Drawing upon work effort and gendered organizations perspectives and using data from the Current Population Survey, we examine how family structure types (i.e., combinations of marital and parental statuses) shape within- and between-gender variation in the earnings of highly educated men and women working in STEM and non-STEM occupations. We find that STEM and non-STEM women earn premia for marriage and for motherhood if they are married, with higher family-related premia for STEM women. Analysis of married men and women by specific STEM category reveals the largest parenthood premium is for women in engineering. Yet, STEM men and non-STEM men generally earn more than their counterpart women, with the largest between-gender wage difference for married parents in non-STEM occupations. Taken together, these findings provide a mixed picture of movement towards gender equality in work organizations.
AckerJoan. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.”Gender & Society4(2):139–58.
2.
Amuedo-DorantesCatalinaKimmelJean. 2005. “The Motherhood Wage Gap for Women in the United States: The Importance of College and Fertility Delay.”Review of Economics of the Household3(1):17–48.
3.
AndersonDeborah J.BinderMelissaKrauseKate. 2002. “The Motherhood Wage Penalty: Which Mothers Pay It and Why?”American Economic Review92(2):354–58.
4.
BeckerGary S.1985. “Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor.”Journal of Labor Economics3(1):S33–58.
5.
BielbyDenise D.BielbyWilliam T.1988. “She Works Hard for the Money: Household Responsibilities and the Allocation of Work Effort.”American Journal of Sociology93(5):1031–59.
6.
Blair-LoyMary. 2003. Competing Devotions: Career and Family among Women Executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M.2017. “The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations.”Journal of Economic Literature55(3):789–865.
8.
BuchmannClaudiaMcDanielAnne. 2016. “Motherhood and the Wages of Women in Professional Occupations.”RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences2(4):128–50.
BudigMichelle J.EnglandPaula. 2001. “The Wage Penalty for Motherhood.”American Sociological Review66(2):204–25.
11.
BudigMichelle J.HodgesMelissa J.2010. “Differences in Disadvantage: Variation in the Motherhood Penalty across White Women’s Earnings Distribution.”American Sociological Review75(5):705–28.
12.
BurkhauserRichard V.FengShuaizhangJenkinsStephen P.LarrimoreJeff. 2011. “Estimating Trends in U.S. Income Inequality Using the Current Population Survey: The Importance of Controlling for Censoring.”The Journal of Economic Inequality9(3):393–415.
13.
CechErin A.Blair-LoyMary. 2019. “The Changing Career Trajectories of New Parents in STEM.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America116(10):4182–87.
CorbettChristianneHillCatherine. 2015. Solving the Equation: The Variables for Women’s Success in Engineering and Computing. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
16.
CorrellShelley J.BenardStephenPaikIn. 2007. “Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?”American Journal of Sociology112(5):1297–338.
17.
Cukrowska-TorzewskaEwaMatysiakAnna. 2020. “The Motherhood Wage Penalty: A Meta-analysis.”Social Science Research 88–89:102416. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102416.
18.
EndersCraig K.2010. Applied Missing Data Analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
19.
EnglandPaula. 2010. “The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled.”Gender & Society24(2):149–66.
20.
EnglandPaulaBearakJonathanBudigMichelle J.HodgesMelissa J.2016. “Do Highly Paid, Highly Skilled Women Experience the Largest Motherhood Penalty?”American Sociological Review81(6):1161–89.
21.
EnglandPaulaLevineAndrewMishelEmma. 2020. “Is the Gender Revolution Stalled? An Update.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America17(13):6990–97.
FloodSarahKingMiriamRodgersRenaeRugglesStevenWarrenJ. Robert. 2020. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 8.0 [Dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS. doi:10.18128/D030.V8.0.
24.
FouadNadya A.ChangWen-HsinWanMinSinghRomila. 2017. “Women’s Reasons for Leaving the Engineering Field.”Frontiers in Psychology8:875. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00875.
25.
FullerSylviaCookeLynn Prince. 2018. “Workplace Variation in Fatherhood Wage Premiums: Do Formalization and Performance Pay Matter?”Work, Employment and Society32(4):768–88.
26.
FullerSylviaHirshC. Elizabeth. 2019. “‘Family-friendly’ Jobs and Motherhood Pay Penalties: The Impact of Flexible Work Arrangements Across the Educational Spectrum.”Work and Occupations46(1):3–44.
