Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

French

Objectives

Treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction is frequently reported by individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) on antidepressants, which negatively impacts treatment adherence and efficacy. We investigated the association of polymorphisms in pharmacokinetic genes encoding cytochrome-P450 drug-metabolizing enzymes, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6, and the transmembrane efflux pump, P-glycoprotein (i.e., ABCB1), on treatment-emergent changes in sexual function (SF) and sexual satisfaction (SS) in the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression 1 (CAN-BIND-1) sample.

Methods

A total of 178 adults with MDD received treatment with escitalopram (ESC) from weeks 0–8 (Phase I). At week 8, nonresponders were augmented with aripiprazole (ARI) (i.e., ESC + ARI, n = 91), while responders continued ESC (i.e., ESC-Only, n = 80) from weeks 8–16 (Phase II). SF and SS were evaluated using the sex effects (SexFX) scale at weeks 0, 8, and 16. We assessed the primary outcomes, SF and SS change for weeks 0–8 and 8–16, using repeated measures mixed-effects models.

Results

In ESC-Only, CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizer (IM) + poor metabolizers (PMs) showed treatment-related improvements in sexual arousal, a subdomain of SF, from weeks 8–16, relative to CYP2C19 normal metabolizers (NMs) who showed a decline, F(2,54) = 8.00, p < 0.001, q = 0.048. Specifically, CYP2C19 IM + PMs reported less difficulty with having and sustaining vaginal lubrication in females and erection in males, compared to NMs. Furthermore, ESC-Only females with higher concentrations of ESC metabolite, S-desmethylcitalopram (S-DCT), and S-DCT/ESC ratio in serum demonstrated more decline in SF (r = −0.42, p = 0.004, q = 0.034) and SS (r = −0.43, p = 0.003, q = 0.034), respectively, which was not observed in males. ESC-Only females also demonstrated a trend for a correlation between S-DCT and sexual arousal change in the same direction (r = −0.39, p = 0.009, q = 0.052).

Conclusions

CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotypes may be influencing changes in sexual arousal related to ESC monotherapy. Thus, preemptive genotyping of CYP2C19 may help to guide selection of treatment that circumvents selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-related sexual dysfunction thereby improving outcomes for patients. Additionally, further research is warranted to clarify the role of S-DCT in the mechanisms underlying ESC-related changes in SF and SS. This CAN-BIND-1 study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01655706) on 27 July 2012.

Keywords

Antidepressants sexual dysfunction pharmacogenetics depression adverse events escitalopram aripiprazole

Introduction

Impairments in sexual function (SF) and sexual satisfaction (SS) are commonly experienced symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), used for the treatment of MDD, have variable effectiveness on the management of sexual dysfunction in patients with some individuals reporting improvements in SF and SS with treatment, while others reporting unchanged or worsening of preexisting problems or even emergence of new impairments in SF and SS following the start of treatment.¹

Disturbances in SF with SSRIs can be attributed to their mechanism of action, which results in elevated levels of synaptic serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT]), a key inhibitory modulator of SF, both centrally and peripherally.^2‐4 Further, SSRIs have also been shown to activate 5-HT_2A and 5-HT_2C receptors inhibiting dopaminergic and adrenergic pathways that facilitate sexual motivation and behaviours.^5‐7 The rates of sexual dysfunction associated with SSRI treatment have been reported to be between ∼25% and ∼80%, with the lower cited rates more likely a function of underreporting by patients in trials that did not specifically assess these side effects.^3,8‐11 There is also considerable variation in the type and intensity of sexual side effects experienced between patients on SSRIs. Common treatment-emergent sexual side effects include problems with sexual desire (e.g., lack of libido), arousal (e.g., erectile dysfunction or decreased vaginal lubrication), and anorgasmia.^11,12 Therefore, determining risk factors for treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction, which negatively impacts medication adherence, may improve efficacy for individuals on SSRIs.^13,14

Genetic polymorphisms underlying interindividual differences in drug pharmacokinetics may be a contributing factor to the observed variability in treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction. Many SSRIs are metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) hepatic enzymes, some of which are polymorphic and show substantial differences in enzymatic capacity. Escitalopram (ESC), an SSRI previously linked with inducing sexual dysfunction in both women and men,^15,16 is metabolized primarily by CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4.¹⁷ Allelic variants of the CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genes convey a wide range of enzymatic activity including fully functional, reduced or null function, or having increased activity.¹⁸ We and others have shown that individuals with reduced or null CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 enzymatic activity, referred to as intermediate metabolizer (IM) and poor metabolizer (PM), respectively, show higher concentrations of ESC in blood compared to individuals with wild-type enzyme function (i.e., normal metabolizers [NMs]), whereas those with increased enzyme activity, known as rapid metabolizers (RMs) or ultrarapid metabolizers (UMs), show relatively lower ESC concentrations.^18‐22 Hence, interindividual differences in serum concentrations of ESC influenced by CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 gene variants may be contributing to variations in the type and intensity of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunctions that patients experience.

Furthermore, the central nervous system concentrations of some SSRIs are regulated by the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transmembrane efflux transporter located on the blood–brain barrier, which actively transports many endogenous and exogenous compounds against the concentration gradient to keep the levels of these substrates low in the brain. In vivo studies have shown that when ATP-binding cassette, subfamily B, member 1 gene (ABCB1), which encodes P-gp, was knocked out in mice, increased concentrations of antidepressants that are substrates of this transporter were detected in the brain of mutant mice as compared to controls.²³ Therefore, variants of ABCB1 that reduce the activity and expression of P-gp may potentially result in higher brain concentrations of the SSRI substrate, thereby enhancing 5-HT inhibition of SF. Previous studies have suggested that ABCB1 polymorphisms are associated with response and remission to SSRIs, but their impact on SSRI-linked sexual dysfunction remains to be elucidated.^23‐25

One approach to reducing sexual dysfunction induced by SSRIs is to use augmentation therapy with an atypical antipsychotic, particularly one that is an agonist at the dopamine D₂ receptor, which plays a fundamental role in the control of sexual functioning in both males and females.²⁶ Aripiprazole (ARI), a partial agonist at the dopamine D₂ receptor, has been shown to be beneficial in reducing sexual dysfunction induced by antidepressant and antipsychotic agents.^27,28 It is also one of the first antipsychotics to be approved for use as adjunctive therapy for MDD by the US Food and Drug Administration.²⁹ The pharmacokinetics of ARI have previously been shown to be affected by variations in the CYP2D6 and ABCB1 genes,^30,31 but the influence of variations in these genes on the effectiveness of ARI in relieving SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction has not been explored.

