A series of split Hopkinson pressure bar tests on two-dimensional and three-dimensional woven composites were presented in order to obtain a reliable comparison between the two types of composites and the effect of the z-yarns along the third direction. These tests were done along different configurations: in-plane and out-of-plane compression test. For the three-dimensional woven composite, two different configurations were studied: compression responses along to the stitched direction and orthogonal to the stitched direction. It was found that three-dimensional woven composites exhibit an increase in strength for both: in-plane and out-of-plane tests.
NachtaneMTarfaouiMEl MoumenAet al.
Damage prediction of horizontal axis marine current turbines under hydrodynamic, hydrostatic and impacts loads. Compos Struct2017;
170: 146–157.
2.
NachtaneMTarfaouiMSaifaouiDet al.
Evaluation of durability of composite materials applied to renewable marine energy: case of ducted tidal turbine. Energy Rep2018;
4: 31–40.
3.
JoglekarSPankowM.Modeling of 3D woven composites using the digital element approach for accurate prediction of kinking under compressive loads. Compos Struct2017;
160: 547–559.
4.
TarfaouiMNêmeAChoukriS.Damage kinetics of glass/epoxy composite materials under dynamic compression. J Compos Mater2009;
43: 1137–1154.
5.
ZhongSGuoLLiuGet al.
A random waveness model for the stiffness and strength evaluation of 3D woven composites. Compos Struct2016;
152: 1024–1032.
6.
BoissePHamilaNGuzman-MaldonadoEet al.
The bias-extension test for the analysis of in-plane shear properties of textile composite reinforcements and prepregs: a review. Int J Mater Forming2016; 10: 1–20.
7.
SassiSTarfaouiMBenyahiaH.Experimental study of the out-of-plane dynamic behaviour of adhesively bonded composite joints using split Hopkinson pressure bars. J Compos Mater. 2018; 52: 2875–2885.
8.
WalterTRSubhashGSankarBVet al.Damage modes in 3D glass fiber epoxy woven composites under high rate of impact loading. Compos Part B2009;
40: 584–589.
9.
StobbeDMohamedM. 3D woven composites: cost and performance viability in commercial applications. In: International SAMPE symposium and exhibition, May 1999, pp.1372–1381. SAMPE.
10.
DonadonMVFalzonBGIannucciLet al.
A 3-D micromechanical model for predicting the elastic behaviour of woven laminates. Compos Sci Technol2007;
67: 2467–2477.
TarfaouiMEl MoumenAYahiaHB.Damage detection versus heat dissipation in E-glass/epoxy laminated composites under dynamic compression at high strain rate. Compos Struct2018;
186: 50–61.
13.
CallusPJMouritzAPBannisterMKet al.Tensile properties and failure mechanisms of 3D woven GRP composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf1999;
30: 1277–1287.
14.
TarfaouiMMohamedMA. Mechanical behavior and damage kinetics of woven E-glass/vinylester laminate composites under high strain rate: experimental and numerical investigation. In: Proceedings of the American society for composites: thirty-first technical conference, 2016.
15.
PankowMSalviAWaasAMet al.
Split Hopkinson pressure bar testing of 3D woven composites. Compos Sci Technol2011;
71: 1196–1208.
16.
MouritzAP.Review of z-pinned composite laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2007;
38: 2383–2397.
17.
MouritzAP.Ballistic impact and explosive blast resistance of stitched composites. Compos Part B Eng2001;
32: 431–439.
18.
RysTSankarBVIfjuPG.Investigation of fracture toughness of laminated stitched composites subjected to mixed mode loading. J Reinf Plast Compos 2010; 29: 422–430.
19.
LuoYLvLSunBet al.Transverse impact behavior and energy absorption of three-dimensional orthogonal hybrid woven composites. Compos Struct2007;
81: 202–209.
20.
BoettcherRRussellAMuellerP.Energy dissipation during impacts of spheres on plates: investigation of developing elastic flexural waves. Int J Solids Struct2017;
106: 229–239.
21.
TarfaouiMChoukriSNemeA.Effect of fibre orientation on mechanical properties of the laminated polymer composites subjected to out-of-plane high strain rate compressive loadings. Compos Sci Technol2008;
68: 477–485.
22.
BaroutajiAGilchristMDOlabiAG.Quasi-static, impact and energy absorption of internally nested tubes subjected to lateral loading. Thin Wall Struct2016;
98: 337–350.
ArbaouiJTarfaouiMAlaouiAEM.Mechanical behavior and damage kinetics of woven E-glass/vinylester laminate composites under high strain rate dynamic compressive loading: experimental and numerical investigation. Int J Impact Eng2016;
87: 44–54.
25.
Tarfaoui M, Nachtane M, Khadimallah H, et al. Simulation of mechanical behavior and damage of a large composite wind turbine blade under critical loads. Appl Compos Mater 2018; 25: 237–254.
26.
MohrDGaryGLundbergB.Evaluation of stress-strain curve estimates in dynamic experiments. Int J Impact Eng2010;
37: 161–169.
27.
LifshitzJMLeberH.Data processing in the split Hopkinson. Int J Impact Eng1994;
15: 723–733.
28.
DaviesEDHHunterSC.The dynamic compression test of solids by the method of the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). J Mech Phys Solids1963;
11: 155–179.
29.
ZhaoHGaryG.On the use of SHPB techniques to determine the dynamic behavior of materials in the range of small strains. Int J Solids Struct1996;
33: 3363–3375.
30.
Gray III GT. Classic split-Hopkinson pressure bar testing. In: ASM handbook 2000; 8: 462–476.
31.
TarfaouiMChoukriS.Effect of fibre orientation on mechanical properties of the laminated polymer composites subjected to out-of-plane high strain rate compressive loadings. Compos Sci Technol2008;
68: 477–485.
32.
LiZLambrosJ.Determination of the dynamic response of brittle composites by the use of the split Hopkinson pressure bar. Compos Sci Technol1999;
59: 1097–1107.
33.
SassiSTarfaouiMYahiaHB.An investigation of in-plane dynamic behavior of adhesively-bonded composite joints under dynamic compression at high strain rate. Compos Struct2018;
191: 168–179.
34.
LarbiGMostaphaTHocineOet al.
A practical note for SHPB test with new algorithms for delimiting pulses. Compos Struct2015;
126: 145–158.
