Occupational activism refers to socially transformative action pursued through one's occupational role or community. In this introduction to Work and Occupations’ special issue on “Working for Social Change,” we clarify how occupational activism is distinct from other concepts such as social movement activism, labor movement activism, institutional activism, and professional activism. We also identify several theoretical frameworks from adjacent fields that can be repurposed and applied to the study of occupational activism, including social movement theory, organizational inequality theories, and street-level bureaucracy theory. Altogether, our article offers a foundation for future research on activism in and through the world of work.
AdlerG. J.Jr.OrtizS. E.PlutzerE.MayrlD.ColeyJ. S.SagerR. (2021). Religion at the frontline: How religion influenced the response of local government officials to the COVID-19 pandemic. Sociology of Religion, 82(4), 397–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srab029
AmentaE.CarruthersB. G.ZylanY. (1992). A hero for the aged? The townsend movement, the political mediation model, and U.S. Old-age policy, 1934–1950. American Journal of Sociology, 98(2), 308–339. https://doi.org/10.1086/230010
6.
AmentaE.ElliottT. A.ShorttN.TierneyA. C.TurkogluD.VannB.Jr. (2019). Making good news: What explains the quality of coverage of the civil rights movement. Mobilization, 24(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-24-1-19
7.
AugustineG.KingB. G. (2024). From movements to managers: Crossing organizational boundaries in the field of sustainability. Work and Occupations, 51(2), 207–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884221142215
8.
BanaszakL. A. (2005). Inside and outside the state: Movement insider status, tactics, and public policy achievements. In MeyerD. S.JennessV.IngramH. (Eds.), Routing the opposition: Social movements, public policy, and democracy (pp. 149–176). University of Minnesota Press.
BriscoeF.ChinM. K.HambrickD. C. (2014). CEO Ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1786–1809. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0255
ChunJ. J. (2005). Public dramas and the politics of justice: Comparison of janitors’ union struggles in South Korea and the United States. Work and Occupations, 32(4), 486–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888405278950
13.
CohenP. (2025). Citizen scholar: Public engagement for social scientists. Columbia University Press.
14.
ColeyJ. S. (2015). Narrative and frame alignment in social movements: Labor problem novels and the 1929 Gastonia strike. Social Movement Studies, 14(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2013.873861
15.
ColeyJ. S. (2021). Creating secular spaces: Religious threat and the presence of secular student alliances at U.S. Colleges and universities. Sociological Forum, 36(3), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12725
16.
ColeyJ. S.AnthonyJ. (2026). Faithfully queer: Pathways to occupational activism within nonaffirming religious traditions in the United States. In LGBTQ religious activism: Rethinking identity, faith, and social change. The University of North Carolina Press.
17.
ColeyJ. S.CornfieldD. B.IsaacL. W.DickersonD. C. (2022). Social movements as schooling for careers: Career consequences of the Nashville civil rights movement. Social Movement Studies, 21(3), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1837098
18.
ColeyJ. S.DasD.GomezG.McElroyJ.Schachle-GordonJ. (2025). How educational opportunity structures shape the presence, forms, and outcomes of campus activism. Sociological Focus, 58(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2024.2431221
19.
ColeyJ. S.MorrisonD. R.TaylorL. L.Schachle-GordonJ. L.GomezG. (2023). Gendered organizations as heterosexualized organizations: The case of housing, roommate, and visitation policies at Christian colleges and universities. Socius, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231231217819
20.
ColeyJ. S.SchachleJ. L. (2023). Occupational activism and the new labor activism: Illustrations from the education sector and an agenda for future research. Work and Occupations, 50(3), 420–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231162935
CornfieldD. B.ColeyJ. S.IsaacL. W.DickersonD. C. (2019). Occupational activism and racial desegregation at work: Activist careers after the nonviolent Nashville civil rights movement. Research in the Sociology of Work, 32, 217–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0277-283320180000032014
De WeldeK.OllilainenM.SolomonC. R. (2024). Solidarity as resistance: Feminist administrators in U.S. academia. Social Currents, 11(4), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294965231221788
27.
EarlJ. (2004). The cultural consequences of social movements. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH. (Eds.), The blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 508–530). Blackwell.
