In the present investigation, four environmental cyclic aging conditions, 0–4 weeks, were applied to evaluate the durability of single-lap adhesively bonded mild steel–mild steel (MS–MS) joints. The conditions included interior humid-cyclic aging, interior thermal-humidity-freeze cycling, exterior land and air cycling, and exterior marine cycling. The adhesive joints were characterized through shear strength–displacement behavior and failure mode analysis. The results showed a progressive decline in strength under all conditions, with the most severe degradation occurring in the marine environment, where strength decreased by 69% after 4 weeks. Land and air cycling and thermal-humidity-freeze cycling produced reductions of 60% and 53%, respectively, while humid-cyclic aging resulted in a comparatively moderate decrease of 43%. Fracture surface analysis revealed that unaged joints fail cohesively within the adhesive layer, but aged joints demonstrated a shift from adhesive–cohesive mixed failure to predominantly interfacial failure. Marine-aged joints showed almost complete interfacial debonding due to chloride ion penetration and substrate corrosion. Land and air cycling promoted oxidative surface degradation, while thermal-humidity-freeze cycling induced microcracking from freeze thaw stresses. Humid-cyclic aging mainly caused adhesive plasticization and partial interfacial weakening. These findings confirm that environmental aging significantly reduces joint strength and alters failure mechanisms, with marine exposure having the greatest impact.
LiuJXueYDongX, et al.Review of the surface treatment process for the adhesive matrix of composite materials. Int J Adhesion Adhes2023; 126: 103446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103446
2.
JairajaRNarayana NaikG. Single and dual adhesive bond strength analysis of single lap joint between dissimilar adherends. Int J Adhesion Adhes2019; 92: 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.04.016
3.
WeiYJinXLuoQ, et al.Adhesively bonded joints–a review on design, manufacturing, experiments, modeling and challenges. Composites, Part B Eng2024; 276: 111225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111225
4.
ZuoSWangLZhangJ, et al.Comparative study of resin and silane coupling agents coating treatments on bonding strength improvement of titanium and carbon fiber composites. Coatings2023; 13: 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13050903
LayecJAnsartFDuluardS, et al.Development of new surface treatments for the adhesive bonding of aluminum surfaces. Int J Adhesion Adhes2021; 117: 103006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.103006
7.
PragathiPJebaJSVelmuruganR. Study on the mechanical behavior of 3D-Printed adhesive-bonded joints under different thermal loading using the Taguchi (L16) method. J Mater Eng Perform2026; 35: 1–15.
8.
FarzanehfarNTaheriARafiemanzelatF, et al.High-performance epoxy nanocomposite adhesives with enhanced mechanical, thermal and adhesion properties based on new nanoscale ionic materials. Chem Eng J2023; 471: 144428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.144428
9.
CeylanROzunECobanO, et al.The effect of hygrothermal aging on the adhesion performance of nanomaterial reinforced aluminium adhesive joints. Int J Adhesion Adhes2023; 121: 103304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103304
10.
BarbosaAQda SilvaLFMOchsnerA. Hygrothermal aging of an adhesive reinforced with microparticles of cork. J Adhes Sci Technol2015; 29: 1714–1732. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2015.1041358
11.
PragathiPJeba JenisonSRaja SinghG, et al.Hygrothermal aging studies on adhesion behaviour of titanium dioxide nanoparticle-reinforced mild steel adhesive joints. Polym Compos2025; 46: 1–16.
12.
PragathiPJebaJSRaja SinghG, et al.Performance of adhesively bonded similar and dissimilar joints under cyclic hygrothermal aging for aerospace applications. Int J Adhesion Adhes2025; 142: 104130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2025.104130
13.
HirulkarNSJaiswalPRReisPNB, et al.Effect of hygrothermal aging and cyclic thermal shocks on the mechanical performance of single-lap adhesive joints. Int J Adhesion Adhes2020; 99: 102584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102584
14.
CostaMVianaGda SilvaLFM, et al.Environmental effect on the fatigue degradation of adhesive joints: a review. J Adhes2016; 93: 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2016.1179117
15.
GurselA. Fundamentals in adhesive bonding design for complex structures and conditions: an overview. Int J Adv Sci Technol2019; 8: 1–10.
ZhangFWangHPHicksC, et al.Experimental study of initial strengths and hygrothermal degradation of adhesive joints between thin aluminum and steel substrates. Int J Adhesion Adhes2013; 43: 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.001
18.
