Using a comparative historical analysis of legislative transcripts and primary and secondary historical documents in Illinois and Michigan, we trace the adoption of a largely understudied form of monetary sanction: pay-to-stay fees. Pay-to-stay fees are financial commitments imposed by the state on incarcerated individuals for the day-to-day cost of their incarceration. Our study identified two mutually constitutive bureaucratic motivations for the adoption of these fees—austerity as the primary rationale and deservingness as a secondary rationale. This analysis highlights an earlier conceptualization of monetary sanctions as a means of revenue generation than has previously been explored. Our findings suggest that pay-to-stay fees originated in these states from broader debates about who is ultimately fiscally responsible for the welfare state and the soaring costs of maintaining the rehabilitative ideal. During periods of fiscal crisis, state legislators have consistently looked toward this type of monetary sanction as a means to fund the correctional system.
ApplemanLaura I. 2016. “Nickel and Dimed into Incarceration: Cash Register Justice in the Criminal System.” Boston College Law Review57(5):1483.
2.
Auditor General v. Hall, 300 Mich. 215 (Mich. 1942)
3.
Auditor General v. Olezniczak, 302 Mich. 336 (Mich. 1942)
4.
AviramHadar. 2015. Cheap on Crime: Recession-era Politics and the Transformation of American Punishment. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
5.
BannonAliciaDillerRebekahNagrechaMitali. 2010. Criminal Justice Debt: A Barrier to Reentry. New York: Brennan Center for Justice.
6.
BarkerVanessa. 2009. The Politics of Imprisonment: How the Democratic Process Shapes the Way America Punishes Offenders. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
7.
BeckettKatherineHarrisAlexes. 2011. “On Cash and Conviction.” Criminology & Public Policy10(3):509–37.
8.
BeckettKatherineMurakawaNaomi. 2012. “Mapping the Shadow Carceral State: Toward an Institutionally Capacious Approach to Punishment.” Theoretical Criminology16(2):221–44.
9.
BeckettKatherineWesternBruce. 2001. “Governing Social Marginality: Welfare, Incarceration, and the Transformation of State Policy.” Punishment & Society3(1):43–59.
10.
BlatterJoachimHaverlandMarkus. 2014. “Case Studies and (Causal-) Process Tracing.” Pp. 59–83 in Comparative Policy Studies, edited by EngeliI.AllisonC. R.London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
BradyHenryCollierDavid. 2010. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
BrightCharles. 1996. The Powers That Punish: Prison and Politics in the Era of the “Big House,” 1920-1955. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
14.
BrowerMeghan L.2011. “Prisoners with Pensions Pay Their Own Way: An Examination of the Michigan State Correctional Facility Reimbursement Act.” New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement37:139.
15.
BuchananKim Shayo. 2007. “It Could Happen to ‘You’: Pay-to-stay Jail Upgrades.” Michigan Law Review106:60–117.
16.
CampbellMichael C.SchoenfeldHeather. 2013. “The Transformation of America’s Penal Order: A Historicized Political Sociology of Punishment.” American Journal of Sociology118(5):1375–423.
17.
ColganBeth A.2014. “Reviving the Excessive Fines Clause.” California Law Review102(2):277–350.
18.
ComfortMegan. 2007. “Punishment Beyond the Legal Offender.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science3(1):271–96.
19.
ConboyS. P.1995. “Prison Reimbursement Statutes: The Trend Toward Requiring Inmates to Pay Their Own Way.” Drake Law Review44:325–50.
20.
EisenLauren-Brooke. 2014. “Paying for Your Time: How Charging Inmates Fees behind Bars May Violate the Excessive Fines Clause.” Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law15:319–41.
21.
EisenLauren-Brooke. 2015. “Charging Inmates Perpetuates Mass Incarceration.” New York: Brennan Center for Justice.
22.
EisenLauren-Brooke. 2017. Inside Private Prisons: An American Dilemma in the Age of Mass Incarceration. New York: Columbia University Press.
FernandesAprilCadiganMicheleEdwardsFrankHarrisAlexes. 2019. “Monetary Sanctions: A Review of Revenue Generation, Legal Challenges, and Reform.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science15:397–413.
25.
FernandesAprilFriedmanBrittanyKirkGabriela. 2020. “The ‘Damaged’ State vs. the ‘Willful’ Nonpayer: Constructing Damage, Harm and Willfulness through Pay-to-Stay Lawsuits” Manuscript submitted for publication.
26.
FriedmanBrittanyFernandesAprilKirkGabriela. 2019. Consumer logic and predatory justice: Why states sue prisoners for the cost of incarceration [Paper presentation]. American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, United States.
27.
FriedmanBrittany. 2020. “Carceral Immobility and Financial Capture: A Framework for the Consequences of Racial Capitalism Penology and Monetary Sanctions.” UCLA Criminal Justice Law Review4(1):177–84.
28.
FriedmanBrittany. 2020. “Unveiling the Necrocapitalist Dimensions of the Shadow Carceral State: On Pay-to-Stay to Recoup the Cost of Incarceration.” Journal of Criminal Justice Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1043986220965040
29.
FriedmanBrittanyPattilloMary. 2019. “Statutory Inequality: The Logics of Monetary Sanctions in State Law.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences5(1):174–96.
30.
GipsonFrances T.PierceElizabeth A.1996. “Current Trends in State Inmate User Fee Programs for Health Services.” Journal of Correctional Health Care3(2):159–78.
31.
