and academic self-perception in students of varying ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 437–448. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
72.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.WuQ. (2011). Kindergarten children’s growth trajectories in reading and mathematics: Who falls increasingly behind?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 472–480. doi:10.1177/002219411414010
73.
MundiaL. (2010). Learning mathematics: Comparison of Brunei Junior High School students in classes with and without repeaters. Journal of Mathematics Research, 2, 150–160. Retrieved from www.ccsenet.org/jmr
74.
MurphyM. M.MazzoccoM. M. M.HanichL. B.EarlyM. C. (2007). Cognitive characteristics of children with mathematics learning disability (MLD) vary as a function of the cutoff criterion used to define MLD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 458–478. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
75.
NaglieriJ. A.JohnsonD. (2000). Effectiveness of a cognitive intervention in improving arithmetic computation based on the PASS theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 591–597. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
76.
National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
77.
NewmanL.WagnerM.HuangT.ShaverD.KnokeyA.-M.YuJ.CametoR. (2011). Secondary school programs and performance of students with disabilities: A special topic report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2012-3000). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Available at www.nlts2.org/reports/2011_11/nlts2_report_2011_11_complete.pdf
78.
NiederA.DehaeneS. (2009). Representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 185–208. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
79.
NysJ.ContentA. (2010). Complex mental arithmetic: The contribution of number sense. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 215–220. doi:10.1037/a0020767
80.
PassolunghiM. C.CornoldiC.De LibertoS. (1999). Working memory and intrusions of irrelevant information in a group of specific poor problem solvers. Memory & Cognition, 27, 779–790. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
81.
PassolunghiM. C.SiegelL. S. (2001). Short-term memory, working memory, and inhibitory control in children with difficulties in arithmetic problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 44–57. doi:10.1006/jecp.2000.2626
82.
PassolunghiM. C.SiegelL. S. (2004). Working memory and access to numerical information in children with disability in mathematics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 348–367. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2004.04.002
83.
PassolunghiM. C.VercelloniB.SchadeeH. (2007). The precursors of mathematics learning: Working memory, phonological ability and numerical competence. Cognitive Development, 22, 165–184. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.09.001
84.
PatersonS. J.HeimS.FriedmanJ. T.ChoudhuryN.BenasichA. A. (2006). Development of structure and function in the infant brain: Implications for cognition, language, and social behaviour. Neuroscience & Behavioral Reviews, 30, 1087–1105. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.05.001
85.
PerelsF.DignathC.SchmitzB. (2009). Is it possible to improve mathematical achievement by means of self-regulation strategy? Evaluation of an intervention in regular math classes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24, 17–31. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
86.
RaghubarK. P.BarnesM. A.HechtS. A. (2010). Working memory and mathematics: A review of developmental, individual difference, and cognitive approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 110–122. doi:10.1016/j .lindif.2009.10.005
87.
RasmussenC.BisanzJ. (2005). Representation and working memory in early arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 137–157. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.01.004
88.
ReuhkalaM. (2001). Mathematical skills in ninth-graders: Relationship with visuo-spatial abilities and working memory. Educational Psychology, 21, 387–399. doi:10.1080/ 01443410120090786
89.
RosenzweigC.KrawecJ.MontagueM. (2011). Metacognitive strategy use of eight-grade students with and without learning disabilities during mathematical problem solving: A think-aloud analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 508–520. doi:10.1177/0022219410378445
90.
RosselliM.MatuteE.PintoN.ArdilaA. (2006). Memory abilities in children with subtypes of dyscalculia. Developmental Neuropsychology, 30, 801–818. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
91.
RourkeB. P. (1993). Arithmetic disabilities specific and otherwise: A neuropsychological perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 214–226. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
92.
SimmonsF. R.WillisC.AdamsA.-M. (2012). Different components of working memory have different relationships with different mathematical skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111, 139–155. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.08.001
93.
SwansonH. L. (2006). Cross-sectional and incremental changes in working memory and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 265–281. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.265
94.
SwansonH. L.Beebe-FrankenbergerM. (2004). The relationship between working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 471–491. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.963.471.
95.
SwansonH. L.JermanO. (2006). A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 76, 249–279. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
96.
SwansonH. L.JermanO.ZhengX. (2009). Math disabilities and reading disabilities: Can they be separated?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,27, 175–196.
97.
SwansonH. L.KimK. (2007). Working memory, short-term-memory, and naming speed as predictors of children’s mathematical performance. Intelligence, 35, 151–168. doi:10.1016/j.intel.2006.07.001.
98.
SwansonH. L.Sachse-LeeC. (2001). Mathematical problem solving and working memory in children with learning disabilities: Both executive and phonological processes are important. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 294–321. doi:10.1006/jecp.2000.2587
99.
TollS. W. M.Van der VenS. H. G.KroesbergenE. H.Van LuitJ. E. H. (2011). Executive functions as predictors of math learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 521–530. doi:10.1177/0022219410387302
100.
TronskyL. N. (2005). Strategy use, the development of automaticity, and working memory involvement in complex multiplication. Memory & Cognition, 33, 927–940. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
101.
U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel. Contract No. ED04CO0082/0001 for Widmeyer Communications and No. ED04CO0015/0006 for Abt Associates Inc. Retrieved from www.ed.gov/MathPanel
VaidyaS. R. (2004). Understanding dyscalculia for teaching. Education, 124, 717–720. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
104.
VukovicR. K. (2012). Mathematics difficulty with and without reading difficulty: Findings and implications from a four-year longitudinal study. Exceptional Children, 78, 280–300.
105.
VukovicR. K.SiegelL. S. (2010). Academic and cognitive characteristics of persistent mathematics difficulty from first through fourth grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 25–38. doi:10.1111lj.1540-5826.2009.00298.x
106.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP.GarzaN. (2006). An Overview of Findings From Wave 2 of the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Available at www.nlts2.org/reports/2006_08/nlts2_report_2006_08_complete.pdf
107.
WatsonS. M. R.GableR. A.GreenwoodC. R. (2011). Combining ecobehavioral assessment, functional assessment, and response to intervention to promote more effective classroom instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 334–344. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com
108.
YangD.-C.WuW.-R. (2010). The study of number sense: Realistic activities integrated into third-grade math classes in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Research, 103, 379–393. doi:10.1080/0022670903383010
109.
ZhengX.SwansonH. L.MarcoulidesG. A. (2011). Working memory components as predictors of children’s mathematical word problem solving. Journal of Experimental child Psychology, 110, 481–498. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.06.001
110.
ZorziM.PriftisK.UmiltaC. (2002). Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417, 138–140.