In this study, we investigated the effects of variations in the CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and ABCB1 genes on treatment-related changes in SF and SS in patients with MDD on ESC monotherapy or ESC with ARI augmentation from the nationwide Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression 1 (CAN-BIND-1) study.³² We hypothesized that IM or PM CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotypes, and ABCB1 genotypes associated with lower P-gp function or expression,³³ would show a greater decline in SF and SS from baseline relative to those with normal activity. In patients on adjunctive ARI therapy, we also expected CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotypes to influence the reversal of any Phase I deteriorations in SF and SS during Phase II following the introduction of ARI. Furthermore, we explored the association between serum levels of ESC, ARI, and their metabolites on treatment-related changes in SF and SS. We expected higher concentrations of ESC and lower concentrations of ARI in serum to be associated with declines in SF and SS.

Methods

Participants

The CAN-BIND-1 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01655706) has been described in detail elsewhere.³² Study protocol was approved by the institutional Research Ethics Board at each site. All study participants provided written informed consent. Participants (N = 211; age range: 18–61 years; 61.8% female) meeting the criteria for a major depressive episode for a duration of at least 3 months according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fourth Revision, Text Revision (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) and with a total score of ≥24 on the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) were recruited from 6 Canadian academic health centres. Further inclusion criteria were MDD diagnosis using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview Version 6.1, being psychotropic medication free for ≥5 half-lives at baseline visit, and fluency in English.

Treatment Protocol

Following screening and baseline visits, participants commenced treatment with ESC at 10 mg/day, with the option of increased dosages at follow-up visits, to a maximum of 20 mg/day (Figure 1). At week 8, participants with ≥50% or <50% reduction from the baseline MADRS total score were classified as responders and nonresponders, respectively. Week 8 responders continued ESC monotherapy (referred to as ESC-Only), while week 8 nonresponders received adjunctive treatment with ARI at 2–10 mg/day (referred to as ESC + ARI) for an additional 8 weeks. Blood samples were collected on weeks 2, 10, and 16 to measure concentrations of study medications and in week 4 for pharmacogenetic analyses. Collection and measurement of blood samples are described in the Supplemental Methods.

Figure 1.

Overview of study protocol.

Measures

SF and SS were assessed using the 13-item clinician-administered sex effects (SexFX) questionnaire at weeks 0, 8, and 16 (Supplemental Table S1). On a 5-point ordered-frequency scale (0–4), SexFX evaluates 3 domains of SF: desire (items 1–4, Cronbach's α = 0.96), arousal (items 5–8, α = 0.60), and orgasm (items 9–11, α = 0.87).³⁴ The summation of items 1–11 produces the SF score. A preorgasm score was obtained by combining the desire and arousal domains (α = 0.89). SS is measured by summing items 12 and 13, each scored on a 0–10 scale. Cronbach's alphas for the SF and SS items were 0.92 and 0.85, respectively. This questionnaire is unique from the sexual functioning questionnaire (SFQ) as it measures SS in addition to sexual functioning changes and also has comparable reliability for the latter (Cronbach's alpha of 0.92 for SexFX vs. 0.90 for SFQ).^35,36

The primary outcomes of the current study are changes in SF and SS for weeks 0–8 and weeks 8–16. Higher scores are associated with better SF or SS.

Genotyping

A modified version of the FlexiGene DNA Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) was used for genomic DNA extraction from whole blood samples. Genotyping for the CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and ABCB1 genes was performed using standard TaqMan® assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific, ON, Canada) following the manufacturer's protocol. CYP2D6 copy number variations (CNVs), including allele deletions and multiplications, were assessed using copy number assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and CopyCaller Version 2.1 (Applied Biosystems, Burlington, ON, Canada). Four replicates were performed for the CNV assays. The overall phenotype for CYP2D6 duplications was determined using the results from the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and CNV assays (e.g., genotype is reported as *1/*3 [xN] if SNP assays revealed *1 and *3 and CNV assay showed more than 2 copies of the CYP2D6 gene for the same participant). TaqMan® genotyping assay IDs for CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 are listed in Supplemental Table S2. Genotyping results were reviewed by two laboratory staff blind to the clinical data.

We translated allelic variants of the CYP2C19 (*1, *2, *3, and *17) and CYP2D6 (*1, *2, *3, *4, *5, *6, *9, *10, *17, *29, *36, and *41) genes into metabolizer phenotypes according to the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC)¹⁸: PMs with 2 loss-of-function alleles, IMs with 1 wild-type allele and 1 reduced function or null allele, and NMs with 2 fully functioning alleles. CYP2D6 UMs are described as carrying multiple copies of functional alleles, whereas CYP2C19 UMs are those with the *17/*17 genotype. For CYP2C19, CPIC defines a fifth metabolizer phenotype, RMs, characterized by the presence of a gain of function allele (CYP2C19*17) together with a normal function allele.¹⁸ The predicted metabolizer phenotype based on CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genotype is reported in Supplemental Table S3.

Six SNPs in the ABCB1 gene were genotyped, including rs1045642 (C3435T), rs1128503 (C1236T), rs2032582 (G2677T/A), rs2032583, rs2235015, and rs2235040. All ABCB1 SNPs were checked for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium deviations in participants of self-reported European ancestry, as they comprised the largest ancestral group. Haploview software version 4.2 (http://www.broad.mit.edu/personal/jcbarret/haploview/) was used to determine the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium deviation, linkage disequilibrium (LD) (D′), and correlation (r²) among ABCB1 SNPs.

Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using R Version 4.2.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform, 2022). The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess the normality of data distribution. The χ², Fisher's exact, Mann–Whitney U, and Kruskal–Wallis tests were performed for comparisons of demographic and clinical characteristics between ESC-Only and ESC + ARI treatment arms. Given the limited sample size, IM and PMs were pooled together into 1 category, IM + PMs, for CYP2C19 and CYP2D6. RMs and UMs were combined as RM + UMs for CYP2C19. Since the sample only included 2 CYP2D6 UMs, they were excluded from all analyses involving CYP2D6.

Phases I and II were analysed separately given the introduction of ARI augmentation for week 8 nonresponders during Phase II. Furthermore, analyses for Phase II were conducted by treatment arms, ESC-Only and ESC + ARI. The effects of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 metabolizer groups and ABCB1 genotypes on the primary outcomes, change in SS and SF for weeks 0–8 and weeks 8–16, were assessed using repeated measures linear mixed-effects models. Age, sex, ancestry (i.e., European or non-European), and comorbidity with medical condition(s) affecting SF and/or SS (i.e., cardiac, endocrine, gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, immune system, nervous system, psychiatric, renal and urinary, reproductive system and breast, and rheumatic disorders) were included as fixed effects, and subject and recruitment site were included as random effect factors. Further, to take into consideration the effects of disease severity on sexual dysfunction, we included an interaction between time and total MADRS scores during the corresponding phase as a fixed effect. For ESC + ARI, since there was variability in ARI dosage between participants, it was also included as a fixed effect variable for this treatment arm. We explored whether measures of serum concentrations at week 2 and week 16 were associated with SF and SS change from weeks 0–8 during Phase I and from weeks 8–16 during Phase II using Spearman's rank correlation.

We performed post hoc mediation analyses to assess whether any significant effects of CYP2C19 or CYP2D6 metabolizer groups on the SF or SS are mediated by dose-adjusted ESC serum concentrations according to the methods of Baron and Kenney³⁷ and MacKinnon et al.³⁸ A detailed description of the mediation analyses is provided in Supplemental Figure S1.

Due to the heterogeneity in ancestry among study participants, which may obscure true associations, all analyses were repeated in the largest homogenous ancestral group in the sample, Europeans (n = 129, age ranging from 18 to 61, 57.4% female).³⁹ To explore the influence of self-reported sex on the relationship between our gene variants and treatment-emergent changes in SS and SF, we conducted all analyses in males and females, separately.

The false discovery rate approach was applied to adjust for multiple comparisons of the influence of the gene variants on the primary outcomes, change in SF and SS, in the analysis of each subsample (i.e., total sample for Phase I and by treatment arms for Phase II), where q < 0.05 (two-tailed) was considered significant.^40,41 For exploratory comparisons (e.g., assessment of baseline sample characteristics), p < 0.05 was considered significant

Results

Sample Characteristics

Table 1 summarizes the demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample. Prior to week 8, 31 participants dropped out and were not included in the analyses due to missing SexFX scores and drug serum level data. Based on drug serum levels, all participants were adherent to treatment at Phase I (n = 178), while 7 participants were considered nonadherent during Phase II due to a lack of treatment medication detected in blood at both week 10 and week 16; therefore, these participants were excluded from Phase II analyses, leaving n = 171 during this phase. Nonadherence was not associated with CYP2C19 or CYP2D6 metabolizer groups nor with ABCB1 genotypic groups.

Table 1.

CAN-BIND-1 Sample Demographics and Clinical Information.

Characteristics	Phase I (N = 178)	Phase II: ESC-Only (N = 80)	Phase II: ESC + ARI (N = 91)
Characteristics	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	p value^a
Sex
Females	110 (61.8%)	53 (66.3%)	54 (59.3%)	0.439
Ancestry^b				0.614
European	129 (72.5%)	57 (71.2%)	69 (75.8%)
Non-European[African (4), East Asian (14), Latin American (9), South Asian (5), South East Asian (4), and mixed ancestry (13)]	49 (27.5%)	23 (28.8%)	22 (24.2%)
CYP2C19				0.326
NM	71 (39.9%)	32 (40.0%)	37 (40.7%)
IM	51 (28.7%)	22 (27.5%)	27 (29.7%)
PM	5 (2.8%)	3 (3.8%)	1 (1.1%)
RM	43 (24.2%)	21 (26.3%)	20 (22.0%)
UM	7 (3.9%)	1 (1.3%)	6 (6.5%)
CYP2D6				0.317
NM	99 (55.6%)	40 (50.0%)	54 (59.3%)
IM	60 (33.7%)	30 (37.5%)	28 (30.8%)
PM	11 (64.7%)	5 (6.3%)	6 (6.6%)
ABCB1 rs1045642 (C3435T)				0.694
TT	52 (29.2%)	21 (26.3%)	29 (31.9%)
CT	78 (43.8%)	37 (46.2%)	38 (41.8%)
CC	47 (26.4%)	22 (27.5%)	23 (25.3%)
ABCB1 rs1128503 (C1236T)				0.987
CC	48 (27.0%)	23 (28.4%)	23 (23.7%)
CT	83 (46.6%)	39 (48.1%)	41 (42.3%)
TT	31 (17.4%)	14 (17.3%)	15 (15.5%)
ABCB1 rs2032582 (G2677T/A)				0.661
GG	45 (25.3%)	23 (28.8%)	21 (23.1%)
GT/GA	87 (48.9%)	39 (48.8%)	45 (49.5%)
TT/TA/AA	43 (25.2%)	17 (21.3%)	23 (25.3%)
ABCB1 rs2032583				0.477
TT	142 (79.8%)	66 (82.5%)	70 (76.9%)
CT/CC	36 (20.2%)	14 (17.5%)	21 (23.1%)
ABCB1 rs2235015				0.452
GT/TT	58 (32.6%)	29 (36.2%)	27 (29.7%)
GG	120 (67.4%)	51 (63.8%)	64 (70.3%)
ABCB1 rs2235040				0.371
GG	130 (73.0%)	64 (79.0%)	60 (61.9%)
AA/AG	33 (18.5%)	13 (16.0%)	19 (19.6%)