28.
EisensteinH. (1996). Inside agitators. Temple University Press.
29.
FineJ. R. (2006). Worker centers: Organizing communities at the edge of the dream. ILR Press/Cornell University Press.
30.
GarrickJ. (2021). How worker centers organize low-wage workers: An exploration of targets and strategies. Labor Studies Journal, 46(2), 134–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X21989429
31.
GhazianiA. (2025). The cultural field of queer nightlife: Organizations, artists, and curatorial activism. The Sociological Quarterly, 65(4), 724–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2025.2466496
32.
GjataJ.RoweM. S.RoudbaiS. (2023). Expand or translate?: Theorising work in professionals’ activism. In MaestripieriL.BelliniA. (Eds.), Professionalism and social change (pp. 255–279). Springer Nature.
33.
GoalwinG. (2024). Sad puppies and SJWs: Symbolic revolution and challenges to field orthodoxy in the struggle for control of science fiction’s hugo awards. The Sociological Quarterly, 65(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2023.2252866
HutchinsonB.ShircliffJ. E.GlassC.MillerG. H.Marquez-VelardeG.SuárezM. I. (2025). Analyzing trans and nonbinary workers’ response to workplace discrimination. Work and Occupations, 52(2), 278–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884241240079
37.
IsaacL. (2012). Literary activists and battling books: The labor problem novel as contentious movement medium. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change, 33(1), 17–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-786X(2012)0000033005
38.
IsaacL. W.ColeyJ. S.CornfieldD. B.DickersonD. C. (2016). Preparation pathways and movement participation: Insurgent schooling and nonviolent direct action in the Nashville civil rights movement. Mobilization, 21(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-21-2-155
39.
IsaacL. W.ColeyJ. S.CornfieldD. B.DickersonD. C. (2020). Pathways to modes of movement participation: Micromobilization in the Nashville civil rights movement. Social Forces, 99(1), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz117
40.
IsaacL. W.ColeyJ. S.MaiQ. D.JacobsA. W. (2022). Striking news: Discursive power of the press as capitalist resource in gilded age strikes. American Journal of Sociology, 127(5), 1602–1663. https://doi.org/10.1086/719424
41.
IsaacL. W.RoseB. (2024). Movement for Black lives at work? Racial justice spillover, labor organization, and new worker militancy. The Sociological Quarterly, 65(4), 558–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2024.2357549
42.
JasperJ. M. (1999). The art of moral protest. University of Chicago Press.
43.
KingB. G. (2008). A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 395–421. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.3.395
44.
KlatchR. E. (1999). A generation divided: The new left, the new right, and the 1960s. University of California Press.
45.
KochanT. A.FineJ. R.BronfenbrennerK.NaiduS.BarnesJ.Diaz-LinhartY.KallasJ.KimJ.MinsterA.TongD.TownsendP.TwissD. (2023). An overview of US workers’ current organizing efforts and collective actions. Work and Occupations, 50(3), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231168793
46.
KoopmansR.OlzakS. (2004). Discursive opportunities and the evolution of right-wing violence in Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 110(1), 198–230. https://doi.org/10.1086/386271
47.
KorpiW. (1983). The democratic class struggle. Routledge.
48.
KucinskasJ.ZylanY. (2023). Walking the moral tightrope: Federal civil servants’ loyalties, caution, and resistance under the Trump administration. American Journal of Sociology, 128(6), 1761–1808. https://doi.org/10.1086/725313
49.
LiM.SukJ.ZhangY.PevehouseJ. C.SunY.KwonH.LianR.WangR.DongX.ShahD. V. (2024). Platform affordances, discursive opportunity, and social media activism: A cross-platform analysis of #MeToo on Twitter, Facebook, and Reddit, 2017–2020.” New Media & Society, online first.
50.
LipskyM. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
51.
LudersJ. (2006). The economics of movement success: Business responses to civil rights mobilization. American Journal of Sociology, 111(4), 963–998. https://doi.org/10.1086/498632
52.
MaddoxP. L.SchmalenbergerS. (2024). Beyond the numbers: Brass players hearing gender in the music workplace. The Sociological Quarterly, 65(2), 204–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2023.2292121
53.