GoodmanPhilipPageJoshuaPhelpsMichelle. 2017. Breaking the Pendulum: The Long Struggle Over Criminal Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
GordonMargaret A.GlaserDaniel. 1991. “The Use and Effects of Financial Penalties in Municipal Courts.” Criminology29(4):651–76.
33.
GottschalkMarie. 2011. “The Past, Present, and Future of Mass Incarceration in the United States: Introduction.” Criminology & Public Policy10(3):483–504.
34.
GottschalkMarie. 2015. “Razing the Carceral State.” Social Justice42(2):31–51.
35.
GottschalkMarie. 2016. Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
HarrisAlexes. 2016. A Pound of Flesh: Monetary Sanctions as Punishment for the Poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
37.
HarrisAlexesEvansHeatherBeckettKatherine. 2010. “Drawing Blood from Stones: Legal Debt and Social Inequality in the Contemporary United States.” American Journal of Sociology115(6):1753–99.
38.
HenricksKasey.2019. “Power to the Paperwork? Mandatory Financial Sanctions and the Bureaucratic Means to Racially Unequal Ends.” American Behavioral Scientist. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0002764219859620.
39.
HillsmanSally T.1990. “Fines and Day Fines.” Crime and Justice12:49–98.
40.
HintonElizabeth. 2017. From the War on Poverty to the War on Crime: The Making of Mass Incarceration in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
JacobiTonjaVan DamJeff. 2013. “The Filibuster and Reconciliation: The Future of Majoritarian Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate.” University of California Davis School of Law Review47:261–342.
42.
KayAdrianBakerPhilip. 2015. “What Can Causal Process Tracing Offer to Policy Studies? A Review of the Literature.” Policy Studies Journal43(1):1–21.
43.
Kohler-HausmannJulilly. 2015. “Guns and Butter: The Welfare State, the Carceral State, and the Politics of Exclusion in the Postwar United States.” The Journal of American History102(1):87–99.
44.
Lara-MillánArmandoGonzalez Van CleveNicole. 2017. “Interorganizational Utility of Welfare Stigma in the Criminal Justice System.” Criminology55(1):59–84.
45.
LevensonLaurie L.GordonMary. 2007. “The Dirty Little Secrets about Pay-to-stay.” Michigan Law Review First Impressions106:67–70.
46.
LevingstonKirsten D.2007. “Making the ‘Bad Guy’ Pay: Growing Use of Cost Shifting as an Economic Sanction.” Pp. 52–79 in Prison Profiteers: Who Makes Money from Mass Incarceration, edited by HerivelT.WrightP.New York: The New Press.
47.
LichtensteinAlex. 2015. “Flocatex and the Fiscal Limits of Mass Incarceration: Toward a New Political Economy of the Postwar Carceral State.” The Journal of American History102(1):113–25.
48.
LynchMona. 2009. Sunbelt Justice: Arizona and the Transformation of American Punishment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
49.
MartinKarin D.2018. “Monetary Myopia: An Examination of Institutional Response to Revenue from Monetary Sanctions for Misdemeanors.” Criminal Justice Policy Review29(6–7):630–62.
50.
MartinKarin D.2020. “Law, Money, People: Insights from a Brief History of Court Funding Concerns.” UCLA Criminal Justice Law Review4:213–26.
51.
MartinKarin D.SykesBryan L.ShannonSarahEdwardsFrankHarrisAlexes. 2018. “Monetary Sanctions: Legal Financial Obligations in U.S. Systems of Justice.” Annual Review of Criminology1(1):471–95.
52.
MartinWilliam G.2016. “Decarceration and Justice Disinvestment: Evidence from New York State.” Punishment & Society18(4):479–504.
53.
MetzlJonathan. 2011. The Protest Psychosis: How Schizophrenia Became a Black Disease. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
54.
MichtomJoshua. 2003. “Making Prisoners Pay for Their Stay: How a Popular Correctional Program Violates the Ex Post Facto Clause.” Boston University Public Interest Law Journal13:187–202.
55.
MillerReuben Jonathan. 2014. “Devolving the Carceral State: Race, Prisoner Reentry, and the Micro-Politics of Urban Poverty Management.” Punishment & Society16(3):305–35.
56.
ParsonsAnne E.2018. From Asylum to Prison: Deinstitutionalization and the Rise of Mass Incarceration after 1945. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
57.
PattilloMaryKirkGabriela. 2020. “Pay Unto Caesar: Breaches of Justice in the Monetary Sanctions Regime.” UCLA Criminal Justice Law Review4(1):49–77.
58.
PeeblesGustav. 2013. “Washing Away the Sins of Debt: The Nineteenth-Century Eradication of the Debtors’ Prison.” Comparative Studies in Society and History55(3):701–24.
PlunkettLeah A.2013. “Captive Markets.” Hastings Law Journal65(1):57–112.
62.
RothmanDavid. 1971. The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
63.
RubinAshley T.2019. “Punishment’s Legal Templates: A Theory of Formal Penal Change.” Law & Society Review53(2):518–53.
64.
SancesMichael W.YouHye Young. 2017. “Who Pays for Government? Descriptive Representation and Exploitative Revenue Sources.” The Journal of Politics79(3):1090–94.
65.
SchneiderEric C.1993. In the Web of Class: Delinquents and Reformers in Boston, 1810s-1930s. New York: New York University Press.
ShannonSarahHuebnerBeth M.HarrisAlexesMartinKarinPattilloMaryPettitBeckySykesBryanUggenChristopher. 2020. “The Broad Scope and Variation of Monetary Sanctions: Evidence from Eight States.” UCLA Criminal Justice Law Review4(1):269–81.
