The Future(s) of Work? Disparities Around Changing Job Conditions When Remote/Hybrid or Returning to Working at Work

Abstract

The future of work is ambiguous at best. Despite widespread shifts to remote/hybrid work during the COVID-19 lockdown, there is a paucity of knowledge about changing job conditions in tandem with different work locales. Is the move to remote/hybrid work a disrupter or accentuator of existing norms and inequalities? Drawing on nationally representative, four-wave panel survey data (October 2020 to April 2022) collected from U.S. workers who spent at least some time working from home since the pandemic onset, we examine effects of within-person changes in where respondents work on changes in job conditions (psychological job demands, job control, coworker support, and monitoring). Estimates from fixed-effects models show that, compared with returning to working at work, ongoing remote and moving to hybrid work lead to greater reductions in psychological job demands, especially among older women and men. Black and Hispanic women moving back to the office experience the greatest loss of decision latitude and schedule control. While white workers see increased coworker support when returning to the office, returning Black and Hispanic men report a decline in coworker support. Family caregivers’ job conditions do not improve whether remote/hybrid or returning to work. Qualitative data collected from Amazon Mechanic Turk illuminate mechanisms leading to salutary effects of remote work, but also the stress of combining jobs with family carework.

Keywords

remote work job conditions intersectionality mixed methods COVID-19

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acker

(1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002

Acker

(2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499

Allen

T. D.

Golden

T. D.

Shockley

K. M.

(2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273

Allison

P. D.

(2009). Fixed effects regression models. Sage Publications.

Alon

Doepke

Olmstead-Rumsey

Tertilt

(2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on Gender Equality. Working Paper. 26947. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26947.

Arnett

J. J.

(2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469

Barrero

J. M.

Bloom

Buckman

Davis

S. J.

(2023). Survey of Working Arrangements and Attitudes (SWAA) July 2023 Updates .

Blair-Loy

(2003). Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. [Reprint d. Ausg.:]. Harvard University Press.

Brown

(2020). Employee surveillance software demand increased as workers transitioned to home working | ZDNet. Retrieved July 12, 2022, https://www.zdnet.com/article/employee-surveillance-software-demand-increased-as-workers-transitioned-to-home-working/.

10.

Chavez

Weisshaar

Cabello-Hutt

(2022). Gender and racial discrimination in hiring before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from a field experiment of accountants, 2018–2020. Work and Occupations, 49(3), 275–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884221094539

11.

Chesley

(2014). Information and communication technology use, work intensification and employee strain and distress. Work, Employment and Society, 28(4), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017013500112

12.

Collins

Landivar

L. C.

Ruppanner

Scarborough

W. J.

(2021). COVID-19 and the gender gap in work hours. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(S1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12506

13.

Collins

P. H.

Bilge

(2020). Intersectionality (Second edition). Polity Press.

14.

Cornfield

D. B.

(2023). The new labor activism, a new labor sociology. Work and Occupations, 50(3), 316–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231168042

15.

Crenshaw

(1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

16.

Dash

Morrow

B. H.

Mainster

Cunningham

(2007). Lasting effects of hurricane andrew on a working-class community. Natural Hazards Review, 8(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:1(13)

17.

Dey

Frazis

Loewenstein

Sun

(2020). Ability to work from home: Evidence from two surveys and implications for the labor market in the COVID-19 pandemic. Monthly Labor Review. https://doi.org/10.21916/mlr.2020.14

18.

Donnelly

Proctor-Thomson

S. B.

(2015). Disrupted work: Home-based teleworking (HbTW) in the aftermath of a natural disaster: Home-based teleworking in disasters. New Technology, Work and Employment, 30(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12040

19.

Eurofound (2013). Impact of the crisis on working conditions in Europe. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.

20.

Fan

Moen

(2022). Working more, less or the same during COVID-19? A mixed method, intersectional analysis of remote workers. Work and Occupations, 49(2), 143–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884211047208

21.

Fan

Zhu

Moen

(2018). Micro-level experiences of macro-level change: A cohort perspective on China’s shift away from state-sector employment. Advances in Life Course Research, 35, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2018.01.006

22.

Fothergill

Peek

L. A.

(2004). Poverty and disasters in the United States: A review of recent sociological findings. Natural Hazards, 32(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000026792.76181.d9

23.

Gajendran

R. S.

Harrison

D. A.

(2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524

24.

Gemelas

Davison

Keltner

Ing

(2022). Inequities in employment by race, ethnicity, and sector during COVID-19. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 9(1), 350–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-021-00963-3

25.

Gibbs

Mengel

Siemroth

(2021). Work from Home & Productivity: Evidence from Personnel & Analytics Data on IT Professionals. SSRN Scholarly Paper. 3843197. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3843197

26.

Glass

J. L.

Noonan

M. C.

(2016). Telecommuting and earnings trajectories among American women and men 1989–2008. Social Forces, 95(1), 217–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow034

27.

Golden

T. D.

(2006). The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.369

28.

Hipp

Krzywdzinski

(2023). Remote work: New fields and challenges for labor activism. Work and Occupations, 50(3), 445–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231163135

29.

Jacobs

J. A.

Gerson

(2004). The time divide: Work, family and gender inequality (1. paperback ed). Harvard University Press.

30.

Kalleberg

A. L.

(2013). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. Russel Sage Foundation.

31.

Kelly

E. L.

Moen

(2021). Overload: How good jobs went bad and what we can do about it. Princeton University Press.

32.

Kossek

E. E.

Gettings

Misra

(2021). The future of flexibility at work. Harvard Business Review, September 28.

33.

