This paper investigates workers’ experiences with collaborative robots in e-commerce fulfillment centers (FCs). Powered by the latest algorithmic technologies, collaborative robots operate alongside their users rather than independently. There are conflicting accounts of how they will impact job quality. On the one hand, they are dismissed for reducing worker autonomy and permitting more pervasive means of managerial control. On the other, they are heralded for augmenting human capabilities, taking on undesirable tasks, and giving workers more command over their jobs. Yet the actual effects of collaborative robots are underexplored. Using data from a survey of more than 1,500 hourly workers employed in 16 FCs operated by a U.S. retailer, I compare job characteristics and worker attitudes across facilities that use one of three main technologies to retrieve customer orders: collaborative robots, conveyors, or hand-pulled carts. The findings show that, compared to the older technologies, collaborative robots are not associated with significantly better jobs. Relative to workers in cart facilities, workers in robotics facilities report lower levels of job satisfaction, decision authority, skill discretion, and supervisor and coworker support, along with increased job insecurity, turnover intentions, and alienation. These levels are similar to those reported in conveyor facilities. In light of these findings, collaborative robots appear to be a refined means of managerial control rather than a liberating departure from past automating technologies. They are likely to impose burdens on growing numbers of workers as the e-commerce industry expands and as they find their way into other sectors.
AllanB. A.Batz-BarbarichC.SterlingH. M.TayL. (2019). Outcomes of meaningful work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 500–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12406
2.
AzadehK.De KosterR.RoyD. (2019). Robotized and automated warehouse systems: Review and recent developments. Transportation Science, 53(4), 917–945. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2018.0873
3.
BaileyD. E. (2022). Emerging technologies at work: Policy ideas to address negative consequences for work, workers, and society. ILR Review, 75(3), 527–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939221076747
BeaneM. (2019). Shadow learning: Building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1), 87–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217751692
7.
BeaneM.OrlikowskiW. J. (2015). What difference does a robot make? The material enactment of distributed coordination. Organization Science, 26(6), 1553–1573. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1004
8.
BerkersH. A.RispensS.Le BlancP. M. (2023). The role of robotization in work design: A comparative case study among logistic warehouses. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(9), 1852–1875. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2043925
9.
BlaunerB. (1964). Alienation and freedom; the factory worker and his industry. University of Chicago Press.
10.
BoydR.HoltonR. J. (2018). Technology, innovation, employment and power: Does robotics and artificial intelligence really mean social transformation?Journal of Sociology, 54(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783317726591
11.
BravermanH. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. Monthly Review Press.
12.
BroughamD.HaarJ. (2020). Technological disruption and employment: The influence on job insecurity and turnover intentions: A multi-country study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120276
13.
BucherE. L.SchouP. K.WaldkirchM. (2021). Pacifying the algorithm – anticipatory compliance in the face of algorithmic management in the gig economy. Organization, 28(1), 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420961531
14.
BurtchG.GreenwoodB.RavindranK. (2025). Lucy and the chocolate factory: Warehouse robotics and worker safety. ILR Review, 78(4), 587–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939251333754
15.
CameronC. A.MillerD. L. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317–372. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317
16.
CameronL. D. (2024). The making of the “good bad” job: How algorithmic management manufactures consent through constant and confined choices. Administrative Science Quarterly, 69(2), 458–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392241236163
17.
CohenY.ShovalS.FaccioM.MintoR. (2022). Deploying cobots in collaborative systems: Major considerations and productivity analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 60(6), 1815–1831. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1870758
DamelangA.OttoM. (2024). Who is replaced by robots? Robotization and the risk of unemployment for different types of workers. Work and Occupations, 51(2), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231162953
20.
DaughertyP. R.WilsonH. J. (2018). Human + Machine: Reimagining Work in the Age of AI. Harvard Business Review Press.
21.
DekkerF.SalomonsA.van der Waal (2017). Fear of robots at work: The role of economic self-interest. Socio-Economic Review, 15(3), 539–562. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwx005
22.
DelfantiA. (2021). The warehouse: Workers and robots at Amazon. Pluto Press.
23.
De StefanoV. (2019). Negotiating the algorithmm: Automation, artificial intelligence and labour protection. Comparative Labor Law and Policy, 41(1), 15–46. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3178233
DornellesJ. D. A.AyalaN. F.FrankA. G. (2023). Collaborative or substitutive robots? Effects on workers’ skills in manufacturing activities. International Journal of Production Research, 61(22), 7922–7955. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2240912
26.
FernandezR. M. (2001). Skill-biased technological change and wage inequality: Evidence from a plant retooling. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 273–320. https://doi.org/10.1086/324009
27.
FindlayP.LindsayC.McQuarrieJ.BennieM.CorcoranE. D.Van Der MeerR. (2017). Employer choice and job quality: Workplace innovation, work redesign, and employee perceptions of job quality in a Complex health-care setting. Work and Occupations, 44(1), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888416678038
28.
FlemingP. (2019). Robots and organization studies: Why robots might not want to steal your job. Organization Studies, 40(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618765568
29.
