This article provides a structural explanation for the paradox of the contented female worker. Although they are generally aware that they earn less than men, women usually perceive their wages as more just. This article argues that men and women do not differ in how they perceive their wages, yet the gendered segregation of the labor market will constrain the availability of preferred same-gender referent standards in some occupations. Random- and fixed-effects analyses of longitudinal data of the German Socio-Economic Panel covering the years 2009 to 2015 (N = 26,362) reveal that the paradox is only detectable in occupations with a considerable number of female referents. However, as soon as women move into a male-dominated occupation, the paradox vanishes. These results contradict the view that men and women generally differ in how they perceive their wages and indicate that gender differences in justice perceptions can be explained by the structural embeddedness of employees in certain occupations.
AdamsJ. S. (1965) Inequity and social exchange. In: BerkowitzL. (ed.) Advances in experimental social psychologyVol. 2, New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 267–299.
2.
AlexanderS.RudermanM. (1987) The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research1(2): 177–198.
3.
AllisonP. D. (2009) Fixed effects regression models, Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
4.
AllmendingerJ.HackmanJ. R. (1995) The more, the better? A four-nation study of the inclusion of women in symphony orchestras. Social Forces74(2): 423–460.
5.
AuspurgK.HinzT.SauerC. (2017) Why should women get less? Evidence on the gender pay gap from multifactorial survey experiments. American Sociological Review82(1): 197–210.
6.
Avent-HoltD.Tomaskovic-DeveyD. (2014) A relational theory of earnings inequality. American Behavioral Scientist58(3): 379–399.
7.
BergerJ.ZelditchM.AndersonB.CohenB. P. (1972) Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status value formulation. In: BergerJ.ZelditchM.AndersonB. (eds) Sociological theories in progressVol. 2, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, pp. 119–146.
8.
BlauF. D.KahnL. M. (2000) Gender differences in pay. The Journal of Economic Perspectives14(4): 75–99.
9.
BlauP. M. (1964) Exchange and power in social life, New York, NY: Wiley.
10.
BrownM. (2001) Unequal pay, unequal responses? Pay referents and their implications for pay level satisfaction. Journal of Management Studies38(6): 879–886.
11.
BuchananT. (2005) The paradox of the contented female worker in a traditionally female industry. Sociological Spectrum25(6): 677–713.
12.
BuschA.HolstE. (2011) Gender-specific occupational segregation, glass ceiling effects, and earnings in managerial positions: Results of a fixed effects model (Disscussion Papers of DIW Berlin, 1101), Berlin, Germany: German Institute for Economic Research.
13.
BygrenM. (2004) Pay reference standards and pay satisfaction: What do workers evaluate their pay against?Social Science Research33(2): 206–224.
14.
CastillaE. J. (2015) Accounting for the gap: A firm study manipulating organizational accountability and transparency in pay decisions. Organization Science26(2): 311–333.
15.
CharlesM.GruskyD. B. (2004) Occupational ghettos: The worldwide segregation of women and men, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
ClarkA. E.SenikC. (2010) Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. The Economic Journal120(544): 573–594.
17.
Clay-WarnerJ.RobinsonD. T.Smith-LovinL.RogersK. B.JamesK. R. (2016) Justice standard determines emotional responses to over-reward. Social Psychology Quarterly79(1): 44–67.
18.
Cohen-CharashY.SpectorP. E. (2001) The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes86(2): 278–321.
19.
CohenP. N.HuffmanM. L. (2003) Occupational segregation and the devaluation of women's work across U.S. labor markets. Social Forces81(3): 881–907.
20.
ColemanJ. S. (1990) Foundations of social theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
CookK. S.ParcelT. L. (1977) Equity theory: Directions for future research. Sociological Inquiry47(2): 75–88.
22.
CorcoranK.CrusiusJ.MussweilerT. (2011) Social comparison: Motives, standards, and mechanisms. In: ChadeeD. (ed.) Theories in social psychology, Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 119–139.
23.
