This study presents a process development and mechanical characterization for through-the-thickness yarns (TTYs) incorporated into continuous fiber-reinforced thermoset composites (CFTCs) using a 3D printing system with photopolymer curing technology. Two types of CFTCs were prepared with different ply orientations and placement of TTYs. The mechanical properties of the samples were evaluated through three-point flexural strength tests and numerical simulations. The experimental and numerical results exhibited acceptable agreement up to the first peak of the reaction force. The presence of TTYs reduced the maximum stress and altered the failure mechanisms, while improving resistance to delamination cracking. The energyabsorption capacity of the samples with TTYs was increased by 23% to 53%. However, the flexural strength of the samples decreased by 14% to 23% with the incorporation of TTYs due to the formation of small sections with low fiber content around TTYs and the concentration of von Mises stress.
TongLMouritzAPBannisterMK. 3D fibre reinforced polymer composites. Elsevier, 2002.
3.
LowKOJoharMSungAN, et al.Displacement rate effects on mixed-mode I/II delamination of laminated carbon/epoxy composites. Polym Test2022; 108: 107512. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107512.
4.
DuralE. Experimental and numerical treatment of delamination in laminated glass plate structures. J Reinforc Plast Compos2016; 35: 56–70. DOI: 10.1177/0731684415613163.
5.
GuillametGCostaJTuronA, et al.In search of the quasi-isotropic laminate with optimal delamination resistance under off-axis loads. J Reinforc Plast Compos2024; 43: 440–455. DOI: 10.1177/07316844231164234.
6.
HuJ. 3-D fibrous assemblies: properties, applications and modelling of three-dimensional textile structures. Elsevier, 2008.
7.
XuanJLiDJiangL. Fabrication, properties and failure of 3D stitched carbon/epoxy composites with no stitching fibers damage. Compos Struct2019; 220: 602–607. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.080.
8.
BaiYWeiHGuJ, et al.Size-dependent mechanical behaviors of 3D woven composite under high strain-rate compression loads. Polym Test2023; 127: 108176. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108176.
9.
DeconinckPCapelleJBouchartV, et al.Delamination propagation analysis in tufted carbon fibre-reinforced plastic composites subjected to high-velocity impact. J Reinforc Plast Compos2014; 33: 1353–1363. DOI: 10.1177/0731684414533017.
10.
McGarrigleCFernándezDMiddendorfP, et al.Extruded high-temperature thermoplastic tufting yarns for enhanced mechanical properties of composites. J Reinforc Plast Compos2020; 39: 249–259. DOI: 10.1177/0731684419886368.
11.
NajaflooBRezadoustAMLatifiM. Effect of through-the-thickness areal density and yarn fineness on the mechanical performance of three-dimensional carbon–phenolic composites. J Reinforc Plast Compos2016; 35: 1447–1459. DOI: 10.1177/0731684416653839.
12.
ElaminMLiBTanKT. Impact performance of stitched and unstitched composites in extreme low temperature arctic conditions. J dynamic behavior mater2018; 4: 317–327. DOI: 10.1007/s40870-018-0158-2.
13.
SongWLiuTSongC, et al.Effects of stitching yarn types on flexural fatigue properties of 3D stitched carbon fiber composites. Polym Test2022; 115: 107744. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107744.
14.
ShangJZhangWLiuF, et al.Z-direction performance and failure behavior of 3D printed continuous fiber reinforced composites with sinusoidal structure. Compos Sci Technol2023; 239: 110069. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110069.
15.
TekinalpHLKuncVVelez-GarciaGM, et al.Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing. Compos Sci Technol2014; 105: 144–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009.
16.
HofstätterTPedersenDBToselloG, et al.State-of-the-art of fiber-reinforced polymers in additive manufacturing technologies. J Reinforc Plast Compos2017; 36: 1061–1073. DOI: 10.1177/0731684417695648.
17.
Naranjo-LozadaJAhuett-GarzaHOrta-CastañónP, et al.Tensile properties and failure behavior of chopped and continuous carbon fiber composites produced by additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf2019; 26: 227–241. DOI: 10.1016/J.ADDMA.2018.12.020.
18.
PiramanayagamSRKalimuthuMNagarajanR, et al.Experimental investigation and statistical analysis of additively manufactured onyx-carbon fiber reinforced composites. J Appl Polym Sci2021; 138: 50338. DOI: 10.1002/app.50338.
19.
LucaDV. Design and manufacture of optimized continuous composite fiber filament using additive manufacturing systems. J Mater Sci Eng2017; 06: 2169. DOI: 10.4172/2169-0022.1000363.
HaoWLiuYZhouH, et al.Preparation and characterization of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermosetting composites. Polym Test2018; 65: 29–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.11.004.
22.
ChristSSchnabelMVorndranE, et al.Fiber reinforcement during 3D printing. Mater Lett2015; 139: 165–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.10.065.
