Mismatches between Americans’ actual and preferred hours of paid work are common, but the understanding of such mismatches is still limited. In this article, the authors provide the first large-scale, longitudinal study of hour mismatches in the United States. They found that the population of workers with hour mismatches is in constant flux. Nevertheless, hour mismatches seem to persist for long periods of time: The vast majority of respondents who wanted fewer hours when first interviewed still wanted fewer hours 5 years later. The authors also found inequalities in the methods through which people develop and resolve mismatches. Women who want fewer hours were less likely than men to resolve their mismatches by working less. Also, they found evidence suggesting that non-Whites who want fewer hours may be settling for the hours they can get rather than getting the hours they want.
AcockA. C. (2005). Working with missing values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1012-1028.
2.
AllisonP. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
3.
AllisonP. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
AltmanM. (2001). Preferences and labor supply: Casting some light into the black box of income-leisure choice. Journal of Socio-Economics, 33, 199-219.
5.
AltonjiJ. G.PaxsonC. H. (1992). Labor supply, hours constraints, and job mobility. Journal of Human Resources, 27, 256-278.
6.
AngristJ. D.EvansW. N. (1998). Children and their parents’ labor supply: Evidence from exogenous variation in family size. American Economic Review, 88, 450-477.
7.
BarnettR. C.GareisK. C. (2000). Reduced-hours employment: The relationship between difficulty of trade-offs and quality of life. Work and Occupations, 27, 168-187.
8.
BarnettR. C.GareisK. C. (2002). Full-time and reduced-hours work schedules and marital quality—A study of female physicians with young children. Work and Occupations, 29, 364-379.
9.
BarnettR. C.GareisK. C.BrennanR. T. (1999). Fit as a mediator of the relationship between work hours and burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4, 1076-1098.
10.
BellL. A. (1998). Differences in work hours and hours preferences by race in the US. Review of Social Economy, 56, 480-500.
11.
BestF. (1980). Exchanging earnings for leisure: Findings of an exploratory national survey on work time preferences (R&D Monograph No. 9). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration.
12.
BianchiS. M.RobinsonJ. P.MilkieM. A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
13.
BielenskiH.BoschG.WagnerA. (2002). Working time preferences in sixteen European countries. Dublin, Ireland: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
14.
BlauP. M.GustadJ.JessorR.ParnesH. S.WilcockR. C. (1956). Occupational choice: A conceptual-framework. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 9, 531-543.
15.
BlundellR.BrewerM.FrancesconiM. (2005). Job changes, hours changes and labour market flexibility: Panel data evidence for Britain (No. W05/12). London, England: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
16.
BöheimR.TaylorM. P. (2003). Option or obligation? The determinants of labour supply preferences in Britain. The Manchester School, 71, 113-131.
17.
BöheimR.TaylorM. P. (2004). Actual and preferred working hours. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42, 149-166.
18.
BondJ. T.GalinskyE.SwanbergJ. E. (1998). The 1997 national study of the changing workforce. New York, NY: Families and Work Institute.
19.
BryanM. L. (2002). Free to choose? Differences in the hours determination of constrainted and unconstrained workers. Unpublished manuscript, University of Essex, Colchester, England.
20.
BudigM. J.EnglandP. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66, 204-225.
21.
CarlinJ. B.GalatiJ. C.RoystonP. (2008). A new framework for managing and analyzing multiply imputed data in stata. Stata Journal, 8(1), 49-67.
22.
ClarkB. R. (1960). The cooling-out function in higher-education. American Journal of Sociology, 65, 569-576.
23.
ClarkbergM.MoenP. (2001). Understanding the time-squeeze: Married couples’ preferred and actual work-hour strategies. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 1115-1136.
24.
DembeA. E.EricksonJ. B.DelbosR. G.BanksS. M. (2005). The impact of overtime and long work hours on occupational injuries and illnesses: new evidence from the United States. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62, 588-597.
25.
DooleyD. (2003). Unemployment, underemployment, and mental health: Conceptualizing employment status as a continuum. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 9-20.
26.
DragoR.TsengY.-P.WoodenM. (2005). Usual and preferred working hours in couple households. Journal of Family Studies, 11, 46-61.
27.
FaganC.WarrenT. (2001). Gender, employment, and working time preferences in Europe. Dublin, Ireland: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
28.
FigartD. M.GoldenL. (1998). The social economics of work time: Introduction. Review of Social Economy, 56, 411-424.
29.
GalinskyE.KimS. S.BondJ. T. (2001). Feeling overworked: When work becomes too much. New York, NY: Families and Work Institute.
30.
GoldenL. (2001). Flexible work schedules—Which workers get them?American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 1157-1178.
31.