CrosbyF. (1982) Relative deprivation and working women, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
DavisonH. K. (2014) The paradox of the contented female worker: Why are women satisfied with lower pay?Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal26(3): 195–216.
25.
DohmenT.FalkA. (2011) Performance pay and multi-dimensional sorting: Productivity, preferences and gender. American Economic Review101(2): 556–590.
26.
DohmenT.FalkA.FliessbachK.SundeU.WeberB. (2011) Relative versus absolute income, joy of winning, and gender: Brain imaging evidence. Journal of Public Economics95(4–5): 279–285.
27.
EnglandP. (2006) Devaluation and the pay of comparable male and female occupations. In: GruskyD. B.SzelenyiS. (eds) The inequality reader: Contemporary and foundational readings in race, class, and gender, Boulder, CO: Westview.
28.
Ferrer-i-CarbonellA. (2005) Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics89(5–6): 997–1019.
29.
FestingerL. (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations7: 117–140.
30.
FestingerL. (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance, Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson & Co.
31.
GoethalsG. R.DarleyJ. M. (1977) Social comparison theory. An attributional approach. In: SulsJ. M.MillerR. L. (eds) Social comparison processes. Theoretical and empirical perspectives, Washington, DC: Hemisphere, pp. 259–278.
32.
HegtvedtK. A.JohnsonC. (2000) Justice beyond the individual: A future with legitimation. Social Psychology Quarterly63(4): 298–311.
33.
HodsonR. (1989) Gender differences in job satisfaction: Why aren't women more dissatisfied?Sociological Quarterly30(3): 385–399.
34.
HomansG. C. (1958) Social-behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology63(6): 597–606.
35.
HomansG. C. (1961) Social behavior: Its elementary forms, New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
36.
JassoG. (1978) On the justice of earnings: A new specification of the justice evaluation function. American Journal of Sociology83(6): 1398–1419.
37.
JassoG.TörnblomK. Y.SabbaghC. (2016) Distributive justice. In: SabbaghC.SchmittM. (eds) Handbook of social justice theory and research, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 201–218.
38.
JohnsonC.DowdT. J.RidgewayC. L. (2006) Legitimacy as a social processs. Annual Review of Sociology32: 53–78.
39.
KalevA. (2009) Cracking the glass cages? Restructuring and ascriptive inequality at work. American Journal of Sociology114(6): 1591–1643.
40.
KimM. (2015) Pay secrecy and the gender wage gap in the United States. Industrial Relations54(4): 648–667.
41.
KmecJ. A. (2005) Setting occupational sex segregation in motion: Demand-side explanations of sex tradtitional employment. Work and Occupations32(3): 322–354.
42.
LiebigS.SauerC. (2016) Sociology of justice. In: SabbaghC.SchmittM. (eds) Handbook of social justice theory and research, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 37–60.
43.
Liebig, S., Valet, P., & Schupp, J. (2010). Perceived income justice depends on the economy. DIW-Weekly Report, 24/2010, 187–192.
44.
MajorB.ForceyB. (1985) Social comparisons and pay evaluations: Preferences for same-sex and same-job wage comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology21: 393–405.
45.
MandelH. (2016) The role of occupational attributes in gender earnings inequality, 1970–2010. Social Science Research55: 122–138.
46.
MandelH.SemyonovM. (2005) Family policies, wage structures, and gender gaps: Sources of earnings inequality in 20 countries. American Sociological Review70(6): 949–967.
47.
MelamedD. (2012) Deriving equity from expectations: A cross-cultural evaluation. Social Science Research41: 170–182.
48.
MooreD. (1990) Discrimination and deprivation: The effects of social comparisons. Social Justice Research4(1): 49–64.
49.
MooreD. (1991) Entitlement and justice evaluations: Who should get more, and why. Social Psychology Quarterly54(3): 208–223.
50.
MouwT.KallebergA. L. (2010) Occupations and the structure of wage inequality in the United States, 1980s to 2000s. American Sociological Review75(3): 402–431.
