Gun reform after a major mass shooting in Australia has largely been heralded as a success. However, understanding how compliance is encouraged among the gun owning community with a history of opposing regulation is currently limited in systematic sociological research. Gun dealers in particular appear to be important for understanding levels of compliance and possibilities for promoting compliance, as they are simultaneously involved in the compliance process and subject to its enforcement as members of the gun owning community. This paper positions gun dealers as street-level bureaucrats responsible for implementing gun regulations and uses a Compliance Motivation framework to explore the possible motivations for compliance and their role in promoting compliance within the gun owning community. Findings are based on 28 in-depth interviews with gun dealers across Australia and demonstrate the challenging but important role that gun dealer’s play in enacting gun control policy.
AlmJamesCherryToddJonesMichaelMcKeeMichael. 2010. “Taxpayer Information Assistance Services and Tax Compliance Behavior.”Journal of Economic Psychology31(4):577–86.
2.
AlpersPhilip. 2013. “The Big Melt: How One Democracy Changed after Scrapping a Third of Its Firearms.” Pp. 205–11 in Reducing Gun Violence in America: Informing Policy with Evidence and Analysis, edited by WebsterD. W.VernickJ. S.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
AltmanJon. 2009. “The Hybrid Economy and Anthropological Engagements with Policy Discourse: A Brief Reflection 1.”The Australian Journal of Anthropology20(3):318–29.
4.
AyresIanBraithwaiteJohn. 1992. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
5.
BazemoreGordonErbeCarsten. 2004. “Reintegration and Restorative Justice: Towards a Theory and Practice of Informal Social Control and Support.” Pp. 27–56 in After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration, edited by MarunaShaddImmarigeonRussell. Cullompton, England: Willan.
6.
BeckerGary S.1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Pp. 13–68 in The Economic Dimensions of Crime, edited by Nigel G. Fielding, Alan Clarke and Robert Witt. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62853-7_2
7.
BlauPeter M.1963. “Critical Remarks on Weber’s Theory of Authority.”The American Political Science Review57(2):305–16.
BraunVirginiaClarkeVictoria. (2012). Thematic analysis. Pp. 57–71 in APA Handbooks in Psychology®. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, edited by HarrisCooperCamicPaul MLongDebra LPanterATRindskopfDavid EdSherKenneth J. American Psychological Association.
10.
BricknellSamantha. 2012. “Firearm Trafficking and Serious and Organised Crime Gangs.” AIC Reports, Research and Public Policy Series. Retrieved May 21, 2021 (https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/rpp/rpp116).
CarlsonJennifer. 2018. “Legally Armed but Presumed Dangerous: An Intersectional Analysis of Gun Carry Licensing as a Racial/Gender Degradation Ceremony.”Gender & Society32(2):204–27.
13.
ChapmanSimonAlpersPhilipAghoKingsleyJonesMichael. 2006. “Australia’s 1996 Gun Law Reforms: Faster Falls in Firearm Deaths, Firearm Suicides, and a Decade without Mass Shootings.” Injury Prevention12(6):365–72.
14.
CookPhilip J.GossKristin A.2014. The Gun Debate: What Everyone Needs to Know®. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
15.
DjankovSimeonLa PortaRafaelLopez-de-SilanesFlorencioShleiferAndrei. 2002. “The Regulation of Entry.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics117(1):1–37.
16.
FeeleyMaleolm M.1979. The Process is the Punishment. New York: Russe.
17.
GezeliusStig S.2007. “Three Paths from Law Enforcement to Compliance: Cases from the Fisheries.”Human Organization66:414–25.
18.
GezeliusStig S.2009. “Conceptual Framework for a Study of Authority.”Acta Politica44(3):241–58.
19.
GezeliusStig S.HauckMaria. 2011. “Toward a Theory of Compliance in State-Regulated Livelihoods: A Comparative Study of Compliance Motivations in Developed and Developing World Fisheries.”Law & Society Review45(2):435–70.
