A method to fabricate flat laminates by filament winding was developed. Different fracture tests were then performed on materials with two different fiber size treatments. Based on the results, simple test methods sensitive to fiber size effects are suggested. Moisture conditioning was necessary for size effects to show.
ZhangH.BerglundL. A.. “Rubber-Toughening of Glass Fiber/Epoxy Filament Wound Composites,” submitted to Polymer Composites.
2.
IshidaH.1984. “A Review of Recent Progress in the Studies of Molecular and Microstructure of Coupling Agents and their Functions in Composites, Coatings and Adhesive Joints,” Polymer Composites, 5:101–123.
3.
DehoffR. T.RhinesR. N.. 1968. Quantitative Microscopy, New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
4.
KnottJ. F.1973. Fundamentals of Fracture Mechanics, Butterworths.
5.
BrowningC. E.AbramsF. L.WhitneyJ. M.. 1983. “A Four-Point Shear Test for Graphite/Epoxy Composites,” in Composite Materials: Quality Assurance and Processing, BrowningC. E., ed., ASTM STP 797, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 54–74.
6.
ChamisC. C.SinclairJ. H.. 1976. “10° Off-Axis Tensile Test for Intralaminar Shear Characterization of Fiber Composites,” NASA TN D-8215.
7.
KiesJ. A.1962. “Maximum Strains in the Resin of Fiberglass Composites,” U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Report NRL 5752.
8.
NewaszG. M. “Transverse Toughness as a Material Characterization Parameter for Unidirectional Composites,” SAMPE Quarterly, 15:20–26.
9.
HullD.1981. An Introduction to Composite Materials, Cambridge University Press.
10.
AshbeeK. H. G.WyattR. C.. 1969. “Water Damage in Glass Fiber/Resin Composites,” Proc. Roy. Soc., A312:553–564.
11.
WhitneyJ. M.DanielI. M.PipesR. B.. 1984, Experimental Mechanics of Fiber Reinforced Composite Materials, Revised Edition, SEM Monograph No. 4.
