This work investigated the flexural performance of glulam wood–polyvinyl chloride composite hollow members (GWPVC), fabricated by assembling individual wood–polyvinyl chloride composite (WPVC) elements with epoxy adhesive and strengthened in singly and doubly reinforced configurations. Shear bonding strength tests were conducted to confirm that the capacity satisfied standard requirements. Several strengthening materials, including carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP), low-cost glass fiber-reinforced polymer (LC-GFRP), and steel, were evaluated using the VIKOR method within a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework based on mechanical performance. Steel was identified as the most suitable strengthening material. The study highlights steel strengthening as an approach to improve the flexural performance and serviceability of GWPVC members, with predictions from analytical method with iterative technique (AMIT) that considers shear deformation effects and finite element method (FEM) simulations, validated against experimental results. Four-point bending tests showed that the ultimate load and initial bending stiffness increased by up to 220.63% and 109.22%, respectively, compared with unstrengthened specimens. Parametric results from AMIT demonstrate that flange reinforcement is more effective than web reinforcement, particularly when placed farther from the neutral axis. Strengthening also extended the serviceable span length of GWPVC members from 3.38 m to 5.27 m, confirming feasibility for residential prefabricated floor panel applications.
RameshMRajeshkumarLSasikalaG, et al.A critical review on wood-based polymer composites: processing, properties, and prospects. Polymers2022; 14: 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14030589
2.
ChetanachanWSookkhoDSutthitavilW, et al.PVC wood: a new look in construction. J Vinyl Addit Technol2001; 7: 134–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.10280
3.
JileLHuoRLiuW, et al.Mechanical properties of PVC-based wood–plastic composites effected by temperature. Front Mater2022; 9: 1018902. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2022.1018902
4.
ZhaoLDoctorFX. Flexural performance of reinforced aluminum–wood–plastic composite beam: An experimental and numerical investigation. Thin-Walled Struct2022; 180: 109910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.109910
5.
ZhaoLLiHWeiY, et al.Flexural properties on aluminum alloy - wood plastic composite beam strengthened by concrete. Constr Build Mater2025; 460: 139792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139792
6.
XuXWangKHuoR, et al. Axial compressive properties of GFRP-reinforced PVC-based glued wood-plastic composites column. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2024; 07316844241302884. https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844241302884
7.
WangKXuXHuoR, et al.Flexural reinforcement of wood plastic composite panels by bonding glass fiber reinforced polymer sheets and embedding bars. Polym Compos2024; 45: 14595–14607. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.28784
8.
HeZFangHZhangX, et al.Lateral behavior of wood frame shear wall using PVC wood-plastic composite (WPC) veneer panels. J Build Eng2024; 89: 109367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109367
PulngernTChucheepsakulSPadyencheanC, et al.Effects of cross-section design and loading direction on the creep and fatigue properties of wood/PVC composite beams. J Vinyl Addit Technol2010; 16: 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.20227
12.
PulngernTChimkhlaiARosarpitakV, et al.Analytical, numerical and experimental investigations on flexural strengthening for wood/PVC composite members using flat bar strips. Constr Build Mater2013; 41: 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.017
13.
PulngernTEakintumasWRosarpitakV, et al.Compressive load, thermal and acoustic properties of wood/polyvinyl chloride composite log-wall panels. J Reinf Plast Compos2017; 36: 1183–1193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684417699712
14.
PulngernTKaewkalyaPRosarpitakV, et al.Experimental and computational investigations of creep responses of wood/PVC composite members. Int Polym Process2014; 29: 307–316. https://doi.org/10.3139/217.2927
15.
PulngernTPadyencheanCRosarpitakV, et al.Flexural and creep strengthening for wood/PVC composite members using flat bar strips. Mater Des2011; 32: 3431–3439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.005
16.
SombatsompopNPrapruitWChaochanchaikulK, et al.Effects of cross-section design and testing conditions on the flexural properties of wood/PVC composite beams. J Vinyl Addit Technol2010; 16: 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.20202
17.
UdtaranakronTPulngernTRosarpitakV, et al.Structural performance of full-scale hybrid hollow core wall with WPVC composite materials under axial compression load via experimental investigation. Constr Build Mater2025; 470: 140656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140656
18.
UdtaranakronTPulngernTSombatsompopN. Analytical and experimental investigation of the flexural and bond adhesive properties of thermally modified rubberwood and hybrid glulam beams with WPVC composites. Structures2023; 58: 105498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105498
19.
EakintumasWPulngernTRosarpitakV, et al.Experimental investigation of lateral resisting elements for the wood polyvinyl chloride composite log-house under in-plane lateral loads. J Vinyl Addit Technol2022; 28: 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.21877
20.
