Previous research has emphasized the positive impact of supportive informal relations on workers in various occupational settings. Such support seems particularly important for workers who aspire to be self-employed, running their own businesses. Existing theory, however, offers little guidance regarding the mechanisms through which these supportive relationships operate. We argue that social support and role expectation theories address this conundrum. Our framework highlights the differences between instrumental and informational support types, the requirements involved in delivering such support, and the benefits of aligning role expectations with the type of support requested. Analyzing a representative sample of people attempting to create their own businesses in the United States, we find evidence consistent with our predictions: social support’s effect on people’s persistence depends on alignment between the tasks performed and the roles of support providers. To the extent that the support is task-role aligned, aspiring business owners receive the greatest benefits from high-commitment service and labor assistance provided by family and low-commitment informational assistance from friends but also suffer the most when such support is misaligned. These findings cast doubt on the prevailing assumption in the broader social support literature: that having more support always leads to better outcomes.
AgneessensF.WaegeH.LievensJ. (2006). Diversity in social support by role relations: A typology. Social Networks, 28, 427-441.
2.
AldrichH. E.CliffJ. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 573-596.
3.
AldrichH. E.KimP. H. (2007). Small worlds, infinite possibilities? How social networks affect entrepreneurial team formation and search. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 147-165.
AldrichH. E.WaldingerR. (1990). Ethnicity and Entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 111-135.
6.
AldrichH. E.ZimmerC. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In SextonD.SmilorR. (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3-23). New York, NY: Ballinger.
7.
AstrachanJ. H.ShankerM. C. (2006). Family businesses’ contribution to the US economy: A closer look. In PoutziourisP.SmyrniosK.KleinS. (Eds.), Handbook of research on family business (pp. 56-66). London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
8.
BakerT.NelsonR. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 329-366.
9.
BarnardC. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BatjargalB.LiuM. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ access to private equity in China: The role of social capital. Organization Science, 15, 159-172.
11.
BeckmanC. M. (2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 741-758.
12.
BhagavatulaS.ElfringT.Van TilburgA.Van de BuntG. G. (2010). How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India’s handloom industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 245-260.
13.
BlauP. M. (1977). A macrosociological theory of social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 26-54.
14.
BottE. (1957). Family and social network; roles, norms, and external relationships in ordinary urban families (p. 252). London, UK: Tavistock.
15.
BrüderlJ.PreisendörferP. (1998). Network support and the success of newly founded business. Small Business Economics, 10, 213-225.
16.
BudigM. (2006). Intersections on the road to self-employment: Gender, family, and occupational class. Social Forces, 84, 2223-2239.
17.
CarrD. (1996). Two paths to self-employment? Women’s and men’s self-employment in the United States, 1980. Work and Occupations, 23(1), 26-53.
18.
ChangE. P. C.MemiliE.ChrismanJ. J.KellermannsF. W.ChuaJ. H. (2009). Family social capital, venture preparedness, and start-up decisions: A study of Hispanic entrepreneurs in New England. Family Business Review, 22, 279-292.
19.
CohenS.WillsT. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.
20.
CurtinR.ReynoldsP. D. (2004). Appendix B—Background for analysis: Data documentation, data preparation and weights. In GartnerW. B.ShaverK. G.CarterN. M.ReynoldsP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurial dynamics: The process of business creation in contemporary America (pp. 477-494). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
DavidssonP.HonigB. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 301-330.
22.
DavisA. E.RenzulliL. A.AldrichH. E. (2006). Mixing or matching? The influence of voluntary associations on the occupational diversity and density of small business owners’ networks. Work and Occupations, 33(1), 42-72.
23.
DelmarF.ShaneS. (2006). does experience matter? The effect of founding team experience on the survival and sales of newly founded ventures. Strategic Organization, 4, 215-247.
24.
DeTienneD. R. (2010). Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: Theoretical development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 203-215.
25.
DiMaggioP. J.LouchH. (1998). Socially embedded consumer transactions: For what kinds of purchases do people most often use networks?American Sociological Review, 63, 619.
26.
DimovD. (2010). Nascent entrepreneurs and venture emergence: Opportunity confidence, human capital, and early planning. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1123-1153.
27.
DuncanJ. W.HandlerD. P. (1994). The misunderstood role of small business. Business Economics, 29(3), 1-6.
28.
DurkheimE. (1964). The division of labor in society. New York, NY: Free Press.
29.
DyerW. G. (2003). The family: The missing variable in organizational research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 401-416.
30.
FesslerD. M. T.HaleyK. J. (2003). The strategy of affect: Emotions in human cooperation. In HammersteinP. (Ed.), Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation (pp. 7-36). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
GartnerW. B.ShaverK. G.CarterN. M.ReynoldsP. D. (2004). Handbook of entrepreneurial dynamics: The process of business creation in contemporary America. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
33.
GeorgeG.BockA. J. (2009). Inventing entrepreneurs: Technology innovators and their entrepreneurial journey. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
34.
GimenoJ.FoltaT. B.CooperA. C.WooC. Y. (1997). Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 750-783.
35.
HamiltonB. H. (2000). Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns of self-employment. Journal of Political Economy, 108, 604-631.
36.
HeaddB. (2005). Business estimates from the Office of Advocacy: A discussion of methodology. Washington, DC: Small Business Administration.
37.
HeckmanJ. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(1): 153-161.
38.
HoangH.AntoncicB. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 165-187.
39.
HoangH.GimenoJ. (2010). Becoming a founder: How founder role identity affects entrepreneurial transitions and persistence in founding. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 41-53.
40.