	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	p value^b
Age (years)	35.4 (12.8)	34.8 (12.4)	36.2 (13.1)	0.511
Baseline MADRS score	30.0 (5.5)	29.1 (5.4)	31.0 (5.5)	0.015*
SexFX scores	At Baseline	At Week 16	At Week 16
Sexual function	19.2 (10.8)	21.4 (11.6)	19.4 (9.8)	0.160
Desire	6.2 (4.8)	7.2 (5.0)	5.3 (4.0)	0.030*
Arousal	8.0 (3.5)	8.7 (3.8)	8.3 (3.2)	0.455
Orgasm	5.2 (4.0)	5.6 (4.4)	5.9 (4.0)	0.881
Preorgasm	14.3 (7.8)	16.0 (8.0)	13.7 (6.4)	0.085
Sexual satisfaction	8.5 (5.8)	11.2 (6.0)	8.1 (5.9)	0.001*

Note. ARI = aripiprazole; ESC = escitalopram; IM = intermediate metabolizer; NM = normal metabolizer; PM = poor metabolizer; RM = rapid metabolizer; SF = sexual function; SS = sexual satisfaction; SD = standard deviation; UM = ultrarapid metabolizer.

Fisher's exact test or chi-square test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables, as appropriate, for comparisons between the two treatment arms, ESC-Only and ESC + ARI.

Categories for ancestry are adapted from the International Genome Sample Resource 1000 Genomes Project (http://www.internationalgenome.org/category/population/)

*p < 0.05.

At the start of Phase I, total MADRS score was negatively correlated with SF (r = −0.25, p < 0.001) and SS (r = −0.24, p = 0.002) at baseline, with participants with higher MADRS score (i.e., greater severity of depression) reporting more sexual dysfunction. When comparing Phase II treatment arms, ESC-Only and ESC + ARI differed significantly in the SF domain, desire (W = 3826.5, p = 0.023), and SS (W = 4070.5 p = 0.001), with ESC + ARI reporting experiencing lower desire (ESC + ARI: mean = 5.4 ± 3.9 vs. ESC-Only: mean = 7.3 ± 5.0) and SS (ESC + ARI: mean = 8.1 ± 5.9 vs. ESC-Only: mean = 11.3 ± 6.0) compared to ESC-Only. There were no statistically significant baseline differences between treatment arms with respect to other demographic characteristics, SexFX scores, and CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 metabolizers and ABCB1 genotypic groups.

For all 6 ABCB1 SNPs tested, genotype distributions were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in the European subsample (N = 129) (Supplemental Table S4). Some variants, rs2032583, rs2032582, rs2235040, and rs1128503, were in strong LD (D′ = 0.94–1, r² = 0.84–1).

Associations of CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and ABCB1 with Treatment-Related Changes in SF and SS

During Phase I, there were no significant differences in SF or SS change between CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 metabolizer and ABCB1 genotypic groups. During Phase II, there was a significant association between the CYP2C19 metabolizer group and treatment-related change in sexual arousal in the ESC-Only treatment arm following multiple testing corrections, F(2,54) = 8.00, p < 0.001, q = 0.048, whereas ESC + ARI did not demonstrate this association (Supplemental Table S5). Repeated measures linear mixed-effects analysis revealed that CYP2C19 IM + PMs (n = 25) showed improvements in sexual arousal from weeks 8–16 (B = 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21 to 0.67), while RM + UMs (n = 22) did not differ significantly from NMs (n = 32) (Figure 2b). More specifically, CYP2C19 IM + PMs reported less difficulty with having (B = 0.09, 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.16) and sustaining (B = 0.17, 95% CI, −0.03 to 0.18) vaginal lubrication in females and erection in males between weeks 8 and 16 compared to NMs (Figure 2d and f). This association was also observed in the European subsample, which showed ESC-Only CYP2C19 IM + PMs improving in functions related to sexual arousal compared to NMs with treatment, F(2,40) = 11.18, p < 0.001, q < 0.001.

Figure 2.

Treatment-related change in sexual arousal over time for Phases I and II by CYP2C19 metabolizer groups. (a) During Phase I, no associations were observed between CYP2C19 metabolizer groups and treatment-related changes in sexual arousal from weeks 0–8. (b) During Phase II, in the ESC-Only treatment arm, CYP2C19 IM + PMs showed improvements in sexual arousal relative to NMs, whereas NMs showed a decline in sexual arousal from weeks 8–16 (B = 0.44, 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.67). This effect was not observed in the ESC + ARI treatment arms. (c) No associations between CYP2C19 and changes in having vaginal lubrication in females and erection in males with treatment were observed during Phase I. (d) CYP2C19 IM + PMs reported less difficulty with having vaginal lubrication in females and erection in males between weeks 8 and 16 compared to NMs (B = 0.09, 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.16), which was observed only in ESC-Only. (e) There were no associations between CYP2C19 and changes in sustaining vaginal lubrication in females and erection in males with treatment during Phase I. (f) CYP2C19 IM + PMs in the ESC-Only treatment arm reported less difficulty with sustaining vaginal lubrication in females and erection in males between weeks 8 and 16 compared to NMs (B = .17, 95% CI, −0.03 to 0.18). All linear mixed-effects analyses included age, ancestry, sex, comorbidity with medication conditions that affect SF/SS, total MADRS scores during the corresponding phase, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 metabolizer groups as fixed effects, and individual and recruitment site as random effects. For ESC + ARI, ARI dosage was included as a fixed effect.

Since sexual arousal is experienced differently between females and males, we conducted post hoc analyses stratifying by sex. We observed a significant association between the CYP2C19 metabolizer group and sexual arousal in both females, F(2,32) = 3.65, p = 0.037, and males, F(2,16) = 7.14, p = 0.006, in the same direction. Follow-up mediation analyses revealed that there was a lack of evidence for a significant mediating effect by dose-adjusted ESC or S-desmethylcitalopram (S-DCT) serum concentrations on the relationship between the CYP2C19 metabolizer group and change in sexual arousal with treatment.

