Existing research on work hour mismatches has examined gender and occupational differences, but it has largely assumed that these factors work independently of each other. This paper combines insights from the stress of higher status hypothesis and the concept of the ideal worker to examine the intersections of gender and occupation in relation to inequalities in workers’ abilities to control the amount of time they spend in paid work. I also offer a longitudinal and process-oriented analysis by examining how men and women in upper, middle, and lower prestige occupations differ in their chances of having hour mismatches, resolving mismatches, and in the methods through which they resolve them. Findings indicate that men and women experience different types of mismatches and men in upper level occupations are at greater risk of mismatches and least likely to find resolutions, yet outcomes are heavily influenced by the intersections of gender and occupation, illustrating the need for this type of analysis. There are few results to indicate differences in the mechanism of mismatch resolution by either gender or occupation.
AckerJoan. 2006. “Inequality Regimes: Gender, Class, and Race in Organizations.” Gender and Society20 (4): 441-64. doi:10.1177/0891243206289499.
2.
AckerJoan. 2010. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” In Women and Management, edited by GatrellCarolineCooperGary L.KossekEllen Ernst, 255-74. International Library of Critical Writings on Business and Management Series. Cheltenham: Elgar.
3.
AmmonsSamantha K.KellyErin L.2008. “Social Class and the Experience of Work-family Conflict during the Transition to Adulthood.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development119:71-84. doi:10.1002/cd.210.
4.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2006. Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations, 1st ed. ABS cat. no. 1220.0
BellLinda A.1998. “Differences in Work Hours and Hours Preferences by Race in the U.S.” Review of Social Economy56 (4): 481-500.
7.
BellLinda A.FreemanRichard B.2001. “Working Harder.” In Working Time in Comparative Perspective. Vol. I: Patterns, Trends, and the Policy Implications for Earnings Inequality and Unemployment, edited by WongGingPicotGarnett, 71-107. Kalamazoo, MI: WE Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
8.
BenardStephenCorrellShelley J.2010. “Normative Discrimination and the Motherhood Penalty.” Gender & Society24:616-46.
9.
BerdahlJennifer L.MoonSue H.2013. “Workplace Mistreatment of Middle Class Workers Based on Sex, Parenthood, and Caregiving.” Journal of Social Issues69 (2): 341-66. doi:10.1111/josi.12018.ß.
10.
Blair-LoyMary. 2003. Competing Devotions: Career and Family Among Women Executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
BöheimRenéTaylorMark P.2003. “Option or Obligation? The Determinants of Labour Supply Preferences in Britain.” Manchester School71 (2): 113-31.
12.
BrowneIreneMisraJoya. 2003. “The Intersection of Gender and Race in the Labor Market.” Annual Review of Sociology29 (1): 487-513.
13.
CallisterPaul. 2005. “Overworked Families? Changes in the Paid Working Hours of Families with Young Children, 1986 to 2001.” Social Policy Journal of New Zealand24:160-84.
14.
CechErin A.Blair-LoyMaryRogersLaura E.2018. “Recognizing Chilliness: How Schemas of Inequality Shape Views of Culture and Climate in Work Environments.” American Journal of Cultural Sociology6 (1): 125-60.
15.
CharlesworthSaraCampbellIain. 2008. “Right to Request Regulation: Two New Australian Models.” Australian Journal of Labour Law21 (2): 116-36.
16.
ChooHae Y.FerreeMyra M.2010. “Practicing Intersectionality in Sociological Research: A Critical Analysis of Inclusions, Interactions, and Institutions in the Study of Inequalities.” Sociological Theory28 (2): 129-49.
17.
ClarkbergMarinMoenPhyllis. 2001. “Understanding the Time-squeeze: Married Couples Preferred and Actual Work-hour Strategies.” American Behavioral Scientist44 (7): 1115-36.
18.
ClawsonDanGerstelNaomi. 2014. Unequal Time: Gender, Class, and Family in Employment Schedules. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
19.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 1986. “Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought.” Social Problems33:s14-32.
20.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2007. “Pushing the Boundaries or Business as Usual? Race, Class, and Gender Studies and Sociological Inquiry.” In Sociology in America: A History, edited by C. Calhoun, 572-604. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
CoserLewis A.1974. Greedy Institutions; Patterns of Undivided Commitment. Free Press.
22.
CrenshawKimberle Williams. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum1989:139-67.
23.
DragoRobertWoodenMarkBlackDavid. 2009a. “Long Work Hours: Volunteers and Conscripts.” British Journal of Industrial Relations47 (3): 571-600. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00717.x.
24.
DragoRobertWoodenMarkBlackDavid. 2009b. “Who Wants and Gets Flexibility? Changing Work Hours Preferences and Life Events.” Industrial & Labor Relations Review62 (3): 394-414.
25.
GalinskyEllenKimStacy S.BondJames T.2001. Feeling Overworked: When Work Becomes Too Much. New York: Families and Work Institute.
