This article studies how participation norms affect workers’ willingness to strike. A factor analysis on the responses of 468 Dutch union members about appropriate behavior during a strike produces two factors. The first factor reflects a “solidarity norm” favoring group solidarity; the second factor reflects a norm about the treatment of defecting colleagues, which we call the “free-rider-punishment” norm. Using OLS regression, we show that adherence to these norms significantly affects union members’ willingness to strike, controlling for group identification, and past participation in strikes. This article contributes to a deeper understanding of how solidarity and free-rider-punishment affect future participation.
AkkermanA. (2000). Verdeelde vakbeweging en stakingen: Concurrentie om leden. (Divided labor movement: Competition for members). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Thesis Publishers.
2.
AshforthB .E.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
3.
AxelrodR. (1986). An evolutionary approach to norms. American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1095-1111.
4.
BachS.GivanR. (2008). Public service modernization and trade union reform: towards managerial led renewal?Public Administration, 86, 523-539.
5.
BanduraA. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75-78.
6.
BarlingJ.FullagarC.KellowayK. (1992). The union and its members: A psychological approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
BronfenbrennerK.HickeyR. (2004). Changing to organize: A national assessment of union organizing strategies. In MilkmanR.VossK. (Eds.), Rebuilding labor: Organizing and organizers in the new union movement (pp. 17-61). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
8.
BronfenbrennerK.FriedmanS.HurdR. W.OswaldR. A.SeeberR. L. (1998) Organising to win. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9.
BrunsdenV.HillR. ( 2009). Firefighters’ experience of strike: An interpretative phenomenological analysis case study. Irish Journal of Psychology, 30(1/2), 99-115.
10.
CasariM.LuiniL. (2009). Cooperation under alternative punishment institutions: An experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71, 273-282.
11.
CialdiniR. B.TrostM. R. (1998). Social influence: social norms, conformity, and compliance. In GilbertD. TFiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 151-192). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
CialdiniR. B.RenoR. R.KallgrenC. A. (1990). A focus theory on normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026.
13.
ColemanJ. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory
. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
14.
Corrigal-BrownC. (2012). Patterns of protest. Trajectories of participation in social movements. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
DixonM.RoscignoV. J. (2003). Status, networks, and social movement participation: The case of the striking workers. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 1292-1327.
16.
DrinkwaterS.IngramP. (2005). Have industrial relations in the UK really improved?Labour, 19, 373-398.
17.
FantasiaR. (1988). Cultures of solidarity: consciousness, Action and contemporary American workers. Berkeley: University of California Press
18.
FehrE.FischbacherU. (2004). Social norms and human cooperation. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 185-190.
19.
FinkelS. E.MullerE. N.OppK. D. (1989). Personal influence, collective rationality and mass political action. American Political Science Review, 83, 885-903.
20.
FrancisH. (1985). The law, oral tradition and the mining community. Journal of Law and Society, 12, 267-271.
21.
FregeC.KellyJ. (2004). Varieties of unionism: Strategies for union revitalization in a globalizing economy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
GächterS.FehrE. (1999). Collective action as a social exchange. Journal of Economic and Behavior and Organization, 39, 341-369.
23.
GahanP.PekarekA. (2012). Social movement theory, Collective action frames and union theory: A critique and extension. British Journal of Industrial Relations. Advanced online Publication. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8543.2012.00912.x
24.
GallagherD. G.StraussG. (1991). Union membership attitudes and participation (Working paper series). Berkeley, CA: Institute for Research on Labor and Employment:.
25.
GetmanJ. G. (1999). The betrayal of local 14. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
GodardJ. (2011). What has happened to strikes?British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49, 282-305.
27.
GouldR. V. (1993). Collective action and network structure. American Sociological Review, 58(2), 182-196.
28.
HechterM.BorlandE. (2001). National self-determination: The emergence of an international norm. In HechterM.OppK. D. (Eds.), Social norms (pp. 186-233). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
29.
HeckathornD. D. (1990). Collective sanction and compliance norms: A formal theory of group-mediated social control. American Sociological Review, 55, 366-384.
30.
HickeyR.KuruvillaS.LakhaniT. (2010). No panacea for success: Member activism, organizing and union renewal. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(1):, 53-83.
31.
HodsonR.WelschS.RiebleS.Sorenson JamisonC.CreightonS. (1993). Is workers solidarity undermined by autonomy and participation? Patterns from the ethnographic literature. American Sociological Review, 58, 398-416.