FragapaneG.De KosterR.SgarbossaF.StrandhagenJ. O. (2021). Planning and control of autonomous mobile robots for intralogistics: Literature review and research agenda. European Journal of Operational Research, 294(2), 405–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.01.019
30.
FranklinC. S.DominguezE. G.FrymanJ. D.LewandowskiM. L. (2020). Collaborative robotics: New era of human–robot cooperation in the workplace. Journal of Safety Research, 74, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.06.013
31.
GlavinP.BiermanA.SchiemanS. (2021). Über-Alienated: Powerless and alone in the gig economy. Work and Occupations, 48(4), 399–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884211024711
32.
GrayM. L.SuriS. (2019). Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
33.
GuendelsbergerE. (2019). On the clock: What low-wage work did to me and how it drives America insane. Little, Brown and Company.
34.
GuertlerM.TomideiL.SickN.CarmichaelM.PaulG.WambsganssA.Hernandez MorenoV.HussainS. (2023). When is a robot a cobot? Moving beyond manufacturing and arm-based cobot manipulators. Proceedings of the Design Society, 3, 3889–3898. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.390
35.
GuteliusB.TheodoreN. (2019). The future of warehouse work: Technological change in the U.S. logistics industry. UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education; Working Partnerships USA. http://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/future-of-warehouse-work/
36.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076546
IFR. (2024). Collaborative robots: How robots work alongside humans. International Federation of Robotics.
39.
JacobF.GrosseE. H.MoranaS.KönigC. J. (2023). Picking with a robot colleague: A systematic literature review and evaluation of technology acceptance in human–robot collaborative warehouses. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 180, 109262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109262
KarasekR.BrissonC.KawakamiN.HoutmanI.BongersP.AmickB. (1998). The job content questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 322–355. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8998.3.4.322
42.
KarasekR. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
43.
KelleyM. R. (1990). New process technology, job design, and work organization: A contingency model. American Sociological Review, 55(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095626
44.
KelloggK. C.ValentineM. A.ChristinA. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
45.
KembroJ. H.NorrmanA. (2025). A strategic perspective on automated warehouse systems in retail: Insights from a multiple case study. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 55(11), 57–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2024-0218
46.
KimS. (2022). Working with robots: Human resource development considerations in human–robot interaction. Human Resource Development Review, 21(1), 48–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843211068810
47.
KörnerU.Müller-ThurK.LunauT.DraganoN.AngererP.BuchnerA. (2019). Perceived stress in human–machine interaction in modern manufacturing environments—results of a qualitative interview study. Stress and Health, 35(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2853
48.
KowalskiA. M.GuteliusB.PintoS.VallasS. P. (2025). At the mercy of the market? E-commerce and warehouse work in the United States. ILR Review.
49.
KrzywdzinskiM. (2017). Automation, skill requirements and labour-use strategies: High-wage and low-wage approaches to high-tech manufacturing in the automotive industry. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32(3), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12100
50.
LeeM. K.KusbitD.MetskyE.DabbishL. (2015). Working with Machines: The Impact of Algorithmic and Data-Driven Management on Human Workers. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1603–1612. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702548
LeonardiP. M.BarleyS. R. (2008). Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization, 18(3), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.03.001
LloydC.PayneJ. (2019). Rethinking country effects: Robotics, AI and work futures in Norway and the UK. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(3), 208–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12149
55.
LloydC.PayneJ. (2023). Digital skills in context: Working with robots in lower-skilled jobs. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 44(4), 1084–1104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X221111416
56.
LodahlT. M. (1964). Patterns of job attitudes in two assembly technologies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 8(4), 482. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391429
57.
LuY.YangM. M.ZhuJ.WangY. (2024). Dark side of algorithmic management on platform worker behaviors: A mixed-method study. Human Resource Management, 63(3), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22211
58.
MajorL.ShahJ. (2020). What to expect when you’re expecting robots: The future of human-robot collaboration (First edition). Basic Books.
59.
McGuireP. M. (2024). Conveyors: Application, selection, and integration (Second edition). CRC Press.
60.
MichaelisJ. E.Siebert-EvenstoneA.ShafferD. W.MutluB. (2020). Collaborative or Simply Uncaged? Understanding Human-Cobot Interactions in Automation. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376547
61.
MoenP.KellyE. L.FanW.LeeS.-R.AlmeidaD.KossekE. E.BuxtonO. M. (2016). Does a flexibility/support organizational initiative improve high-tech Employees’ well-being? Evidence from the work, family, and health network. American Sociological Review, 81(1), 134–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415622391
62.
MonizA.KringsB.-J. (2016). Robots working with humans or humans working with robots? Searching for social dimensions in new human-robot interaction in industry. Societies, 6(3), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6030023
63.
MooreP. (2020). Data subjects, digital surveillance, AI and the future of work. (No. PE 656.305; Panel for the Future of Science and Technology). European Parliamentary Research Service. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2861/879078.
64.
MooreP.RobinsonA. (2016). The quantified self: What counts in the neoliberal workplace. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2774–2792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604328
65.
