Underreward is associated with depression—but is that association contingent upon job authority and other forms of status in the work role? And, do these patterns differ for women and men? Analyses of a national sample of American workers reveal that underreward is more strongly associated with depression among women with higher levels of job authority compared to similarly situated men. The authors then demonstrate that this pattern is amplified when other status elements are considered: income, skill level, autonomy, and decision latitude. These patterns are observed net of a range of sociodemographic measures, work stressors, and workplace sex composition. The findings of this study provide new insights about the gendered ways that job authority and other forms of status shape the association between underreward and depression. In doing so, the authors speak to diverse theoretical traditions related to distributive justice and engage with key ideas of reward expectation states theory. The efforts of the authors dovetail with recent interest in the gendered implications of authority and status as well as their connections to psychological distress.
AdamsJ. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.
2, pp. 267–299).
New York, NY:
Academic Press.
2.
AlvesW. M.RossiP. H. (1978).
Who should get what? Fairness judgments of the distribution of earnings. American Journal of Sociology,
84(3), 541–564.
3.
AustinW.WalsterE. (1974).
Reactions to confirmations and disconfirmations of expectancies of equity and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
30(2), 208–216.
4.
BellaviaG. M.FroneM. R. (2005). Work-family conflict. In BarlingJ.KellowayE. K.FroneM. R. (Eds.), Handbook of work stress (pp. 113–148).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE.
5.
BergerJ.FisekM. H.NormanR. Z.WagnerD. G. (1985). Formation of reward expectations in status situations. In BergerJ.ZelditchM. (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence (pp. 215–261).
San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
6.
BergerJ.FisekM. H.NormanR. Z.ZelditchM. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation-states approach.
New York, NY:
Elsevier.
7.
BergerJ.RidgewayC. L.FisekM. H.NormanR. Z. (1998).
The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review,
63(3), 379–405.
8.
BergerJ.RosenholtzS. J.ZelditchM. (1980).
Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology,
6(1), 479–508.
9.
BergerJ.WebsterM.Jr.(2006). Expectations, status, and behavior. In BurkeP. J. (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 268–300).
Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
10.
BergerJ.ZelditchM.AndersonB.CohenB. P. (1972). Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status value formulation. In BergerJ.ZelditchM.AndersenB. (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol
2., pp. 119–146).
Boston, MA:
Houghton Mifflin.
11.
BolzendahlC. I.MyersD. J. (2004).
Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998. Social Forces,
83(2), 759–789.
12.
BuchananT. (2008).
The same-sex-referent-work satisfaction relationship: Assessing the mediating role of distributive justice perceptions. Sociological Focus,
41(2), 177–196.
13.
BylsmaW. H.MajorB. (1994).
Social comparisons and contentment: Exploring the psychological costs of the gender wage gap. Psychology of Women Quarterly,
18(2), 241–249.
14.
BylsmaW. H.MajorB.CozzarelliC. (1995).
The influence of legitimacy appraisals on the determinants of entitlement beliefs. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,
17(1–2), 223–237.
15.
CohenP. N.HuffmanM. L.KnauerS. (2009).
Stalled progress? Gender segregation and wage inequality among managers, 1980–2000. Work and Occupations,
36(4), 318–342.
16.
CohenR. L.GreenbergJ. (1982). The justice concept in social psychology. In GreenbergJ.CohenR. L. (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 1–41).
New York, NY:
Academic Press.
17.
CookK. S. (1975).
Expectations, evaluations, and equity. American Sociological Review,
40(3), 372–388.
18.
CookK. S.HegtvedtK. A. (1983).
Distributive justice, equity, and equality. Annual Review of Sociology,
9, 217–241.
19.
CorrellS. J.RidgewayC. L. (2003). Expectation states theory. In DeLamaterJ. (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 29–51).
New York, NY:
Kluwer.
20.
CrosbyF. (1976).
A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review,
83(2), 85–113.
21.
DavisN. J.RobinsonR. V. (1991).
Men’s and women’s consciousness of gender inequality: Austria, West Germany, Great Britain, and the United States. American Sociological Review,
56(1), 72–84.
22.
De CremerD.Van DijkE. (2005).
When and why leaders put themselves first: Leader behaviour in resource allocations as a function of feeling entitled. European Journal of Social Psychology,
35(4), 553–563.
23.
