Past research that asserts a fatherhood wage premium often ignores the heterogeneity of fathering contexts. I expect fatherhood to produce wage gains for men if it prompts them to alter their behavior in ways that increase labor-market productivity. Identity theory predicts a larger productivity-based fatherhood premium when ties of biology, coresidence with the child, and marriage to the child’s mother reinforce one another, making fatherhood, and the role of financial provider in particular, salient, high in commitment, and clear. Employer discrimination against fathers in less normative family structures may also contribute to variation in the fatherhood premium. Using fixed-effects models and data from the 1979 cohort of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY79), I find that married, residential, biological fatherhood is associated with wage gains of about 4 percent, but unmarried residential fathers, nonresidential fathers, and stepfathers do not receive a fatherhood premium. Married residential fathers also receive no statistically significant wage premium when their wives work full-time. About 15 percent of the wage premium for married residential fathers can be explained by changes in human capital and job traits.
AdamsonsKari. 2010. “Using Identity Theory to Develop a Midrange Model of Parental Gatekeeping and Parenting Behavior.” Journal of Family Theory & Review2:137–48.
2.
AstoneNan MarieDariotisJacinda K.SonensteinFreya L.PleckJoseph H.HynesKathryn. 2010. “Men’s Work Efforts and the Transition to Fatherhood.” Journal of Family and Economic Issues31:3–13.
3.
AugustineJennifer MarchNelsonTimothyEdinKathryn. 2009. “Why Do Poor Men Have Children? Fertility Intentions among Low-Income Unmarried U.S. Fathers.” ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science624:99–117.
4.
BergerLawrence M.LangtonCallie E.2011. “Young Disadvantaged Men as Fathers.” ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science635:56–75.
5.
BianchiSuzanne M.RobinsonJohn P.MilkieMelissa A.2006. Changing Rhythms of American Family Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
6.
BudigMichelle J.EnglandPaula. 2001. “The Wage Penalty for Motherhood.” American Sociological Review66:204–225.
7.
BumpassLarryLuHsien-Hen. 2000. “Trends in Cohabitation and Implications for Children’s Family Contexts in the United States.” Population Studies54:29–41.
8.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. 2008. National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 Cohort, 1979–2008 (rounds 1–23) [computer file]. Columbus, OH: Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University.
9.
CastilloJasonWelchGregSarverChristian. 2011. “Fathering: The Relationship between Fathers’ Residence, Fathers’ Sociodemographic Characteristics, and Father Involvement.” Maternal and Child Health Journal15:1342–49.
10.
CherlinAndrew. 1978. “Remarriage as an Incomplete Institution.” American Journal of Sociology84:634–50.
11.
CookseyElizabeth C.FondellMichelle M.1996. “Spending Time with His Kids: Effects of Family Structure on Fathers’ and Children’s Lives.” Journal of Marriage and the Family58:693–707.
12.
CorrellShelley J.BenardStephenPaikIn. 2007. “Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?” American Journal of Sociology112:1297–1338.
13.
CutronaCarolyn E.1996. Social Support in Couples: Marriage as a Resource in Times of Stress. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
ForsteRenataBartkowskiJohn P.JacksonRebecca Allen. 2009. “‘Just Be There for Them’: Perceptions of Fathering among Single, Low-Income Men.” Fathering7:49–69.
15.
FoxGreer LittonBruceCarol. 2001. “Conditional Fatherhood: Identity Theory and Parental Investment Theory as Alternative Sources of Explanation of Fathering.” Journal of Marriage and Family63:394–403.
16.
Gibson-DavisChristina M.EdinKathrynMcLanahanSara. 2005. “High Hopes but Even Higher Expectations: The Retreat from Marriage among Low-Income Couples.” Journal of Marriage and Family67:1301–1312.
17.
GlauberRebecca. 2008. “Race and Gender in Families and at Work: The Fatherhood Wage Premium.” Gender & Society22:8–30.
18.
HamerJennifer. 2001. What It Means to Be Daddy: Fatherhood for Black Men Living Away From Their Children. New York: Columbia University Press.
19.
HeckmanJames J.LochnerLance J.ToddPetra E.2003. “Fifty Years of Mincer Earnings Regressions.” NBER Working Paper 9732.
20.
HenleyKariPasleyKay. 2005. “Conditions Affecting the Association between Father Identity and Father Involvement.” Fathering3:59–80.
21.
HerschJoniStrattonLeslie S.1997. “Housework, Fixed Effects, and Wages of Married Workers.” Journal of Human Resources32:285–307.
22.
HerschJoniStrattonLeslie S.2000. “Household Specialization and the Male Marriage Wage Premium.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review54:78–94.
23.
HodgesMelissa J.BudigMichelle J.2010. “Who Gets the Daddy Bonus? Organizational Hegemonic Masculinity and the Impact of Fatherhood on Earnings.” Gender & Society24:717–45.
24.
HofferthSandra L.AndersonKermyt G.2003. “Are All Dads Equal? Biology versus Marriage as a Basis for Paternal Investment.” Journal of Marriage and Family65:213–32.
25.