GoldenL. (2006). Overemployment in the US: Which workers are willing to reduce their work hours and income? In BoulinJ.-Y.LallementM.MessengerJ. C.MichonF. (Eds.), Decent working time: New trends, new issues (pp. 209-261). Geneva, Switzerland: International Labor Organization.
32.
GoldenL.FigartD. M. (2000). Doing something about long hours. Challenge, 43(6), 15-37.
33.
GoldenL.GebreselassieT. (2007). Overemployment mismatches: The preference for fewer work hours. Monthly Labor Review, 130(4), 18-37.
34.
HamermeshD. S. (1999). The timing of work over time. Economic Journal, 109(452), 37-66.
35.
HofferthS. L.CurtinS. C. (2006). Parental leave statues and maternal return to work after childbirth in the United States. Work and Occupations, 33, 73-105.
36.
JacobsJ. A.GersonK. (1998). Who are the overworked Americans?Review of Social Economy, 56, 442-459.
37.
JacobsJ. A.GersonK. (2004). The time divide: Work, family, and gender inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
KanM. Y. (2007). Work orientation and wives employment careers—An evaluation of Hakim’s preference theory. Work and Occupations, 34, 430-462.
39.
KaufmanG.UhlenbergP. (2000). The influence of parenthood on the work effort of married men and women. Social Forces, 78, 931-947.
40.
KonradA. M.YangY.GoldbergC.SullivanS. E. (2005). Preferences for job attributes associated with work and family: A longitudinal study of career outcomes. Sex Roles, 53, 303-315.
41.
LandersR. M.RebitzerJ. B.TaylorL. J. (1996). Rat race redux: Adverse selection in the determination of work hours in law firms. American Economic Review, 86, 329-348.
42.
LundbergS.RoseE. (2002). The effects of sons and daughters on men’s labor supply and wages. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 251-268.
43.
MacInnesJ. (2005). Work-life balance and the demand for reduction in working hours: Evidence from the British Social Attitudes Survey2002. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43, 273-295.
44.
MaumeD. J. (2006). Gender differences in taking vacation time. Work and Occupations, 33, 161-190.
45.
MerzJ. (2002). Time and economic well-being: A panel analysis of desired versus actual working hours. Review of Income and Wealth, September, 317-346.
46.
MoenP.Dempster-McClainD.AltobelliJ.WimonsateW.DahlL.RoehlingP.SweetS. (2004). The new “middle” work force. Minneapolis: The Life Course Center at the University of Minnesota.
47.
MoenP.Dempster-McClainD. I. (1987). Employed parents: Role strain, work time, and preferences for working less. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 579-590.
48.
PraschR. E. (2000). Reassessing the labor supply curve. Journal of Economic Issues, 34, 679-692.
49.
PresserH. B. (2003). Race-ethnic and gender differences in nonstandard work shifts. Work and Occupations, 30, 412-439.
50.
ReynoldsJ. (2003). You can’t always get the hours you want: Mismatches between actual and preferred work hours in the United States. Social Forces, 81, 1171-1199.
51.
ReynoldsJ. (2004). When too much is not enough: Actual and preferred hours of work in the United States and abroad. Sociological Forum, 19, 89-120.
52.
ReynoldsJ. (2005). In the face of conflict: Work-family conflict and desired work hour adjustments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1313-1331.
53.
ReynoldsJ.AletrarisL. (2006). Pursuing preferences: The creation and resolution of work hour mismatches. American Sociological Review, 71, 618-638.
54.
RoystonP. (2005). Multiple imputation of missing values: Update of ice. Stata Journal, 5, 527-536.
55.
ShankS. E. (1986). Preferred hours of work and corresponding earnings. Monthly Labor Review, 109(11), 40-44.
56.
Sousa-PozaA.HennebergerF. (2002). An empirical analysis of working hours constraints in twenty-one countries. Review of Social Economy, 60, 209-242.
57.
StierH.Lewin-EpsteinN. (2003). Time to work: A comparative analysis of preferences for working hours. Work and Occupations, 30, 302-326.
58.
SweetJ. A.BumpassL. L. (2002). The National Survey of Families and Households—Waves 1, 2, and 3: Data description and documentation. Wisconsin: Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
59.
ThomasL. T.GansterD. C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work family conflict and strain—A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 6-15.
60.
ThottamJ. (2005, July18). Reworking work. Time, 166(4), 50-52.
61.
van EchteltP. E.GlebbeekA. C.LindenbergS. M. (2006). The new lumpiness of work: explaining the mismatch between actual and preferred working hours. Work, Employment and Society, 20, 493-512.
62.
von HippelP. T. (2007). Regression with missing Ys: An improved strategy for analyzing multiple imputed data. Sociological Methodology, 37, 83-117.
63.
WilkinsR. (2007). The consequences of underemployment for the underemployed. Journal of Industrial Relations, 49, 247-275.