23.
LiuGXiongYZhouL. Additive manufacturing of continuous fiber reinforced polymer composites: design opportunities and novel applications. Compos Commun2021; 27: 100907. DOI: 10.1016/j.coco.2021.100907.
24.
WangXJiangMZhouZ, et al.3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Compos B Eng2017; 110: 442–458. DOI: 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2016.11.034.
25.
ZhongWLiFZhangZ, et al.Short fiber reinforced composites for fused deposition modeling. Materials Science and Engineering: A2001; 301: 125–130. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01810-4.
26.
KabirSMFMathurKSeyamA-FM. A critical review on 3D printed continuous fiber-reinforced composites: history, mechanism, materials and properties. Compos Struct2020; 232: 111476. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111476.
27.
NingFCongWQiuJ, et al.Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling. Compos B Eng2015; 80: 369–378. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013.
28.
MoriKMaenoTNakagawaY. Dieless forming of carbon fibre reinforced plastic parts using 3D printer. Procedia Eng2014; 81: 1595–1600. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.196.
29.
Venkata ChalapathiKPrabhakarMNLeeD-W, et al.Development of thermoplastic self-healing panels by 3D printing technology and study extrinsic healing system under low-velocity impact analysis. Polym Test2023; 119: 107923. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.107923.
30.
BettiniPAlittaGSalaG, et al.Fused deposition technique for continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic. J Mater Eng Perform2017; 26: 843–848. DOI: 10.1007/s11665-016-2459-8.
31.
FidanIImeriAGuptaA, et al.The trends and challenges of fiber reinforced additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2019; 102: 1801–1818. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-03269-7.
32.
HuCSunZXiaoY, et al.Recent patents in additive manufacturing of continuous fiber reinforced composites. Recent Pat Mech Eng2019; 12: 25–36. DOI: 10.2174/2212797612666190117131659.
33.
CaseSWReifsniderKL. Fatigue of composite materials. In: Comprehensive Structural Integrity, Vol. 1–9. Elsevier, 2003, pp. 405–441. DOI: 10.1016/B0-08-043749-4/04100-8.
34.
HeXDingYLeiZ, et al.3D printing of continuous fiber-reinforced thermoset composites. Addit Manuf2021; 40: 101921. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.101921.
35.
TamezMBATahaI. A review of additive manufacturing technologies and markets for thermosetting resins and their potential for carbon fiber integration. Addit Manuf2021; 37: 101748. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101748.
36.
MingYDuanYWangB, et al.A novel route to fabricate high-performance 3d printed continuous fiber-reinforced thermosetting polymer composites. Materials2019; 12: 1369. DOI: 10.3390/ma12091369.
37.
MishraVNegiSKarS, et al.Recent advances in fused deposition modeling based additive manufacturing of thermoplastic composite structures: a review. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2023; 36: 3094–3132. DOI: 10.1177/08927057221102857.
38.
TianXTodorokiALiuT, et al.3D printing of continuous fiber reinforced polymer composites: development, application, and prospective. Chin J Mech Eng: Additive Manufacturing Frontiers2022; 1: 100016. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjmeam.2022.100016.
39.
WangBZhangZPeiZ, et al.Current progress on the 3D printing of thermosets. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater2020; 3: 462–472. DOI: 10.1007/s42114-020-00183-z.
40.
JiangHAbdullahAMDingY, et al.3D Printing of continuous fiber composites using two-stage UV curable resin. Mater Horiz2023; 10: 5508–5520. DOI: 10.1039/D3MH01304A.
41.
RahmanMAHallEGibbonL, et al.A mechanical performance study of dual cured thermoset resin systems 3D-printed with continuous carbon fiber reinforcement. Polymers2023; 15: 1384. DOI: 10.3390/polym15061384.
42.
NajaflooBRezadoustAMLatifiM. Investigation on process window of 3D printed continuous glass fiber-reinforced thermosetting composites. Polym Compos2023; 45: 448–460. DOI: 10.1002/pc.27790.
43.
AlsaadiMHinchyEPMcCarthyCT, et al.Liquid-based 4D printing of shape memory nanocomposites: a review. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing2023; 7: 35. DOI: 10.3390/jmmp7010035.
44.
GleadallA. FullControl GCode Designer: open-source software for unconstrained design in additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf2021; 46: 102109. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102109.
45.
MohamedOAMasoodSHBhowmikJL. Experimental investigation of time-dependent mechanical properties of PC-ABS prototypes processed by FDM additive manufacturing process. Mater Lett2017; 193: 58–62. DOI: 10.1016/J.MATLET.2017.01.104.
46.
TangSLemanskiSZhangX, et al.Fatigue life prediction of z-fibre pinned composite laminate under mode I loading. Compos Sci Technol2019; 174: 221–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.02.010.
