The energy-absorbing characteristics of filament wound hybrid carbon fiber-reinforced plastic/polylactic acid tubes with different infill pattern structures
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2019
The energy-absorbing characteristics of filament wound hybrid carbon fiber-reinforced plastic/polylactic acid tubes with different infill pattern structures
The study aims to investigate the effect of different infill pattern structures on the energy-absorbing characteristics of single filament wound carbon fiber-reinforced plastic tubes, single polylactic acid and hybrid carbon fiber-reinforced plastic/ polylactic acid tubes under quasi-static axial compression condition, which were fabricated using filament winding and additive manufacturing techniques. Five infill pattern structures of single polylactic acid tubes and hybrid tubes were studied and compared on their energy-absorbing characteristics, which referred to normal, triangle, square, hexagonal and tetrahedral patterns. It concluded that the effect of the infill pattern structure had a significant influence on energy-absorbing characteristics of single polylactic acid and hybrid carbon fiber-reinforced plastic/polylactic acid tubes. For pure polylactic acid tubes, the triangle infill pattern tube represented the highest values of energy absorption (EA) of 0.75 kJ, specific energy absorption (SEA) of 28.50 J/g, compressive strength and modulus of 69.72 MPa and 1.40 GPa, yield strength of 27.80 MPa, peak crushing force (Fpeak) of 23.13 kN and mean crushing force (Fmean) of 18.82 kN. For the hybrid carbon fiber-reinforced plastic/polylactic acid tube, tetrahedral infill pattern tube showed the highest values of EA with 0.99 kJ, SEA with 29.66 J/g, Fpeak with 22.68 MPa and yield strength with 29.91 MPa. Energy absorption interaction (EAinteraction) and interaction ratio (φe) of all specimens were evaluated, which showed that the tetrahedral infill pattern tube recorded the highest of all hybrid tubes with 259.92 J and 35.72 %. The result revealed that the tetrahedral pattern displayed better crashworthiness in terms of crushing force efficiency (CFE), EA and SEA in the hybrid structure, which had greater potential to apply as energy absorbers. Moreover, triangle and square infill patterns of hybrid tubes provided the negative interaction effect results, which conducted lower energy-absorbing characteristics compared to individual tubes, respectively.
Alia RA, Al-Ali O, Kumar S, et al. The energy-absorbing characteristics of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy honeycomb structures. Journal of Composite Materials 2019; 53: 1145–1157.
2.
SunGLiuTHuangX, et al.
Topological configuration analysis and design for foam filled multi-cell tubes. Eng Struct2018;
155: 235–250.
3.
LauSTSaid Ma YaakobMY.On the effect of geometrical designs and failure modes in composite axial crushing: a literature review. Compos Struct2012;
94: 803–812.
4.
YahayaRSapuanSJawaidM, et al.
Effect of fibre orientations on the mechanical properties of kenaf–aramid hybrid composites for spall-liner application. Defence Technol2016;
12: 52–58.
5.
ZhuGSunGLiuQ, et al.
On crushing characteristics of different configurations of metal-composites hybrid tubes. Compos Struct2017;
175: 58–69.
6.
ShinKCLeeJJKimKH, et al.
Axial crush and bending collapse of an aluminum/GFRP hybrid square tube and its energy absorption capability. Compos Struct2002;
57: 279–287.
7.
AliaRGuanZJonesN, et al.
The energy-absorption characteristics of metal tube-reinforced polymer foams. J Sandwich Struct Mater2015;
17: 74–94.
8.
HeimbsSStroblFMiddendorfP, et al.
Composite crash absorber for aircraft fuselage applications. WIT Trans Built Environ2010;
113: 3–14.
9.
BisagniCDi PietroGFraschiniL, et al.
Progressive crushing of fiber-reinforced composite structural components of a formula one racing car. Compos Struct2005;
68: 491–503.
10.
HouTPearceGPrustyB, et al.
Pressurised composite tubes as variable load energy absorbers. Compos Struct2015;
120: 346–357.
11.
KimHCShinDKLeeJJ, et al.
Crashworthiness of aluminum/CFRP square hollow section beam under axial impact loading for crash box application. Compos Struct2014;
112: 1–10.
12.
ZareiHKrögerM.Crashworthiness optimization of empty and filled aluminum crash boxes. Int J Crashworthiness2007;
12: 255–264.
13.
ZareiHKrögerMAlbertsenH.An experimental and numerical crashworthiness investigation of thermoplastic composite crash boxes. Compos Struct2008;
85: 245–257.
14.
NampoothiriKMNairNRJohnRP.An overview of the recent developments in polylactide (PLA) research. Bioresour Technol2010;
101: 8493–8501.
15.
ThompsonRCMooreCJVom SaalFS, et al.
Plastics, the environment and human health: current consensus and future trends. Phil Trans R Soc B2009;
364: 2153–2166.
16.
Rodríguez-PanesAClaverJCamachoA.The influence of manufacturing parameters on the mechanical behaviour of PLA and abs pieces manufactured by FDM: a comparative analysis. Materials2018;
11: 1333.
17.
Fernandez-VicenteMCalleWFerrandizS, et al.
Effect of infill parameters on tensile mechanical behavior in desktop 3D printing. 3D Printing Additive Manuf2016;
3: 183–192.
18.
GroenendykMGallantR.3D printing and scanning at the Dalhousie University Libraries: a pilot project. Library Hi Tech2013;
31: 34–41.
19.
RankouhiBJavadpourSDelfanianF, et al.
Failure analysis and mechanical characterization of 3D printed ABS with respect to layer thickness and orientation. J Fail Anal Prev2016;
16: 467–481.
20.
VaeziMChuaCK.Effects of layer thickness and binder saturation level parameters on 3D printing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2011;
53: 275–284.