Munoz De BustilloR.Fernandez-MaciasE.EsteveF.AntonJ.-I. (2011). E pluribus unum? A critical survey of job quality indicators. Socio-Economic Review, 9(3), 447–475. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr005
66.
MutluB.ForlizziJ. (2008). Robots in organizations. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human Robot Interaction - HRI‘08, 287. https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349860
67.
NarisadaA.SchiemanS. (2022). Not just about the money: Which job qualities compensate for unjust pay?Socius, 8, 23780231221085115. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221085115
68.
NguyenT.MalikA. (2022). A two-wave cross-lagged study on AI service quality: The moderating effects of the job level and job role. British Journal of Management, 33(3), 1221–1237. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12540
69.
NielsenK.NielsenM. B.OgbonnayaC.KänsäläM.SaariE.IsakssonK. (2017). Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Work & Stress, 31(2), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2017.1304463
70.
NobleD. F. (1984). Forces of production: A social history of industrial automation. Knopf.
71.
OrlikowskiW. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice Lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
72.
OrlikowskiW. J.ScottS. V. (2015). The algorithm and the crowd: Considering the materiality of service innovation. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.09
73.
ParkerS. K.MorgesonF. P.JohnsG. (2017). One hundred years of work design research: Looking back and looking forward. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000106
74.
PasparakisA.De VriesJ.De KosterR. (2023). Assessing the impact of human–robot collaborative order picking systems on warehouse workers. International Journal of Production Research, 61(22), 7776–7790. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2183343
75.
PfeifferS. (2016). Robots, industry 4.0 and humans, or why assembly work is more than routine work. Societies, 6(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6020016
76.
RahmanH. A. (2021). The invisible cage: Workers’ reactivity to opaque algorithmic evaluations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(4), 945–988. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392211010118
77.
RenS.ChowdhuryS. (2025). Employee Digital Transformation Experience Towards Automation Versus Augmentation: Implications for Job Attitudes. Human Resource Management, 64(5), 1359–1379. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22313
78.
SewellG. (1998). The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2), 397. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393857
79.
SgarbossaF.GrosseE. H.NeumannW. P.BattiniD.GlockC. H. (2020). Human factors in production and logistics systems of the future. Annual Reviews in Control, 49, 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.04.007
80.
ShaikenH. (1986). Work transformed: Automation and labor in the computer age. Lexington Books.
81.
ShepardJ. M. (1971). Automation and alienation; a study of office and factory workers. MIT Press.
SheuJ.ChoiT. (2023). Can we work more safely and healthily with robot partners? A human-friendly robot–human-coordinated order fulfillment scheme. Production and Operations Management, 32(3), 794–812. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13899
84.
SpencerD. A. (2018). Fear and hope in an age of mass automation: Debating the future of work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12105
85.
StrunaJ.ReeseE. (2020). Automation and the surveillance-driven warehouse in inland southern California. In Alimahomed-WilsonJ.ReeseE. (Eds.), The cost of free shipping: Amazon in the global economy (pp. 85–101). Pluto Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv16zjhcj
86.
StubbsK.HindsP. J.WettergreenD. (2007). Autonomy and common ground in human-robot interaction: A field study. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(2), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2007.21
87.
ThomasR. J. (1994). What machines can’t do: Politics and technology in the industrial enterprise. University of California Press.
88.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025). The employment situation. U.S. Department of Labor.
89.
ValentineM.HindsR. (2022). How Algorithms Change Occupational Expertise by Prompting Explicit Articulation and Testing of Experts’ Theories. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4246167
90.
VallasS. P. (1988). New technology, job content, and worker alienation: A test of two rival perspectives. Work and Occupations, 15(2), 148–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888488015002002
91.
VallasS. P. (2001). Symbolic boundaries and the new division of labor: Engineers, workers and the restructuring of factory life. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 18, 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0276-5624(01)80021-4
92.
VallasS. P.KronbergA.-K. (2023). Coercion, consent, and class consciousness: How workers respond to Amazon’s production regime. Socius, 9, 23780231231216286. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231231216286
WeissA.WortmeierA.-K.KubicekB. (2021). Cobots in industry 4.0: A roadmap for future practice studies on human–robot collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 51(4), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2021.3092684
WoodA. J. (2021). Algorithmic management: Consequences for work organisation and working conditions (No. JRC124874). European Commission.
99.
WoodA. J.GrahamM.LehdonvirtaV.HjorthI. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
100.
WoodA. J.LehdonvirtaV. (2023). Platforms disrupting reputation: Precarity and recognition struggles in the remote gig economy. Sociology, 57(5), 999–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221126804
101.
YamK. C.TangP. M.JacksonJ. C.SuR.GrayK. (2023). The rise of robots increases job insecurity and maladaptive workplace behaviors: Multimethod evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(5), 850–870. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001045
102.
YangH.-J.ChengY.LiuY.-L.ChengW.-J. (2025). Techno-strain and techno-insecurity are associated with poor mental well-being in specific age and occupation groups. Journal of Occupational Health, 67(1), uiae079. https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiae079
103.
ZuboffS. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. Basic Books.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
