Researchers critique athletic admissions, claiming that lower academic standards for athletes lead to disengagement, retention issues, and mission-drift. Yet few studies scrutinize the athletic standards utilized. Despite the concentration of Black men in football and basketball, overall, white and middle-class athletes receive the greatest admission advantages suggesting athletic merit aligns with privilege. Drawing on 47 life-history interviews with Division I college athletes from one elite university, I apply Althusserian ideology to examine how exceptionally admitted participants interpret and (re)enact their advantages. Narratives revealed the institutional conditions, rituals, and practices that link athleticism to college access. Across three themes—access, ascendance, and admission—I consider how athletes are interpellated into meritorious recipients of preferential treatment, obscuring the structural alignments undergirding university access.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardo. 2017. Racism without Racists: Color-blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States. 5th ed.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
5.
CalarcoJessica McCrory. 2018. Negotiating Opportunities: How the Middle-class Secures Advantages in School. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
CoakleyJay. 2011. “Youth Sports: What Counts as ‘Positive Development?’”Journal of Sport and Social Issues35(3):306–25.
7.
CoakleyJay. 2015. Sport in Society: Issues and Controversies. 11th ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
EcksteinRick. 2017. How College Athletics Are Hurting Girls’ Sports: The Pay-to-play Pipeline. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
9.
GirouxHenry A.1981. Ideology, Culture, and the Process of Schooling. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
10.
GuinierLani. 2015. The Tyranny of the Meritocracy: Democratizing Higher Education in America. Boston, MA: Beacon.
11.
HallStuart. 1985. “Signification, Representation, Ideology: Althusser and the Post-structuralist Debates.”Critical Studies in Media Communication2(2):91–114.
12.
HextrumKirsten. 2018. “The Hidden Curriculum of College Athlete Recruitment.”Harvard Educational Review88(3):355–77.
13.
HextrumKirsten. 2019. “Reproducing Sports Stars: How Students Become Elite Athletes.”Teachers College Record121(4):1–38.
14.
HextrumKirsten. 2020a. “Bigger, Faster, Stronger: How Racist and Sexist Ideologies Persist in College Sports.” Gender and Education32(8):1053–1071.
15.
HextrumKirsten. 2020b. “Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions that Maintain Whiteness in College Sports. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education13(4):384–395.
16.
HextrumKirsten. 2021a. Special Admission: How College Sports Recruitment Favors White Suburban Athletes. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
17.
HextrumKirsten. 2021b. “Producing Athletes and Centering Whiteness: Reexamining Non-Revenue Generating Collegiate Athletic Cultures.” Journal of College and Character22(2):114–133.
18.
JayakumarUma M.PageScott E.. 2021. “Cultural Capital and Opportunities for Exceptionalism: Bias in University Admissions.”The Journal of Higher Education92:1109–39. doi:10.1080/00221546.2021.1912554.
19.
JonesSusan R.TorresVastiArminioJan. 2014. Negotiating the Complexities of Qualitative Research in Higher Education Fundamental Elements and Issues. 2nd ed.New York: Routledge.
20.
KarabelJerome. 2005. The Chosen: The Hidden History of Admission and Exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Books.
21.
KaufmanPeter. 2005. “Middle-class Social Reproduction: The Activation and Negotiation of Structural Advantages.”Sociological Forum20(2):245–70.
22.
KenyonElizabeth A.2017. “Lived Experience and the Ideologies of Preservice Social Studies Teachers.”Teaching and Teacher Education61:94–103.
23.
KhanShamus. 2012. Privilege: The Making of an Adolescent Elite at St. Paul’s School. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
KillgoreLeslie. 2009. “Merit and Competition in Selective College Admissions.”Review of Higher Education32(4):469–88.
25.
LareauAnette. 2015. “Cultural Knowledge and Social Inequality.”American Sociological Association80(1):1–27.
National Federation of State High School Associations. 2019. 2018-2019 High School Athletics Participation Survey Results. Indianapolis, IN: National Federation of State High School Associations.
28.
National Women’s Law Center. 2015. Finishing Last: Girls of Color and School Sports Opportunities. Washington, DC: National Women’s Law Center.
29.
PattersonBrian F.MatternKrista D.. 2013. Validity of the SAT for Predicting First-year Grades: 2010 SAT Validity Sample. New York: College Board.
RavitchSharon M.CarlNicole M.. 2016. Qualitative Research: Bridging the Conceptual, Theoretical, and Methodological. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
32.
SaboDonVelizPhil. 2008. Go Out and Play: Youth Sports in America. East Meadow, NY: Women’s Sports Foundation.
33.
ShamashRebecca. 2018. “(Re)production of the Contemporary Elite Through Higher Education: A Review of Critical Scholarship.” Berkeley Review of Education8(1):5–21.
34.
ShulmanJamesBowenWilliam G.. 2001. The Game of Life: College Sports and Educational Values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
SmithRonald. 2011. Pay for Play: A History of Big-time College Athletic Reform. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
36.
TompsettJamesKnoesterChris. 2021. “The Making of a College Athlete: High School Experiences, Socioeconomic Advantages, and the Likelihood of Playing College Sports.”Sociology of Sport Journal39:129–40. doi:10.1123/ssj.2020-0142.
37.
WeisLoisCipolloneKristinJenkinsHeather. 2014. Class Warfare: Class, Race, and College Admissions in Top-tier Secondary Schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