The following analyses on the effects of an interaction between all three genes, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, or ABCB1, on treatment-related changes in SF and SS over time were exploratory.⁴² Interestingly, there was a significant effect of an interaction between CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 metabolizer groups and ABCB1 SNP, rs1045642, on SF change, F(4,131) = 4.52, p = 0.002, q = 0.048. Simple effects analyses revealed that significantly greater mean decline in SF from baseline was observed in CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 IM + PMs who had the CC (B = −4.37, 95% CI, −7.09 to −1.63) or CT (B = −2.65, 95% CI, −4.94 to −0.36) genotype at the ABCB1 rs1045642 SNP or was CYP2D6 IM + PM and CYP2C19 RM + UM and had the rs1045642 CC genotype (B = −5.54, 95% CI, −8.25 to −2.82) compared to those with normal CYP function and P-gp expression (i.e., NMs of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 with the rs1045642 TT genotype) (Supplemental Figure S2a). Likewise, the same effect was observed for the arousal and preorgasm subdomains of SF (Supplemental Figure S2b and c).

Associations of ESC and ARI Exposure with SF and SS

Supplemental Table S6 presents the Spearman correlations between the outcome measures, SF and SS, and serum concentrations of ESC and its metabolite, S-desmethylcitalopram (S-DCT), and ARI and its metabolite, dehydroaripiprazole. No significant associations were observed between these variables following multiple testing corrections.

When analysing males and females separately, interestingly, ESC-Only females showed a significant correlation between concentrations of S-DCT and S-DCT/ESC ratio in serum and SF and SS at week 16, respectively. ESC-Only females with higher S-DCT and S-DCT/ESC ratio (i.e., higher S-DCT relative to ESC) demonstrated more decline in SF (r = −0.42, p = 0.004, q = 0.034) and SS (r = −0.43, p = 0.003, q = 0.034), respectively (Figure 3). ESC-Only females also demonstrated a trend for a correlation between S-DCT and change in sexual arousal in the same direction (r = −0.39, p = 0.009, q = 0.052). These correlations were not observed in males.

Figure 3.

Spearman correlations between concentrations of ESC metabolite, S-DCT, and S-DCT/ratio in serum and SF and SS at Week 16, respectively, in females and males of the ESC-Only treatment arm. (a) ESC-Only females with higher S-DCT demonstrated more decline in SF (r = −0.42, p = 0.004, q = 0.034), whereas males did not show a significant correlation between these variables. Furthermore, (b) only females in this treatment arm with a higher S-DCT/ESC ratio (i.e., higher S-DCT relative to ESC) demonstrated more decline in SS (r = −0.43, p = 0.003, q = 0.034).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the effects of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotypes on changes in SF and SS related to the treatment of MDD with ESC.⁴³ Although the exact mechanism of SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction is not well understood, it is postulated that elevated levels of synaptic 5-HT and increased activity of 5-HT_2A and 5-HT_2C receptors induced by SSRIs exacerbate the inhibition of circuitry underlying sexual behaviours and reflexes.^35,44 Therefore, we hypothesized that those with gene variants contributing to elevated brain SSRI concentrations (i.e., CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 IM + PMs and ABCB1 genotypes associated with lower P-gp function or expression) are expected to have increased 5-HT neurotransmission enhancing the inhibition of brain circuitry mediating SF and SS, and thus will experience a decline in SF and SS from baseline with treatment.

Interestingly, we did not observe any significant associations between CYP2D6 and ABCB1 with SF or SS, and the association we observed between CYP2C19 and change in sexual arousal was not in the direction we had predicted. During Phase II, in the ESC-Only treatment arm, it was CYP2C19 IM + PMs who demonstrated the most treatment-related improvements in sexual arousal from weeks 8–16, whilst NMs showed relatively more decline in sexual arousal. Specifically, CYP2C19 IM + PMs reported a higher frequency of having and sustaining vaginal lubrication in females and erection in males.

The mechanisms by which CYP2C19 NMs of the ESC-Only treatment arm experienced more decline in sexual arousal relative to IM + PMs may in part be explained by ESC serum levels and its metabolite. Although measuring brain levels of ESC and S-DCT is not feasible, serum concentrations can be used as a proxy to investigate the effects of these compounds on SF and SS. Our serum level analyses revealed a decline in SF, particularly sexual arousal, with higher S-DCT concentrations in serum of females of the ESC-Only treatment arm, which was not observed in males. A previous study reported a decrease in CYP2C19 activity with oral contraceptive (OC) usage in females compared to females who did not use OCs.⁴⁵ Therefore, OC usage may be confounding these findings, as OC-using females may have slower ESC metabolism, and therefore lower S-DCT concentrations, than non-OC-using females. Since our study did not collect data on OC usage, further research with more comprehensive data on OC usage and timing of menstrual cycles of female participants on antidepressants is warranted.

S-DCT is itself active as a 5-HT reuptake inhibitor with potency comparable to the parent compound. Thus, it is possible that S-DCT contributes to the physiological blockade of 5-HT transport leading to elevated synaptic 5-HT and enhanced inhibition of neural pathways relating to sexual functioning.^46,47 Furthermore, ex vivo assays using serum and brain tissue extracts collected from mice injected intraperitoneally with citalopram (CIT) or desmethylcitalopram (DCT) at different time points have shown that DCT levels increased in the brain whereas CIT concentrations decreased.⁴⁶ The accumulation of DCT in the brain over time suggests that DCT may have a longer-lasting effect on SF than CIT.

We have previously shown that in those on ESC monotherapy, CYP2C19 NMs demonstrated approximately twice as high S-DCT/ESC ratios compared to IM + PMs, which was observed even when stratified by sex.²¹ This indicates that NMs have higher serum concentrations of S-DCT relative to ESC, whereas CYP2C19 IM + PMs, who have a reduced ability to metabolize ESC, demonstrate lower metabolite levels relative to the parent compound (Supplemental Figure S4). These findings taken together suggest that a possible explanation for deteriorations in sexual arousal observed in CYP2C19 NMs may be due to elevated concentrations of S-DCT relative to ESC in these individuals given S-DCT's affinity for the 5-HT transporter, as well as accumulation in the brain over time, whereas IM + PMs, lacking high concentrations of S-DCT, do not show this deterioration (see Figure 4 for the proposed model). It is important to note that when we assessed the mediating effects of serum levels of ESC, S-DCT, and the S-DCT/ESC ratio on the relationship between CYP2C19 metabolizer groups and change in sexual arousal, drug serum measures did not appear to be mediating this effect. Therefore, further research is required to validate these findings in a larger, independent sample and elucidate the effects of S-DCT on the mechanisms underlying treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction.