51.
MuellerC. W.KimS.-W. (2008) The contented female worker: Still a paradox? In: HegtvedtK. A.Clay-WarnerJ. (eds) Justice: Advances in group processesVol. 25, Bingley, England: Emerald, pp. 117–149.
52.
MuellerC. W.WallaceJ. E. (1996) Justice and the paradox of the contented female worker. Social Psychology Quarterly59(4): 338–349.
53.
NarisadaA.SchiemanS. (2016) Underpaid but satisfied: The protective functions of security. Work and Occupations43(2): 215–255.
54.
OECD (2014) OECD employment outlook 2014, Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
55.
PetersenT.SaportaI. (2004) The opportunity structure for discrimination. American Journal of Sociology109(4): 852–901.
56.
PfefferJ.Davis-BlakeA. (1987) The effect of the proportion of women on salaries: The case of college administrators. Administrative Science Quarterly32(1): 1–24.
57.
PhelanJ. (1994) The paradox of the contented female worker: An assessment of alternative explanations. Social Psychology Quarterly57(2): 95–107.
58.
Rabe-HeskethS.SkrondalA. (2005) Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata, College Station, TX: Stata Press.
59.
ReskinB. F.McBrierD. B.KmecJ. A. (1999) The determinants and consequences of workplace sex and race composition. Annual Review of Sociology25(1): 335–361.
60.
RoscignoV. J.YavorskyJ. (2015) Discriminiation, diversity, and work. In: VertovecS. (ed.) Routledge international handbook of diversity studies, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 274–284.
61.
SauerC.MayM. J. (2017) Determinants of just earnings: The importance of comparisons with similar others and social relations with supervisors and coworkers in organizations. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility47: 45–54.
62.
SauerC.ValetP.LiebigS. (2016) Welche Lohnungleichheiten sind gerecht? Arbeitsmarktbezogene Ursachen von Lohnungleichheiten und die wahrgenommene (Un-)Gerechtigkeit des eigenen Erwerbseinkommens [Which income inequalities are considered just? Labour market related causes of income inequalities, and employees' (in)justice perceptions of their earnings]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie68(4): 619–645.
SchneiderS.ValetP. (2017) Relative standards and distributive justice: How social comparison orientations moderate the link between relative earnings and justice perceptions. Social Psychology Quarterly80(3): 276–287.
65.
SchunckR.SauerC.ValetP. (2015) Unfair pay and health: The effects of perceived injustice of earnings on physical health. European Sociological Review31(6): 655–666.
66.
SenikC. (2008) Ambition and jealousy: Income interactions in the ‘Old' Europe versus the ‘New' Europe and the United States. Economica75: 495–513.
67.
StierH.YaishM. (2014) Occupational segregation and gender inequality in job quality: A multi-level approach. Work, Employment, and Society28(2): 225–246.
68.
Tiemann, M., Schade, H.-J., Helmrich, R., Hall, A., Braun, U., & Bott, P. (2008). Berufsfeld-Definitionen des BIBB auf Basis der Klassifikation der Berufe 1992. [The occupational field definition of the BIBB based on the German standard classification of occupations 1992]. Wissenschaftliche Diskussionspapiere des Bundesinstituts für Berufsbildung, 105.
69.
Tomaskovic-DeveyD.SkaggsS. (2002) Sex segregation, labor process organization, and gender earnings inequality. American Journal of Sociology108(1): 102–128.
70.
TrappeH.RosenfeldR. A. (2004) Occupational sex segregation and family formation in the former East and West Germany. Work and Occupations31(2): 155–192.
71.
WagnerG. G.FrickJ. R.SchuppJ. (2007) The German socio-economic panel study (SOEP)—Scope, evolution and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch127(1): 139–169.
72.
WalsterE.WalsterG. W.BerscheidE. (1978) Equity: Theory and research, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
73.
WheatleyD. (2017) Autonomy in paid work and employee subjective well-being. Work and Occupations44(3): 296–328.
