Determination of the Mode II Fatigue Delamination Toughness of Laminated Composites

Abstract

A study was conducted with the aim of determining a criterion for defining the onset of delamination growth for mode II loading using the end-notched flexure (ENF) test, and then using this criterion to develop a mode II toughness versus number of cycles diagram for use in design. Unidirectional graphite/epoxy specimens were fatigue tested in load control at various percentages of the mode II fracture toughness. These tests were stopped whenever a compliance change was observed, at which point the specimens were removed from the test fixture and ultrasonically inspected. The specimens were then returned to the ENF fixture for additional testing, and the process repeated. In this manner, it was determined that a 2% compliance change was necessary for crack advance to occur across a specimen’s full width. Additional tests were then conducted, and the 2% compliance change criterion used, to develop a mode II fatigue initiation toughness curve, i.e., a plot showing fatigue initiation toughness versus the number of loading cycles.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Gustaafson, C-G. and Hojo, M.

“Delamination Fatigue Crack Growth in Unidirectional Graphite/Epoxy Laminates,”

Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, Vol. 6, 1987, pp. 36-52.

2. Russell, A. J. and Street, K. N.

“The Effect of Matrix Toughness on Delamination: Static and Fatigue Fracture under Mode II Shear Loading of Graphite Fiber Composites,”

Toughened Composites, ASTM STP 937, N. J. Johnston , Ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1987, pp. 275-294.

3. Mall, S. , Yun, K-T. and Kochhar, N. K.

“Characterization of Matrix Toughness Effect on Cyclic Delamination Growth in Graphite Fiber Composites,”

Composite Materials: Fatigue and Fracture, Second Volume, ASTM STP 1012, P.A. Lagace , Ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1989, pp. 296-310.

4. Martin, R. H. and Murri, G. B. , “Characterization of Mode I and Mode II Delamination Growth and Thresholds in AS4/PEEK Composites,” Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Ninth Volume), ASTM STP 1059, S. P. Garbo , Ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, 1990, pp. 251-270.

5. O’Brien, T. K.

“Towards a Damage Tolerance Philosophy for Composite Materials and Structures,”

Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Ninth Volume), ASTM STP 1059, S. P. Garbo , Ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, 1990, pp. 7-33.

6. Murri, G. B. and Martin, R. H.

“Effect of Initial Delamination on Mode I and Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Fracture Threshold,”

Composite Materials: Fatigue and Fracture (Fourth Volume), ASTM STP 1156, W. W. Stinchcomb and N. E. Ashbough , Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, 1991, pp. 239-256,

7. Davidson, B. D.

“Prediction of Delamination Growth in Laminated Structures,”

Failure Mechanics in Advanced Polymeric Composites, AMD-Vol. 196, G. A. Kardomateas and Y. D. S. Rajapakse , Eds., American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1994, pp. 43-65.

8. ASTM Standard D6115-97 , “Standard Test Method for Mode I Fatigue Delamination Growth Onset of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites,” American Society for Testing and Materials, 1997.

9. Davidson, B. D. , Altonen, C. S. and Polaha, J. J.

“Effect of Stacking Sequence on Delamination Toughness and Delamination Growth Behavior in Composite End-Notched Flexure Specimens,”

Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Twelfth Volume), ASTM STP 1274, R. B. Deo and C. R. Saff , Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, 1996, pp. 393-413.

10.

10. Davidson, B. D. , Krüger, R. and König, M.

“Three Dimensional Analysis and Resulting Design Recommendations for Unidirectional and Multidirectional End-Notched Flexure Tests,”

Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 29, Number 16, 1995, pp. 2108-2133.

11.

11. O’Brien, T. K. , Murri, G. B. and Salpekar, S. A.

“Interlaminar Shear Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Thresholds for Composite Materials,”

Composite Materials; Fatigue and Fracture, Second Volume, ASTM STP 1012, P. A. Lagace , Ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, 1989, pp. 222-250.

12.

12. Broek, D. Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1986.

13.

13. Michaels, T. E. and Davidson, B. D.

“Ultrasonic Inspection Detects Hidden Damage in Composite Materials,”

Advanced Materials and Processes, Vol. 143, Number 3, 1993, pp. 34-38.

14.

14. Davidson, B. D. , Michaels, J. E. , Sundararaman, V. and Michaels, T. E.

“Ultrasonic Imaging of Impact Damaged Composite Panels,”

Acoustical Imaging, Volume 19, H. Ermert and H.-P. Harjes , Eds., Plenum Press, 1992, pp. 589-594.

15.

15. MIL-HDBK-17-1 , “The Composite Materials Handbook, Volume 1, Guidelines for Characterization of Structural Materials,” Department of Defense Single Stock Point, 1999.

16.

16. Neal, D. and Vangel, M. “Statistical Analysis of Mechanical Properties,” in Engineered Materials Handbook, Vol. 1: Composites, ASM International, 1987, pp. 302-307.