Predicting failure in a composite can be performed using ply level mechanisms and/or micro level mechanisms. This paper uses the generalized method of cells and high-fidelity generalized method of cells micromechanics theories, coupled with classical lamination theory, to study progressive damage in composites. Different failure theories, implemented at the fiber and matrix constituent level within a laminate, are investigated. A comparison is made among maximum stress, maximum strain, Tsai-Hill, and Tsai-Wu failure theories. To verify the failure theories, the Worldwide Failure Exercise experiments are used. The Worldwide Failure Exercise is a comprehensive study that covers a wide range of polymer matrix composite laminates. The objectives of this paper are to evaluate the current predictive capabilities of the generalized method of cells and high-fidelity generalized method of cells micromechanics theories for the progressive failure prediction of polymer matrix composite laminates and to evaluate the influence of four failure criteria applied at the fiber/matrix constituent scale. The numerical results demonstrate overall agreement with the experimental results for most of the composite layups examined, but also point to the need for more accurate resin damage progression models.
HerakovichCTMechanics of fibrous composites, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1998.
2.
Yekani FardMLiuYChattopadhyayA. Nonlinear flexural behavior and moment curvature response of epoxy resin using digital image correlation technique. J Mater Sci Eng2011; 5: 212–219.
3.
Yekani FardMLiuYChattopadhyayA. Characterization of epoxy resin including strain rate effects using digital image correlation system. J Aerosp Eng2012; 25: 308–320.
4.
Yekani Fard M, Liu Y and Chattopadhyay A. Analytical solution for flexural response of epoxy resin materials. J Aerosp Eng 2012; Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000133.
5.
Yekani Fard M, Liu Y and Chattopadhyay A. A simplified approach for flexural behavior of epoxy resin materials. J Strain Anal Eng Des 2012; Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1177/0309324711430023.
6.
Yekani FardMChattopadhyayALiuY. Multi-linear stress-strain and closed-form moment curvature response of epoxy resin materials. Int J Mech Sci2012; 57: 9–18.
7.
BoyceMCArrudaEM. An experimental and analytical investigation of the large strain compressive and tensile response of glassy polymers. Polym Eng Sci1990; 30: 1288–1298.
8.
GilatAGolbergRKRobertsGD. Strain rate sensitivity of epoxy resin in tensile and shear loading. J Aerospace Eng2007; 20: 75–89.
9.
G’SellCSouahiA. Influence of cross linking on the plastic behavior of amorphous polymers at large strains. J Eng Mater-T1997; 119: 223–227.
10.
HasanOABoyceMC. A constitutive model for the nonlinear viscoelastic viscoplastic behavior of glassy polymers. Polym Eng Sci1995; 35: 331–344.
11.
LiangYMLiechtiKM. On the large deformation and localization behavior of an epoxy resin under multiaxial stress state. Int J Solids Struct1996; 33: 1479–1500.
12.
MullikenADBoyceMC. Mechanics of the rate-dependent elastic-plastic deformation of glassy polymers from low to high strain rates. Int J Solids Struct2006; 43: 1331–1356.
13.
JonesRMMechanics of composite materials, New York, NY: Hemisphere, 1975.
14.
Bednarcyk BA and Arnold SM. MAC/GMC 4.0 user’s manual. NASA/TM—2002-212077, 2002.
15.
HintonMJSodenPD. Predicting failure in composite laminates: background to the exercise. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58: 1001–1010.
16.
SodenPDHintonMJKaddourAS. Lamina properties, lay-up configuration and loading conditions for a range of fibre reinforced composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58: 1011–1022.
17.
SodenPDHintonMJKaddourAS. A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theoris for composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol1998; 58: 1225–1254.
18.
SodenPDHintonMJKaddourAS. Biaxial test results for strength and deformation of a range of E-glass and carbon fibre reinforced composite laminates: failure exercise benchmark data. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62: 1489–1514.
19.
HintonMJKaddourASSodenPD. Evaluation of failure prediction in composite laminates: background to ‘part B’ of the exercise. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62: 1481–1488.
PinderaMJBednarcykBA. An efficient implementation of the generalized method of cells for unidirectional, multi-phased composites with complex microstructures. Compos Pt B1999; 30: 87–105.
27.
BednarcykBAPinderaMJ. Inelastic response of a woven carbon/copper composite part II: micromechanics model. J Compos Mater2000; 34: 299–331.
28.
AboudiJPinderaMJArnoldSM. Linear thermoelastic higher-order theory for periodic multiphase materials. J Applied Mech2001; 68: 697–707.
29.
AboudiJPinderaMJArnoldSM. Higher-order theory for periodic multiphase materials with inelastic phases. Int J Plast2003; 19: 805–847.
30.
AboudiJ. Micromechanical analysis of composites by the method of cells – update. Appl Mech Rev1996; 49: S83–S91.
31.
AboudiJ. The generalized method of cells and high-fidelity generalized method of cells micromechanical models – a review. Mech Adv Mater Struct2004; 11: 329–366.
32.
TsaiSWSchwartzRTSchwartzHS. Strength theories of filamentary structures. Fundamental aspects of fiber reinforced plastic composites, New York, NY: Wiley Interscience, 1968; 3–11.
33.
TsaiSWWuEM. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. J Compos Mater1971; 5: 58–80.
34.
TsaiSWHahnHTIntroduction to composite materials, Lancaster, PA: Technomic Pub. Co, 1980.
35.
GibsonRFPrinciples of composite material mechanics, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2007.
36.
BogettiTAHoppelCPRHarikVM. Predicting the nonlinear response and failure of composite laminates: correlation with experimental results. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64: 477–485.
37.
Pineda EJ, Bednarcyk BA, Waas AM, et al. Progressive failure of a unidirectional fiber-reinforced composite using the method of cells: discretization objective computational results. In: Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Honolulu, HI, April, 2012, AIAA, pp.2012–1539.