GlassJennifer L.SasslerSharonLevitteYaelMichelmoreKatherine M.2013. “What’s So Special about STEM? A Comparison of Women’s Retention in STEM and Professional Occupations.”Social Forces92(2):723–56.
29.
GlauberRebecca. 2007. “Marriage and the Motherhood Wage Penalty among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites.”Journal of Marriage and Family69(4):951–61.
30.
GlauberRebecca. 2008. “Race and Gender in Families and at Work: The Fatherhood Wage Premium.”Gender & Society22(1):8–30.
31.
GlauberRebecca. 2018. “Trends in the Motherhood Wage Penalty and Fatherhood Wage Premium for Low, Middle, and High Earners.”Demography55(5):1663–80.
32.
HaysSharon. 1996. The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
HillCatherineCorbettChristianneRoseAndresse St.2010. Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
35.
HirshfieldLaura E.GlassEmilie. 2018. “Scientific and Medical Careers: Gender and Diversity.” Pp. 479–91 in Handbook of the Sociology of Gender, 2nd ed., edited by RismanB. J.FroyumC. M.ScarboroughW. J.Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
36.
HodgesMelissa J.BudigMichelle J.2010. “Who Gets the Daddy Bonus? Organizational Hegemonic Masculinity and the Impact of Fatherhood on Earnings.”Gender & Society24(6):717–45.
37.
HuntJennifer. 2016. “Why Do Women Leave Science and Engineering?”Industrial and Labor Relations Review69(1):199–226.
38.
JeanVanessa A.PayneStephanie C.ThompsonRebecca J.2015. “Women in STEM: Family-related Challenges and Initiatives.” Pp. 291–311 in Gender and the Work-Family Experience: An Intersection of Two Domains, edited by MillsM. J.Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
39.
JeeEunjungMisraJoyaMurray-CloseMarta. 2019. “Motherhood Penalties in the U.S., 1986–2014.”Journal of Marriage and Family81(2):434–49.
JuhnChinhuiMcCueKristin. 2016. “Selection and Specialization in the Evolution of Marriage Earnings Gaps.”RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences2(4):237–69.
42.
JuhnChinhuiMcCueKristin. 2017. “Specialization Then and Now: Marriage, Children, and the Gender Earnings Gap across Cohorts.”Journal of Economic Perspectives31(1):183–204.
43.
KaufmanGayleUhlenbergPeter. 2000. “The Influence of Parenthood on the Work Effort of Married Men and Women.”Social Forces78(3):931–47.
44.
KillewaldAlexandra. 2013. “A Reconsideration of the Fatherhood Premium: Marriage, Coresidence, Biology, and Fathers’ Wages.”American Sociological Review78(1):96–116.
45.
KillewaldAlexandraGoughMargaret. 2013. “Does Specialization Explain Marriage Penalties and Premiums?”American Sociological Review78(3):477–503.
46.
KnoesterChrisEggebeenDavid J.2006. “The Effects of the Transition to Parenthood and Subsequent Children on Men’s Well-being and Social Participation.”Journal of Family Issues27(11):1532–60.
47.
LandivarLiana Christin. 2017. Mothers at Work: Who Opts Out?Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
48.
LudwigVolkerBrüderlJosef. 2018. “Is There a Male Marital Wage Premium? New Evidence from the United States.”American Sociological Review83(4):744–70.
49.
LundbergShellyRoseElaina. 2000. “Parenthood and the Earnings of Married Men and Women.”Labour Economics7(6):689–710.
50.
MartinPatricia Yancey. 2020. “Gendered Organizations: Fifty Years and Counting.” Pp. 263–96 in Gender, Considered: Feminist Reflections Across the US Sciences, edited by FenstermakerS.StewartA. J.Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
51.
MichelmoreKatherineSasslerSharon. 2016. “Explaining the Gender Wage Gap in STEM: Does Field Sex Composition Matter?”RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences2(4):194–215.
52.
MisraJoyaMurray-CloseMarta. 2014. “The Gender Wage Gap in the United States and Cross Nationally.” Sociology Compass8(11):1281–1295.
53.
MouwTedKallebergArne L.2010. “Occupations and the Structure of Wage Inequality in the United States, 1980s to 2000s.” American Sociological Review75(3):402–31.
