How does mutual intelligibility impact the political sphere? This paper uses Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations as a means of examining this connection. I argue that Wittgenstein’s paradigm of a dialectical world suggests that his analysis of mutual intelligibility in understanding experiences is necessary in a pluralistic democracy. I conclude that via his theory of social reality politics is a dynamic dialectical process of communicating experiences.
BakerGPHackerPMS (1983) Wittgenstein: Meaning and Understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
2.
CaroniaLetiziaCoorenFrançois. (2014) Decentering our analytical positions: The dialogicity of things. Discourse & Communication8(1): 41–61.
3.
ErmanEvaMöllerNiklas (2014) What not to expect from the pragmatic turn in political theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 14(2).
4.
GameroIsabel G (2016) Rules and bedrocks within a socio-political realm mirroring some Wittgenstein’s remarks. The Philosophical Forum: 131–152.
5.
GunnellJohn (2004) Desperately seeking Wittgenstein. European Journal of Political Theory, 3(1): 77–98.
6.
GustafssonMartin (2014) ‘Wittgenstein and ‘Tonk’: Inference and representation in the Tractatus (and beyond). Philosophical Topics42(2): 75–100.
7.
KripkeSaul A (1982) Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
8.
LuntleyMichael (2003) Wittgenstein: Meaning and Judgement. Blackwell: Oxford.
9.
MansbridgeJane (2005) Quota problems: Combating the dangers of essentialism. Politics and Gender11(4): 622–638.
10.
MedinaJosé (2010) Wittgenstein as a rebel: Dissidence and contestation in discursive practices. International Journal of Philosophical Studies18(1):1–29.
11.
MorrisKatherine J (1994) The ‘context principle’ in the later Wittgenstein. The Philosophical Quarterly44(176).
12.
O’ConnorPeg (2002) Oppression and Responsibility. A Wittgensteinian Approach to Social Practice of Moral Theory. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
13.
OgienAlbert (2016) Obligation and impersonality: Wittgenstein and the nature of the social. Philosophy of the Social Sciences46(6): 604–623.
14.
PitkinHannah (1967) The Concept of Representation. University of California Press: Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London.
15.
PitkinHannah (1972) Wittgenstein and Justice. University of California Press: Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London.
16.
PolhausGaileWrightJohn R (2002) Using Wittgenstein critically: A political approach to philosophy. Political Theory, 30(6): pp. 800–827.
17.
SchweberSSTianYC (1993) The conceptual foundations and the philosophical aspects of renormalization theory. Synthese97(1): 33–108.
18.
SidaniusJimPrattoFelicia (1999) Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