HoganD. P.EggebeenD. J.CloggC. C. (1993). The structure of intergenerational exchanges in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1428-1458.
41.
HurlbertJ. S.HainesV. A.BeggsJ. J. (2000). Core networks and tie activation: What kinds of routine networks allocate resources in nonroutine situations?American Sociological Review, 65, 598-618.
42.
JackS. L. (2005). The role, use and activation of strong and weak network ties: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1233-1259.
43.
JackS. L. (2010). Approaches to studying networks: Implications and outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 120-137.
44.
JenningsJ. E.McDougaldM. S. (2007). Work-family interface experiences and coping strategies: Implications for entrepreneurship research and practice. Academy of Management Review, 32, 747-760.
45.
Kana’iaupuniS. M.DonatoK. M.Thompson-ColónT.StainbackM. (2005). Counting on kin: Social networks, social support, and child health status. Social Forces, 83, 1137.
46.
KarraN.TraceyP.PhillipsN. (2006). Altruism and agency in the family firm: Exploring the role of family, kinship, and ethnicity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 861-877.
47.
KimP. H.AldrichH. E.KeisterL. A. (2006). Access (not) denied: The impact of financial, human, and cultural capital on entrepreneurial entry in the United States. Small Business Economics, 27(1), 5-22.
48.
KothaR.GeorgeG. (2012). Friends, family, or fools: Entrepreneur experience and its implications for equity distribution and resource mobilization. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 525-543.
49.
LinN. (1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 467-487.
50.
LinN.EnselW. M. (1989). Life stress and health: Stressors and resources. American Sociological Review, 54, 382-399.
51.
LitwakE. (1985). Helping the elderly: The complementary roles of informal networks and formal systems. Perspectives on marriage and the family. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
52.
LoasbyB. J. (2007). A cognitive perspective on entrepreneurship and the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1078-1106.
53.
LoscoccoK.BirdS. R. (2012). Gendered paths: Why women lag behind men in small business success. Work and Occupations, 39, 183-219.
54.
McGuireG. M. (2007). Intimate work: A typology of the social support that workers provide to their network members. Work and Occupations, 34(2), 125-147.
55.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.BrashearsM. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71, 353-375.
56.
MeadowsS. O. (2007). Evidence of parallel pathways: Gender similarity in the impact of social support on adolescent depression and delinquency. Social Forces, 85, 1143.
57.
MertonR. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
58.
MesseriP.SilversteinM.LitwakE. (1993). Choosing optimal support groups: A review and reformulation. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34(2), 122-137.
59.
NdoforH. A.PriemR. L. (2011). Immigrant entrepreneurs, the ethnic enclave strategy, and venture performance. Journal of Management, 37, 790-818.
60.
NewbertS. L.TornikoskiE. T. (2012). Supporter networks and network growth: A contingency model of organizational emergence. Small Business Economics, 39, 141-159.
61.
NewbertS. L.TornikoskiE. T.QuigleyN. R. (2013). Exploring the evolution of supporter networks in the creation of new organizations. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 281-298.
62.
PescosolidoB. A. (2007). Sociology of social networks. In BryantC. D.PeckD. L. (Eds.), 21st century sociology: A reference handbook (pp. 208-217). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
63.
PescosolidoB. A.RubinB. A. (2000). The web of group affiliations revisited: Social life, postmodernism, and sociology. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 52-76.
64.
PetrovaK. (2012). Part-time entrepreneurship and financial constraints: Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics. Small Business Economics, 39, 473-493.
65.
PodolnyJ. M.BaronJ. N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, 673-693.
66.
RenzulliL. A.AldrichH.MoodyJ. (2000). Family matters: Gender, networks, and entrepreneurial outcomes. Social Forces, 79, 523-546.
67.
ReynoldsP. D. (2007). New firm creation in the United States. Hanover, MA: Now.
68.
RuefM. (2010). The entrepreneurial group: Social identities, relations, and collective action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
RuefM.AldrichH. E.CarterN. M. (2003). The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. Entrepreneurs. American Sociological Review, 68, 195-222.
70.
SimmelG. (1955). Conflict and the web of group affiliations. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
71.
SloanM. M. (2011). Unfair treatment in the workplace and worker well-being: The role of coworker support in a service work environment. Work and Occupations, 39(1), 3-34.
72.
SmithS. S. (2005). Don’t put my name on it: Social capital activation and job-finding assistance among the Black urban poor. American Journal of Sociology, 111(1), 1-57.
73.
StamW.ElfringT. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra- and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 97-111.
74.
StinchcombeA. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In MarchJ. G.(Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142-193). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
75.
ThoitsP. A. (1995). Stress, coping, and social support processes: Where are we? What next?Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 53-79.
76.
TurnerR. J.TurnerJ. B. (1999). social integration and support. In AneshenselPhelan (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of mental health (pp. 301-321). New York, NY: Plenum.
77.
VissaB. (2011). A matching theory of entrepreneurs’ tie formation intentions and initiation of economic exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 137-158.
78.
WalkerM. E.WassermanS.WellmanB. (1993). Statistical models for social support networks. Sociological Methods and Research, 22(1), 71-98.
79.
WassermanN. (2012). The founder’s dilemmas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
80.
WeberM. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
81.
WellmanB.WortleyS. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 558-588.
82.
YangT.AldrichH. E. (2012). Out of sight but not out of mind: Why failure to account for left truncation biases research on failure rates. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 477-492.
83.
ZhangJ.SohP. H.WongP. K. (2010). Entrepreneurial resource Acquisition through indirect ties: Compensatory effects of prior knowledge. Journal of Management, 36, 511-536.