54.
MunschChristin L.RidgewayCecilia L.WilliamsJoan C.2014. “Pluralistic Ignorance and the Flexibility Bias: Understanding and Mitigating Flextime and Flexplace Bias at Work.”Work and Occupations41(1):40–62.
55.
National Science Board, National Science Foundation. 2020. Science and Engineering Indicators 2020: The State of U.S. Science and Engineering. NSB-2020-1. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. Retrieved November 5, 2021 (https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20201/).
56.
NoonanRyan. 2017. “STEM Jobs: 2017 Update.” ESA Issue Brief #02-17. Office of the Chief Economist, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved November 5, 2021 (https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED594354.pdf).
57.
PalIpshitaWaldfogelJane. 2016. “The Family Gap in Pay: New Evidence for 1967 to 2013.”RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences2(4):104–27.
58.
PercheskiChristineWildemanChristopher. 2008. “Becoming a Dad: Employment Trajectories of Married, Cohabiting, and Nonresident Fathers.”Social Science Quarterly89(2):482–501.
59.
SanchezLauraThomsonElizabeth. 1997. “Becoming Mothers and Fathers: Parenthood, Gender, and the Division of Labor.”Gender & Society11(6):747–72.
60.
SaxLinda J.LehmanKathleen J.JacobsJerry A.KannyM. AllisonLimGloriaMonje-PaulsonLauraZimmermanHilary B.2017. “Anatomy of an Enduring Gender Gap: The Evolution of Women’s Participation in Computer Science.”The Journal of Higher Education88(2):258–93.
61.
SayerLiana C.2016. “Trends in Women’s and Men’s Time Use, 1965–2012: Back to the Future?” Pp. 43–77 in Gender and Couple Relationships, edited by McHaleS. M.KingV.Van HookJ.BoothA.Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
62.
SchwartzChristine R.2010. “Earnings Inequality and the Changing Association between Spouses’ Earnings.”American Journal of Sociology115(5):1524–57.
63.
SeronCarrollSilbeySusanCechErinRubineauBrian. 2018. “‘I am not a Feminist, but…’: Hegemony of a Meritocratic Ideology and the Limits of Critique among Women in Engineering.”Work and Occupations45(2):131–67.
64.
SmythFrederick L.NosekBrian A.2015. “On the Gender-science Stereotypes Held by Scientists: Explicit Accord with Gender-ratios, Implicit Accord with Scientific Identity.”Frontiers in Psychology6:415. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00415.
65.
StaffJeremyMortimerJeylan T.2012. “Explaining the Motherhood Wage Penalty during the Early Occupational Career.”Demography49(1):1–21.
66.
ThébaudSarahCharlesMaria. 2018. “Segregation, Stereotypes, and STEM.”Social Sciences7(7):111. doi:10.3390/socsci7070111.
67.
WaldfogelJane. 1997. “The Effect of Children on Women’s Wages.”American Sociological Review62(2):209–17.
68.
Wilkins-YelKerrie G.SimpsonAmberSparksPatricia D.2019. “Persisting Despite the Odds: Resilience and Coping Among Women in Engineering.”Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering25(4):353–68.
69.
WilliamsChristine L.MullerChandraKilanskiKristine. 2012. “Gendered Organizations in the New Economy.”Gender & Society26(4):549–73.
70.
WilliamsJoan C.2000. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do about It. New York: Oxford University Press.
71.
WilliamsJoan C.Blair-LoyMaryBerdahlJennifer L.2013. “Cultural Schemas, Social Class, and the Flexibility Stigma.”Journal of Social Issues69(2):209–34.
72.
WynnAlison T.CorrellShelley J.2018. “Puncturing the Pipeline: Do Technology Companies Alienate Women in Recruiting Sessions?”Social Studies of Science4(1):149–64.
73.
XuYonghong. 2015. “Focusing on Women in STEM: A Longitudinal Examination of Gender-based Earning Gap of College Graduates.”The Journal of Higher Education86(4):489–523.
74.
YonemuraRachelWilsonDenise. 2016. “Exploring Barriers in the Engineering Workplace: Hostile, Unsupportive, and Otherwise Chilly Conditions.”Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, June 28, New Orleans, LA.