McAdamD. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. University of Chicago Press.
54.
McAdamD. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 64–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/228463
55.
McAdamD. (1989). The biographical consequences of activism. American Sociological Review, 54(5), 744–760. https://doi.org/10.2307/2117751
56.
McCammonH. J. (2022). Discursive opportunity structure. In SnowD. A.PortaD.KlandermansB.McAdamD. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements (2nd ed., pp. 1–3). Wiley.
57.
McCammonH. J.MuseC. S.NewmanH. D.TerrellT. M. (2007). Movement framing and discursive opportunity structures: The political successes of the U.S. Women’s jury movements. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 725–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200504
58.
McDonnellM.-H.KingB. G.SouleS. A. (2015). A dynamic process model of private politics: Activist targeting and corporate receptivity to social challenges. American Sociological Review, 80(3), 654–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415581335
59.
McKaneR. G.McCammonH. J. (2018). Why we march: The role of grievances, threats, and movement organizational resources in the 2017 women’s marches. Mobilization, 23(4), 401–424. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-23-4-401
MoodyJWeissmanS (2025). Religious freedom as a defense for DEI? Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/institutions/religious-colleges/2025/03/13/religious-freedom-defense-dei
63.
MorrisA. D. (1984). The origins of the civil rights movement. The Free Press.
NelsonJ. L.JohnsonT. D. (2024). How white workers navigate racial difference in the workplace: Social-emotional processes and the role of workplace racial composition. Work and Occupations, 51(3), 362–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231176833
66.
PettinicchioD. (2012). Institutional activism: Reconsidering the insider/outsider dichotomy in social movements. Sociology Compass, 6(6), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2012.00465.x
RhombergC.LopezS. (2021). Understanding strikes in the 21st century: Perspectives from the United States. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change, 44(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-786X20210000044005
SchachleJ. (2022). “I think that’s the Norma Rae in me”: Teachers’ perceptions of outcomes for the 2018 Oklahoma teacher walkout. Sociological Focus, 55(4), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2022.2134238
72.
Schachle-GordonJ. (2025). “If I’m going to be an ally, I have to walk the walk”: Negotiating occupational activism within K-12 educational contexts.” Sociological Inquiry, online first. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.70034
73.
SchmalzS.LudwigC.WebsterE. (2018). The power resources approach: Developments and challenges. Global Labour Journal, 9(2), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v9i2.3569
74.
SchurmanR. (2004). Fighting ‘frankenfoods’: Industry opportunity structures and the efficacy of the anti-biotech movement in Western Europe. Social Problems, 51(2), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2004.51.2.243
75.
SchussmanA.SouleS. A. (2005). Process and protest: Accounting for individual protest participation. Social Forces, 84(2), 1083–1108. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0034
76.
SilverB. (2003). Forces of labor: Workers' movements and globalization since 1870. Cambridge University Press.
77.
SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH.McCammonH. J. (2019). Mapping and opening up the terrain. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH.McCammonH. J. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (2nd ed, pp. 1–16). Wiley.
TanJ. S.LukaN.MazoE. (2025). Unlikely organizers: The rise of tech worker labor activism. ILR Review, online first.
80.
TarrowS. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.
81.
VallasS. P.JohnstonH. (2023). Labor unbound? Assessing the current surge in labor activism. Work and Occupations, 50(3), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231162929
82.
Van DykeN.SouleS. A. (2002). Structural social change and the mobilizing effect of threat: Explaining levels of patriot and militia organizing in the United States. Social Problems, 49(4), 497–520. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2002.49.4.497
83.
VaughanD. (2014). Analogy, cases, and comparative social organization. In SwedbergR. (Ed.), Theorizing in social science: The context of discovery (pp. 61–84). Stanford University Press.
WrightE. O. (2000). Working-class power, capitalist-class interests, and class compromise. American Journal of Sociology, 105(4), 957–1002. https://doi.org/10.1086/210397
88.
YavorskyJ. E. (2016). Cisgendered organizations: Trans women and inequality in the workplace. Sociological Forum, 31(4), 948–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12291