26.
GerstelNaomiClawsonDan. 2014. “Class Advantage and the Gender Divide: Flexibility on the Job and at Home.” American Journal of Sociology120 (2): 395-431. doi:10.1086/678270.
27.
GlassJennifer. 2005. “Sociological Perspectives on Work and Family.” In Work, Family, Health, and Well-being, edited by BianchiSuzanne M.CasperLynne M.KingBerkowitz Rosalind, 215-29. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
GoldenLonnie. 2006. “Overemployment in the U.S.: Which Workers Are Willing to Reduce their Work Hours and Income?” In Decent Working Time: New Trends, New Issues, edited by BoulinJean-YvesLallementM.MessengerJ. C.MichonF., 209-61. Geneva: International Labour Office.
29.
GoldenLonnieGebreselassieTesfayi. 2007. “Overemployment Mismatches: The Preference for Fewer Work Hours.” Monthly Labor Review130 (4): 18-37.
HochschildArlie Russell. 1997. The Time Bind: When Work becomes Home and Home becomes Work. New York: Metropolitan Books.
33.
HodsonRandy. 2004. “A Meta-Analysis of Workplace Ethnographies: Race, Gender, and Employee Attitudes and Behaviors.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography33 (1): 4-38.
34.
JacobsJerry A.GersonKathleen. 1998. “Who Are the Overworked Americans?” Review of Social Economy56 (4): 442-59.
35.
JacobsJerry A.GersonKathleen. 2004. The Time Divide: Work, Family, and Gender Inequality, the Family and Public Policy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
KallebergArne L.2011. Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970S to 2000S. American Sociological Association’s Rose Series in Sociology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
LambertSusan J.Haley-LockAnnaHenlyJulia R.2012. “Schedule Flexibility in Hourly Jobs: Unanticipated Consequences and Promising Directions.” Community, Work & Family15 (3): 293-315. doi:10.1080/13668803.2012.662803.
40.
LautschBrenda A.ScullyMaureen A.2007. “Restructuring Time: Implications of Work-hours Reductions for the Working Class.” Human Relations60 (5): 719-43.
41.
LeeSangheon. 2004. “Working-hour Gaps: Trends and Issues.” In Working Time and Workers’ Preferences in Industrialized Countries: Finding the Balance, edited by MessengerJon C., 29-59. London: Routledge.
42.
LeibouiitzArleen A.2005. “An Economic Perspective on Work, Family, and Well-Being.” In Work, Family, Health, and Well-Being, edited by BianchiSuzanne M.CasperLynne M.KingBerkowitz Rosalind, 187-200. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
MaumeDavid J.2006. “Gender Differences in Restricting Work Efforts Because of Family Responsibilities.” Journal of Marriage & Family68 (4): 859-69. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00300.x.
45.
MaumeDavid J.2008. Gender Differences in Providing Urgent Childcare among Dual-earner Parents. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
46.
McCallLeslie. 2000. “Explaining Levels of Within-group Wage Inequality in U.S. Labor Markets.” Demography37: 415-30. doi:10.2307/2648069.
47.
McCallLeslie. 2005. “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” Signs30 (3): 1771-800. doi:10.1086/426800.
MoenPhyllis. 2004. New “Middle” Work Force. Minneapolis: Life Course Center, University of Minnesota.
50.
MoenPhyllisLamJackAmmonsSamanthaKellyErin L.2013. “Time Work by Overworked Professionals: Strategies in Response to the Stress of Higher Status.” Work and Occupations40 (2): 79-114.
51.
MoenPhyllisYuYan. 2000. “Effective Work/Life Strategies: Working Couples, Work Conditions, Gender, and Life Quality.” Social Problems47:291-326.
52.
NemotoKumiko. 2013. “Long Working Hours and the Corporate Gender Divide in Japan.” Gender, Work & Organization20 (5): 512-27. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00599.x.
OstroffCheri. 1993. “The Effects of Climate and Personal Influences on Individual Behavior and Attitudes In Organizations.” Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes56 (1): 56-90. doi:10.1006/obhd.1993.1045.
55.
KarpPaul. 2018. “‘Epidemic of Time Theft’: Australians Work two Months’ Unpaid Overtime a year.” The Guardian, November21, 2018.
56.
PedullaDavid S.ThébaudSarah. 2015. “Can We Finish the Revolution? Gender, Work-family Ideals, and Institutional Constraint.” American Sociological Review80 (1): 116-39. doi:10.1177/0003122414564008.
ReynoldsJeremy. 2003. “You Can’t Always Get the Hours You Want: Mismatches between Actual and Preferred Work Hours in the United States.” Social Forces81 (4): 1171-99.
59.
ReynoldsJeremy. 2004. “When Too Much Is Not Enough: Actual and Preferred Hours of Work in the United States and Abroad.” Sociological Forum19 (1): 89-120.