DiekmannK. A.SondakH.BarsnessZ. I. (2007).
Does fairness matter more to some than to others? The moderating role of workplace status on the relationship between procedural fairness perceptions and job satisfaction. Social Justice Research,
20(2), 161–180.
24.
DornbushS. M.ScottW. R. (1975). Evaluation and the exercise of authority.
San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
25.
DuguidM. M.LoydD. L.TolbertP. S. (2012).
The impact of categorical status, numeric representation, and work group prestige on preference for demographically similar others: A value threat approach. Organization Science,
23(2), 386–401.
26.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J. (2002).
Role congruity theory of prejudice towards female leaders. Psychological Review,
109(3), 573–598.
27.
ElliottJ. R.SmithR. A. (2004).
Race, gender, and workplace power. American Sociological Review,
69(3), 365–386.
28.
ElsesserK. M. (2016). Gender bias against female leaders: A review. In ConnerleyM. L.WuJ. (Eds.), Handbook of well-being of working women (pp.161–173).
Dordrecht, the Netherlands:
Springer.
29.
FordM. T. (2014).
Perceived unfairness at work, social and personal resources, and resting blood pressure. Stress and Health,
30(1), 12–22.
30.
FoxS.SpectorP. E.MilesD. (2001).
Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior,
59(3), 291–309.
31.
GibsonD. E.LawrenceB. S. (2010).
Women’s and men’s career referents: How gender composition and comparison level shape career expectations. Organization Science,
21(6), 1159–1175.
32.
GruskyD. B. (2001). The past, present, and future of Social Inequality. In GruskyD. B. (Ed.), Social stratification: Class, race, and gender in sociological perspective (2nd ed., pp. 3–51).
Boulder, CO:
Westview Press.
33.
HamiltonL. (2013). Statistics with STATA (8th ed.).
Boston, MA:
Brooks/Cole.
34.
HartmannH. I.RoosP. A.TreimanD. J. (1985). An agenda for basic research on mparable worth. In HartmanmH. I. (Ed.), Comparable worth: New directions for research (pp. 3–33).
Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
35.
HegtvedtK. A. (1989).
Fairness conceptualizations and comparable worth. Journal of Social Issues,
45(4), 81–97.
36.
HegtvedtK. A. (1990).
The effects of relationship structure on emotional responses to inequity. Social Psychology Quarterly,
53(3), 214–228.
37.
HegtvedtK. A. (1992).
When is a distribution rule just?Rationality and Society,
4(3), 308–331.
38.
HegtvedtK. A. (2006). Justice frameworks. In BurkeP. J. (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 46–69).
Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
39.
HegtvedtK. A.Clay-WarnerJ.JohnsonC. (2003).
The social context of responses to injustice: Considering the indirect and direct effects of group-level factors. Social Justice Research,
16(4), 343–366.
40.
HegtvedtK. A.KillianC. (1999).
Fairness and emotions: Reactions to the process and outcomes of negotiations. Social Forces,
78(1), 269–303.
41.
HegtvedtK. A.ParrisC. (2014). Emotions in justice processes. In StetsJ. E.TurnerJ. H. (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (
Vol. 2, pp. 103–125).
New York, NY:
Springer.
42.
HeilmanM. E. (2001).
Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues,
57(4), 657–674.
43.
HeilmanM. E.WallenA. S.FuchsD.TamkinsM. M. (2004).
Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology,
89(3), 416–427.
44.
HochschildA. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work.
New York, NY:
Metropolitan Books.
45.
HomansG. C. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms(revised ed.).
New York, NY:
Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
46.
HuffmanM. L. (2016). Does the presence of women in management impact gender inequality? In ConnerleyM. L.WuJ. (Eds.), Handbook on well-being of working women (pp. 175–187).
New York, NY:
Springer.
JacksonL. A.GardnerP. D.SullivanL. A. (1992).
Explaining gender differences in self-pay expectations: Social comparison standards and perceptions of fair pay. Journal of Applied Psychology,
77(5), 651–663.
49.
JacobsJ. A. (1992).
Women’s entry into management: Trends in earnings, authority, and values among salaried managers. Administrative Science Quarterly,
37(2), 282–301.
50.
JacobsJ. A.GersonK. (2004). The time divide: Work, family, and gender inequality.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
51.
