Subjective Cognitive Complaints and Functional Disability in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder and Their Nonaffected First-Degree Relatives
Free accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2014
Subjective Cognitive Complaints and Functional Disability in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder and Their Nonaffected First-Degree Relatives
To examine the contributions of subjective cognitive complaints to functional disability in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and their nonaffected relatives.
Method:
Patients with BPD (n = 26), their first-degree biological relatives (n = 17), and nonpsychiatric control subjects (n = 31) completed a self-report measure of cognitive difficulties and rated the severity of their functional disability on the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.
Results:
After accounting for group differences in age and severity of depressive symptoms, patients and relatives endorsed more inattention and memory problems than control subjects. Whereas probands reported greater disability than relatives and control subjects across all functional domains, relatives described more difficulties than control subjects in managing multiple life activities, including domestic activities and occupational and academic functioning, and participating in society. For both probands and relatives, inattention and memory problems were linked primarily to difficulties with life activities, independent of depression and other comorbid psychiatric disorders.
Conclusions:
Problems with inattention and forgetfulness may lead to difficulties carrying out activities of daily living and occupational or academic problems in patients with BPD, as well as their nonaffected first-degree relatives.
RuoccoAC. The neuropsychology of borderline personality disorder: A meta-analysis and review. Psychiatry Res. 2005;137(3):191–202.
4.
ParkSHongJPLeeHB, Relationship between personality disorder dimensions and verbal memory functioning in a community population. Psychiatry Res. 2012;196(1):109–114.
5.
Krause-UtzASobanskiEAlmB, Impulsivity in relation to stress in patients with borderline personality disorder with and without co-occurring attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: An exploratory study. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013;201(2):116–123.
6.
JungwirthSFischerPWeissgramS, Subjective memory complaints and objective memory impairment in the Vienna–Transdanube aging community. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(2):263–268.
7.
ProuteauAVerdouxHBriandC, Self-assessed cognitive dysfunction and objective performance in outpatients with schizophrenia participating in a rehabilitation program. Schizophr Res. 2004;69(1):85–91.
8.
FossatiANovellaLDonatiD, History of childhood attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms and borderline personality disorder: A controlled study. Compr Psychiatry. 2002;43(5):369–377.
9.
FerrerMAndionOMataliJ, Comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in borderline patients defines an impulsive subtype of borderline personality disorder. J Pers Disord. 2010;24(6):812–822.
10.
DowsonJHMcLeanABazanisE, The specificity of clinical characteristics in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A comparison with patients with borderline personality disorder. Eur Psychiatry. 2004;19(2):72–78.
11.
BowieCRDeppCMcGrathJA, Prediction of real-world functional disability in chronic mental disorders: A comparison of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(9):1116–1124.
12.
GrantBFChouSPGoldsteinRB, Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV borderline personality disorder: Results from the wave 2 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(4):533–545.
13.
SkodolAEGundersonJGMcGlashanTH, Functional impairment in patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(2):276–283.
14.
ZanariniMCJacobyRJFrankenburgFR, The 10-year course of social security disability income reported by patients with borderline personality disorder and Axis II comparison subjects. J Pers Disord. 2009;23(4):346–356.
15.
SieverLJTorgersenSGundersonJG, The borderline diagnosis III: Identifying endophenotypes for genetic studies. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;51(12):964–968.
16.
RuoccoACLaporteLRussellJ, Response inhibition deficits in unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with borderline personality disorder. Neuropsychology. 2012;26(4):473–482.
17.
GvirtsHZHarariHBrawY, Executive functioning among patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and their relatives. J Affect Disord. 2012;143(1–3):261–264.
18.
WhiteCNGundersonJGZanariniMC, Family studies of borderline personality disorder: A review. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2003;11(1):8–19.
19.
BowieCRLeungWWReichenbergA, Predicting schizophrenia patients' real-world behavior with specific neuropsychological and functional capacity measures. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;63(5):505–511.
20.
WechslerD.WTAR: Wechsler Test of Adult Reading. Manual. San Antonio (TX): The Psychological Corporation; 2002.
21.
FirstMBSpitzerRLGibbonM, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders—patient edition (SCID-I/P, 11/2002 revision).New York (NY): Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute; 2002.
22.
PfohlBBlumNZimmermanM.Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality (SIDP-IV). Iowa City (IA): The University of Iowa; 1995.
ConnersCKSitareniosGParkerJD, The revised Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R): Factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1998;26(4):257–268.
26.
World Health Organization (WHO). Measuring health and disability: Manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0).Geneva (CH): WHO; 2010.
27.
World Health Organization (WHO). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).Geneva (CH): WHO; 2001.
28.
American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed.Washington (DC): APA; 2013.
29.
MorrisSBDeShonRP. Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(1):105–125.
30.
BenjaminiYDraiDElmerG, Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav Brain Res. 2001;125(1–2):279–284.
31.
BenjaminiYHochbergY.Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1995;57:289–300.
32.
SkodolAEPaganoMEBenderDS, Stability of functional impairment in patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorder over two years. Psychol Med. 2005;35(3):443–451.
33.
PattersonTLGoldmanSMcKibbinCL, UCSD performance-based skills assessment: Development of a new measure of everyday functioning for severely mentally ill adults. Schizophr Bull. 2001;27(2):235–245.
34.
HallRC. Global assessment of functioning: A modified scale. Psychosomatics. 1995;36(3):267–275.