60.
ReynoldsJeremy. 2005. “In the Face of Conflict: Work-family Conflict and Desired Work Hour Adjustments.” Journal of Marriage and Family67 (5): 1313-31.
61.
ReynoldsJeremyAletrarisLydia. 2006. “Pursuing Preferences: The Creation and Resolution of Work Hour Mismatches.” American Sociological Review71 (4): 618-38.
62.
ReynoldsJeremyAletrarisLydia. 2007. “Work-family Conflict, Children, and Hour Mismatches in Australia.” Journal of Family Issues28 (6): 749-72. doi:10.1177/0192513x06296634.
63.
ReynoldsJeremyAletrarisLydia. 2010. “Mostly Mismatched with a Chance of Settling: Tracking Work Hour Mismatches in the United States.” Work and Occupations37 (4): 476-511. doi:10.1177/0730888410383245.
64.
SchiemanScott. 2013. “Job-related Resources and the Pressures of Working Life.” Social Science Research42:271-82. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.10.003.
65.
SchiemanScottGlavinPaulMilkieMelissa A.2009. “When Work Interferes with Life: Work-nonwork Interference and the Influence of Work-related Demands and Resources.” American Sociological Review74 (6): 966-88. doi:10.1177/000312240907400606.
66.
SchiemanScottWhitestoneYuko KurashinaVan GundyKaren. 2006. “The Nature of Work and the Stress of Higher Status.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior47 (3): 242-57. doi:10.2307/30040316.
67.
SchorJuliet. 1991. The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure. New York: Basic Books.
68.
SheridanMikeSunterDeborahDivertyBrent. 2001. “The Changing Workweek: Trends in Weekly Hours of Work in Canada, 1976-1995.” In Working Time in Comparative Perspective. Vol. 1. Patterns, Trends, and the Policy Implications for Earnings Inequality and Unemployment, edited by WongGingPicotGarnett, 13-44. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
69.
SkinnerNataliePocockBarbara. 2011. “Flexibility and Work-life Interference in Australia.” Journal of Industrial Relations53 (1): 65-82. doi:10.1177/0022185610390297.
70.
StamperChristina L.DyneLinn Van. 2001. “Work Status and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Field Study of Restaurant Employees.” Journal of Organizational Behavior22 (5): 517-36. doi:10.1002/job.100.
71.
StierHayaLewin-EpsteinNoahBraunMichael. 2001. “Welfare Regimes, Family-Supportive Policies, and Women’s Employment along the Life-Course.” American Journal of Sociology106 (6): 1731-60. doi:10.1086/321302.
72.
StierHayaLewin-EpsteinNoah. 2003. “Time to work: A Comparative Analysis of Preferences for Working Hours.” Work and Occupations30 (3): 302-26.
73.
StonePamela. 2007. Opting Out? Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home. Berkeley: University of California Press.
74.
WalbySylviaArmstrongJoStridSofia. 2012. “Intersectionality: Multiple Inequalities in Social Theory.” Sociology46 (2): 224-40. doi:10.1177/0038038511416164.
75.
WilliamsJoan C.2000. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do about It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
76.
WilliamsJoan C.Blair-LoyMaryBerdahlJennifer L.2013a. “Cultural Schemas, Social Class, and the Flexibility Stigma.” Journal of Social Issues69 (2): 209-34. doi:10.1111/josi.12012.
77.
WilliamsJoan C.Blair-LoyMaryBerdahlJennifer L.2013b. “The Flexibility Stigma: Work Devotion vs. Family Devotion.” Rotman Magazine, Winter 2013, 34-39.
78.
WilliamsJoan C.BousheyHeather. 2010. The Three Faces of Work-family Conflict. San Francisco: Center for WorkLife Law.
79.
WoodenMark. 2002. “The Changing Labour Market and Its Impact on Work and Employment Relations.” In Working Futures: The Changing Nature of Work and Employment Relations in Australia, edited by CallusR.LansburyR. D., 51-69. Annandale, NSW, Australia: The Federation Press.
80.
WoodenMarkDragoRobert. 2007. “The Changing Distribution of Working Hours in Australia.” Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series 19/07. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
81.
WoodenMarkWarrenDianaDragoRobert. 2009. “Working Time Mismatch and Subjective Well-being.” British Journal of Industrial Relations47 (1): 147-79. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8543.2008.00705.x.
82.
Yuval-DavisNira. 2011. “Beyond the Recognition and Re-distribution Dichotomy: Intersectionality and Stratification.” In Framing Intersectionality: Debates on a Multi-faceted Concept in Gender Studies, edited by LutzHelmaHereraM. T.SupikL., 155-70. Farnham: Ashgate.
83.
Yuval-DavisNira. 2015. “Situated Intersectionality: A Reflection on Ange-Marie Hancock’s Forthcoming Book: Intersectionality—An Intellectual History.” New Political Science37 (4): 637-42.