21.
BradyD.The crystallinity of poly (phenylene sulfide) and its effect on polymer properties. J Appl Polym Sci1976;
20: 2541–2551.
22.
ZhuGSunGLiG, et al.
Modeling for CFRP structures subjected to quasi-static crushing. Compos Struct2018;
184: 41–55.
23.
ChiuLNFalzonBGRuanD, et al.
Crush responses of composite cylinder under quasi-static and dynamic loading. Compos Struct2015;
131: 90–98.
24.
SanjayMArpithaGYogeshaB.Study on mechanical properties of natural-glass fibre reinforced polymer hybrid composites: a review. Mater Today2015;
2: 2959–2967.
25.
AndrewsKEnglandGGhaniE.Classification of the axial collapse of cylindrical tubes under quasi-static loading. Int J Mech Sci1983;
25: 687–696.
26.
GuillowSLuGGrzebietaR.Quasi-static axial compression of thin-walled circular aluminium tubes. Int J Mech Sci2001;
43: 2103–2123.
27.
GreveLPickettAPayenF.Experimental testing and phenomenological modelling of the fragmentation process of braided carbon/epoxy composite tubes under axial and oblique impact. Compos Part B2008;
39: 1221–1232.
28.
Tarlochan F, Samer F, Hamouda AMS, et al. Design of thin wall structures for energy absorption applications: enhancement of crashworthiness due to axial and oblique impact forces. Thin-Walled Structures 2013; 71: 7–17.
29.
KimHCShinDKLeeJJ.Characteristics of aluminum/CFRP short square hollow section beam under transverse quasi-static loading. Compos Part B2013;
51: 345–358.
30.
PriemCOthmanRRozyckiP, et al.
Experimental investigation of the crash energy absorption of 2.5 D-braided thermoplastic composite tubes. Compos Struct2014;
116: 814–826.
31.
KalhorRCaseSW.The effect of FRP thickness on energy absorption of metal-FRP square tubes subjected to axial compressive loading. Compos Struct2015;
130: 44–50.
32.
SunGLiSLiG, et al.
On crashing behaviors of aluminium/CFRP tubes subjected to axial and oblique loading: an experimental study. Compos Part B2018;
145: 47–56.
33.
BaroutajiASajjiaMOlabiA-G.On the crashworthiness performance of thin-walled energy absorbers: recent advances and future developments. Thin-Walled Struct2017;
118: 137–163.
34.
BoriaSScattinaABelingardiG.Axial energy absorption of CFRP truncated cones. Compos Struct2015;
130: 18–28.
35.
KimJ-SYoonH-JShinK-B.A study on crushing behaviors of composite circular tubes with different reinforcing fibers. Int J Impact Eng2011;
38: 198–207.
36.
GrauersLOlssonRGutkinR.Energy absorption and damage mechanisms in progressive crushing of corrugated NCF laminates: fractographic analysis. Compos Struct2014;
110: 110–117.
37.
MamalisAGManolakosDIoannidisM, et al.
Crashworthy characteristics of axially statically compressed thin-walled square CFRP composite tubes: experimental. Compos Struct2004;
63: 347–360.
38.
JiaXChenGYuY, et al.
Effect of geometric factor, winding angle and pre-crack angle on quasi-static crushing behavior of filament wound CFRP cylinder. Compos Part B2013;
45: 1336–1343.
39.
SunGLiSLiuQ, et al.
Experimental study on crashworthiness of empty/aluminum foam/honeycomb-filled CFRP tubes. Compos Struct2016;
152: 969–993.
40.
SunGWangZHongJ, et al.
Experimental investigation of the quasi-static axial crushing behavior of filament-wound CFRP and aluminum/CFRP hybrid tubes. Compos Struct2018;
194: 208–225.
41.
BabbageJMallickP.Static axial crush performance of unfilled and foam-filled aluminum–composite hybrid tubes. Compos Struct2005;
70: 177–184.
42.
EyvazianAMozafariHHamoudaAM. Experimental study of corrugated metal-composite tubes under axial loading. 2017.
43.
ReuterCTrösterT.Crashworthiness and numerical simulation of hybrid aluminium-CFRP tubes under axial impact. Thin-Walled Struct2017;
117: 1–9.
44.
XuJMaYZhangQ, et al.
Crashworthiness of carbon fiber hybrid composite tubes molded by filament winding. Compos Struct2016;
139: 130–140.
45.
KarimiKTaitMJEl-DakhakhniWW.Testing and modeling of a novel FRP-encased steel–concrete composite column. Compos Struct2011;
93: 1463–1473.
46.
FengPChengSBaiY, et al.
Mechanical behavior of concrete-filled square steel tube with FRP-confined concrete core subjected to axial compression. Compos Struct2015;
123: 312–324.
QuanjinMRejabMSahatI.Design of portable 3-axis filament winding machine with inexpensive control system. J Mech Eng Sci2018;
12: 3479–3493.
49.
GulerMACeritMEBayramB, et al.
The effect of geometrical parameters on the energy absorption characteristics of thin-walled structures under axial impact loading. Int J Crashworthiness2010;
15: 377–390.
50.
SunGXuFLiG, et al.
Crashing analysis and multiobjective optimization for thin-walled structures with functionally graded thickness. Int J Impact Eng2014;
64: 62–74.
51.
RezvaniMJJahanA.Effect of initiator, design, and material on crashworthiness performance of thin-walled cylindrical tubes: a primary multi-criteria analysis in lightweight design. Thin-Walled Struct2015;
96: 169–182.
52.
AzizAR.The energy-absorbing characteristics of novel tube-reinforced sandwich structures. PhD Dissertation, University of Liverpool, UK, 2015.