Figure 4.

Proposed model explaining the effects of variations in CYP2C19 on sexual arousal functions. (a) ESC biotransformation pathway. (b) Genetic differences in the metabolism of ESC by CYP2C19 are expected to contribute to variations in treatment-emergent dysfunctions in sexual arousal that some patients on SSRIs experience. Specifically, individuals with gene variants contributing to elevated brain concentrations of S-DCT (i.e., CYP2C19 NMs), which itself is active as a serotonin reuptake inhibitor with potency comparable to the parent compound, are expected to have increased serotonin neurotransmission leading to enhanced inhibition of brain circuitry mediating sexual arousal. As a result, these individuals may experience more negative effects of the medication on their ability to have and sustain vaginal lubrication in females and erection in males.

Since sexual impairments are also a commonly experienced symptom of MDD, self-reported sexual dysfunction during the trial is unlikely to be solely due to the pharmacological treatment or genetic variations in the studied genes. The advantages of the present study include the availability of longitudinal data on SF, SS, and MADRS, which allowed us to assess the trajectory of treatment-related changes in these variables, as well as control for variability between participants. Some limitations of this study that are worth noting include (a) a limited sample size, (b) numerous factors influencing the reporting and experience of SF and SS, (c) lack of data on concurrent medications and week 8 serum levels, and (d) the limited generalizability of the findings to non-European populations. First, the sample size is limited, especially during Phase II when analysis is conducted by treatment arm, which limits our power to detect clinically significant differences in SF and SS between metabolizer or genotypic groups. Second, reporting of SF and SS may be affected by numerous individual factors, such as age, sex, levels of gonadal steroid hormones and timing of menstrual cycle,^48,49 OC usage in females, stability of relationships, level of sexual activity, sexual preferences, and cultural differences or individual openness to answering questions on one's sexual life, which we did not control for. Third, comedications were not recorded which might have modulated CYP2C19 or CYP2D6 activity and resulted in phenoconversion. Comedications, such as hormonal contraceptives, may also potentially influence SF/SS.⁵⁰ Furthermore, for the analyses of associations of ESC and ARI exposure with SF and SS, week 2 serum levels were used as a proxy, since blood was not collected on week 8 when SexFX was administered, whereas for week 16, both serum levels and SexFX scores were available. Finally, our sample was ∼72% European, which limits the generalizability of the findings to other ancestral groups, given that CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and ABCB1 allele frequencies differ between populations. Particularly, the number of CYP2D6 UMs was lower than expected within this sample (n = 2), and as a result, this group could not be included in our analyses. CYP2D6 UM phenotype is present in ∼28% of North Africans, Ethiopians, and Arabs, 3% of Europeans, 3% of African Americans, and 1% of Hispanics, Chinese, and Japanese.^51,52 Therefore, further research examining antidepressant efficacy and changes in SF in CYP2D6 UMs is necessary.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction in individuals on ESC with ARI augmentation. We showed that genetic variations within CYP2C19 appear to be related to changes in sexual arousal induced by treatment with ESC monotherapy. The results showed that CYP2C19 NMs could be at an increased risk of experiencing SSRI-associated decline in sexual arousal; however, these findings need to be replicated in a larger, independent sample. This study sheds some light on the pharmacogenetics of SSRI-related sexual dysfunction, which has been understudied, even though it plays a major role in treatment adherence, and ultimately, the efficacy of SSRIs for individuals with MDD.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-cpa-10.1177_07067437231203433 - Supplemental material for Influence of CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and ABCB1 Gene Variants and Serum Levels of Escitalopram and Aripiprazole on Treatment-Emergent Sexual Dysfunction: A Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression 1 (CAN-BIND 1) Study

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-cpa-10.1177_07067437231203433 for Influence of CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and ABCB1 Gene Variants and Serum Levels of Escitalopram and Aripiprazole on Treatment-Emergent Sexual Dysfunction: A Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression 1 (CAN-BIND 1) Study by Farhana Islam, Leen Magarbeh, Samar S. M. Elsheikh, Stefan Kloiber, Caroline W. Espinola and Venkat Bhat, Benicio N. Frey, Roumen Milev, Claudio N. Soares, Sagar V. Parikh, Franca Placenza, Stefanie Hassel, Valerie H. Taylor, Francesco Leri, Pierre Blier, Rudolf Uher, Faranak Farzan, Raymond W. Lam, Gustavo Turecki, Jane A. Foster, Susan Rotzinger, Sidney H. Kennedy, Daniel J. Müller in The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

We want to acknowledge and thank the study participants who gave their time and trust to research and without whom this study is not possible. We would like to thank the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND) research team who contributed to participant recruitment and data collection. We would also like to thank our CAMH Biobank and Molecular Core Facility for sample genotyping.