LeeDGKwonJWChoDH. Hygrothermal effects on the strength of adhesively bonded joints. J Adhes Sci Technol1998; 12: 1253–1275. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856198x00425
19.
LiuSChengXZhangQ, et al.An investigation of hygrothermal effects on adhesive materials and double lap shear joints of CFRP composite laminates. Composites, Part B Eng2016; 91: 431–440.
20.
SugimanSCrocombeADAshcroftIA. Experimental and numerical investigation of the static response of environmentally aged adhesively bonded joints. Int J Adhesion Adhes2013; 40: 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.08.007
21.
JiangXQiangXKolsteinMH, et al.Experimental investigation on mechanical behaviour of FRP-to-steel adhesively bonded joint under combined loading – part 2: after hygrothermal ageing. Compos Struct2015; 125: 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.040
22.
ZhangFYangXXiaY, et al.Experimental study of strain rate effects on the strength of adhesively bonded joints after hygrothermal exposure. Int J Adhesion Adhes2015; 53: 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.07.008
23.
JianzeLJingxinNWeiT, et al.Comparative study on mechanical properties of aluminum alloy and BFRP single lap joints with hygrothermal aging. J Adhes2020; 97: 918–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2020.1712656
24.
GivANAyatollahiMRGhaffariSH, et al.Effect of reinforcements at different scales on mechanical properties of epoxy adhesives and adhesive joints: a review. J Adhes2018; 94: 1082–1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2018.1452736
25.
ReisPNBSoaresJRLPereiraAM, et al.Effect of adherends and environment on static and transverse impact response of adhesive lap joints. Theor Appl Fract Mech2015; 80: 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2015.07.004
26.
AgarwalAFosterSJHamedE, et al.Influence of freeze–thaw cycling on the bond strength of steel–FRP lap joints. Composites, Part B Eng2014; 60: 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.024
27.
LiWPangBHanX, et al.Predicting the strength of adhesively bonded T-joints under cyclic temperature using a cohesive zone model. J Adhes2016; 92: 892–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2015.1055354
28.
YisaFGejinZZhenL, et al.An experimental study on the mechanical performance of BFRP–Al adhesive joints subjected to salt solutions at elevated temperature. J Adhes Sci Technol2023; 12: 1937–1957.
29.
KhaliliaSMRSharafiaMEslami-FarsaniaR, et al.Effect of thermal cycling on tensile properties of degraded FML-to-metal hybrid joints exposed to seawater. Int J Adhesion Adhes2017; 79: 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.09.011
30.
LiHLZhangKFFanXT. Effect of seawater ageing with different temperatures and concentrations on static and dynamic mechanical properties of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites. Composites, Part B Eng2019; 173: 106910.
31.
JianWJiaxinGJunxiaJ, et al.Predicting degradation of composite–titanium adhesively bonded joints exposed to seawater environment. Eng Struct2023; 297: 116993.
32.
PragathiPRaja SinghGGovindarajanKV, et al.Experimental investigation on enhancing the adhesive bonding behaviour of titanium dioxide-based BK-9 adhesives under varying ambient temperature. J Adhes2024; 100: 1066–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2023.2288922
33.
PragathiPJebaJSRaja SinghG, et al.Enhanced interfacial bonding strength in K-300 adhesive joint between aluminum alloy and mild steel substrates through effective resin precoating treatment. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp2024; 687: 133491.
34.
PragathiPJebaJSRaja SinghG, et al.A simple and efficient resin precoating treatment on anodised substrate surfaces for enhancing the adhesive bonding strength between aluminium and mild steel. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp2024; 697: 134336.
35.
QinGLiGMiP, et al.A systematic study on the failure behaviors of aluminum alloy/composite bonded joints exposed to various typical aging environments for automobiles. J Adhes2023; 99: 1508–1535. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2022.2141114
36.
QinGZhengLMiP, et al.Influence of single or multi-factor coupling of temperature, humidity and load on the aging failure of adhesively bonded CFRP/aluminum alloy composite joints for automobile applications. Int J Adhesion Adhes2023; 123: 103345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103345
37.
Da CostaJAAkhavan-SafarAMarquesEAS, et al.The influence of cyclic ageing on the fatigue performance of bonded joints. Int J Fatig2022; 161: 106939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106939
