This paper focuses on Georg Lukács, for it is in his work, and the attendant debates and disagreements, that an entire constellation of questions around Realism is first compellingly formulated. The purpose of the paper is to revisit Lukács’ theory of realism as a response to a host of mainstream currents shaping the landscape of Continental philosophy in the first three decades of the 20th century. Particular attention is paid to the problem of form and truth at the core of Lukács’ theory of realism.
BarthesR (1968) L’effet de réel. Communications11: 84–89.
2.
HandkeP (1966) Ich bin ein Bewohner des Elfenbeinturms. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
3.
JakobsonR (1987) On realism in art. In: PomorskaKRudyS (eds) Language in Literature. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 19–27.
4.
JamesonF (2013) The Antinomies of Realism. London and New York: Verso.
5.
JeffersonA (1988) Reading Realism in Stendhal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
LukácsG (1964) Werke, Vol. 7, ed. BenselerF.Darmstadt and Neuwied: Luchterhand.
7.
LukácsG (1971) Werke, Vol. 7, ed. BenselerF.Darmstadt and Neuwied: Luchterhand.
8.
PetreyA (1988) Realism and Revolution: Balzac, Stendhal, Zola, and the Performances of History. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
9.
PrendergastC (1986) The Order of Mimesis: Balzac, Stendhal, Nerval, Flaubert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
RobbinsB (1993) Modernism and literary realism: Response. In: LevineG (ed.) Realism and Representation. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 225–231.
11.
TihanovG (1998) Voloshinov, ideology and language: The birth of Marxist sociology from the spirit of Lebensphilosophie. South Atlantic Quarterly97(3–4): 599–621.