Data Access

The CAN-BIND-1 study data can be accessed on Brain-CODE via

Declaration of Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Benicio N. Frey has no conflicts to disclose. Roumen V. Milev has received consulting and speaking honoraria from AbbVie, Allergan, Eisai, Janssen, KYE Pharmaceuticals, Lallemand, Lundbeck, Otsuka, and Sunovion, and research grants from CAN-BIND, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Janssen, Lallemand, Lundbeck, Nubiyota, Ontario Brain Institute (OBI), and Ontario Mental Health Foundation. Sagar V. Parikh has received research support or consulting income from Aifred, Assurex (Myriad), Janssen, Mensante, Otsuka, Sage, and Takeda. Stefanie Hassel has no conflicts of interest to disclose. Pierre Blier received honoraria for participation in advisory boards, giving lectures, and/or expert consultation from Allergan, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pierre Fabre Medicaments, Pfizer, and Sunovion; he received grants from Allergan, Janssen, and Lundbeck/Otsuka. Faranak Farzan received funding from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery, and CIHR. Raymond W. Lam has received honoraria for ad hoc speaking or advising/consulting or received research funds, from Allergan, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, BC Leading Edge Foundation, CIHR, Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments, Healthy Minds Canada, Janssen, Lundbeck, Lundbeck Institute, Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, MITACS, Myriad Neuroscience, OBI, Otsuka, Pfizer, Unity Health, and VGH-UBCH Foundation. Gustavo Turecki has received an investigator-initiated grant from Pfizer Canada, and honoraria from Bristol-Meyers Squibb Canada and Janssen Canada. Susan Rotzinger has received grant funding from the OBI, and CIHR, and holds a patent on Teneurin C-Terminal Associated Peptides and methods and uses thereof. Stefan Kloiber has received honorarium for past consultation for EmpowerPharm. Sidney H. Kennedy has received research funding or honoraria from the following sources: Abbott, Alkermes, Allergan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Brain Canada, CIHR, Janssen, Lundbeck, Lundbeck Institute, OBI, Ontario Research Fund, Otsuka, Pfizer, Servier, and Sunovion and holds stock in Field Trip Health. Daniel J. Müller reports to be a coinvestigator on two pharmacogenetic studies where genetic test kits were provided as in-kind contributions by Myriad Neuroscience. All other authors report no conflicts of interest related to this work.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: CAN-BIND is an Integrated Discovery Program carried out in partnership with, and financial support from, the OBI, an independent nonprofit corporation, funded partially by the Ontario government. The opinions, results and conclusions are those of the authors and no endorsement by the OBI is intended or should be inferred. Additional funding is provided by the CIHR, Lundbeck, and Servier. Funding and/or in-kind support is also provided by the investigators’ universities and academic institutions. All study medications are independently purchased at wholesale market values.

ORCID iDs

Farhana Islam

Samar S. M. Elsheikh

Stefan Kloiber

Venkat Bhat

Sagar V. Parikh

Rudolf Uher

Raymond W. Lam

Sidney H. Kennedy

Daniel J. Müller

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Baldwin

Manson

Nowak

. Impact of antidepressant drugs on sexual function and satisfaction. CNS Drugs. 2015;29(11):905‐913.

Keltner

McAfee

Taylor

. Mechanisms and treatments of SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2002;38(3):111-116.

Atmaca

. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-induced sexual dysfunction: current management perspectives. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020;16:1043-1050.

Rothmore

. Antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction. Med J Aust. 2020;212(7):329-334.

Bishop

Moline

Ellingrod

, et al. Serotonin 2A −1438 G/A and G-protein Beta3 subunit C825 T polymorphisms in patients with depression and SSRI-associated sexual side-effects. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006;31(10):2281-2288.

Demireva

Suri

Morelli

, et al. 5-HT2C receptor blockade reverses SSRI-associated basal ganglia dysfunction and potentiates therapeutic efficacy. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25(12):3304-3321.

Baskak

Uckun

, et al. Association between serotonin 2A receptor (HTR2A), serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene polymorphisms and citalopram/sertraline induced sexual dysfunction in MDD patients. Pharmacogenomics J. 2020;20(3):443-450.

Khin

Kronstein

Yang

, et al. Regulatory and scientific issues in studies to evaluate sexual dysfunction in antidepressant drug trials. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76(8):17222.

Serretti

Chiesa

. Treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction related to antidepressants: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009;29(3):259-266.

10.

Jing

Straw-Wilson

. Sexual dysfunction in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and potential solutions: a narrative literature review. Ment Health Clin. 2016;6(4):191-196.

11.

Kennedy

Eisfeld

Dickens

, et al. Antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction during treatment with moclobemide, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61(4):276-281.

12.

Ekselius

von Knorring

. Effect on sexual function of long-term treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in depressed patients treated in primary care. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001;21(2):154-160.

13.

Rosenberg

Bleiberg

Koscis

, et al. A survey of sexual side effects among severely mentally ill patients taking psychotropic medications: impact on compliance. J Sex Marital Ther. 2003;29(4):289-296.

14.

Solmi

Miola

Croatto

, et al. How can we improve antidepressant adherence in the management of depression? A targeted review and 10 clinical recommendations. Braz J Psychiatry. 2020;43:189-202.

15.

Roy

Gupta

Tripathi

, et al. Sexual functioning in females with depression in remission receiving escitalopram. Indian J Med Res. 2019;150(6):606-611.

16.

Winter

Curtis

, et al. Sexual dysfunction with major depressive disorder and antidepressant treatments: impact, assessment, and management. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2022;21(7):913-930.

17.

Carvalho Henriques

Yang

Lapetina

, et al.

How can drug metabolism and transporter genetics inform psychotropic prescribing?

Front Genet. 2020;11:491895.

18.

CPIC®. CPIC® guideline for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and CYP2D6 and CYP2C19. 2019. [accessed 2021 Nov 16]. https://cpicpgx.org/guidelines/guideline-for-selective-serotonin-reuptake-inhibitors-and-cyp2d6-and-cyp2c19/

19.

Strawn

Mills

Schroeder

, et al. Escitalopram in adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2020;81(5):20m13396.

20.

Jukić

Haslemo

Molden

, et al. Impact of CYP2C19 genotype on escitalopram exposure and therapeutic failure: a retrospective study based on 2,087 patients. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(5):463-470.

21.

Islam

Marshe

Magarbeh

, et al. Effects of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 gene variants on escitalopram and aripiprazole treatment outcome and serum levels: results from the CAN-BIND 1 study. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):1-11.

22.

Huezo-Diaz

Perroud

Spencer

, et al. CYP2C19 genotype predicts steady state escitalopram concentration in GENDEP. J Psychopharmacol. 2012;26(3):398-407.

23.

Uhr

Tontsch

Namendorf

, et al. Polymorphisms in the drug transporter gene ABCB1 predict antidepressant treatment response in depression. Neuron. 2008;57(2):203-209.

