A systematic and efficient approach for the selection of material is necessary to choose a best alternative for the structure or component under consideration. The multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches are well suited to deal intricacy in judgment of material assortment. In this paper, integrated MCDM approaches like analytical hierarchy process (AHP)–technique for order preference by the resemblance to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) and AHP–multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) methods are used to rank aluminum-coconut shell ash (CSA) composites. The weightage for each criterion is calculated by AHP method and utilized in the TOPSIS and MOORA approaches to rank the materials. The target-based attributes such as density (physical property), hardness, tensile strength, toughness (mechanical properties), wear rate, and coefficient of friction (tribological properties) of the prepared composites are considered in the selection of criteria process. The composites are fabricated using stir-casting process by varying the volume fraction (5, 10, 15, and 20%) of CSA incorporated with Al-1100 matrix. A detailed study on the MCDM approaches revealed that Al-15% CSA composite emerged as the best material followed by Al-10% CSA composite among all, whereas the base matrix is found as the poor performed material in this study.
BaradeswaranAVettivelSCElaya PerumalAet al.
Experimental investigation on mechanical behaviour, modelling and optimization of wear parameters of B4C and graphite reinforced aluminium hybrid composites. Mater Des2014;
63: 620–632.
5.
DouYLiuYLiuYet al.
Friction and wear behaviors of B4C/6061Al composite. Mater Des2014;
60: 669–677.
6.
KökMÖzdinK.
Wear resistance of aluminium alloy and its composites reinforced by Al2O3 particles. J Mater Process Technol2007;
183: 301–309.
7.
Veeresh KumarGBRaoCSPSelvarajN.
Mechanical and tribological behavior of particulate reinforced aluminum metal matrix composites—a review. J Miner Mater Charact Eng2011;
10: 59–91.
8.
KalirasuSRajiniNWinowlin JappesJTet al.
Mechanical and machining performance of glass and coconut sheath fibre polyester composites using AWJM. J Reinf Plast Compos2015;
34: 564–580.
9.
SamalSKMohantySNayakSK.
Polypropylene–bamboo/glass fiber hybrid composites: fabrication and analysis of mechanical, morphological, thermal, and dynamic mechanical behavior. J Reinf Plast Compos2009;
28: 2729–2747.
10.
NunnaSChandraPRShrivastavaSet al.
A review on mechanical behavior of natural fiber based hybrid composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2012;
31: 759–769.
AnojkumarLIlangkumaranMSasirekhaV.
Expert systems with applications comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry. Expert Syst Appl2014;
41: 2964–2980.
14.
AroraRKumarSSinghGet al.
Role of different range of particle size on wear characteristics of al-rutile composites. Part Sci Technol2015;
33: 229–233.
15.
RaoRVDavimJP.
A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2008;
35: 751–760.
16.
HambaliASapuanSMIsmailNet al.
Material selection of polymeric composite automotive bumper beam using analytical hierarchy process. J Cent South Univ Technol2010;
17: 244–256.
17.
KumarRJagadishRayA.
Selection of material for optimal design using multi-criteria decision making. Procedia Mater Sci2014;
6: 590–596.
18.
MardaniAJusohANorKet al.
Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications—a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Econ Res Istraživanja2015;
28: 516–571.
19.
RaoRV.
A decision making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method. Mater Des2008;
29: 1949–1954.
20.
SapuanSMMansorMR.
Concurrent engineering approach in the development of composite products : a review. J Mater Des2014;
58: 161–167.
21.
SinghTPatnaikAFeketeGet al.
Application of hybrid analytical hierarchy process and complex proportional assessment approach for optimal design of brake friction materials. Polym Compos2019;
40: 1602–1608.
22.
AthawaleVMKumarRShankarC.
Decision making for material selection using the UTA method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2011;
57: 11–22.
23.
KarandePChakrabortyS.
Application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method for materials selection. Mater Des2012;
37: 317–324.
24.
Al-RefaieAAl-AlaweenWDiabatAet al.
Solving dynamic systems with multi-responses by integrating desirability function and data envelopment analysis. J Intell Manuf2017;
28: 387–403.
25.
MadićMRadovanovićMPetkovićD.
Non-conventional machining processes selection using multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis method. J Eng Sci Technol2015;
10: 1441–1452.
26.
AkkayaGTuranoʇluBÖztaşS.
An integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MOORA approach to the problem of industrial engineering sector choosing. Expert Syst Appl2015;
42: 9565–9573.
27.
ChakladarNDChakrabortyS.
A combined TOPSIS–AHP-method-based approach for non-traditional machining processes selection. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf2008;
222: 1613–1623.
28.
Banwet DK and Majumdar A. Comparative analysis of AHP–TOPSIS and GA–TOPSIS methods for selection of raw materials in textile industries. In: International conference on industrial engineering and operations management, Bali, Indonesia, 7–9 January 2014, pp.2071–2080.
29.
ArianHAshkanH.
Comprehensive MULTIMOORA method with target-based attributes and integrated significant coefficients for materials selection in biomedical applications. Mater Des2015;
87: 949–959.
30.
KecekGFatmaD.
A comparative analysis of TOPSIS and MOORA in laptop selection. Res Hum Soc Sci2016;
6: 1–9.
31.
PetrovićGMihajlovićJĆojbašićŽet al.
Comparison of three fuzzy MCDM methods for solving the supplier selection problem. Facta Univ Ser Mech Eng2019;
17: 455–469.
32.
RajuSSRaoGSSivaBV.
Experimental studies of mechanical properties and tribological behaviour of aluminium composite reinforced with coconut shell ash particulates. Int J Mater Eng Innov2018;
9: 140–157.
33.
Sankara RajuRSPanigrahiMKGangulyRIet al.
Optimization of tribological behaviour on Al-coconut shell ash composite at elevated temperature. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2018;
314: 012009.
34.
Sankara RajuRSPanigrahiMKGangulyRIet al.
Tribological behaviour of Al-1100-coconut shell ash (CSA) composite at elevated temperature. Tribol Int2019;
129: 55–66.
35.
Siva Sankara RajuRPanigrahiMKGangulyRIet al.
Investigation of tribological behavior of a novel hybrid composite prepared with Al-coconut shell ash mixed with graphite. Metall Mater Trans A2017;
48: 3892–3903.
36.
SharmaPKhandujaDSharmaS.
Tribological and mechanical behavior of particulate aluminum matrix composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2014;
33: 2192–2202.
37.
Siva Sankara RajuRVenkata SivaBSrinivasa RaoGet al.
Quantitative analysis of tribological performance on Al–CSA composite using orthogonal array. In: HKVorugantiKKiran KumarPVamsi Krishna (eds) Advances in applied mechanical engineering.
Singapore:
Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd, 2019, pp.381–388.
38.
Siva Sankara RajuRSrinivasa RaoGSamantraC.
Wear behavioral assessment of Al-CSAp-MMCs using grey-fuzzy approach. Measurement2019;
140: 254–268.
39.
KundakciNBiÇKararKet al.
Combined multi-criteria decision making approach based on Macbeth and multi-MOORA methods. J Oper Res Stat Econ Manag Inf Syst2016;
4: 17–26.
40.
RajuRSSRaoGS.
Assessment of tribological performance of coconut shell ash particle reinforced Al-Si-Fe composites using grey-Fuzzy approach. Tribol Ind2017;
39: 364–377.