Landivar

L. C.

Ruppanner

Scarborough

W. J.

Collins

(2020). Early signs indicate that COVID-19 is exacerbating gender inequality in the labor force. Socius, 6, 2378023120947997. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120947997

34.

Mas

Pallais

(2020). Alternative work arrangements. Annual Review of Economics, 12(1), 631–658. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-022020-032512

35.

Microsoft (2022). 2022 Work trend index: Annual report.

36.

Moen

(2001). The gendered life course. In Binstock

R. H.

George

L. K.

(Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (pp. 179–196). Academic Press.

37.

Moen

(2022). The uneven stress of social change: Disruptions, disparities, and mental health. Society and Mental Health, 12(2), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/21568693221100171

38.

Moen

Pedtke

J. H.

Flood

(2020). Disparate disruptions: Intersectional COVID-19 employment effects by age, gender, education, and race/ethnicity. Work, Aging and Retirement, 6(4), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waaa013

39.

Mortimer

J. T.

Moen

(2016). The changing social construction of age and the life course: Precarious identity and enactment of ‘early’ and ‘encore’ stages of adulthood. In Shanahan

M. J.,

Mortimer

J. T.

, & Kirkpatrick Johnson

(Eds.), Handbook of the life course, handbooks of sociology and social research (pp. 111–129). Springer International Publishing.

40.

Munsch

C. L.

Ridgeway

C. L.

Williams

J. C.

(2014). Pluralistic ignorance and the flexibility bias: Understanding and mitigating flextime and flexplace bias at work. Work and Occupations, 41(1), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888413515894

41.

Nicholas

Hull

(2022). Elon Musk’s email to Tesla employees: Return to the office or leave the company - bloomberg. Retrieved June 9, 2022, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-01/musk-s-tesla-ultimatum-return-to-office-or-work-somewhere-else.

42.

Padavic

Reskin

(2002). Women and men at work. Sage Publications, Inc.

43.

Pager

(2009). Marked: Race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration (Paperback ed). University of Chicago Press.

44.

Pager

Shepherd

(2008). The sociology of discrimination: Racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 181–209. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131740

45.

Paolucci

(1996). The changing dynamics of working time. Time & Society, 5(2), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X96005002002

46.

Parker

Horowitz

J. M.

Minkin

(2022). COVID-19 pandemic continues to reshape work in America. Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends Project. Retrieved May 9, 2022, https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2022/02/16/covid-19-pandemic-continues-to-reshape-work-in-america/.

47.

Perlow

L. A.

Kelly

E. L.

(2014). Toward a model of work redesign for better work and better life. Work and Occupations, 41(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888413516473

48.

Petts

R. J.

Carlson

D. L.

Pepin

J. R.

(2021). A gendered pandemic: Childcare, homeschooling, and parents’ employment during COVID-19. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(S2), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12614

49.

Powell

Craig

(2015). Gender differences in working at home and time use patterns: Evidence from Australia. Work, Employment and Society, 29(4), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017014568140

50.

Ray

(2019). A theory of racialized organizations. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418822335

51.

Ridgeway

C. L.

Korn

R. M.

Williams

J. C.

(2022). Documenting the routine burden of devalued difference in the professional workplace. Gender & Society, 36(5), 627–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432221111168

52.

Schieman

Badawy

Hill

(2022). Did perceptions of supportive work–life culture change during the COVID-19 pandemic? Journal of Marriage and Family, 84(2), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12826

53.

Shank

D. B.

(2016). Using crowdsourcing websites for sociological research: The case of Amazon mechanical turk. The American Sociologist, 47(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-015-9266-9

54.

Small

M. L.

(2011). How to conduct a mixed methods study: Recent trends in a rapidly growing literature. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102657

55.

Smith

S. M.

Edwards

(2021). Unemployment rises in 2020, as the country battles the COVID-19 pandemic. Monthly Labor Review. https://doi.org/10.21916/mlr.2021.12

56.

Steward

(2000). Changing times: The meaning, measurement and use of time in teleworking. Time & Society, 9(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X00009001004

57.

Storer

Schneider

Harknett

(2020). What explains racial/ethnic inequality in job quality in the service sector? American Sociological Review, 85(4), 537–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420930018

58.

Sue

D. W.

Lin

A. I.

Rivera

D. P.

(2009). Racial microaggressions in the workplace: Manifestation and impact. In Diversity in mind and in action, vol 2: Disparities and competence., praeger perspectives: Race and ethnicity in psychology (pp. 157–172). Praeger/ABC-CLIO.

59.

Thomas

L. T.

Ganster

D. C.

(1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.6

60.

Vallas

S. P.

Finlay

Wharton

A. S.

(2009). The sociology of work: Structures and inequalities. Oxford University Press.

61.

Waters

M. C.

(2016). Life after hurricane katrina: The resilience in survivors of katrina (RISK) project. Sociological Forum, 31(S1), 750–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12271

62.

Wharton

A. S.

(2013). The sociology of gender: An introduction to theory and research. Wiley.

63.

Wharton

A. S.

(2015). Working in America: Continuity, conflict, and change in a new economic era .

64.

Williams

(2001). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. Oxford University Press.

65.

Wingfield

A. H.

(2009). Racializing the glass escalator: Reconsidering men’s experiences with women’s work. Gender & Society, 23(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208323054

66.

Wingfield

A. H.

(2023). Race, repression and the future of new labor activism. Work and Occupations, 50(3), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231162962

67.

Wingfield

A. H.

Alston

R. S.

(2014). Maintaining hierarchies in predominantly white organizations: A theory of racial tasks. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(2), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213503329

68.

Zickuhr

(2021). Workplace surveillance is becoming the new normal for U.S. workers. Washington Center for Equitable Growth.