24.

Bly

Bishop

Thomas

KLH

, et al. P-glycoprotein (PGP) polymorphisms and sexual dysfunction in female patients with depression and SSRI-associated sexual side effects. J Sex Marital Ther. 2013;39(3):280-288.

25.

Magarbeh

Hassel

Choi

, et al. ABCB1 gene variants and antidepressant treatment outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis including results from the CAN-BIND-1 study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023;114(1):88-117.

26.

Simonsen

Comerma-Steffensen

Andersson

K-E

. Modulation of dopaminergic pathways to treat erectile dysfunction. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2016;119(Suppl):363-374.

27.

Allen

Baban

Munjiza

, et al. Management of antipsychotic-related sexual dysfunction: systematic review. J Sex Med. 2019;16(12):1978-1987.

28.

Montejo

de Alarcón

Prieto

, et al. Management strategies for antipsychotic-related sexual dysfunction: a clinical approach. J Clin Med. 2021;10(2):308.

29.

Kamijima

Yasuda

Yamamura

, et al. Real-world effectiveness and safety of aripiprazole augmentation therapy in patients with major depressive disorder. Curr Med Res Opin. 2018;34(12):2105-2112.

30.

Zhang

Xiang

Zhao

, et al. Association between aripiprazole pharmacokinetics and CYP2D6 phenotypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019;44(2):163-173.

31.

Rafaniello

Sessa

Bernardi

, et al. The predictive value of ABCB1, ABCG2, CYP3A4/5 and CYP2D6 polymorphisms for risperidone and aripiprazole plasma concentrations and the occurrence of adverse drug reactions. Pharmacogenomics J. 2018;18(3):422-430.

32.

Kennedy

Lam

Rotzinger

, et al. Symptomatic and functional outcomes and early prediction of response to escitalopram monotherapy and sequential adjunctive aripiprazole therapy in patients with Major depressive disorder: a CAN-BIND-1 report. J Clin Psychiatry. 2019;80(2):18m12202.

33.

Brückl

Uhr

. ABCB1 genotyping in the treatment of depression. Pharmacogenomics. 2016;17(18):2039-2069.

34.

Kennedy

Rizvi

Fulton

, et al. A double-blind comparison of sexual functioning, antidepressant efficacy, and tolerability between agomelatine and venlafaxine XR. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008;28(3):329-333.

35.

Strohmaier

Wüst

Uher

, et al. Sexual dysfunction during treatment with serotonergic and noradrenergic antidepressants: clinical description and the role of the 5-HTTLPR. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2011;12(7):528-538.

36.

Smith

O’Keane

Murray

. Sexual dysfunction in patients taking conventional antipsychotic medication. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;181:49-55.

37.

Baron

Kenny

. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173-1182.

38.

MacKinnon

Lockwood

Hoffman

, et al. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(1):83.

39.

Simonin-Wilmer

Orozco-del-Pino

Bishop

, et al. An overview of strategies for detecting genotype–phenotype associations across ancestrally diverse populations. Front Genet. 2021;12:703901.

40.

Benjamini

Hochberg

. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Method). 1995;57(1):289-300.

41.

Benjamini

Drai

Elmer

, et al. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav Brain Res. 2001;125(1):279-284.

42.

Fudio

Borobia

Piñana

, et al. Evaluation of the influence of sex and CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 polymorphisms in the disposition of citalopram. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010;626(2–3):200-204.

43.

Stevenson

Bishop

. Genetic determinants of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor related sexual dysfunction. Pharmacogenomics. 2014;15(14):1791-1806.

44.

Bijlsma

Chan

JSW

Olivier

, et al.

Sexual side effects of serotonergic antidepressants: mediated by inhibition of serotonin on central dopamine release?

Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2014;121:88-101.

45.

Hägg

Spigset

Dahlqvist

. Influence of gender and oral contraceptives on CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 activity in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;51(2):169-173.

46.

Krout

Rodriquez

Brose

, et al. Inhibition of the serotonin transporter is altered by metabolites of selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and represents a caution to acute or chronic treatment paradigms. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2017;8(5):1011-1018.

47.

Ozbey

Yucel

Bodur

, et al. Serum N-desmethylcitalopram concentrations are associated with the clinical response to citalopram of patients with major depression. Psychiatry Investig. 2018;15(3):313-319.

48.

Cappelletti

Wallen

. Increasing women’s sexual desire: the comparative effectiveness of estrogens and androgens. Horm Behav. 2016:78:178-193.

49.

Andersen

Alvarenga

Mazaro-Costa

, et al. The association of testosterone, sleep, and sexual function in men and women. Brain Res. 2011;1416:80-104.

50.

de Castro Coelho

Barros

. The potential of hormonal contraception to influence female sexuality. Int J Reprod Med. 2019;2019:9701384.

51.

Zhang

Zhong

, et al.

The advantages and challenges of diversity in pharmacogenomics: can minority populations bring us closer to implementation?

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;106(2):338.

52.

Kane

. CYP2D6 overview: allele and phenotype frequencies. In: Pratt

Scott

Pirmohamed

, et al., editors. Medical genetics summaries. Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information (US); 2021. [accessed 2023 May 31]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK574601/

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.34 MB

Influence of CYP2C19,CYP2D6,and ABCB1 Gene Variants and Serum Levels of Escitalopram and Aripiprazole on Treatment-Emergent Sexual Dysfunction: A Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression 1 (CAN-BIND 1) Study

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Participants

Treatment Protocol

Measures

Genotyping

Statistical Analyses

Results

Sample Characteristics

Associations of CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and ABCB1 with Treatment-Related Changes in SF and SS

Associations of ESC and ARI Exposure with SF and SS

Discussion

Conclusions

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-cpa-10.1177_07067437231203433 - Supplemental material for Influence of CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and ABCB1 Gene Variants and Serum Levels of Escitalopram and Aripiprazole on Treatment-Emergent Sexual Dysfunction: A Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression 1 (CAN-BIND 1) Study

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Data Access

Declaration of Conflicts of Interest

Funding

ORCID iDs

Supplemental Material

References

Supplementary Material