Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The influence of interfacial modification and relative fiber orientation (parallel, Pa and perpendicular, Pe) on the solid particle erosion was investigated in unidirectional (UD) reinforced glass fiber (GF) epoxy (EP) composites. The interfacial modification was varied by GF sizing. The erosive wear behavior was studied in a modified sandblasting apparatus at three impact angles (30, 60 and 90). The surface topography of the eroded composites was investigated by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and a non-contact 3D laser profilometer.

The results showed a strong dependence of the erosive wear on the jet angle. The GF/EP systems presented a brittle erosion behavior, with maximum weight loss at 90 impact angle. It was established that good fiber/matrix adhesion improved the resistance to erosive wear. On the other hand, the relative fiber orientation had anegligible effect except the erosion at 30 impact angle. High roughness of the eroded surfaces indicated for high erosion rates, i.e. low resistance to solid particle erosion.

Keywords

fiber-matrix interface jet-erosion impact angle fiber orientation GF/EP composites

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Hager, A. , Friedrich, K. , Dzenis, Y. and Paipetis, S.A. (1995). Study of erosion wear of advanced polymer composites. In: Street, K. (ed.), Whistler, B.C., Canada, Proceedings ICCM-10. Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing Ltd. pp. 155-162.

2. Tilly, G.P. (1969). Sand erosion of metals and plastics: a brief review. Wear, 14: 241-248.

3. Tilly, G.P. (1969). Erosion caused by airborne particles. Wear, 14: 63-79.

4. Miyazaki, N. and Takeda, N. (1993). Solid particle erosion of fiber reinforced plastics. Journal of Composite Materials, 27(1): 21-31.

5. Pool, K.V. , Dharan, C.K.H. and Finnie, I. (1986). Erosion wear of composite materials. Wear, 107: 1-12.

6. Zahavi, J. , Schnitt, G.F., Jr. (1981). Solid particle erosion of reinforced composite materials. Wear, 71: 179-190.

7. Tilly, G.P. and Sage, W. (1970). The interaction of particle and material behaviour in erosion process. Wear, 16: 447-465.

8. Miyazaki, N. and Hamao, T. (1996). Effect of interfacial strength on erosion behavior of FRPs. Journal of Composite Materials, 30: 35-50.

9. Tsiang, T.-H (1989). Sand erosion of fiber composites: testing and evaluation. In Chamis, C.C. (ed.), Test Methods for Design Allowables for Fibrous Composites., Vol. 2. ASTM STP 1003. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials. pp. 55-74.

10.

10. Roy, M. , Vishwanathan, B. and Sundararajan, G. (1994). The solid particle erosion of polymer matrix composites. Wear, 171: 149-161.

11.

11. Finnie, I. (1995). Some reflections on the past and future of erosion. Wear, 186- 187: 1-10.

12.

12. Hoecker, F. , Friedrich, K. , Blumberg, H. and Karger-Kocsis, J. (1995). Effects of fiber/matrix adhesion on off-axis mechanical response in carbon-fiber/epoxy-resin composites. Composites Science and Technology, 54: 317-327.

13.

13. Hoecker, F. and Karger-Kocsis, J. (1996). Surface energetics of carbon fibers and its effect on the mechanical performance of CF/EP composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 59: 139-153.

14.

14. Ruff, A.W. and Ives, L.K. (1975). Measurement of solid particle velocity in erosive wear. Wear, 35: 195-199.

15.

15. Hutchings, I. (1992). Ductile-brittle transitions and wear maps for the erosion and abrasion of brittle materials. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 25: A212-A221.

Solid Particle Erosion of Unidirectional GF Reinforced EP Composites with Different Fiber/Matrix Adhesion

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References