32.
KellyJ. E. (1998). Rethinking industrial relations. Mobilization, collectivism and long waves. London, UK: Routledge.
33.
KlandermansB. (1983) Participatie in een Sociale Beweging: een Mobilisatiecampagne Onderzocht (Participation in a social movement: A mobilization campaign investigated). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: VU Boekhandel/Uitgeverij.
34.
KlandermansB . (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 4, 583-600.
35.
KlandermansB. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
36.
KlandermansB.SmithJ. (2002). Survey research: A case for comparative designs. In KlandermansB.StaggenborgS. (Eds.), Methods of social movement research (pp. 3-31). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
37.
KlandermansB.SabucedoJ. M.RodriguezM. (2004). Inclusiveness of identification among farmers in The Netherlands and Galicia (Spain). European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 279-295.
38.
MacDowellL. S. (1993). After the strike. Labour relations in Oshawa, 1937-1939. Industrial Relations, 48, 691-711.
39.
MarquesJ. M.PáezD. (1994). The “black sheep effect”: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 5(1), 37-68.
40.
McAdamD. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of Freedom Summer. American Sociological Review, 92(1), 64-90.
41.
McClendonJ. A.KlaasB. (1993). Determinants of strike-related militancy: An analysis of a university faculty strike. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 46, 560-573.
42.
OberschallA. R. (1994). Rational choice in collective protest. Rationality and Society, 6(1), 79-100.
43.
OliverP. (1980). Rewards and punishments as selective incentives for collective action: Theoretical investigations. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 1356-1375.
44.
OlsonM. (1971). The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
OppK. D. (2001). Social networks and the emergence of protest norms. In HechterM.OppK. D. (Eds.). Social norms (pp. 234-273). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
46.
RinkF.EllemersN. (2007). Diversity as a basis for shared organizational identity: The norm congruity principle. British Journal of Management, 18, S17-S27.
47.
ScheuerS. (2006). A novel calculus? Institutional change, globalization and industrial conflict in Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 12(2), 143-164.
48.
SchussmanA.SouleS. A. (2005). Process and protest: Accounting for individual protest participation. Social Forces, 84, 1083-1108.
49.
SimonB.KlandermansB. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56, 319-331.
50.
SmithV. (1997). New forms of work organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 315-339
51.
SnowD. A.ZurcherL. A.Ekland-OlsonS. (1980). Social networks and social movements: A microstructural approach to differential recruitment. American Sociological Review, 45, 787-801.
52.
TaylorV.WhittierN. E. (1992). Collective identity in social movement communities: Lesbian feminist mobilization. In MorrisA.MuellerC. (Eds.), Frontiers of social movement theory (pp. 104-130). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
53.
TerryD. J.HoggM. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude–Behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776-793.
54.
TurnerL. (2005). From transformation to revitalization: A new research agenda for a contested global economy. Work and Occupations, 32, 383-399.
55.
TurnerJ. C.OakesP. J.HaslamS. A.McGartyC. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463.
56.
VallasS. P. (2003a). The adventures of managerial hegemony: Teamwork, ideology, and worker resistance. Social Problems, 50, 204-225.
57.
VallasS. P. (2003b). Why teamwork fails: Obstacles to workplace change in four manufacturing plants. American Sociological Review, 68, 223-250.
58.
van CruchtenJ.KuijpersR. (2008). Vakbeweging en Organisatiegraad van werknemers (Labor movement and unionizationrate of employees), Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Sociaaleconomische trends, 01, 7-18.
59.
van der VeldenS., (2000) Stakingen in Nederland. (Strikes in the Netherlands). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Stichting beheer ISSG/NIWI.
van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Towards an integrative social identity model of collective action. A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535.
62.
van ZomerenM.SpearsR.LeachC. W. (2008). Exploring psychological mechanisms of collective action: Does relevance of group identity influence how people cope with collective disadvantage?British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 353-372.
63.
van ZomerenM.SpearsR.FischerA. H.LeachC. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649-664.
64.
WaddingtonD.DicksB.CritcherC. (1994). Community responses to pit closure in the post-strike era. Community Development Journal, 29, 141-150.
65.
WindmullerJ. P.de GalanC.van ZweedenA. F. (1987) Arbeidsverhoudingen in Nederland. (Labor relations in the Netherlands). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Aula/Het Spectrum.
66.
YamagishiT. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 110-116.