JohnsonC.HegtvedtK. A.BrodyL. M.WaldronK. W. (2007).
Feeling injustice, expressing injustice: How gender and context matter. Advances in Group Processes,
24, 149–186.
52.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994).
The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology,
33(1), 1–27.
53.
KallebergA. L. (2011). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s–2000s.
New York, NY:
Russell Sage Foundation.
54.
KanterR. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation.
New York, NY:
Basic Books.
55.
KorabikK.Van KampenJ. (1995).
Gender, social support, and coping with work stressors among managers. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,
10(4), 135–148.
56.
KulikC. T.AmbroseM. L. (1992).
Personal and situational determinants of referent choice. Academy of Management Review,
17(2), 212–237.
57.
LepkowskiJ. M. (1988). Telephone sampling methods in the United States. In GrovesR. (Ed.), Telephone survey methodology (pp. 73–98).
New York, NY:
John Wiley.
58.
MajorB. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.
26, pp. 293–355).
San Diego, CA:
Academic Press.
59.
MajorB.McFarlinD. B.GagnonD. (1984).
Overworked and underpaid: On the nature of gender differences in personal entitlement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
47(6), 1399–1412.
60.
ManagoB.TaylorC. J. (2015). Occupational sex-segregation, workplace interactions, and chronic physiological stress exposure. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, August, Chicago, IL.
61.
MarkovskyB. (1985).
Toward a multilevel distributive justice theory. American Sociological Review,
50(6), 822–839.
62.
MirowskyJ.RossC. E. (2003). Social causes of psychological distress (2nd ed.).
Hawthorne, NY:
Aldine de Gruyter.
63.
NarisadaA. (2017).
Socioeconomic status and the relationship between underreward and distress: Buffering-resource or status-disconfirmation?Social Justice Research,
30(3), 191–220.
64.
PearlinL. I. (1989).
The sociological study of stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior,
30(3), 241–256.
65.
PearlinL. I.BiermanA. (2013). Current issues and future directions in research into the stress process. In AneshenselC. S.PhelanJ. C.BiermanA. (Eds.) Handbook of the sociology of mental health (2nd ed., pp. 325–40).
New York, NY:
Springer.
66.
PearlinL. I.MenaghanE. G.LiebermanM. A.MullanJ. T. (1981).
The stress process. Journal of Health and Social Behavior,
22(4), 337–356.
67.
PelhamB. W.HettsJ. J. (2001).
Underworked and overpaid: Elevated entitlement in men’s self pay. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
37(2), 93–103.
68.
PudrovskaT. (2013).
Job authority and breast cancer. Social Forces,
92(1), 1–24.
69.
PudrovskaT.KarrakerA. (2014).
Gender, job authority, and depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior,
55(4), 424–441.
70.
RadloffL. S. (1977).
The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement,
1, 385–401.
71.
ReskinB. F.RossC. E. (1992).
Jobs, authority, and earnings among managers. Work and Occupations,
19(4), 342–365.
72.
RidgewayC. L. (2001).
Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues,
57(4), 637–655.
73.
RidgewayC. L. (2006). Status construction theory. In BurkeP. J. (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 301–323).
Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
74.
RidgewayC. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world.
New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
75.
RidgewayC. L.BergerJ. (1986).
Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. American Sociological Review,
51, 603–617.
76.
RidgewayC. L.CorrellS. J. (2004).
Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on cultural beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society,
18(4), 510–531.
77.
RidgewayC. L.NakagawaS. (2014). Status. In McLeodJ. D.LawlerE. J.SchwalbeM. (Eds.), Handbook of the social psychology of inequality (pp. 3–25).
Dordrecht, the Netherlands:
Springer.
78.
RidgewayC. L.WalkerH. (1995). Status structures. In CookK.FineG.HouseJ. (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 281–310).
New York, NY:
Allyn and Bacon.
79.
RismanB. J. (1998). Gender vertigo: American families in transition.
New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
80.
RobbinsJ. M.FordM. T.TetrickL. E. (2012).
Perceived unfairness and employee health: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Applied Psychology,
97(2), 235–272.
SawaokaT.HughesB. L.AmbadyN. (2015).
Power heightens sensitivity to unfairness against the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
41(8), 1023–1035.
83.
SchiemanS.MilkieM. A.GlavinP. (2009).