Ihinger-TallmanMarilynPasleyKayBuehlerCheryl. 1993. “Developing a Middle-Range Theory of Father Involvement Postdivorce.” Journal of Family Issues14:550–71.
26.
JoynerKaraPetersH. ElizabethHynesKathrynSikoraAsiaTaberJamie RubensteinRendallMichael S.2012. “The Quality of Male Fertility Data in Major U.S. Surveys.” Demography49:101–124.
27.
KaufmanGayleUhlenbergPeter. 2000. “The Influence of Parenthood on the Work Effort of Married Men and Women.” Social Forces78:931–47.
28.
KennellyIvy. 1999. “‘That Single-Mother Element’: How White Employers Typify Black Women.” Gender & Society13:168–92.
29.
KmecJulie A.2011. “Are Motherhood Penalties and Fatherhood Bonuses Warranted? Comparing Pro-work Behaviors and Conditions of Mothers, Fathers, and Non-parents.” Social Science Research40:444–59.
30.
KnoesterChrisEggebeenDavid J.2006. “The Effects of the Transition to Parenthood and Subsequent Children on Men’s Well-being and Social Participation.” Journal of Family Issues27:1532–60.
31.
KoslowskiAlison Smith. 2011. “Working Fathers in Europe: Earning and Caring.” European Sociological Review27:230–45.
32.
KreiderRose M.EllisRenee. 2011. Living Arrangements of Children: 2009. Current Population Reports P70-126. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved July 4, 2012 (http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/p70-126.pdf).
33.
LoughranDavid S.ZissimopoulosJulie M.2009. “Why Wait? The Effect of Marriage and Childbearing on the Wages of Men and Women.” Journal of Human Resources44:326–49.
34.
LundbergShellyRoseElaina. 2000. “Parenthood and the Earnings of Married Men and Women.” Labour Economics7:689–710.
35.
LundbergShellyRoseElaina. 2002. “The Effects of Sons and Daughters on Men’s Labor Supply and Wages.” Review of Economics and Statistics84:251–68.
36.
MarsiglioWilliam. 1992. “Stepfathers with Minor Children Living at Home: Parenting Perceptions and Relationship Quality.” Journal of Family Issues13:195–214.
37.
MillimetDaniel L.2000. “The Impact of Children on Wages, Job Tenure, and the Division of Household Labor.” The Economic Journal110:C139–C157.
38.
MintonCarmellePasleyKay. 1996. “Fathers’ Parenting Role Identity and Father Involvement: A Comparison of Nondivorced and Divorced, Nonresident Fathers.” Journal of Family Issues17:26–45.
39.
NockSteven L.1995. “A Comparison of Marriages and Cohabiting Relationships.” Journal of Family Issues16:53–76.
40.
NockSteven L.1998. “The Consequences of Premarital Fatherhood.” American Sociological Review63:250–63.
41.
PercheskiChristineWildemanChristopher. 2008. “Becoming a Dad: Employment Trajectories of Married, Cohabiting, and Nonresident Fathers.” Social Science Quarterly89:482–501.
42.
Pollmann-SchultMatthias. 2011. “Marriage and Earnings: Why Do Married Men Earn More than Single Men?” European Sociological Review27:147–63.
43.
QuillianLincolnPagerDevah. 2001. “Black Neighbors, Higher Crime? The Role of Racial Stereotypes in Evaluations of Neighborhood Crime.” American Journal of Sociology107:717–67.
44.
RaneThomas R.McBrideBrent A.2000. “Identity Theory as a Guide to Understanding Fathers’ Involvement with Their Children.” Journal of Family Issues21:347–66.
45.
RoyKevin M.2006. “Father Stories: A Life Course Examination of Paternal Identity among Low-Income African American Men.” Journal of Family Issues27:31–54.
46.
SanchezLauraThomsonElizabeth. 1997. “Becoming Mothers and Fathers: Parenthood, Gender, and the Division of Labor.” Gender & Society11:747–72.
47.
SeltzerJudith A.1991. “Relationships between Fathers and Children Who Live Apart: The Father’s Role After Separation.” Journal of Marriage and Family53:79–101.
48.
SeltzerJudith A.1994. “Consequences of Marital Dissolution for Children.” Annual Review of Sociology20:235–66.
49.
SouthScott J.SpitzeGlenna. 1994. “Housework in Marital and Nonmarital Households.” American Sociological Review59:327–47.
50.
StrykerSheldon. 1968. “Identity Salience and Role Performance: The Relevance of Symbolic Interaction Theory for Family Research.” Journal of Marriage and the Family30:558–64.
51.
StrykerSheldonBurkePeter J.2000. “The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly63:284–97.
52.
TachLauraMincyRonaldEdinKathryn. 2010. “Parenting as a ‘Package Deal’: Relationships, Fertility, and Nonresident Father Involvement among Unmarried Parents.” Demography47:181–204.
53.
ThoitsPeggy A.1992. “Identity Structures and Psychological Well-Being: Gender and Marital Status Comparisons.” Social Psychology Quarterly55:236–56.
54.
TownsendNicholas W.2002. The Package Deal: Marriage, Work and Fatherhood in Men’s Lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