20.
GroffElizabeth R.2015. “Informal Social Control And Crime Events.”Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice31(1):90–106.
21.
HauckMaria. 2009. “Rethinking Small-scale Fisheries Compliance: From Criminal Justice to Social Justice.” Retrieved May 21, 2021 (https://open.uct.ac.za/handle/11427/6067).
22.
KaganRobert A.ScholzJohn T.1984. “The Criminology of the Corporation and Regulatory Enforcement Strategies.”Enforcing Regulation67:69–74.
23.
Lara-MillánArmandoCleveNicole Gonzalez Van. 2017. “Interorganizational Utility of Welfare Stigma in the Criminal Justice System.”Criminology55(1):59–84.
24.
LignierPhilEvansChrisTran-NamBinh. 2014. “Tangled up in Tape: The Continuing Tax Compliance Plight of the Small and Medium Enterprise Business Sector.”Australian Tax Forum29:217–47.
25.
LipskyMichael. 2010. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
26.
MayPeter J.2004. “Compliance Motivations: Affirmative and Negative Bases.”Law & Society Review38(1):41–68.
27.
MazerolleLorraineAntrobusEmmaBennettSarahTylerTom R.2013. “Shaping Citizen Perceptions of Police Legitimacy: A Randomized Field Trial of Procedural Justice.”Criminology51(1):33–63.
28.
MelzerScott. 2009. “Gun Crusaders: The NRA’s Culture War.”Social Forces89:3.
29.
MoodyCarlisle E.MarvellThomas B.2005. “Guns and Crime.”Southern Economic Journal71:720–36.
30.
MurphyKristinaCherneyAdrian. 2012. “Understanding Cooperation with Police in a Diverse Society.”The British Journal of Criminology52(1):181–201.
31.
National Firearms Agreement. 1996. (Cth of Australia).
32.
NewmanJoshuaHeadBrian W.2017. “Wicked Tendencies in Policy Problems: Rethinking the Distinction between Social and Technical Problems.”Policy and Society36(3):414–29.
33.
PapachristosAndrew V.MearesTracey L.FaganJeffrey. 2009. “Why Do Criminals Obey the Law? The Influence of Legitimacy and Social Networks on Active Gun Offenders.”Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology102:3.
34.
ParkerChristine. 2006. “The ‘Compliance’ Trap: The Moral Message in Responsive Regulatory Enforcement.”Law & Society Review40(3):591–622.
35.
ParsonsTalcott. 1968. The Structure of Social Action/Marshall, Pareto, Durkheim. The Structure of Social Action a Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers. Vol. 1. New York: The Free Press.
36.
PaternosterRaymondSimpsonSally. 1996. “Sanction Threats and Appeals to Morality: Testing a Rational Choice Model of Corporate Crime.”Law and Society Review30:549–83.
37.
PaternosterRaymondSaltzmanLinda EWaldoGordon PChiricosTheodore G. 1983. “Estimating Perceptual Stability and Deterrent Effects: The Role of Perceived Legal Punishment in the Inhibition of Criminal Involvement.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology74:270.
38.
SampsonRobert J.2012. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39.
ShermanLawrence W.2001. “Reducing Gun Violence: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising.”Criminal Justice1(1):11–25.
40.
SunshineJasonTylerTom R.2003. “The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing.”Law & Society Review37(3):513–48.
41.
TylerTom R.1990. “Justice, Self-interest, and the Legitimacy of Legal and Political Authority.” Pp. 171–79 in Beyond Self-interest, edited by MansbridgeJ. J.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
TylerTom R.HuoYuen. 2002. Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
43.
WeissRobert S.1995. Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: Simon and Schuster.
44.
WinterSøren C.MayPeter J.2001. “Motivation for Compliance with Environmental Regulations.”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management20(4):675–98.
45.
YoungDavid B.1983. “Cesare Beccaria: Utilitarian or Retributivist?”Journal of Criminal Justice11(4):317–26.