When work interferes with life: Work-nonwork interference and the influence of work-related demands and resources. American Sociological Review,
74(6), 966–988.
84.
SchiemanS.ReidS. (2008).
Job authority and interpersonal conflict in the workplace. Work and Occupations,
35(3), 296–326.
85.
SchiemanS.ReidS. (2009).
Job authority and health: Unraveling the competing suppression and explanatory influences. Social Science & Medicine,
69, 1616–1624.
86.
SchiemanS.SchaferM. H.McIvorM. (2013).
The rewards of authority in the workplace: Do gender and age matter?Sociological Perspectives,
56(1), 75–96.
87.
SchunckR.SauerC.ValetP. (2015).
Unfair pay and health: The effects of perceived injustice of earnings on physical health. European Sociological Review,
31(6), 655–666.
88.
ShepelakN. J.AlwinD. F. (1986).
Beliefs about inequality and perceptions of distributive justice. American Sociological Review,
51(1), 30–46.
89.
SimonR. W.NathL. E. (2004).
Gender and emotion in the United States: Do men and women differ in self-reports of feelings and expressive behaviors?American Journal of Sociology,
109(5), 1137–1176.
90.
SmithR. A. (2002).
Race, gender, and authority in the workplace: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology,
28, 509–542.
91.
SpaethJ. L. (1985).
Job power and earnings. American Sociological Review,
50(5), 603–617.
92.
SumnerK. E.BrownT. J. (1996).
Men, women, and money: Exploring the role of gender, gender-linkage of college major and career-information sources in salary expectations. Sex Roles,
34(11–12), 823–839.
93.
TarisT. W.KalimoR.SchaufeliW. B. (2002).
Inequity at work: Its measurement and association with worker health. Work & Stress,
16(4), 287–301.
94.
TaylorC. J. (2010).
Occupational sex-composition and the gendered availability of workplace support. Gender & Society,
24(2), 189–212.
95.
TaylorC. J. (2016).
Relational by nature? Men and women do not differ in physiological response to social stressors faced by token women. American Journal of Sociology,
122(1), 49–89.
96.
TreimanD. J. (2001). Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. In GruskyD. B. (Ed.), Social stratification in sociological perspective (2nd ed., pp. 260–263).
Boulder, CO:
Westview Press.
97.
TurnerJ. H. (2007).
Justice and emotions. Social Justice Research,
20(3), 288–311.
98.
ValetP. (2018).
Social structure and the paradox of the contented female worker: How occupational gender segregation biases justice perceptions of wages. Work and Occupations,
45(2), 168–193.
99.
Van DijkE.De CremerD. (2006).
Self-benefiting in the allocation of scarce resources: Leader-follower effects and the moderating effect of social value orientations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
32(10), 1352–1361.
100.
WaksbergJ. (1978).
Sampling methods for random digit dialing. Journal of the American Statistical Association,
73, 40–46.
101.
WalsterE.WalsterW. G.BerscheidE. (1978). Equity: Theory and research.
Boston, MA:
Allyn and Bacon.
102.
WeberM. (1922/1968). Economy and society.
New York, NY:
Bedminster Press.
103.
WebsterM.Jr.FoschiM. (1988). Status generalization: New theory and research.
Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
104.
WheatonB. (1999). The nature of stressors. In HorwitzA. V.ScheidT. L. (Eds.), A handbook for the study of mental health (pp. 176–197).
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press.
105.
WolfW. C.FligsteinN. D. (1979).
Sexual stratification: Differences in power in the work setting. Social Forces,
58(1), 94–107.
106.
WrightE. O.BaxterJ.BirkelundG. E. (1995).
The gender gap in workplace authority: A cross-national study. American Sociological Review,
60(3), 407–435.
107.
ZannaM. P.CrosbyF.LoewensteinG. (1987). Male reference groups and discontent among female professionals. In GutekB.LarwoodL. (Eds.), Women’s career development (pp. 28–41).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE.
108.
ZelditchM.Jr. (2001). Theories of legitimacy. In JostJ. T.MajorB. (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 33–53).
Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.
109.
ZelditchM.Jr.(2006). Legitimacy theory. In BurkeP. J. (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 324–352).
Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
110.
ZelditchM.Jr.WalkerH. A. (1984).
Legitimacy and the stability of authority. Advances in Group Processes,
1, 1–25.
