Jute fiber (hessian cloth)-reinforced polypropylene matrix composites (50 wt% fiber) were fabricated by compression molding. Tensile strength, tensile modulus, bending strength, bending modulus, and impact strength of the composites were found to be 48 MPa, 2.5 GPa, 56 MPa, 4.5 GPa, and 18 kJ/m2, respectively. Then E-glass fiber (woven)-reinforced polypropylene-based composites (50 wt% fiber) were fabricated and the mechanical properties were compared with those of the jute-based composites. It was revealed that E-glass fiber-based composites had almost double the mechanical properties as compared to jute composites. The interfacial shear strength of the jute and E-glass fiber-based systems was investigated and found to be 2.13 and 4.66 MPa, respectively, measured using the single-fiber fragmentation test. Fracture sides after flexural testing of both types of the composites were studied by scanning electron microscope and the results revealed poor fiber matrix adhesion for jute-based composites when compared to that of the E-glass fiber composites.
Seible, F. and Karbhari, V.M. ( 1996). Advanced Composites for Civil Engineering Applications in the United States. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Composites in Infrastructure, pp. 21-37, January, Tucson, AZ.
2.
Munikenche, G.T., Naidu, A.C.B. and Rajput, C. (1999). Some Mechanical Properties of Untreated Jute Fabric Reinforced Polyester Composites , Compos.: Part A., 30(3): 277-284.
3.
Mishra, S., Mohanty, A.K., Drzal, L.T., Misra, M., Parija, S., Nayak, S.K. et al. (2003). Studies on Mechanical Performance of Biofibre/Glass Reinforced Polyester Hybrid Composites, Compos. Sci. Technol. , 63(10): 1377-1385.
4.
Bullions, T.A. , Gillespie, R.A., Price-O’Brien , J. and Loos, A.C. ( 2004). The Effect of Maleic Anhydride Modified Polypropylene on the Mechanical Properties of Feather Fiber, Kraft Pulp, Polypropylene Composites , J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 92(6): 3771-3783.
5.
Mohanty, A.K. , Misra, M. and Hinrichsen, G. (2000). Biofibers, Biodegradable Polymer and Biocomposites: An Overview, Macromol . Mater. Eng. , 276(1): 1-24.
6.
Joseph, P.V. , Joseph, K. and Thomas, S. (2002). Short Sisal Fiber Reinforced Polypropylene Composites: The Role of Interface Modification on Ultimate Properties, Compos. Interf., 9(2): 171-205.
7.
Cantero, G., Arbelaiz, A., Llano-Ponte, R. and Mondragon, I. ( 2003). Effects of Fiber Treatment on Wettability and Mechanical Behavior of Flax/Polypropylene Composites, Compos. Sci. Technol. , 63(9): 1247-1254.
8.
Buck, S.E., Lischer, D.W. and Nemat-Nasser, S. ( 1998). The Durability of E-Glass/Vinyl Ester Composite Materials Subjected to Environmental Conditioning and Sustained Loading. J. Compos. Mater., 32(9): 874-892.
9.
Cameron, N.M. , (1968). The Effect of Environment and Temperature on the Strength of E-Glass Fibers. Part 1: High Vacuum and Low Temperature. Glass Technol., 9(1): 14-21.
10.
Saheb D.N. and Jog, J.P. ( 1999). Natural Fiber Polymer Composites: A Review. Advances in Polymer Technol., 18(4): 351-363.
11.
Wittig W. ( 1994). Einsatz von Naturfasern in Kfz-Bauteilen, In: Kunstoffe im Automobilbau, VDI-Verlag, Dusseldorf, Germany, pp. 1-7.
12.
Hill, S. ( 1997). New Scientist, Vol. 1, p. 36.
13.
Cantero, G. , Arbelaiz, A., Llano-Ponte, R. and Mondragon, I. ( 2003). Effects of Fiber Treatment on Wettability and Mechanical Behavior of Flax/Polypropylene Composites, Compos . Sci. Technol. , 9(63): 1247-1258.
14.
Mohanti, A.K. and Mirsa, M. (1995). Studies on Jute Composites: A Literature Review, Polym. Plastic Technol. Eng., 35(5): 729.
15.
Rahman, S.M.M.A. , Khan, M.A. and Mustafa, A.I. (2008). Jute Reinforced Polypropylene Composite: Effect of Surface Pretreatment by Photocuring with Acrylic Monomers . J. Rein. Plast. Comp , doi: 10.1177/ 0731684408097770.
16.
Khan, M.A., Shehrzade, S. and Hassan, M.M. ( 2004). Effect of Alkali and Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation Pretreatment on Physical and Mechanical Properties of 1,6-Hexanediol Diacrylate-Grafted Jute Yarn by UV Radiation, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 92(1): 18-24.
17.
Cabral, F.S. , Paiva, M.C., Nunes, J.P. and Bernardo, C.A. (2003). A Novel Technique for the Interfacial Characterization of Glass Fiber-Polypropylene Systems, Polym . Testi., 22(8): 907-913.
18.
National Physical Laboratory Report No. MATC(A) (2001). 16: 1-69.
19.
Greenfield, M.J., Pedicini, A. and Penn, L.S. (2000). Development of a Single Fiber Fragmentation Test for High Strain Rates, Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives, 20(5): 403-407.
20.
Zhou, X.F., Wagner, H.D. and Nutt, S.R. ( 2001). Interfacial Properties of Polymer Composites Measured by Push-Out And Fragmentation Tests, Compos.: Part A, 32(11): 1543-1551.
21.
Slivka, M.A. , Chu, C.C. and Adisaputro , I.A. (1997). Fiber-Matrix Interface Studies on Bioabsorbable Composite Materials for Internal Fixation of Bone Fractures. I. Raw Material Evaluation and Measurement of Fiber-matrix Interfacial Adhesion, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. , 36(4): 469-477.
22.
Kelly, A. and Tyson, W.R. ( 1965). Tensile Properties of Fibre Reinforced Metals: Copper/Tungsten, Copper/Molybdenum, J. Mech. Phys. Solids , 13: 329-350.
23.
Drzal, L.T. , Rich, M.J., Koeng, M.F. and Lloyd, P.F., (1983). Adhesion of Graphite Fibres to Epoxy Matrices, J. Adhes., 16(2): 133-152.
24.
Wu, H.F. and Netravali, A.N. (1992). Weibull Analysis of Strength-Length Relationships in Single Nickel on SiC Fibres, J. Mater. Sci., 27(12): 3318-3324.
25.
Hassan, M.M. , Islam M.R. and Khan, M.A. (2003). Improvement of the Physico-Mechanical Properties of Jute Yarn by Photografting with 3-Trimethoxysisyl Propylmethacrylate, J. Adhesion Sci. Tech. 17(5): 737-750.
26.
Honggang, W. , Zheng, A. and Dae , G. (1999). Study on the Interfacial Bonding of Glass Fibre Reinforced Polypropylene Composite. 2. Effect of Elements on Interfacial Shear Strength and Determination of its Optimum, East China University of Technology, Fuhe Cailiao Xuebao, 16: 51-56.