EakintumasWPulngernTRosarpitakV, et al.Load-bearing capacity of wood polyvinyl chloride composite log-walls with openings strengthened with steel flat bars via experimental and numerical studies. Structures2022; 37: 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.003
21.
EakintumasWPulngernTRosarpitakV, et al.Finite element modeling and experimental investigation for wood/PVC composites log-walls under in-plane lateral load. Polymers2022; 14: 4673. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214673
22.
AunyingcharoenPPulngernTRosarpitakV, et al.Analytical method with iteration technique (AMIT) and finite element method (FEM) for predicting the flexural performance of glulam wood/PVC composite hollow member. BioResources2024; 19(3): 5197–5226. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.19.3.5197-5226
23.
YoddumrongPRodsinKKatawaethwaragS. Seismic strengthening of low-strength RC concrete columns using low-cost glass fiber reinforced polymers (GFRPs). Case Stud Constr Mater2020; 13: e00383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00383
24.
UdtaranakronTPulngernTMahasuwanchaiN, et al.Flexural strengthening of thermally modified rubberwood glulam beams with FRP under static and cyclic loads. Wood Res2024; 69: 469–484.
25.
İşleyenÜGhoroubiRMercimekÖ, et al.Behavior of glulam timber beam strengthened with carbon fiber reinforced polymer strip for flexural loading. J Reinf Plast Compos2021; 40: 665–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684421997924
26.
GlišovićIStevanovicBTodorovicM, et al.Glulam beams externally reinforced with CFRP plates. Wood Res2016; 61: 141–154.
27.
Wdowiak-PostulakAWieruszewskiMBahledaF, et al.Fibre-reinforced polymers and steel for the reinforcement of wooden elements—experimental and numerical analysis. Polymers2023; 15: 2062. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15092062
28.
TamrakarSShalerSLopez-AnidoR, et al.Mechanical property characterization of fiber-reinforced polymer wood-polypropylene composite panels manufactured using a double belt pressing technology. J Mater Civ Eng2012; 24: 1193–1200. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000489
29.
NaghipourMNematzadehMYahyazadehQ. Analytical and experimental study on flexural performance of WPC–FRP beams. Constr Build Mater2011; 25: 829–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.104
30.
NaghipourMArefiSLNematzadehM. Performance of longitudinal grooves to prevent debonding of GFRP sheets used for the reinforcement of WPC beams. Eur J Environ Civ Eng2013; 17: 761–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2013.815136
31.
ChakrabortySChatterjeeP. Selection of materials using multi-criteria decision-making methods with minimum data. Decis Sci Lett2013; 2: 135–148. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2013.03.005
32.
NadirYNagarajanPAmeenM, et al.Flexural stiffness and strength enhancement of horizontally glued laminated wood beams with GFRP and CFRP composite sheets. Constr Build Mater2016; 112: 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.133
33.
HeMWangYLiZ, et al.An experimental and analytical study on the bending performance of CFRP-reinforced glulam beams. Front Mater2022; 8: 2021.
34.
AbdelshahidBNassarKYoussefP, et al.Evolutionary algorithm-based design and performance evaluation of wood–plastic composite roof panels for low-cost housing. Polymers2025; 17: 795. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17060795
35.
FajdigaGŠubicBKovačičA. Bending stiffness of hybrid wood-metal composite beams: an experimentally validated numerical model. Forests2021; 12(7): 918. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070918
36.
GlišovićIPavlovićMStevanovicB, et al.Numerical analysis of glulam beams reinforced with CFRP plates. J Civ Eng Manag2017; 23: 868–879. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1341953
37.
MrówczyńskiDGajewskiTGarbowskiT. Application of the generalized nonlinear constitutive law in 2D shear flexible beam structures. Arch Civ Eng2021; 67: 157–176. https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2021.138049
38.
ASTM D905. Standard test method for strength properties of adhesive bonds in shear by compression loading.
39.
ASTM D638. Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics.
40.
ASTM D6108. Standard test method for compressive properties of plastic lumber and shapes.
41.
ASTM D3039. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.
42.
ASTM E8. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials.
43.
OgbonnaOSAkinlabiSAMadusheleN, et al.Grey-based taguchi method for multi-weld quality optimization of gas metal arc dissimilar joining of mild steel and 316 stainless steel. Results Eng2023; 17: 100963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.100963
KianiBLiangRYGrossJ. Material selection for repair of structural concrete using VIKOR method. Case Stud Constr Mater2018; 8: 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2018.03.008
46.
GentileRGalassoC. Simplified seismic loss assessment for optimal structural retrofit of RC buildings. Earthq Spectra2020; 37: 346–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020952441
47.
ASTM D198. Standard test methods of static tests of lumber in structural sizes.
48.
NiederwestbergJZhouJChuiY-H. Comparison of theoretical and laboratory out-of-plane shear stiffness values of cross laminated timber panels. Buildings2018; 8: 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8100146
