Using an inductive framing analysis of news coverage, we examine how the most popular liberal and conservative news media in the United States and South Korea mobilize different nationalist narratives on China in responding to social, economic, and political upheavals during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. We identify three major areas of political cleavage in both Korean and U.S. media discourse on nationalist identities vis-à-vis the construction of the national or racialized “Other.” This includes (1) imagined solidarity against China as an adversary; (2) political disputes over boundary-making; (3) and the construction of ethnonational belonging and exclusion. Our research underscores how intrastate and interstate shifts during periods of crisis can heighten political cleavages along racial and ethnic fault lines and complicate dominant frameworks of civic and ethnic nationalism in both countries.
AllenJohnBurnsNicholasGarrettLaurieHaassRichard N.IkenberryG. JohnMahbubaniKishoreMenonShivshankarNiblettRobinNyeJoseph S.2020. “How the World Will Look after the Coronavirus Pandemic.” Foreign Policy, March20. Retrieved March 24, 2021 (https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/03/20/world-order-after-coroanvirus-pandemic).
BrubakerRogers. 2004. Ethnicity without Groups. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BrubakerRogers. 2009. “Ethnicity, Race, and Nationalism.” Annual Review of Sociology35:21–42.
10.
CalhounCraig. 1997. Nationalism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
CastlesStephen. 2011. “Globalization, Ethnic Identity and the Integration Crisis.” Ethnicities11(1):23–26.
12.
ChrismanRobert. 2008. “Globalization and the Media Industry.” The Black Scholar43(3):74–77.
13.
CollinsRandall. 1999. Macrohistory: Essays in the Sociology of the Long Run. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14.
DuranBurhanettin. 2020. “The Future of Global Great Power Competition after the Coronavirus.” Insight Turkey22(2):79–92.
15.
EntmanRobert M.2007. “Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power.” Journal of Communication57(1):163–73.
16.
FissPeer C.HirschPaul M.2005. “The Discourse of Globalization: Framing and Sensemaking of an Emerging Concept.” American Sociological Review70(1):29–52.
GarciniLuz M.Domenech RodríguezMelanie M.MercadoAlfonsoParisManuel. 2020. “A Tale of Two Crises: The Compounded Effect of COVID-19 and Anti-immigration Policy in the United States.” Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy12:S230–32.
19.
HarimanRobertLucaitesJohn Louis. 2003. “Public Identity and Collective Memory in US Iconic Photography: The Image of ‘Accidental Napalm.’” Critical Studies in Media Communication20(1):35–66.
20.
HarmesAdam. 2012. “The Rise of Neoliberal Nationalism.” Review of International Political Economy19(1):59–86.
21.
HsiehHsiu-FangShannonSarah E.2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research15(9):1277–88.
LarsenChristian Albrekt. 2017. “Revitalizing the ‘Civic’ and ‘Ethnic’ Distinction. Perceptions of Nationhood across Two Dimensions, 44 Countries and Two Decades: Revitalizing the ‘Civic’ and ‘Ethnic’ Distinction.” Nations and Nationalism23(4):970–93.
MorrisJonathan S.2007. “Slanted Objectivity? Perceived Media Bias, Cable News Exposure, and Political Attitudes.” Social Science Quarterly88(3):707–28.
31.
NewmanNicFletcherRichardKalogeropoulosAntonisNielsenRasmus. 2019. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019. Vol. 2019. Oxford, England: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
32.
NewmanNicFletcherRichardSchulzAnneAndıSimgeNielsenRasmus. 2020. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020. Vol. 2020. Oxford, England: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
33.
NortonMatthew. 2011. “A Structural Hermeneutics of the O’Reilly Factor.” Theory and Society40(3):315–46.
34.
ReeskensTimHoogheMarc. 2010. “Beyond the Civic-ethnic Dichotomy: Investigating the Structure of Citizenship Concepts across Thirty-three Countries: Beyond the Civic-ethnic Dichotomy.” Nations and Nationalism16(4):579–97.
35.
RodrikDani. 2011. The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. New York: W.W. Norton.
RutledgePaul E.2020. “Trump, COVID-19, and the War on Expertise.” The American Review of Public Administration50(6–7):505–11.
38.
SchwakJuliette. 2016. “Branding South Korea in a Competitive World Order: Discourses and Dispositives in Neoliberal Governmentality.” Asian Studies Review40(3):427–44.
39.
SeolDong-HoonSeoJungmin. 2014. “Dynamics of Ethnic Nationalism and Hierarchical Nationhood: Korean Nation and Its Othernesss since the Late 1980s.” Korea Journal54(2):5–33.
40.
ShulmanStephen. 2002. “Challenging the Civic/Ethnic and West/East Dichotomies in the Study of Nationalism.” Comparative Political Studies35(5):554–85.
41.
SimonsenKristina BakkærBonikowskiBart. 2020. “Is Civic Nationalism Necessarily Inclusive? Conceptions of Nationhood and Anti-Muslim Attitudes in Europe.” European Journal of Political Research59(1):114–36.
42.
SmithAnthony D.1991. National Identity. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press.
43.
SmithRogers. 1997. Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of American Citizenship in U.S. History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
44.
StreetJohn. 2001. Mass Media, Politics, and Democracy. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
TamirYael (Yuli). 2019. “Not So Civic: Is There a Difference between Ethnic and Civic Nationalism?” Annual Review of Political Science22(1):419–34.
46.
TaylorMalaenaGunbyKate. 2016. “Moving beyond the Sound Bite: Complicating the Relationship Between Negative Television News Framing and In-depth Reporting on Activism.” Sociological Forum31(3):577–98.
Van GorpBaldwin. 2010. “Strategies to Take Subjectivity out of Framing Analysis.” Pp. 84–109 in Doing News Framing Analysis Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, edited by D’AngeloP.KuypersJ. A.London, England: Taylor & Francis.
52.
WimmelAndreas. 2013. Ethnic Boundary Making: Institutions, Power, Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
53.
WodakRuth. 2017. “Discourses about Nationalism.” Pp. 403–20 in Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by FlowerdewJ.RichardsonJ. E.London, England: Routledge.
54.
WoodsEric TaylorSchertzerRobertGreenfeldLiahHughesChrisMiller-IdrissCynthia. 2020. “COVID-19, Nationalism, and the Politics of Crisis.” Nations and Nationalism 26(4):807–25. doi:10.1111/nana.12644.
